CMMI Maturity Profile 2010SepCMMI

Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon
Software Engineering Institute
CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results
Process Maturity Profile

CMMI For Development SCAMPISM Class A Appraisal Results 2010 Mid-Year Update
September 2010
We could not produce this report without the support of the organizations and lead appraisers who reported their appraisal results to the SEISM. Our many thanks for their continuing cooperation with our data collection and analysis efforts.
CMMI Appraisal Program
The Software Engineering Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon University
CMMI, Capability Maturity Model and Carnegie Mellon are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University SM SCAMPI and SEI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University

September 2010
Process Maturity Profile - Page 1
Carnegie Mellon
Outline
Introduction Current Status Community Trends Organizational Trends Summary And Terms used in this Briefing How to Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI
This briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of all organizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verification purposes. The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes/certifies lead appraisers, team leaders and high maturity lead appraisers to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organization is a certifying authority of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to be used for this purpose can not be fulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reported results of the use of CMMI products and services only. Organizations performing source selection or verification should consider performing an evaluation appraisal. For more information on appraisal methods and for a directory of authorized lead appraisers who can perform them, visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 2
Carnegie Mellon
Introduction: Purpose
Characterize the adoption of CMMI - DEV Describe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) v1.1/v1.2 Class A appraisals using Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS v1.1 or CMMI - DEV v1.2) * Encourage continued reporting of results
* Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 and which have not reappraised against v1.1 or
v1.2 are not included in this report Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm for additional information or questions you may have about this briefing before contacting the SEI directly
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Introduction - 2: Briefing Contents

This briefing includes three primary sections: 1. Current Status - Snapshot of the software community based on the most
recent appraisal, since 2002, of reporting organizations
2. Community Trends - Global distribution of appraisals

- Growth in the number of appraisals performed - Shifts in the maturity profile over time
3. Organizational Trends
- Time to move up in maturity based on change in maturity level and time between appraisals
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Current Status
SCAMPI v1.1/v1.2 Class A appraisals conducted from the SCAMPI V1.1 April 2002 release through June 2010 and reported to the SEI by July 2010
6,126 4909 3,857 957 34,291
75.3%
appraisals organizations participating companies reappraised organizations projects Non-USA organizations
Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 27
Additional charts providing different views and break down of this information will be added to this briefing as more appraisal data is reported to the SEI over time.
Carnegie Mellon
Process Maturity Profile by All Reporting Organizations

3600 3400 3200
Number Of Organizations
3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
55.3%
27.5%
6.5%
7.3%
0.8%
2.5%
Based on most recent appraisal of 4909 organizations

Carnegie Mellon
Process Maturity Profile (V1.2 Only) by All Reporting Organizations

2800 2600 2400
Number Of Organizations
2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Not Given Initial Managed
63.9%
24.5%
4.5% 0.4%
Defined
5.0% 1.7%
Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
Based on most recent appraisal of 3284 organizations

Carnegie Mellon
Reporting Organization Categories
Commercial/In-house
77.8%
Contractor for Military/Government
18.0%
Military/Government Agency
4.2%
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Number of Organizations
Based on 4909 organizations reporting an organization category
Carnegie Mellon
Process Maturity Profile by Reporting Organization Categories

100% 90%
Commercial/In-house = 3779
% Of Organizations Within Category
80% 70% 60% 50% 40%

31.5%
Contractor for Military/Government = 874 Military/Government Agency = 206
58.1%
49.3% 45.6%
30%
22.3%
25.8%
26.7%
20% 10% 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
8.0% 5.3% 0.6% 1.4% 1.0% 2.9% 1.0% 1.5% 8.8% 2.9%
7.2%
Based on most recent appraisal of 4859 organizations reporting an organization category

