Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 March 2009
Process improvement
chieving on-time starts can be elusive for OR leaders, including those at Memorial University Medical Center (MUMC) in Savannah, Georgia. Faced with a dismal 27% on-time starts for the first cases of the day in their 21-room OR, the leaders applied Six Sigma principles to the process. The result? A jump in on-time starts to 83%. Heres how they did it.
The Six Sigma process consists of these steps: define, measure, analyze, improve, and control. It takes the right team to work with this process. At MUMC, Kelli Porzio, RN, Six Sigma Black Belt, process excellence consultant; and then-perioperative clinical practice manager Cindy Beauvais, RN, BSN, CPAN, CAPA, facilitated the core project team for on-time starts. Core team members included managers of the OR, postanesthesia care unit (PACU), day surgery, surgical scheduling, and presurgical testing; chief anesthetist; perioperative data analyst; and staff members from OR, PACU, and day surgery. An ad hoc team, which provided additional support and consultation, included the physician chair of the OR committee (the major governing body of the OR), chief medical officer, department of anesthesia chair, and surgeon representative. The project team set a goal to increase on-time starts from 27% to 80% by December 31, 2007. After a business analysis of the current situation, which showed significant loss of revenue from late starts ($1.7 million in 2006), the team was ready to measure and analyze data. We created high-level process maps that looked at our processes from beginning to end, says Porzio. The maps define suppliers, input, process, output, and criteria for quality. Its like a big puzzle; you have to know everyone whos involved and what they do, says Porzio. The maps helped the team determine the boundaries of the project and identify their customerssurgeons, anesthesiologists, patients, families, staff, and ancillary departments. We then went to those customers to determine what is critical to quality for them, says Porzio. Answers varied. For the OR staff, a correctly scheduled case with no equipment conflicts and an OR that was set up correctly by the night staff were critical. For physicians, it was that patients were ready to go to the OR, and for anesthesia providers it was that diagnostic test results were available.
The team then analyzed data from the NaviCare dashboard system from HillRom to determine causes of delays but realized the method was potentially flawed. Were all the reasons for delay captured? Was there bias in entering the data; for example, surgeons changing the reason for delays to shift blame to the OR? To answer these and other questions, the team collected manual feedback for 2 weeks and compared it with the automated data. They found additional reasons for delay, including staff arriving late to work, ORs set up incorrectly by the night shift, and
Invest in rewards
Peer pressure
Daily and weekly first-case starts were posted for the OR staff. Physicians were also kept in the loop. We posted results every month, first by physician numbers, says Beauvais. After 3 months, surgeon names were used. Peer pressure took over, with surgeons vying to be at the top of the list. When the OR met its goal of on-time starts, staff held a physician appreciation day. Beauvais and Porzio cite the success story of how a surgeon who was always at the bottom for on-time starts became the best. Staff rewarded him with a cake. Its important not to underestimate the need for physician rewards, too, says Porzio.
The project team implemented an automated staff assignment phone line to facilitate flexing of staff. Staff call in the day before to see what time they need to arrive for the first case. Another initiative was a daily interdisciplinary meeting to review the schedule for the next day, which helps prevent instrument and equipment conflicts. The surgery scheduling manager, OR manager, OR coordinators, and day surgery senior staff nurse comprise the team. The meeting takes place at 1:30 pm so the day surgery staff can start calling patients to notify them of their arrival times for surgery. After 5 pm, only urgent cases can be scheduled. It took a bit longer than expected, but in February 2008, on-time starts reached 83% and are hovering around 80%. Although the hospital didnt have a way to specifically measure the results in financial terms, the team saw a decrease in overtime and a more efficient schedule, which likely resulted in more cases and more revenue. In addition, physician, staff, and patient satisfaction are all up. Porzio emphasizes the need for a feedback loop that includes ongoing monitoring. We have a thermometer where we mark on-time starts every day. The perioperative director and the chair of the OR committee continue to monitor SLAs and take action as needed. The project team still has quarterly meetings to keep addressing problems. This project will never end, says Beauvais. It must always be a priority. O Cynthia Saver, RN, MS Cynthia Saver is a freelance writer in Columbia, Maryland.
Goal met!
Measure
Establish baseline measurement. Plan for data collection. Validate measurement system. Identify possible root causes.
Analyze
Improve
Control
Develop feedback loops. Develop process control plan to hold the gains.
The time the case is posted on the surgery schedule. This time is considered the patient induction time.
Induction time
The beginning of IV sedation for patients receiving general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, or moderate sedation, or the time of local anesthetic injection for local patients.
Surgery is considered late if induction time is more than 5 minutes after the scheduled start time.