Report of Project Design of Kalimantan

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.
CDM – Executive Board page 1
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD)
Version 03.1 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006
CONTENTS
A. General description of project activity
B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period
D. Environmental impacts
E. Stakeholders’ comments
Annexes
Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity
Annex 2: Information regarding public funding
Annex 3: Baseline information
Annex 4: Monitoring plan
This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1
SECTION A. General description of project activity
A.1 Title of the project activity:

Pontianak - GHG emission reduction through improved MSW management – LFG
Capture, Flaring and Electricity Generation
Version 02.00 Date of Version: 21 May 2007
Pontianak_Ver5-01-03 CDM_PDD_Ver03 ACM0001 Ver 5.doc
A.2. Description of the project activity:
This CDM project will be implemented under a Build Own & Operate (BOO) commercial agreement
between PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia and the Municipal Government of Pontianak that will cover the
landfill gas collection and flaring systems as well as the required budgetary requirement for landfill
management and waste collection improvements. This private sector approach to investment in municipal
solid waste management (MSWM) will be a first for Indonesia, demonstrating the potential for removing
Commercial Barriers that have restricted private sector investment into sustainable MSWM and the
associated environmental and social improvements.
The objectives of this project are;
1. Contribute to the global abatement of greenhouse gas emissions,

2. Improve MSW collection and disposal services within the city,
3. Improve the living and working environment for the landfill workers (government and
scavengers) and the surrounding community, and
4. Contribute to an improved living environmental for the population of the city.
To achieve these objectives the project proposes the installation of LFG collection system and an
Enclosed LFG Flaring facility which will destroy the methane gas that is being generated within the City
of Pontianak’s landfill, TPA Batu Layang. In addition the project will utilize some of the collected LFG
for the generation of electricity required to meet the parasitic load of the facility. During implementation
and operation, studies will be undertaken to evaluate the future potential for electricity generation,
methane gas sales and landfill mining for compost material (emission reductions calculations are not
included for theses options).
The Municipality of Pontianak currently has a population of approximately 521,000 people, population
growth of 2.76 per annum and solid waste generation rate of 0.8 kg/capita/day. In 2006 disposal rates
averaged 146 tonne / day, collection rate of approximately 35%.and total disposal of 53,201 tonne for the
year1.
Pontianak’s landfill, TPA Batu Layang, is located 15 km from the city centre on a 26.6 hectare parcel of
land owned by the government of which 11 hectares is currently zoned for landfill and the rest is for
buffer zone. The landfill commenced receiving waste in 1996 and during 1998 – 99, under the World
Bank’s Kalimantan Urban Development Program (KUDP) improvements were made to upgrade the
landfill to that of a “Controlled Landfill” management system. The landfill is estimated to have received
1
Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan, Profil UPTD TPA, Kota Pontianak, 2005
approximately 400,000 tonne of MSW by the end of 2006.
Controlled landfill management has decreased over the past years due to limited operational and
maintenance budgets. Currently no cover material is being placed on the landfill due to the cost associated
with this and heavy equipment being out of service. The sustainability of landfill management is
recognized as a problem in the World Bank’s completion report of KUDP “…landfill sites are unlikely to
be maintained at acceptable levels because of the limited O&M budget and attention given it.”2. These
issues will be addressed under the proposed BOO agreement with the support of revenue generated from
the projects landfill gas flaring activity.
Under the agreement between Gikoko and the City, Gikoko will invest / reinvest into the waste collection
systems so as to improve and increase collection services for the city. This will ensure that collection
services increases at the same rate as population growth, estimated at 2.7%/year. In addition service
coverage area is to be increased to ensure full service within the city and increase/ensuring collection
rates are maintained at a minimum of 80%.
Whilst the above describes the project’s focus on SWM improvements across the city, it is also the desire
of Gikoko and the city of Pontianak to implement local parallel programs that bring direct benefits to the
communities on and around TPA Batu Layang. These communities are typical of city landfills in
Indonesia, consisting of;
1. Residents native to the area, and

2. Waste pickers (pemulung) and small-scale non-organic recycling industries that are non-native to
the area.
The impacts of municipal waste disposal on both communities are basically similar, environmental
pollution, poor health and a reduce quality of life. The major difference between the two groups is that for
economic reasons the recycling communities chooses to live and work around landfills whilst the native
residents have had the landfill imposed upon them.
Developing appropriate solutions and benefits for both groups, whilst avoiding any action/preference that
would cause social friction/conflict between the communities is paramount to implementation of the
proposed community development (CD) programs. The objectives of the CD activities are therefore to
implement appropriate solutions to each group that bring about real, measurable and sustainable
improvements in “quality of life”, education, income earning opportunity and specific focus on women
and children of the scavenger community.
The project will establish a joint committee (Gikoko, Government and community) to develop, implement
and oversee community development activities that are to be partly financed from a percentage of the
CERs revenue generated by the project. Initial programs will concentrate of clean water supply, non
organic processing and improved local living environment.
A.3. Project participants:

2
The World Bank, Implementation Completion Report - Kalimantan Urban Development Project, June 24, 2003
Name of Party involved Private and/or public entity(ies) Kindly indicate if the Party
((host) indicates a host project participants involved wishes to be considered
Party) (as applicable) as project participant (Yes/No)
Indonesia (host) No
PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia
The Municipal Government of the

City of Pontianak, West Kalimantan,
Indonesia
The Netherlands International Bank for Yes
Reconstruction and Development
(“IBRD”) acting as the trustee of the
Netherlands Clean Development
Mechanism Facility (“NCDMF”)
A.4. Technical description of the project activity:
A.4.1. Location of the project activity:
The project will be located at the City of Pontianak landfill, TPA Batu Layang.
A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies):
The Republic of Indonesia
A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.:
West Kalimantan, Indonesia
A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc:
Kota Pontianak, Desa Batu Layung
A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the unique

