Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.6 Each candidate will have the opportunity give a 5 minute speech; however this may be extended at the discretion of the current acting Chair. It must be noted that these are the only ways a potential candidate may actively promote or endorse themselves. No campaigning may occur before the nomination process begins. 3.7 The opportunity for any full member to ask questions of the candidates will be given after all speeches are heard. These questions must be addressed to all candidates. The number of questions heard will be at the discretion of the current acting Chair, but there will be a minimum of 3 questions if the floor so demands. 3.8 All candidates must leave the chamber whilst the balloting occurs. Candidates, if already Guild Councillors, may not vote for themselves as they would have an inherent unfair one vote advantage over other candidates who are not Guild Councillors. 3.9 The winning candidates will take office at the beginning of the next academic year.
Section Four: Written Statement in Support of Motion (please do not go outside the box) The Chair and Deputy Chair of Guild Council exist to serve Guild Councillors needs and facilitate the democratic principles that provide our student body with an audible voice. The Chairs are accountable to Guild Councillors in this respect and it is only right that they should be elected by the body which they serve. A large proportion of the student body have never been to Guild Council, and do not fully understand the processes of the meeting. An election by Guild Council, rather than a cross campus ballot ensures that the manifestos of candidates are understood and evaluated by those with the sufficient experience. Guild Councillors are elected to represent the entirety of the student population, through schools, RAs, liberation groups and mini-forums, as well as open place positions. However, the Chairs role is not to represent the views of any constituency or student, in fact they must seek to distance themselves from any opinion on policy which is being debated. Many democratic legislative chambers around the world follow this format and often have done since their formation. For example, the Speaker of the House of Commons in the UK is elected internally as is the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. These models have been emulated by many political systems and continue to be seen as effective democratic institutions. This change will further empower Guild Council as the highest democratic body within the Guild. By deciding how to be governed, Guild Council will become a more effective and efficient institution, better able to react to the needs of the students.
Changes that have come in from the previous policy include introducing new checks and balances into the process, enabling Guild Council to judge whether an Officer is performing their political duties appropriately and allowing the Trustee Board to refer cases onto Guild Council for decision. Additionally all committees are made up of majority students, with the Guild Officer Group (all 7 elected Sabbatical Officers and 11 elected Non-Sabbatical Officers) having far more influence than before. Changes that have come in from the previous policy include introducing new checks and balances into the process, enabling Guild Council to judge whether an Officer is performing their political duties appropriately and allowing the Trustee Board to refer cases onto Guild Council for decision. Additionally all committees are made up of majority students, with the Guild Officer Group (all 7 elected Sabbatical Officers and 11 elected Non-Sabbatical Officers) having far more influence than before. If an Officer were to be suspended, there is now a clear and coherent time frame in place stating that an investigation is to be concluded with 25 working days and needs approval from the Guild Officer Group if it is to be extended. Moreover, the decision to suspend will now be placed in the hands of the Sabbatical Officer Group, as opposed to solely the President. Furthermore, upon approval, Guild Council will be able to amend this document in parts, via a motion to Guild Council. Previously it was an all or nothing document and this new mechanism will allow for greater flexibility in adapting the policy to the changing needs of students.