Carnegie Mellon
Organization Type
Based on Primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code
Wholesale Trade 0.1% Retail Trade 0.2% Transportation, Communication, Electric, Gas and Sanitary Services 3.4% Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 5.4% Public Administration (Including Defense) 3.1% Fabricated Metal Products 0.1% Primary Metal Industries 0.3% Industrial Machinery And Equipment 0.7%
Manufacturing 15.7%
Business Services 35.7%
Services 72.1%
Electronic & Other Electric Equipment 10.1% Instruments And Related Products 0.9% Transportation Equipment 2.2% Other Manuf acturing Industries 1.3%
Health Services 1.3% Engineering & Management Services 24.2% Other Services 10.9%
Based on 4222 organizations reporting SIC code. For more information visit: http://www.osha.gov/oshstats/sicser.html
Carnegie Mellon
Organization Size
Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised
1001 to 2000 2.4%
501 to 1000 5.0%
2000+ 1.6%
301 to 500 6.1%

201 to 2000+ 22.6%
25 or fewer 17.3%
201 to 300 7.3%
1 to 100 60.2%
101 to 200 17.3%
26 to 50 22.0%
76 to 100 8.3% 51 to 75 12.6%
Based on 4863 organizations reporting size data

Carnegie Mellon
Maturity Profile by Organization Size

Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised
100% 90%
% of Organizations by Size
80% 70% 60%

49.4% 43.5%
62.6%
61.2%
61.7%
56.6%
52.4%
54.2%
52.1%
50% 40%
47.3%
48.8% 26.9% 6.3% 1.7% 3.8%
29.5%
26.9%
21.6%
21.3%
22.1%
30% 20%
17.7%
16.7%
12.8%
25.5%
5.3% 10.4% 5.7% 0.3%
4.2% 6.0% 8.3% 1.0%
9.3% 8.1%
5.6% 0.7%
1.0% 1.3% 5.5% 0.8%
2.1% 3.4% 6.5%
5.4%
8.2%
1.7%
0.8%
2.5% 4.2%
3.5%
10% 0%
0.2% 0.6% 5.0% 0.6%
5.3%
12.6%
25 or fewer
26 to 50
51 to 75
76 to 100
101 to 200
201 to 300
301 to 500
501 to 1000 1001 to 2000
2000+
Not Given
Initial
Managed
Defined
Quantitatively Managed
Optimizing
Based on 4863 organizations reporting size data

1.3%
40.0%
Carnegie Mellon
USA and Non-USA Reporting Organization Categories

Commercial/Inhouse
425
3354
Contractor for Military/Government
651 223
USA: 100% = 1206 Non-USA: 100% = 3653
Military/Government Agency
130 76
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% of Organizations
Based on 1206 USA organizations and 3653 Non-USA organizations reporting an organization category
Carnegie Mellon
Maturity Profile by All Reporting USA Organizations

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50%
507
% of Organizations
40% 30% 20%

148
457
10%
13
7
81
0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
Based on 1213 USA organizations

Carnegie Mellon
Maturity Profile by All Reporting Non-USA Organizations

100% 90% 80% 70%
2207
% of Organizations
60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
279
895
173 25
117
Based on 3696 Non-USA organizations

Carnegie Mellon
Section 2: Community Trends

Appraisals conducted through June 2010 and reported to the SEI by July 2010 71 Countries reported appraisals
- most of the appraisals are from Asia and North America
5207 Appraisals posted on PARS
- expired appraisals are removed from PARS and replaced with the newest reappraisal result
Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 27
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Countries where Appraisals have been Performed and Reported to the SEI
Argentina Australia Austria Bahrain Bangladesh Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Dominican Republic Egypt Finland France Germany Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel Macedonia Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malaysia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States * Red/Italic country name: New additions with this reporting since March 2010
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010
Belarus Costa Rica Greece Italy Mauritius Panama Saudi Arabia Taiwan Uruguay
Belgium Czech Republic Guatemala Japan Mexico Paraguay Singapore Thailand Viet Nam
Brazil Denmark Hong Kong Korea, Republic Of Morocco Peru Slovakia Tunisia
Carnegie Mellon
Number of Appraisals Reported to the SEI by Continent