identification of this project activity (maximum one page):
The project will be located at the City of Pontianak landfill, TPA Batu Layang, which is situated in 15
kilometres from the city centre.
Figure 1 Project Location Map
A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:
Sectoral Scope 13: Waste handling and disposal, is the appropriate category for the proposed project
activity of landfill gas capture and flaring.
A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:
The project will employ proven technology and engineering approach to landfill gas extraction, flaring
and small-scale electricity generation. These systems have been established on many landfills around the
world but this will be the first to be established in the Province of West Kalimantan, Indonesia.
The basic operational principle is the application of vacuum in the waste mass to extract the gas. The
main components of the active collection system to be installed are as follows;
Collection System. This project will employ a horizontal LFG collection piping system. The design of
this system will employ dropouts within the collection systems to reduce the impacts of excessive
leachate and condensation on the extraction system.
Horizontal collection piping will be progressively installed during the filling of new cells and designed to
ensure protection from damage during filling operations. This system will increase LFG capture during
the period of filling, reduce the impact of high leachate levels and provide improved leachate drainage
within the cells.
These LFG extraction wells will be connected to a manifold pipe that will carry the LFG to the blower
facility. Condensation which forms in the collection system pipe work will be controlled by self-draining
condensate traps and manholes fitted with pumps where necessary.
Landfill Cell Closure. The technique to be used for cell closure to improve LFG efficiency, rainfall
infiltration and leachate discharge is that of an “Entombed Cell”. This form of closure is recommended
for all landfills in western countries so as to limit all methane gas emission and improve gas collection
efficiency.
The cells are capped with a synthetic liner which is then covered with a 300mm vegetation layer (growing
medium). Infiltration of rainfall is minimal which reduces leachate levels in the cells and LFG capture is
maximized due to the liner prohibiting LFG surface emissions.
As this technique reduces internal moisture content of the cells, moisture content levels of the cells will
be monitored and a leachate recycling system will be employed.
Leachate Management System will be installed to maintain low levels of leachate within the gas
collection wells so to improve LFG recovery efficiency. This system will include the recycling of
leachate within the landfill.
LFG pumping equipment will include pipeline manifold system and blowers. The blowers to be
installed will be single-stage centrifugal type. A pipeline will convey the LFG from the well system to the
LFG treatment unit.
LFG treatment unit will consist of condensate and flare systems. A knockout vessel will be used to
remove gas condensate. An Enclosed Flare, which meets the UK EPA “Guidance on Landfill Gas
Flaring”3or similar standards, will be installed to burn the LFG in a controlled environment so as to
maximize the destruction of methane and other harmful constituents before discharging them safely to the
atmosphere.
Monitoring and control systems of the facility will be linked by telemetry to an off-site SCADA
(Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) monitoring location which will allow for real time
performance monitoring, systems control, error logging, analysis and reporting. In addition, monitoring
points and valves will be installed at each wellhead to allow for manual measurements and “tuning” of
individual wells to ensure optimum performance of the collection system.
LFG Generator, 60 kW output capacity, will be installed after ensuring sufficient gas generation rates
to run the generator, to produce all the onsite electricity requirements of the collection and flaring facility.
Additional electricity capacity will be evaluated to meet proposed waste separation and non-organic
recycling facility requirements at a later stage. No emission reductions will be claimed from the
displacement of grid electricity.
3
Environmental Agency, Guidance on Landfill Gas Flaring, Environmental Agency & SEPA, Bristol,
UK, November 2002, ISBN: 1844320278
A.4.4 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:
Through the project activity of collecting, flaring and combustion of landfill gas (LFG) this project
proposal estimates approximately 1,928,089 tonne CO2equivalent as the potential emission reductions of
during the 21-year period (2007 to 2027) of this proposal at an average yearly emission reduction of
91,814 tonne CO2equivalent (refer Table 1)
Table 1 Estimated Project Emission Reductions

Project Years Potential Methane Reduction
(tonne CO2e / year)
2007 12,873
2008 38,237
2009 45,585
2010 53,233
2011 60,383
2012 67,100
2013 73,440
2014 79,455
2015 85,188
2016 90,683
2017 95,974
2018 101,095
2019 106,076
2020 110,943
2021 115,720
2022 120,429
2023 125,089
2024 129,719
2025 134,335
2026 138,951
2027 143,580
Total estimated reductions 1,928,089
(tonnes of CO2e)
Total number of crediting years 21
Annual average over the 91,814

crediting period of estimated
reductions (tonnes of CO2e)
A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:
No ODA funds will be used for this project.
SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology
B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the
project activity:
ACM0001 - Version 05 “Consolidated baseline methodology for landfill gas project activities”,–
Revision to the approved consolidated baseline methodology.
Annex 13 - Methodological “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing
methane”
Version 3 of the ACM001 Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality, 28 November 2005
B.2 Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project
activity:
This methodology is applicable to landfill gas capture project activities, where the baseline scenario is
partial or total atmospheric release of the gas and the project activities include situations such as:
a) The captured gas is flared; or

b) The captured gas is used to produce energy (e.g. electricity/thermal energy), but no emission
reductions are claimed for displacing or avoiding energy from other sources;
The Batu Layang LFG flaring project meets the above criteria of this methodology, as the baseline
scenario for the project is the total atmospheric release of the gas and the project activity is predominantly
the capture and flaring of the gas, item a). In addition the project may only utilise the extracted gas to
generate its own electricity for running the gas extraction system, hence item b) is included. No emission
reductions are being claimed for displacing or avoiding energy from other sources.
B.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary
The consolidated baseline methodology ACM0001 defines the project boundary as the site of the project
activity where the gas is captured and destroyed/used.
As a consequence of solid waste disposal practices in Pontianak, the organic fraction of MSW within the
landfill undergoes anaerobic degradation resulting in the generation of methane gas. The project proposes
that this methane gas is collected and flared on site so as to reduce emissions into the atmosphere. Power
requirement for operating the facility will also be generated from the collected methane. Accordingly, the
boundary for the proposed project is defined as the landfill site of TPA Batu Layang.The Projects GHGs
by source are defined in Table 2, whilst Figure 2 schematically illustrates the project boundary, the
components associated with this boundary and the emissions/abatements associated with the project
activity.
CO2 emissions from LFG recovery combustion as well as the emission of CO2 originally contained in the
LFG are of biogenic origin and are not to be accounted for.4,5
4
IPCC Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Chapter 5 Waste
Table 2 Project GHG Emissions

Source Gas Included Justification/Explanation
Baseline Landfill Gas emission CO2 No Not included because this GHG is
from a biogenic source
CH4 Yes Included as this is the GHG being
emitted from the landfill
N2O No Not included as emission of this
GHG are insignificant
Project Active Landfill Gas CO2 No Not included because this GHG is
Activity capture and destruction by from a biogenic source
Flaring and combustion in CH4 Yes Included as this is the GHG being
the electrical generator abated by the project activity
N2O No Not included as emission of this
GHG are insignificant
Project 1. Un-captured Landfill CO2 No Not included because this GHG is
Emissions Gas, from a biogenic source
2. CO2 formed from the
combustion of CH4
1. Un-captured Landfill CH4 Yes Included as this is the GHG which
Gas, will continue to be emitted within
2. CH4 not destroyed due to the project boundary
inefficiencies in flaring
and combustion in the
electrical generator
All project emission N2O No Not included as emission of this
sources GHG are insignificant
5
Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual, Chapter 6 Waste
Figure 2 Project Boundary Definition
B.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified
baseline scenario:
The organic content in municipal waste disposed of in landfills produces methane gas as a bi-product of
anaerobic decomposition. This process of anaerobic decomposition will continue for many decades until
all available organic carbon is degraded.
Since receiving MSW in 1996 it is estimated that approximately 411,498 tonne of Organic Waste has
been deposited in the landfill. Based upon the forecast population growth and improvements in collection
services in the City of Pontianak it is expected that an additional 3,183,404 tonne of Organic Waste will
be collected from the city and disposed to the landfill over the remaining 21-years life of the landfill.
The organic waste disposed of during the expected remaining operational lifetime of the landfill will
generate and emit methane gas as the available organic carbon resources are degraded. Calculations using
the First Order Decay Model6, forecast potential emissions during the proposed 21-year project period
(2007 – 2027) at approximately 304.07 x 106 m3 methane, minus that which is oxidised (10%) within the
landfill surface leaving potential atmospheric emission of 273.66 x 106 m3 methane. This is equivalent to
approximately 4,119,394 tonne CO2equivalent.
Indonesian design guidelines7 and standards8 for landfill construction and operation requires only basic
gas venting to be installed but there is no enforcement of even this basic requirement. Environmental
regulations are equally limited in their guidelines for reducing the environmental impacts of methane
production and emissions from landfills. Without the policy, regulation requirements and financial
capacity the current practice of “controlled open dumping” with little regard to methane gas generation
and emissions from landfills will continued by local governments.
Implementation of this proposed CDM project will therefore substantially reduce these anthropogenic
emissions through the installation of the proposed LFG collection system and the destruction of the
methane content of the LFG.
B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below
those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment
and demonstration of additionality):
Additionality of this project activity has been determined using the “Tool for the demonstration and
assessment of additionality – Version 3” and the assessment is as follows;
The PIN for this project, City of Pontianak - Batu Layang Landfill Gas Flaring Project, was
originally prepared and submitted to The World Bank in August 2005 for consideration as a CDM project
supported by World Bank Carbon Financing. Acceptance by the Bank was notified in October 2006. The
project implementation is scheduled for after registration.
Step 1. Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and
regulations
Sub-step 1a. Define alternatives to the project activity:
Alternatives;
Alternative 1 Continuation of the current landfill operational and management practices;