Appendix 2
Contents: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Statement Purpose and Scope Complaints and Disputes Committee Making a Complaint Informal Action Grounds for invoking the disciplinary procedure Disciplinary Procedure Suspension Officer Disciplinary Committee Disciplinary Hearing Procedure Disciplinary Action Appeals Appeal Hearing Procedure Page 2 Page 2 Page 2 Page 3 Page 3 Page 4 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10
File18
Guild Officer Group Discipline and Appeals Policy 1. 1.1 Statement In being an elected Guild Officer, there is an inherent obligation to conduct oneself in a highly responsible and professional manner, and in accordance with the law, which includes for these purposes, charity law, company law, the Education Act 1994 and any other relevant legislation or regulations that impact on any aspect as a Guild Officer. In addition, Guild Officers should be familiar with and act in accordance with the governing documents of the Guild of Students. The governing documents include for these purposes the Memorandum and Articles of Association, Bye-Laws, Guidance & Strategy documents, and relevant policies and procedures. This policy should be read together with the Guild Officer Group Code of Conduct. Purpose and Scope Every Guild Officer is expected to carry out his or her duties to the best of his or her ability and to always take into consideration the best interests of the Guild of Students. This policy applies to all Guild Officers, including Sabbatical Officers and NonSabbatical Officers. For the avoidance of doubt, this policy applies to those Sabbatical Officers who are also Trustees of the Guild of Students. The purpose of the policy is to: a) b) c) d) 2.4 promote high standards of behaviour in the treatment of individuals and in the conduct of Officer relations; assist the Guild of Students to operate effectively; set standards of conduct and performance for the Guild Officers; and provide a fair method of dealing with alleged failures to maintain those standards.
1.2
1.3 2. 2.1
2.2
2.3
This policy is intended to be corrective rather than punitive. Where performance or conduct falls short of an acceptable standard, then this policy will ensure that there is an opportunity to make improvements and achieve the levels required. In this policy, the "Guild Officer" refers to the person facing the allegation in the complaint. The Complaints & Disputes Committee - This committee will exist in order to provide oversight to the Officer disciplinary process and act as arbiter at certain stages of the process. It will report into Guild Council on an annual basis, outlining recommendations for further improvement to the Officer Disciplinary Policy. All business conducted through this committee shall be confidential, unless otherwise stated.
2.5 3. 3.1
3.2 -
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
3.3
- The committee will consist of: (i) The Chair or Deputy Chair of Guild Council, who will act as Chair (ii) A student trustee (iii) 3 Guild Councillors elected annually by Guild Council (iv) The HR & Admin Co-ordinator will be in attendance to give advice when needed. Making a Complaint Any person may make a complaint about alleged poor performance or misconduct of a Guild Officer. The complaint should be made in writing to the relevant authority, who shall be: a) b) c) the President; the nominated external Trustee (where the complaint is regarding the President); or the Chief Executive (where the complaint is received from a member of Guild staff).
4. 4.1 4.2
4.3 4.4
The complaint will be shared with the HR Co-ordinator. The complaint should give details of the name(s) of the person(s) involved, together with details of alleged poor performance or misconduct (including the date and place at which the alleged misconduct took place), and be delivered as soon as possible after the events complained of (and ideally within ten working days of the occurrence). The person who received the complaint shall acknowledge receipt of it. Informal Action Minor mistakes will be dealt with informally, usually by the relevant authority discussing the concerns with the Guild Officer. In the case of allegations of fault against the President, the nominated external Trustee will usually discuss the concerns with the President. The relevant authority will determine what further action to take in relation to the complaint, and will inform the complainant and the Guild Officer of what action, if any, is to be taken. Where possible further training for improvement will be provided. Where appropriate, the Guild Officer will be advised of the standard required to improve conduct or behaviour and the timescale within which the Guild Officer should improve. The Guild Officer is not required to receive written notification at this informal stage. However, a note of the discussion will be kept on his or her confidential file and will be used as the basis for monitoring conduct going forward. Additionally, the Disputes & Complaints Committee will be informed. Where there is a more serious case of poor performance or misconduct or the Guild Officer fails to improve and maintain that improvement, formal action may be taken and the disciplinary procedure outlined in paragraph [6] below may be invoked.