3600 3400 3200 3000 2800
3012
Number of Appraisals
2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Africa Asia Australia Europe North America South America
72 42 355 760 1885
Based on 6126 appraisals * North America includes Canada, the USA, and Mexico; South America includes Central America and the Caribbean ; Australia includes New Zealand
Carnegie Mellon
Number of Appraisals and Maturity Levels Reported to the SEI by Country

Country Argentina Australia Austria Bahrain Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Czech Republic Denmark Dominican Republic Egypt Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel Number of Appraisals 79 39 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 167 10 or fewer 62 43 1475 43 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 52 10 or fewer 183 80 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 20 10 or fewer 576 10 or fewer 11 21 19 1 Maturity Level 1 Reported 1 Maturity Level 2 Reported 50 10 Maturity Maturity Maturity Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Reported Reported Reported Country 20 7 2 2 4 4 Malaysia Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Singapore Slovakia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Tunisia Turkey Number of Appraisals 74 10 or fewer 104 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 15 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 29 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 11 26 10 or fewer 14 10 or fewer 11 10 or fewer 22 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 198 14 10 or fewer 10 or fewer 147 41 10 or fewer 19 Maturity Maturity Level 1 Level 2 Reported Reported 22 43 Maturity Maturity Maturity Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Reported Reported Reported 46 47 4 6 8
1 1 1
89 17 25 142 14
62 25 15 1213 15
1 5 44 4
11 4 2 51 4
22
5 3 5
6 12 7 3
8 1
3 1
4 4
1 4 9
25 108 40
18 56 15
2 1 1
3 2 1
12
117 2
61 12
4 19 2 3 19 88 59
11 320 4 11 23 146 78 16 19 25
5 197
81 13
58 25 16
2 2 3
4 17 8
Italy 46 Japan 324 Korea, Republic Of 176 Latvia 10 or fewer Lithuania 10 or fewer Luxembourg 10 or fewer Macedonia 10 or fewer
Ukraine 10 or fewer United Arab Emirates10 or fewer United Kingdom 118 United States 1719 Uruguay 10 or fewer Viet Nam 18
3 30
52 611
36 683 13
1 23 2
4 149 3
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Number of SCAMPI A Appraisals Reported to SEI by Year

1600 1400
TOTAL
1352
1300
1200
POSTED ON PARs
1029
1001
1000
842
943 938
800
600
692
600
437
615
588
400
186
230
425
200
52
0 2002
85
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Based on 6126 appraisals

Carnegie Mellon
Number of SCAMPI A Appraisals Reported to SEI by Year

1600 1400
343
1006
1200
First Appraisal
834
Reappraisal
1000
180 241 1021
598
800
109 733 849 760
437
600
96 504
180
400
186
43 394
435
200
52
23 163
1 51
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Based on 6126 appraisals

Carnegie Mellon
Trends in the Community Maturity Profile

100% 90% 80% 70%
Year
2002-2005 2006 2007 2008
55.3% 55.3%
Orgs
1112 1845 2694 3454 4,474 4,909
% of Organizations
2009 2010
60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Not Given Initial Managed
9.1% 9.1% 8.9% 7.8% 6.5% 6.5% 48.3% 32.9% 32.0% 32.3% 30.1% 27.5% 27.5% 33.0% 37.2% 41.6%
2.2% 1.5% 1.3% 1.1% 0.8% 0.8%
Defined Quantitatively ManagedOptimizing
Based on a cumulative view of the most recent appraisals of organizations up through the year indicated
4.4% 4.5% 3.4% 2.8% 2.5% 2.5%
18.3% 15.8% 12.5% 9.8% 7.3% 7.3%
Carnegie Mellon
Maturity Level of First and Latest CMMI Appraisal