controlled open dumping, minimal cell capping on closure and passive LFG
venting.
6
IPCC (1996) First-Order Decay Model –Equation 4
7
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Spesifikasi area penimbunan sampah dengan system lahan urug terkendali di TPA
Sampah, Pt S-07-2000-C
8
Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Tata cara teknik operasional pengelolaan sampah perkotaan, SNI 19-2454-
2002, and Tata cara pemilihan lokasi tempat pembuangan akhir sampah, SNI 03-3241-1994
Alternative 2 The proposed CDM project of improved landfill management with LFG
capture Flaring and Electricity Generation for on-site use is undertaken NOT as
a CDM project.
Alternative 3 LFG collections and utilisation for power generation or gas supply off site.
There are no mandatory laws, regulation or a national standard that forces the municipal governments to
collect and flare methane or to use it for any other purpose. Therefore, Alternatives 2 and 3 are additional
to the baseline - Alternative 1.
As Alternative 2 has no revenue stream implementing this alternative would likely divert local
government budgets away from other waste management activities and therefore is not a viable
alternative.
Alternative 3 requires a much higher capital investment, technology, expertise and yearly O&M costs
than Alternative 1-Baseline and the Project. This would also divert local government budgets for the
required investment, yearly O&M costs and have a higher risk due to the lack of local expertise. Current
“buy-back rates” for selling into the national grid are seen by the private sector as to low to make such an
approach commercially viable.
From the above simple analysis of likely alternatives to the proposed project, Alternative 1 – Baseline is
the only realistic alternative to the Project.
Sub-step 1b. Enforcement of applicable laws and regulations:
1. Indonesian design guidelines9 and standards10 for landfill construction and operation requires only
basic gas venting to be installed but there is no enforcement of even this basic requirement.
2. Indonesian environmental laws do not specifically require local governments to maintain sanitary
landfill management, recognizing the costs associated with this and the limited financial and human
resource capacity to implement sanitary landfills.
In addition, the environmental regulations are limited in their guidelines for reducing the
environmental impacts of methane production and emissions. Therefore without the financial means
to improve landfill management, the municipal government of Pontianak will be forced to continue
the current practice of “controlled open dumping” and passive gas venting.
The relevant Indonesian environmental regulations are;
Relevant Indonesian Comment Extract of Relevant Section

Regulation
9
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Spesifikasi area penimbunan sampah dengan system lahan urug terkendali di TPA
Sampah, Pt S-07-2000-C
10
Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN), Tata cara teknik operasional pengelolaan sampah perkotaan, SNI 19-2454-
2002, and Tata cara pemilihan lokasi tempat pembuangan akhir sampah, SNI 03-3241-1994

Regulation
Decree Concerning Types Of This regulation stipulates that • Garbage disposal using
Businesses Or Activities an Environmental Impact controlled landfill
Required To Prepare An Assessment must be undertaken or sanitary landfill systems
Environmental Impact for the following activities; >=800 ton/ha
Assessment, Minister Of State
For The Environment, Decree • Garbage disposal using
No. Kep-11/Menlh/3/1994 open dumping systems >=80
ton/ha
Regulation Regarding An Environmental Impact

Environmental Impact Assessment must include the
Assessment, Government following components;
Regulation Number 51 of 199
3- Environmental impact 1. Environmental Impact
assessment (Analisa Mengenai Statement,
Dampak Lingkungan, or
AMDAL) is the process of 2. Environmental Management
studying the significant impact Plan, and
of a proposed business or
activity on the environment, 3. Environmental Monitoring
which is required as part of the Plan.
decision-making process.
Decree Concerning Guidelines Definitions A significant impact shall mean

For The Determination Of any fundamental change in the
Significant Impacts, Head Of environment caused by a
The Environmental Impact business or activity; Article 16 of
Management Agency, Decree Law Number 4 of 1982 states
Number Kep-056 Of 1994 that any proposed activity which
is predicted to have a significant
impact on the environment is
required to be subject to the
environmental impact assessment
process.
Law Concerning Environmental management

Environmental Management, which is performed with a
Law No. 23 Of 1997 Article 3 principle of national
responsibility, a principle of
sustainability, and a principle of
exploitation, aims to create
environmentally sustainable
development in the framework of
the holistic development of the
Indonesian human and the
development of an Indonesian

Regulation
community in its entirety which is
faithful and devoted to God the
Almighty.
Whilst the previously Chapter VI Evaluation of

Decree Concerning General
mentioned regulations provide Significant Impacts
Guidelines For The
a basis for environmental 2. Basic Management Studies
Preparation Of Environmental
Impact Assessment, Minister management of landfills they d. The extent of areas which may
Of State For The Environment, do not specifically provide be potentially affected by these
Decree Number Kep- regulations that, if significant impacts, whether
14/Menlh/3/1994 implemented, would reduce the these impacts will be
production and emissions of experienced locally,
methane. In addition it is regionally, nationally or even
recognised in the following internationally in areas
Decree that the capability of all beyond the boundaries of
levels of government to fully Indonesian territory. Thus, the
implement the environmental proposed effort to manage
Laws and regulations is these impacts should be
limited. clearly described, taking into
consideration the
government's capability, at
district, municipal, provincial,
national and international
levels, to deal with the
negative impacts and to
enhance the positive impacts.
Step 2. Investment analysis
Sub-step 2a. Determine appropriate analysis method
As this project generates no financial or economic benefits from LFG Flaring activity except for CDM
related income, the simple cost analysis (Option 1) is appropriate.
Sub-step 2b. – Option I. Apply simple cost analysis
The capital investment and associated operational & maintenance costs required for the capture and
destruction via flaring of landfill gas generates no commercial benefits to the municipal government of
Pontianak or a potential private sector investor (Table 3). It is beyond the financial capacity of the
municipality to implement this project without CDM related income, as it would divert a significant
amount of municipal budget away from other local government services and solid waste management
activities (which are currently under resourced). This alternative is also of no commercial interest to the
private sector as it does not deliver adequate commercial return on the investment.
Whilst there are institutional and technical barriers that would prevent the proposed project activity, the
investment analysis (simple cost analysis) demonstrates that the proposed CDM project activity is not a
financially attractive option. Step 3 Barrier analysis of the “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of
additionality (version 02)” therefore does not require assessment.
Table 3 Project Financial Assessment – No CERs Revenue
Costs Amount ($US) Frequency
Initial Capital Investment(1) $475,750 On implementation