4.5 5. 5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
6. 6.1 6.2
Grounds for invoking the Disciplinary Procedure The disciplinary procedure will usually be invoked once all informal procedures have been exhausted. It is impossible to specify all the circumstances that would warrant invoking the formal disciplinary procedure, but typical cases would be where the Guild Officers standard of performance, level of achievement, timekeeping, attendance or general conduct falls below the standard required by the Guild of Students, including that set out in the Guild Officer Code of Conduct. The disciplinary procedure will usually be invoked where the alleged poor performance or misconduct constitutes gross misconduct. It is not practical to compile an exhaustive list of what will constitute gross misconduct, but the following are some important examples: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) l) m) n) Disruption of, or improper interference with, the administrative, social or other activities of the Guild of Students whether on the Guild of Students premises or elsewhere. Obstruction of, or improper interference with, the functions, duties or activities of any student, member of staff or other employee of the Guild of Students or any authorised visitor to the Guild of Students. Violent, indecent, disorderly, threatening, or offensive behaviour or language whilst on the Guild of Students premises or engaged in any Guild of Students activity. Any form of theft, fraud, deceit or dishonesty in relation to the Guild of Students or its staff or in connection with the holding of any office in the Guild of Students or in relation to being a member of the Guild of Students. Action likely to cause injury or impair safety on the Guild of Students premises, including wilful disregard of health and safety rules. Harassment of any kind of any student member of staff or other employee or any visitor of the Guild of Students. Conscious unlawful acts of racial, sexual or disability discrimination or harassment against Officers, staff or job applicants. Malicious damage to, or defacement of, the Guild of Students property, the property of other members of the Guild of Students community or property available for the use by its members. Unauthorised possession or misuse use of the Guild of Students premises or items of property. Behaviour which is likely to bring the Guild of Students or any constituent part of the Guild of Students or any individual into serious disrepute. Alcohol, drug or substance abuse in the course of work, within working hours or on the Guild of Students premises. Gross carelessness resulting in damage or injury or other unacceptable loss. Conduct which, if proved in a court of law, would constitute a criminal offence or affected other members of the Guild of Students. Serious and substantial breach of the Guild Officer Group Code of Conduct.
6.3
6.4 7. 7.1
Concerns regarding the political performance in the role as a Guild Officer will usually be dealt with through Guild Council or Referendum. Disciplinary Procedure Where it is believed that the disciplinary procedure should be invoked, any of the following may convene an Investigations Panel: a) The President;
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
b) c) 7.2
The nominated external Trustee (where the complaint is regarding the President) or, At least 5 members of the Sabbatical Officer Group.
The Investigation Panel (convened as in paragraph [6.1]) will usually include a Guild Officer and a member of the management team. The Investigation Panel will be supported by a member of the HR & Admin staff who will be in attendance to act as an advisor and as the note taker. The Investigation Panel shall be appointed from the Guild Officer Group and Management team pool, usually based on the criteria below. a) b) c) The experience of the persons concerned in dealing with disciplinary matters. Whether the person will have any conflict of interest in the matter. Availability of the persons (to ensure that timescales are not unnecessarily protracted).
7.3
The appointment shall be approved by the Disputes & Complaints Committee. 7.4 7.5 7.6 The Guild Officer will be written to and advised of the allegations against him or her and provided with a copy of this policy. The matter will then normally be investigated by the Investigation panel. The purpose of the investigation is to establish a fair and balanced view of the facts relating to the allegations against the Guild Officer. The Investigations Panel may obtain statements from witnesses whose evidence is relevant, and consider additional allegations. The Investigation Panel will deal with the investigation as quickly as is practicable. The panel will aim to confirm the findings within 25 working days. However it may be necessary to extend this timeline, depending on the nature of the allegations and will be at the discretion of the Disputes & Complaints Committee (and will usually be for no more than 10 working days). Following the investigation, the Investigation Panel will make one of the following recommendations to the relevant authority who requested the Investigation Panel: a) b) c) d) to take no further action; referral to an Officer Disciplinary Committee to hold a disciplinary hearing; or to pass to Guild Council or referendum to hold a Vote of No Confidence to inform the University authorities so that action may be pursued either under the University Disciplinary Procedures, by the police or under the disciplinary procedures of a body that is deemed appropriate.