100% 90% 80%
First
70%
% of Organizations
Latest
60% 50%
38.1%
40% 30% 20%

9.8% 6.2%
34.8%
56.7%
10.1%
3.9%
0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
Based on 957 reappraised organizations using their first and latest appraisal
0.1%
2.9%
10%
6.1%
10.3%
20.8%
Carnegie Mellon
Time to Move Up
60
50
Number of months to move to next maturity level
40
30
24 21
28
28 25 23
75th Percentile
Median
20
18
18.5
19
25th Percentile
10
0
Time Period of Initial Appraisal Level Orgs 1 to 2 13 2002 to 2005 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 118 28 59 2006 to Present 1 to 2 2 to 3 7 184 3 to 4 39 3 to 5 37 All (2002 to Present) 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 20 302 67 96
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Summary
6126 appraisals have been reported to the SEI Since 2002 Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Egypt, Taiwan reported appraisals are increasing at a rapid rate More than 60% of appraised organizational units have 100 or fewer employees The percentage of appraised organizations with a unit size 100 or fewer employees is increasing steadily The majority of reported appraisals are Maturity level 2 and 3 organizations
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Summary - 2
For organizations that began their CMMI-based SCAMPI effort in 2002 or later, the median time to move from: maturity level 1 to 2 is 5 months maturity level 2 to 3 is 19 months maturity level 3 to 4 is 25 months maturity level 3 to 5 is 23 months
Note: Since the March 2009 report, the median time to move from maturity level 1 to 2 increased from 4.5 months to 5 months. The median time to move from maturity level 3 to 4 increased from 24 months to 25 months , the median time to move from maturity level 3 to 5 increased from 19 months to 23 months
Carnegie Mellon
Terms Used in this Report

Company - Parent of the appraised entity A company can be a commercial or non-commercial firm, for-profit or not for-profit business, a research and development unit, a higher education unit, a government agency, or branch of service, etc.
Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entity The organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. An appraised entity can be the entire company, a selected business unit, units supporting a particular product line or service, etc. Non-USA - Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the United States. The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be based within the United States. - Published Appraisal Results webpage contains CMMI appraisals published at the request of the appraisal sponsor. The link is: http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/
PARS
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI

The briefing is only possible due to the cooperation of organizations and individuals sending in their appraisal results to the SEI In order to provide this information and service in the future, it will depend on this continued cooperation Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm for forms, information, and instructions on how to report appraisals to the SEI
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Contact Information
Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm and review the information provided before contacting: SEI Customer Relations SEI FAX number (412) 268-5800 (412) 268-5758
Internet Address customer-relations@sei.cmu.edu Mailing Address Customer Relations Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
September 2010

CMMI Maturity Profile 2010SepCMMI

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CMMI Maturity Profile 2010SepCMMI

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile

2010 by Carnegie Mellon University

Process Maturity Profile - Page 1

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

2010 by Carnegie Mellon University

Process Maturity Profile - Page 3

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Introduction - 2: Briefing Contents

2. Community Trends - Global distribution of appraisals

2010 by Carnegie Mellon University

Process Maturity Profile - Page 4

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

6,126 4909 3,857 957 34,291

appraisals organizations participating companies reappraised organizations projects Non-USA organizations

Please refer to: Terms Used in this Report on page 27

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile by All Reporting Organizations

Based on most recent appraisal of 4909 organizations

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile (V1.2 Only) by All Reporting Organizations

Based on most recent appraisal of 3284 organizations

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Reporting Organization Categories

Contractor for Military/Government

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Process Maturity Profile by Reporting Organization Categories

% Of Organizations Within Category

80% 70% 60% 50% 40%

Contractor for Military/Government = 874 Military/Government Agency = 206

Based on most recent appraisal of 4859 organizations reporting an organization category

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Business Services 35.7%

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

501 to 1000 5.0%

301 to 500 6.1%

201 to 300 7.3%

101 to 200 17.3%

76 to 100 8.3% 51 to 75 12.6%

Based on 4863 organizations reporting size data

Software Engineering Institute

CMMI- DEV v1.1/v1.2 SCAMPI v1.1/V1.2 Class A Appraisal Results

Maturity Profile by Organization Size

80% 70% 60%

48.8% 26.9% 6.3% 1.7% 3.8%

5.3% 10.4% 5.7% 0.3%

4.2% 6.0% 8.3% 1.0%

1.0% 1.3% 5.5% 0.8%

2.1% 3.4% 6.5%

0.2% 0.6% 5.0% 0.6%