Expansion/Extension of LFG collection
$542,250 On closure of cells
system over 10 year life of project(1)
Operation & Maintenance costs (10 year
$351,608 Total of life of project
project life)
Total $1,369,608.00
Financial Indicators $US

Total Debt $0
Total Equity $1,018,000
IRR Project #DIV/0!
(#DIV/0! Denote that the number is a large
negative or unable to calculate) Asset #DIV/0!
NPV Discount Rate $US
10.00% ($980,197)
15.00% ($859,974)
18.00% ($802,098)
WACC (asset) ($1,067,550)
The CDM project financial assessment provided in Table 4 demonstrates that with a revenue stream
generated via the destruction of methane the proposed project is sustainable and can provide the
additional finance required for SWM improvement within the city.
Table 4 Project Financial Assessment - CERs Revenue
Costs Amount ($US) Frequency
Initial Capital Investment(1) $475,750 On implementation

Expansion/Extension of LFG collection
$542,250 On closure of cells
system over 10 year life of project(1)
Operation & Maintenance costs (10 year

project life) [includes upfront finance $761,608 Total of life of project
repayment and monitoring]
Total $1,779,608.00
Project Revenue Tonne CO2e Sold $US
CERs Revenue based on a 10 year purchase

350,000 $3,500,000
agreement (@ $10.00 / tonne CO2e)
Financial Indicators $US

Total Debt (Upfront finance CDM Development) $160,000
Total Equity $1,018,000
Project 22.19%
IRR
Asset 21.43%
NPV Discount Rate $US
10.00% $339,688
15.00% $159,984
18.00% $82,200
WACC (asset) $1,095,450
Note 1: As the project owner, PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia, will be fabricating the required LFG flaring
system in Indonesia this reduces the capital investment and Operation and Maintenance costs of the
project, therefore overcoming a major barrier for private sector involvement and investment.
Step 4. Common practice analysis
Sub-step 4a. Analyze other activities similar to the proposed project activity:
There are no other similar projects previously or currently underway in Indonesia therefore no
comparisons can be made.
Sub-step 4b. Discuss any similar options that are occurring:
The proposed CDM project activity is not common practice in Indonesia.
This project activity is assessed as being Additional
B.6. Emission reductions:

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:
ACM0001 Version 5 “Consolidated monitoring methodology for landfill gas project activities”- Revision
to the approved consolidated monitoring methodology.
This methodology is applicable to landfill gas capture project activities, where the baseline scenario is
partial or total atmospheric release of the gas and the project activities include situations such as:
c) The captured gas is flared; or

d) The captured gas is used to produce energy (e.g. electricity/thermal energy), but no emission
reductions are claimed for displacing or avoiding energy from other sources;
The Sumur Batu LFG flaring project meets the above criteria of this methodology, as the baseline
scenario for the project is the total atmospheric release of the gas and the project activity is predominantly
the capture and flaring of the gas, item a). In addition the project will utilise the extracted gas to generate
its own electricity for running the gas extraction system, hence item b) is included. No other emission
reductions are being claimed for displacing or avoiding energy from other sources.
According the projects methodology, ACM001- Version 5, the greenhouse gas emission reduction
achieved by the project activity during a given year “y” (ERy) is calculated using Equation 1
Equation 1: ERy = (MDproject,y – MDreg,y) * GWPCH4 + ELy * CEFelectricity,y - ETy * CEFthermal, y
Where:
ERy is emission reduction, in tonnes of CO2 equivalents (t CO2e);

MDproject,y the amount of methane that would have been destroyed/combusted during year y, in
tonnes of methane (tCH4);
MDreg,y the amount of methane that would have been destroyed/combusted during year y in the
absence of the project, in, tonnes of methane (tCH4);
GWPCH4: Global Warming Potential value for methane for the first commitment period is 21
tCO2e / tCH4;
Ely net quantity of electricity exported during year y, in megawatt hours (MWh);
CEFelectricity,y CO2 emissions intensity of the electricity displaced, in tCO2e / MWh, using AMS I.D;
ETy incremental quantity of fossil fuel, defined as difference of fossil fuel used in the
baseline and fossil fuel use during the project, for energy requirement on site under
project activity during the year y, in TJ;
CEFthermal, y CO2 emissions intensity of the fuel used to generate thermal/mechanical energy, in
tCO2e/TJ.
As the project does not import or export electricity the equation is simplified to project Equation B.6.–1,
ERy = (MDproject,y - MDreg,y)* GWPCH4 Eq. B.6 - 1
and MDreg,y, the amount of methane that would have been destroyed/combusted during year y in the absence of
the project is calculated as per projects equation B.6 - 2
MDreg,y, = MDproject,y x AF Eq. B.6 - 2
where:
AF is the Adjustment Factor for cases where regulatory or contractual requirements do
not specify MDreg,y a value for AF shall be used. For the proposed project activity AF
is zero because collection and destruction of landfill methane are not mandated by
legislation or contractual agreement that requires the collection and destroying of

specific percentage of the generated methane,.
The methane destroyed by the project activity MDproject,y during a year is determined by monitoring the
quantity of methane actually flared MDflared,y and used for site electricity generation MDPowerPlant,y:
MDproject,y = MDflared,y + MDPowerPlant,y Eq. B.6. - 3
Methane combusted by the Power Plant, MDPowerPlant,y, for on site electricity generation is determined by:
MDPowerPlant,y = LFGPowerPlant,y * WCH4,y * DCH4 * PPE Eq. B.6. - 4
Where:
MDPowerPlanty,y is the quantity of methane destroyed by generation of electricity
LFGPowerPlant,y is the quantity of landfill gas fed into electricity generator.
WCH4,y. is the average methane fraction of the landfill gas during the years,
DCH4 is the methane density. At standard temperature and pressure11 (0 degree
Celsius and 1,013 bar) the density of methane is 0.0007168 tCH4/m3CH4.
PPE is the combustion/conversion efficiency of the on-site Power Plant
Methane destroyed, MDflared,, by the flare is determined by the following equation;
MDflared,y = (LFGflare,y * WCH4,y * DCH4) – (PEflare,y / GWPCH4) Eq. B.6 - 5
Where:
LFGflare,y Quantity of landfill gas flared during the year measured in cubic meters (m3)
WCH4,y Average methane fraction of the landfill gas
DCH4 Methane density expressed in tCH4/m3CH4
PEflare,y Project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream in year y
GWPCH4 Global Warming potential of CH4
The projects emissions, PElared,y, are determined using Annex 13 - Methodological “Tool to determine
project emissions from flaring gases containing methane”. The seven steps required by this tool are as
follows;
STEP 1: Determination of the mass flow rate of the residual gas that is flared
STEP 2: Determination of the mass fraction of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen in the residual gas
STEP 3: Determination of the volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas on a dry basis
STEP 4: Determination of methane mass flow rate of the exhaust gas on a dry basis
11
ACM0001 Version 5, “Consolidated baseline methodology for landfill gas project activities”
STEP 5: Determination of methane mass flow rate of the residual gas on a dry basis
STEP 6: Determination of the hourly flare efficiency
STEP 7: Calculation of annual project emissions from flaring based on measured hourly values or based
on default flare efficiencies.
As this project will install an enclosed flare, continuous monitoring of the methane destruction efficiency
of the flare (flare efficiency) is required. The Project participants will apply the above 7 steps to calculate
project emissions from flaring (PEflare,y) based on the measured hourly flare efficiency (ηflare,h). If there is
no record of the temperature of the exhaust gas of the flare or if the recorded temperature is less than 500
°C for any particular hour, it shall be assumed that during that hour the flare efficiency is zero.
The calculation procedure in this tool determines the flow rate of methane before and after the destruction
in the flare, taking into account the amount of air supplied to the combustion reaction and the exhaust gas
composition (oxygen and methane). The flare efficiency is calculated for each hour of a year based either
on measurements or default values plus operational parameters. Project emissions are determined by
multiplying the methane flow rate in the residual gas with the flare efficiency for each hour of the year.
STEP 1. Determination of the mass flow rate of the residual gas that is flared
This step calculates the residual gas mass flow rate in each hour h, based on the volumetric low rate and
the density of the residual gas. The density of the residual gas is determined based on the volumetric
fraction of all components in the gas.
FM RG,h = ρRG,n,h * FVRG,h Eq. Step 1- 1
Where:
Variable SI Unit Description