7.7
7.8 7.9
Where the case is referred to another body, the Guilds processes will normally cease until the conclusion of that investigation. It is recognised that being the subject of investigation can be difficult, and the Guild will therefore endeavour to undertake an investigation with appropriate discretion, care and consideration. No Guild Officer or staff member shall comment publicly on any investigation or disciplinary (apart from to confirm at what stage the process is at). Suspension It may be necessary to suspend the Guild Officer from some or all duties until such time as an investigation and/or the disciplinary procedure/s are complete. The ability
8. 8.1
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
to suspend an Officer during an investigation will be at the discretion of the Sabbatical Officer Group, where a unanimous resolution will be required (for the avoidance of doubt, the Officer in question will not count towards quoracy). The Guild Officer will continue to be remunerated throughout the investigation and shall retain their Officer status for the duration of the process. Any suspension will be communicated to the Disputes & Complaints Committee, who can overturn the suspension via a unanimous decision. Please note that the Trustee Board will have precedence over the Disputes & Complaints Committee when it comes to the suspension of an Officer, as per section 8.3. 8.2 A suspension will be without prejudice and will not constitute disciplinary action, and will be reviewed to ensure it is not unnecessarily protracted. Grounds for suspension may include, but is not limited to; a) Gross or serious misconduct is alleged; b) Serious breach of the Officer Code of Conduct; c) Risk to third parties, the Guild of Students or University property, or d) The working relationship between the Officer and others is significantly impaired. 8.3 Any suspension will be reported to both the Guild Officer Group and the Trustee Board and a suspension decision may be overturned by the Trustee Board. A suspension which exceeds 25 working days will further require the majority approval of the Disputes & Complaints Committee. The relevant authority shall determine the extent of the suspension, which may include a partial suspension such as exclusion from attendance at meetings. Access to welfare services will be available by arrangement. The Sabbatical Officer Group may allocate the duties of a suspended Officer as appropriate. Officer Disciplinary Committee The Officer Disciplinary Committee shall be convened as soon as is practicable, to hear allegations of poor performance or alleged gross misconduct. The Officer Disciplinary Committee shall be comprised of: a) b) c) d) 9.3 9.4 the President (unless the allegations are against the President) or nominee; two Trustees (at least one of which shall be a Student Trustee) appointed annually by the Board; the Chair of Guild Council or Deputy Chair (whichever has not been involved with the Disputes & Complaints Committee); and An ordinary member of Guild Council appointed annually by Guild Council.
8.4
A member of the HR & Admin staff will be in attendance to act as an advisor to the Disciplinary Committee and as the note taker. The quorum of the Disciplinary Committee shall be four and the Chair shall be elected from the Committee, but shall not be the President or nominee. The Chair of Guild Council or Deputy Chair shall normally be present. The Chair shall give both the complainant and the Guild Officer at least 72 hours' notice of the date and time of the Disciplinary Committee meeting.
9.5
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
9.6 9.7
Both the complainant and Guild Officer shall have the right to attend the meeting and be accompanied and/or represented by any other full member. The Disciplinary Committee shall endeavour to provide the Guild Officer with a copy of the allegation against him or her and any written evidence to be presented to the Disciplinary Committee at least 5 working days before the date of the meeting. These papers shall be deemed confidential by all parties. Discipline Hearing Procedure The Chair will ensure that copies of the allegation and of all written evidence, and the names of any witnesses to be called is distributed to the members of the Officer Disciplinary Committee who will be given time to read the material carefully. The Guild Officer shall be considered to be not guilty of any allegation until the opposite is shown on the balance of probabilities. The findings of the investigation shall be presented by the Investigation Panel. The findings and conclusions of the Investigation Panel shall be presented first. The Guild Officer will be asked whether he or she admits or denies the allegation. If the Guild Officer admits the allegation, the Chair will proceed as in paragraph 10.13 below. If the Guild Officer denies the allegation, the Guild Officer or their representative shall then be able to present their defence. Either side may present witnesses to support their case. Either party may ask questions of witnesses, as may members of the Committee. The Committee may invite such other witnesses as it thinks fit to be summoned, or such other evidence as it considers relevant to be produced. The Chair or Guild Officer may ask for a short adjournment at any time for consideration of information, points of procedure or emotional distress. The Chair may also consider adjourning the hearing, particularly if the meeting is protracted. The meeting should be reconvened as soon as is possible, and within 10 working days. The ruling of the Chair as to whether any question or evidence is or is not permissible shall be final. The Guild Officer may make a final statement, which may include mitigation for their actions. The Committee shall then withdraw to consider its decision. The Committee should attempt to reach a unanimous decision but if a vote is required then a simple majority will be deemed sufficient. If the Committee finds that the allegation has not been proved, the hearing will end but official notes shall be retained.
10. 10.1
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
10.17
If the Committee finds that the allegation has been proved, the Committee shall consider the appropriate sanction and their reasons for making such a sanction. The Committee may consider any mitigation that the Guild Officer has made. The Chair shall endeavour to communicate the decision to the Guild Officer and to the complainant within 5 working days of the hearing. The Chair will also communicate the decision to the relevant parties. [The disciplinary actions that may be taken are set out in paragraph [11] below. The written outcome will advise the Guild Officer of his or her right of appeal as set out at paragraph [12] below]. Disciplinary Action Disciplinary action may be implemented at any stage of the procedure if the Guild Officers alleged misconduct or poor performance warrants such action. If the offence is of a serious nature, then it may be necessary to begin the procedure at a later stage in the process depending on the circumstances. Normally, any formal warnings will expire six months after issue, unless specifically indicated to the contrary. Formal Verbal Warning
10.18
11. 11.1
11.2
11.3
If conduct or performance does not meet the required standard, the Guild Officer will normally be given a formal verbal warning. He or she will be advised of the reason for the warning, the improvement required, and the timescale. The Guild Officer will also be informed that it is the initial stage of the Disciplinary Procedure. The Guild Officer will be told of the likely consequences should the failure be repeated, should there be a further incidence of unacceptable conduct or performance, or should the required improvement not be made within the specified time period and then maintained. A record detailing the reasons for the warning will be given to the Guild Officer and a copy kept on his or her confidential file. First Written Warning
11.4
11.5
If the required improvement does not take place, or if the offence is of a serious nature, a first written warning will be given to the Guild Officer. This will give details of the disciplinary issue, the improvement required and the timescale. It will warn that if there is no satisfactory improvement, or there is further unsatisfactory conduct or performance then it may be necessary to move to the next stage of the procedure. A copy of the written warning will be given to the Guild Officer and one will be kept on his or her confidential file. Final Written Warning
11.6
If there is still a failure to improve conduct, or performance is still unsatisfactory, a final written warning will be given to the Guild Officer. If the misconduct is sufficiently serious to warrant only one written warning, but insufficiently serious to justify a referral to the Trustee Board or the Guild Council for removal from Office, a first and final written warning will be issued. The warning will give details of the complaint and will advise the Guild Officer that a referral to the Trustee Board or the Guild Council for removal from Office will result if there is no satisfactory improvement, or there is further unsatisfactory conduct or performance. He or she will also be told of the right to appeal. A copy of the
11.7
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
warning will be given to the Guild Officer and a copy kept on his or her confidential file. Removal as an Officer 11.8 If the conduct or performance is still unsatisfactory and the Guild Officer still fails to reach the prescribed standards or further misconduct is committed, the Officer Disciplinary Committee will recommend removal from Office by referral to either Guild Council or in the case of a serious breach of paragraph [6.3] to the Trustee Board. In the case of a Guild Officer who is also a Trustee of the Guild of Students: a) Guild Council may remove the Guild Officer as a Trustee of the Guild of Students in accordance with Article 20.2 of the Articles of Association of the Guild of Students. Following such removal, Guild Council shall consider whether to dismiss the Guild Officer as a paid sabbatical of the Guild of Students, in accordance with Article 21; and. The Trustee Board may remove the Guild Officer as a Trustee of the Guild of Students in accordance with Article 22 of the Articles of Association of the Guild of Students. Following such removal, the Trustee Board shall decide whether to dismiss the Guild Officer as a paid sabbatical of the Guild of Students. If the misconduct is in relation to political performance, the matter will be referred to Guild Council.