FM RG,h kg/h Mass flow rate of the residual gas in hour h
ρRG,n,h kg/m3 Density of the residual gas at normal conditions in hour h

FVRG,h m3/h Volumetric flow rate of the residual gas in dry basis at normal conditions
in the hour h
and:
ρRG,n,h = Pn / ((Ru / MMRG,h) * Tn) Eq. Step 1- 2
where;

ρRG,n,h kg/m3 Density of the residual gas at normal conditions in hour h
Pn Pa pressure at normal conditions (101.325)
Ru Pa.m3/kmol.K Universal ideal gas constant (8 314)
MMRG,h kg/kmol Molecular mass of the residual gas in hour h
Tn K (kelvin) Temperature at normal conditions (273.15)
and:
MMRG,h = ∑ (fvi,h * MMi ) Eq. Step 1- 3

i
where:

fvi,h - Volumetric fraction of component i in the residual gas in the hour h
MMi kg/kmol Molecular mass of residual gas component i
I The components CH4, CO, CO2, O2, H2, N2
STEP 2. Determination of the mass fraction of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen in the
residual gas
Determine the mass fractions of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen in the residual gas, calculated
from the volumetric fraction of each component i in the residual gas, as follows:
fmj,h = (∑ fvi,h * AMi * NAj,i) / MMRG,h Eq. Step 2 - 4

i
where:
fmj,h - Mass fraction of element j in the residual gas in hour h
fvi,h - Volumetric fraction of component i in the residual gas in the hour h
AMi kg/kmol Atomic mass of element j
NAj,i - Number of atoms of element j in component i
j The elements carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen
i The components CH4, CO, CO2, O2, H2, N2
STEP 3. Determination of the volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas on a dry basis
Determine the average volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas in each hour h based on a stoichiometric
calculation of the combustion process, which depends on the chemical composition of the residual gas,
the amount of air supplied to combust it and the composition of the exhaust gas, as follows:
TVn,FG,h = Vn,FG,h * FMRG,h Eq. Step 3 - 5
where:

TVn,FG,h m3/h Volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas in dry basis at normal
conditions in hour h
Vn,FG,h m3/kg Volume of the exhaust gas of the flare in dry basis at normal
residual gas conditions per kg of residual gas in hour h
FMRG,h kg residual Mass flow rate of the residual gas in the hour h
gas / h
Vn,FG,h = Vn,CO2,h + Vn,N2,h + Vn,O2,h Eq. Step 3 - 6
where:
Vn,FG,h m3/kg Volume of the exhaust gas of the flare in dry basis at normal
residual gas conditions per kg of residual gas in hour h
Vn,CO2,h m3/kg Quantity of CO2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
residual gas normal conditions per kg of residual gas in the hour h
Vn,N2,h m3/kg Quantity of N2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
Vn,O2,h m3/kg Quantity of O2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
Vn,O2,h = nO2,h x MVn Eq. Step 3 - 7
where:
Vn,O2,h m3/kg Quantity of O2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
nO2,h kmol/kg Quantity of moles O2 in the exhaust gas of the flare per kg
residual gas residual gas flared in hour h
MVn m3/kmol Volume of one mole of any ideal gas at normal temperature and
pressure (22.4 L/mol)
Vn,N2,h = MVn * { ((fmN,h / 200 AMn )+ ( 1 - MFO2 / MFO2 )) * [Fh + nO2,h] } Eq. Step 3 - 8
where:

Vn,N2,h m3/kg Quantity of N2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
pressure (22.4 m3/Kmol)
fmN,h - Mass fraction of nitrogen in the residual gas in the hour h
AMn kg/kmol Atomic mass of nitrogen
MFO2 - O2 volumetric fraction of air
Fh kmol/kg Stochiometric quantity of moles of O2 required for a complete
residual gas oxidation of one kg residual gas in hour h
nO2,h kmol/kg Quantity of moles O2 in the exhaust gas of the flare per kg
Vn,CO2,h = (fmC,h / AMC ) * MVn Eq. Step 3 - 9
where:
Vn,CO2,h m3/kg Quantity of CO2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
fmC,h - Mass fraction of carbon in the residual gas in the hour h
AMC kg/kmol Atomic mass of carbon
pressure (22.4 m3/Kmol)
nO2,h = tO2,h / (1 – (tO2,h / MFO2)) * [(fmC,h / AMC ) + [(fmN,h / 2AMN ) + ( 1 - MFO2 / MFO2 ) x Fh ]
Eq. Step 3 - 10
where:

nO2,h kmol/kg Quantity of O2 volume free in the exhaust gas of the flare at
tO2,h - Volumetric fraction of O2 in the exhaust gas in the hour h
MFO2 - Volumetric fraction of O2 in the air (0.21)
Fh kmol/kg Stochiometric quantity of moles of O2 required for a complete
residual gas oxidation of one kg residual gas in hour h
fmj,h - Mass fraction of element j in the residual gas in hour h (from
equation 4)
AMj kmol/kg Atomic mass of element j
j The elements carbon (index C) and nitrogen (index N)
Fh = (fmC,h / AMC) + (fmH,h / 4AMH) + (fmO,h / 2AMO) Eq. Step 3 - 11
where:
Fh kmol O2 /kg Quantity of moles O2 in the exhaust gas of the flare per kg
fmj,h - Mass fraction of element j in the residual gas in hour h (from
equation 4)
AMj kmol/kg Atomic mass of element j
j The elements carbon (index C), hydrogen (index H) and oxygen
(index O)
STEP 4. Determination of methane mass flow rate in the exhaust gas on a dry basis
The mass flow of methane in the exhaust gas is based on the volumetric flow of the exhaust gas and the
measured concentration of methane in the exhaust gas, as follows:
TMFG,h = (TVn,FG,h x fvCH4,FG,h) / 1,000,000 Eq Step 4 - 12

TMFG,h kg/h Mass flow rate of methane in the exhaust gas of the flare in dry
basis at normal conditions in the hour h
TVn,FG,h m3/h exhaust Volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas in dry basis at normal
gas conditions in hour h
fvCH4,FG,h mg/m3 Concentration of methane in the exhaust gas of the flare in dry
basis at normal conditions in hour h
STEP 5. Determination of methane mass flow rate in the residual gas on a dry basis
The quantity of methane in the residual gas flowing into the flare is the product of the volumetric flow
rate of the residual gas (FVRG,h), the volumetric fraction of methane in the residual gas (fvCH4,RG,h) and the
density of methane (ρCH4,n,h) in the same reference conditions (normal conditions and dry or wet basis).
It is necessary to refer both measurements (flow rate of the residual gas and volumetric fraction of
methane in the residual gas) to the same reference condition that may be dry or wet basis. If the residual
gas moisture is significant (temperature greater than 60ºC), the measured flow rate of the residual gas that
is usually referred to wet basis should be corrected to dry basis due to the fact that the measurement of
methane is usually undertaken on a dry basis (i.e. water is removed before sample analysis).
TMRG,h = FVRG,h x fvCH4,RG,h x ρCH4,n,h Eq Step 5 - 13
where:
TMRG,h kg/h Mass flow rate of methane in the residual gas in the hour h
FVRG,h m3/h Volumetric flow rate of the residual gas in dry basis at normal
conditions in hour h
fvCH4,RG,h Volumetric fraction of methane in the residual gas on dry basis
in hour h (NB: this corresponds to fvi,RG,h where i refers to
methane).
ρCH4,n,h Kg/m3 Density of methane at normal conditions (0.716)
STEP 6. Determination of the hourly flare efficiency
The determination of the hourly flare efficiency depends on the operation of flare (e.g.temperature), the
type of flare used. This project will install an enclosed flares with continuous monitoring of the flare
efficiency, the flare efficiency in the hour h (ηflare,h) is;
• 0% if the temperature of the exhaust gas of the flare (Tflare) is below 500 °C during more than 20
minutes during the hour h.
• determined as follows in cases where the temperature of the exhaust gas of the flare
(Tflare) is above 500 °C for more than 40 minutes during the hour h :
η flare,h = 1 – (TMFG,h / TMRG,h ) Eq Step 6 - 14
where:

η flare,h - Flare efficiency in the hour h
TMFG,h kg/h Methane mass flow rate in exhaust gas averaged in a
period of time t (hour, two months or year)
TMRG,h kg/h Mass flow rate of methane in the residual gas in the hour
h
STEP 7. Calculation of annual project emissions from flaring
Project emissions from flaring are calculated as the sum of emissions from each hour h, based on the
methane flow rate in the residual gas (TMRG,h) and the flare efficiency during each hour h
(η flare,h), as follows:
8760
PEflare,y = ∑ TMRG,h x (1 - η flare,h) x (GWPCH4 / 1,000) Eq Step 7 - 15
h=1
where:
PEflare,y tCO2e Project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream in year y
TMRG,h kg/h Mass flow rate of methane in the residual gas in the hour h
η flare,h - Flare efficiency in the hour h

GWPCH4 tCO2e/tCH4 Global Warming Potential of methane valid for the commitment
period
No leakage effects need to be accounted under the approved consolidated methodology ACM0001
Version 5.
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.
CDM – Executive Board
page 27
B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:
ACM0001 Version 5 states that “The methane destroyed by the project activity (MDproject,y) during a year
is determined by monitoring the quantity of methane actually flared and gas used to generate electricity
and/or produce thermal energy, if applicable, and the total quantity of methane captured.“
The following data and parameters are used to calculate the Baseline, Project Emissions and Emission
Reductions using the IPCC (1996) First-Order Decay Model –Equation 4. These items are not required to
be monitored during the life of the project.
Data / Parameter: MSWComposition

Data unit: %
Description: The Municipality of Pontianak Solid Waste Characteristics % composition
Source of data used:
Value applied:
Organic Composition;
Wood 1.50%
Paper 5.00%
Organic (Food & Garden) 83.00%
Textile 0.10%
Total Organic 89.60%
Non Organic Composition

Plastic 6.00%
Glass 2.10%
Metal 2.00%
Other 0.30%
Justification of the Refer Annex 3 Baseline Information for further definition and data sets
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
and procedures actually
applied :
Any comment: Used to determine the project Baseline, Project Emissions and Emission
Reductions
Data / Parameter: MSW Generation

Data unit: Various
Description: Municipality of Pontianak Solid Waste Generation and Disposal
Source of data used: Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), Kota Pontianak
Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan, Kota Pontianak, 2006
Value applied: 1. Municipality of Pontianak Population 2000 (census year) 491,010
2. Project MSW generation rate 0.80 kg/capita/day
3. Municipality of Pontianak Forecast Population Growth Rate 2.7%
4. Municipality of Pontianak MSW disposal rate 35 to 40%
page 28
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: DOC

Data unit: kg per kg of fresh organic waste
Description: Degradable Organic Carbon
Value applied: 0.187
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: DOCf

Data unit: %
Description: Fraction of Degradable Organic Carbon Dissimilated
Source of data used: IPCC (1996), Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories –
Revised, Chapter 6
Value applied: 0.77
Justification of the IPCC default value
choice of data or Refer Annex 3 Baseline Information for further definition and data sets
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: MCF

Data unit: Parameter
Description: Methane Correction Factor
Revised, Chapter 6
Value applied: 1.0
Justification of the IPCC (1996) default value for a Managed landfill
choice of data or
description of
page 29
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: WCH4Baseline

Data unit: %
Description: Fraction of Methane (CH4) in Landfill Gas (LFG)
Revised, Chapter 6
Value applied: 50%
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: RE
Data unit: %
Description: Methane Recovery Efficiency
Source of data used: Estimated

Value applied: 50%
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: OX
Description: Oxidation Factor
Revised, Chapter 6
Value applied: 0.1
description of
measurement methods
page 30
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: k
Description: Methane Generation Rate Constant
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: Lo
Data unit: m3/kg
Description: Methane Generation Potential
choice of data or
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
Data / Parameter: DCH4

Data unit: Tonnes CH4/m3CH4
Description: Methane Density
Source of data used: ACM0001 / Version 05
Justification of the Density of methane at standard temperature and pressure (0 degree Celsius and
choice of data or 1,013 bar)
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Reductions
page 31
Data / Parameter: MMCH4

Data unit: kg/kmol
Description: Molecular mass of methane
Source of data used: UNFCCC, EB 28 Meeting report, Annex 13 - Methodological “Tool to
determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane”
Justification of the Constants provided in Annex 13 - Methodological “Tool to determine project
choice of data or emissions from flaring gases containing methane”
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Any comment: Used to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane
Data / Parameter: MMCO

Data unit: kg/kmol
Description: Molecular mass of carbon monoxide
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: MMC02

Data unit: kg/kmol
Description: Molecular mass of carbon dioxide
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: MM02

Data unit: kg/kmol
Description: Molecular mass of oxygen
page 32

description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: MMH2

Data unit: kg/kmol
Description: Molecular mass of hydrogen
Value applied: 2.02
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: MMN2

Data unit: kg/kmol
Description: Molecular mass of nitrogen
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: AMc

Data unit: kg/kmol (g/mol)
Description: Atomic mass of carbon
description of
measurement methods
page 33

applied :
Data / Parameter: AMh

Description: Atomic mass of hydrogen
Value applied: 1.01
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: AMo

Description: Atomic mass of oxygen
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: AMn

Description: Atomic mass of nitrogen
description of
measurement methods
applied :
page 34
Data / Parameter: Pn
Data unit: Pa
Description: Atmospheric pressure at normal conditions
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: Ru
Data unit: Pa.m3/kmol. K
Description: Universal ideal gas constant
Value applied: 8,314.472
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: Tn
Data unit: K
Description: Temperature at normal conditions (Kelvin)
description of
measurement methods
applied :
page 35
Data / Parameter: MFO2