11.9
b)
11.10
In the case of a Guild Officer who is not a Trustee of the Guild of Students: a) Guild Council may remove the Guild Officer from Office by passing a motion of no confidence in the Guild Officer by a two thirds majority in a vote of Guild Council; and The Trustee Board may remove the Guild Officer from Office by passing a unanimous resolution of no confidence by the Sabbatical and Student Trustees.
The Trustee Board can refer the decision to remove a Guild Officer to Guild Council if it deems appropriate and when regarding political performance. The Officer Disciplinary Committee reserves the right to refer the matter onto the University authorities or law enforcement agencies. Appeals The Guild Officer may appeal against the Disciplinary Committee's decision to the Chair of the Trustee Board (and copied to the HR Co-ordinator), in writing, within 7 working days of the receipt of the Disciplinary Committee's decision. In the event of an appeal, the Chair of the Trustee Board shall convene a meeting of the Appeal Committee. The Appeal Committee shall be convened usually within fourteen working days within receipt of an appeal. The Appeal Committee shall be comprised of: a) The Chair of the Trustee Board;
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
b) c)
A representative of the Sabbatical Officer Group, appointed by the Disputes & Complaints Committee; A Student Trustee, who has not previously been involved.
Each member of the Appeal Committee shall be independent and shall not have had any substantive involvement in the matter under appeal. 12.5 12.6 12.7 The quorum of the Committee shall be three and the Chair shall be the Chair of the Trustee Board. The Chair shall inform both the complainant and the Guild Officer of the date and time of the Appeal Committee meeting. Both the complainant and the Guild Officer shall have the right to attend the meeting and be accompanied and/or represented by any full member The Chair will, at the same time, instruct the Guild Officer to submit in writing as soon as possible, and in any event not later than 2 working days before the hearing a detailed statement why the Guild Officer is appealing and on what basis. The Chair, on receipt of the information above, will then confirm the date, time and place of the hearing with all involved. Appeal Hearing Procedure The Chair will distribute copies of the original allegation and all original written evidence, and the written confirmation of the Disciplinary Committee's decisions and reasons for them, along with the letter of appeal. The members of the Appeal Committee will be given time to read the material carefully. The Chair will then invite the Guild Officer into the meeting who will be asked to make a statement as to his or her reason for appeal. The Appeal Committee may ask the Guild Officer any questions it thinks fit. The Appeal Committee may ask the complainant any questions it thinks fit. When the Chair is satisfied that the Appeal Committee has enough information on which to base a decision, the Guild Officer will be asked if he or she wishes to make a final statement. The Appeal Committee will consider, in private, whether the appeal should be upheld. The Appeal Committee may alter the decision of the Disciplinary Committee, but cannot increase the disciplinary penalty imposed by the Disciplinary Committee. The Appeal Committee should attempt to reach a unanimous decision, but if a vote is required then a simple majority will be deemed sufficient. The Chair will inform the Guild Officer and complainant of the Appeal Committee's decision in the most appropriate way it thinks relevant. The Chair will endeavour, within 5 working days of the hearing, to send the Guild Officer and the complainant written confirmation of the Appeal Committees decisions. The Chair will also communicate the decision to the relevant parties.
203434/0001/000893345/Ver.03
10
Appendix 2
February 2012
Contents: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Law, governing document and standards Objectives, vision and policies Responsibilities and relations with others Committee and Meetings Guild of Students Staff Events Protecting the reputation of the Guild of Students Financial Responsibilities Personal gain Conflict of interest Principles in public life Performance Page 2 Page 2 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 4 Page 5 Page 5 Page 5 Page 5 Page 5 Page 6
203434/0001/000893333/Ver.02
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.4 3. 3.1
4. 4.1 4.2
4.3
4.4 4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6 5.7
5.8
6. 6.1
6.2
6.3
7.2
7.3
8.
12.2