Data unit: Dimensionless
Description: O2 volumetric fraction of air
Value applied: 0.21
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: MVn

Data unit: m3/Kmol
Description: Volume of one mole of any ideal gas at normal temperature and pressure
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: ρCH4,n,h

Data unit: kg/m3
Description: Density of methane at normal conditions
description of
measurement methods
applied :
Data / Parameter: NAi,j
page 36
Data unit: Dimensionless

Description: Number of atoms of element j in compound I, depending on molecular structure
Value applied: na
description of
measurement methods
applied :
B.6.3 Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:
These calculations will follow the guideline provided in ACM001 which are as follows; “The
greenhouse gas emission reduction achieved by the project activity during a given year “y” (ERy) is the
difference between the amount of methane actually destroyed/combusted during the year (MDproject,y) and
the amount of methane that would have been destroyed/combusted during the year in the absence of the
project activity (MDreg,y), times the approved Global Warming Potential value for methane
(GWPCH4)……”
ERy = (MDproject,y - MDreg,y)* GWPCH4 Eq. B.6.3 - 1
where:
Ery emission reductions [tonne CO2e/year]
MDproject,y is the methane destroyed in the Flaring and Power Plant [tonne CH4/year]
MDreg,y is the methane that would have been destroyed during the year in the absence of the
project activity [tonne CH4/year].
GWP is the Global Warming Potential value for methane 21 [tonne CO2e/tonne CH4]
MDreg,y, = MDproject,y x AF Eq. B.6.3 - 2
where:
AF is the Adjustment Factor for cases where regulatory or contractual requirements do
not specify MDreg,y a value for AF shall be used. For the proposed project activity AF
is zero because collection and destruction of landfill methane are not mandated by
legislation or contractual agreement that requires the collection and destroying of
specific percentage of the generated methane, as explained in Section B3, sub-
step1b.
The methane destroyed by the project activity MDproject,y during a year is determined by monitoring the
quantity of methane actually flared MDflared,y and used for site electricity generation MDPowerPlant,y:
page 37
MDproject,y = MDflared,y + MDPowerPlant,y Eq. B.6.3 - 3
Methane actually flared is determined by:
MDflared,y = (LFGflared,y * WCH4,y * DCH4 ) – (PEflare,y / GWPCH4) Eq. B.6.3 - 4
where:
MDflared,y is the quantity of methane destroyed by flaring [tonne CH4/year],
LFGflared,y is the quantity of landfill gas flared during the year,
DCH4 is the methane density. At standard temperature and pressure12 (0 degree Celsius
and 1,013 bar) the density of methane is 0.0007168 tCH4/m3CH4. Refer to Equation
B.2. - 6 for calculating the mass of methane flared,
PEflare,y are the project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream in year y (tonne
CO2e) determined following the procedure described in the “Tool to determine
project emissions from flaring gases containing Methane”.
.
Methane combusted by the Power Plant for on site electricity generation is determined by:
MDPowerPlant,y = LFGPowerPlant,y * WCH4,y * DCH4 * PPE Eq. B.6.3 - 5
Where:
MDPowerPlanty,y is the quantity of methane destroyed by generation of electricity
LFGPowerPlant,y is the quantity of landfill gas fed into electricity generator.
DCH4 is the methane density. At standard temperature and pressure13 (0 degree
Celsius and 1,013 bar) the density of methane is 0.0007168 tCH4/m3CH4. Refer
to Equation B.2. - 6 for calculating the mass of methane flared,
PPE is the combustion/conversion efficiency of the on-site Power Plant
Methane density (DCH4) is calculated by the following equation,
DCH4 = 16.043* LFGpress,y /(R* LFGtemp,y) Eq. B.6.3. - 6
Where,
Molecular weight of methane = 16.043 [g/mol]
12
ACM0001 Version 5, “Consolidated baseline methodology for landfill gas project activities” pg. 3
13
ACM0001 Version 2, “Consolidated baseline methodology for landfill gas project activities” pg. 3
page 38
LFGpress,y is the mean pressure for year y of the LFG given in Pascal [Pa].
LFGtemp ,y is the mean temperature for year y of the LFG given in Kelvin [K].
R is the universal gas constant (8310000 [Pa*m3/(mol*k)])14
Details of how the ACM0001 methodology is applied in the context of the proposed project activity as
well as the Monitoring Plan are fully described in Section B.7.
No leakage effects need to be accounted under this methodology.
B.6.4 Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:
Table 5 Estimated ex-ante Project Emissions

Year Estimation of Estimation of Estimation Estimation of
project activity baseline of leakage emission reductions
emissions (tonnes emissions (tonnes of (tonnes of CO2e)
of CO2e) (tonnes of CO2e)
CO2e)
2007 55,474 68,347 0 12,873
2008 43,212 81,449 0 38,237
2009 51,335 96,920 0 45,585
2010 59,787 113,020 0 53,233
2011 67,690 128,074 0 60,383
2012 75,114 142,215 0 67,100
2013 82,122 155,562 0 73,440
2014 88,769 168,223 0 79,455
2015 95,106 180,295 0 85,188
2016 101,179 191,861 0 90,683
2017 107,027 203,001 0 95,974
2018 112,687 213,782 0 101,095
2019 118,192 224,268 0 106,076
2020 123,572 234,514 0 110,943
2021 128,852 244,571 0 115,720
2022 134,056 254,485 0 120,429
2023 139,207 264,297 0 125,089
2024 144,325 274,044 0 129,719
2025 149,426 283,761 0 134,335
2026 154,528 293,478 0 138,951
2027 159,645 303,225 0 143,580
14
Ideal Gas Law PV = nRT Where P = Absolute Pressure, V = Volume, n = quantity of matter, R = gas constant,
T = Absolute Temperature
page 39
Total (tonnes of 2,191,305 4,119,394 0 1,928,089

CO2e)
Annual Average 104,348 196,162 0 91,814
B.7 Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:
Monitoring Methodology as per ACM0001 Version 5 “Consolidated monitoring methodology for

landfill gas project activities”
This monitoring methodology is appropriate for this project as it directly measures the amount of landfill
gas captured and destroyed at the flare platform and the electricity generating unit(s). Monitoring points
are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 Monitoring Plan
The monitoring plan provides for continuous measurement of the quantity and quality of LFG flared. The
main variables that are determined are the quantity of methane actually captured MDproject,y, quantity of
methane flared (MDflared,y), the quantity of methane used to generate electricity (MDelectricity,y) and the
quantity of methane generated (MDtotal,y).
To determine these variables, the following parameters shall be monitored:
• The amount of landfill gas generated (in m³, using a continuous flow meter), where the total
quantity (LFGtotal,y) as well as the quantities fed to the flare (LFGflare,y) and to the power plant
(LFGelectricity,y) are measured continuously. The flow meters are to be calibrated periodically by an
officially accredited entity.
page 40
• The fraction of methane in the landfill gas (wCH4,y) is to be measured with a continuous analyzer
and accordingly the amount of land fill gas from LFGtotal,y, LFGflare,y, and LFGelectricity,y shall be
monitored in the same frequency. A continuous methane analyser is to be used as the methane
content of landfill gas captured can vary by more than 20% during a single day due to gas capture
network conditions (dilution with air at wellheads, leakage on pipes, etc.). Methane fraction of the
landfill gas to be measured on wet basis.
• Flare Efficiency parameters used for determining the project emissions from flaring of the
residual gas stream in year y (PEflare,y) shall be monitored as per the “Tool to determine project
emissions from flaring gases containing Methane”.
• Temperature (T) and pressure (p) of the landfill gas are to be continuously measure so as to
determine the density of methane in the landfill gas.
• Relevant regulations for LFG project activities shall be monitored and updated at renewal of each
credit period. Changes to regulation are to be converted to the amount of methane that would have
been destroyed/combusted during the year in the absence of the project activity (MDreg,y). Project
participant must explain how any changes in regulations are translated into that amount of gas.
• The operating hours of the flare and energy plant are to monitored and recorded. This is to ensure
methane destruction is claimed for methane used in electricity equipment when it is operational.
B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored:
Data / Parameter: LFGtotal,y

Data unit: m3
Description: Total amount of landfill gas captured
Source of data to be Flow meter
used: Measured on site
Value of data applied n/a
for the purpose of
calculating expected
emission reductions in
section B.5
Description of Measured continuously, data to be aggregated monthly and yearly.
measurement methods Data archival: Electronic and paper
and procedures to be Period of archival: During the Crediting period and two years after
applied:
QA/QC procedures to Flow meters shall be subject to a regular maintenance and testing regime to
be applied: ensure accuracy.
Any comment: ID number:1
Data / Parameter: LFGflared,y

Data unit: m3
Description: Flow of LFG to the flare. Amount of landfill gas flared
page 41

for the purpose of
section B.5
applied:
Data / Parameter: LFGPowerPlant,y

Data unit: m3
Description: Flow of LFG flared. The amount of landfill gas combusted in power plant
for the purpose of
section B.5
applied:
Data / Parameter: PEflare,y

Data unit: Tonne CO2e
Description: Project emissions from flaring of the residual gas stream in year y
Source of data to be The parameters used for determining the project emissions from flaring of the
used: residual gas stream in year y (PEflare,y) are to be monitored as per the “Tool to
determine project emissions from flaring gases containing Methane”.
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
section B.5
page 42
applied:
QA/QC procedures to Instruments are periodically tested in order to secure accuracy.
be applied:
Data / Parameter: wCH4,y

Data unit: m³ CH4/ m³ LFG
Description: Methane fraction in the landfill gas
Source of data to be Measured by continuous gas quality analyser. Methane fraction of the landfill gas
used: to be measured on wet basis.
Value of data applied 50%
for the purpose of
section B.5
applied:
QA/QC procedures to The gas analyser shall be subject to regular maintenance and testing regime to ensure
be applied: accuracy.
Data / Parameter: T
Data unit: °C
Description: Temperature of the landfill gas. Measured to determine the density of methane
DCH4.
Source of data to be No separate monitoring of temperature is necessary when using flow meters that
used: automatically measure temperature and pressure, expressing LFG volumes in
normalized cubic meters.
Value of data applied 35OC
for the purpose of
section B.5
applied:
be applied:
Data / Parameter: P
Data unit: Pa
Description: Pressure of the landfill gas. Measured to determine the Density of methane DCH4.
page 43
Source of data to be No separate monitoring of pressure is necessary when using flow meters that
used: automatically measure temperature and pressure, expressing LFG volumes in
normalized cubic meters
Value of data applied na
for the purpose of
section B.5
applied:
be applied:
Data / Parameter: FE
Data unit: %
Description: Flare combustion efficiency, determined by the (1) operation hours
and (2) the methane content in the exhaust gas
Source of data to be (1) Timer
used: (2)Measurement
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of (1) Continuous measurement of operation time of flare (e.g. with temperature)
measurement methods (2) Continuous measurement of methane content of flare exhaust gas.
and procedures to be Measured continuously, data to be aggregated monthly and yearly.
applied: Data archival: Electronic and paper
Period of archival: During the Crediting period and two years after
be applied: Regular maintenance shall be undertaken to ensure optimal operation of flares.
Flare efficiency shall be checked quarterly, with monthly checks if the efficiency
shows significant deviations from previous values
Data / Parameter: PPE

Data unit: %
Description: Combustion efficiency of the Power Plant determined by (1) operation hours
and (2) the methane content in the exhaust gas
Source of data to be (1)Timer
used: (2)Measurement
page 44
for the purpose of

section B.5
Description of (1) Continuous measurement of operation time of flare (e.g. with temperature)
measurement methods (2) Continuous measurement of methane content of flare exhaust gas.
and procedures to be Measured continuously, data to be aggregated monthly and yearly.
applied: Data archival: Electronic and paper
Period of archival: During the Crediting period and two years after
be applied: Regular maintenance shall be undertaken to ensure optimal operation of the
Power Plant. Combustion efficiency shall be checked quarterly, with monthly
checks if the efficiency shows significant deviations from previous values.
Data / Parameter: AF
Data unit: Test
Description: Regulatory requirements relating to landfill gas projects
Source of data to be Indonesian Regulator Agency (ies)
used:
Value of data applied
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of The information though recorded annually, is used for changes to the adjustment
measurement methods factor (AF) or directly MDreg,yat renewal of the credit period.
and procedures to be
applied:
QA/QC procedures to n/a
be applied:
Data / Parameter: Operation of the Power Plant

Data unit: Hours
Description: This is monitored to ensure methane destruction is claimed for methane
used in electricity equipment when it is operational.
Source of data to be Watt hour meter
Value of data applied 8760
for the purpose of
section B.5
page 45
applied:
QA/QC procedures to n/a
be applied:
Data / Parameter: fvi,h

Data unit: --
Description: Volumetric fraction of component i in the residual gas in the hour h where
i = CH4, CO, CO2, O2,H2, N2
Source of data to be Measurements by project participants using a continuous gas analyser

used:
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of Ensure that the same basis (dry or wet) is considered for this measurement
measurement methods and the measurement of the volumetric flow rate of the residual gas (FVRG,h)
and procedures to be when the residual gas temperature exceeds 60 ºC
applied: Measured continuously. Values to be averaged hourly or at a shorter time interval
QA/QC procedures to Analysers must be periodically calibrated according to the manufacturer’s
be applied: recommendation. A zero check and a typical value check should be
performed by comparison with a standard certified gas.
Any comment: As a simplified approach, project participants may only measure the methane
content of the residual gas and consider the remaining part as N2.
Data / Parameter: FVRG,h

Data unit: m3/h
Description: Volumetric flow rate of the residual gas in dry basis at normal conditions in the
hour h
Source of data to be Measurements by project participants using a flow meter
used:
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of Ensure that the same basis (dry or wet) is considered for this measurement and
measurement methods the measurement of volumetric fraction of all components in the residual gas
and procedures to be (fvi,h) when the residual gas temperature exceeds 60 ºC
applied: Measured continuously. Values to be averaged hourly or at a shorter time interval
QA/QC procedures to Flow meters are to be periodically calibrated according to the
be applied: manufacturer’s recommendation.
page 46
Any comment:
Data / Parameter: tO2,h

Data unit: --
Description: Volumetric fraction of O2 in the exhaust gas of the flare in the hour h
used:
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of Extractive sampling analysers with water and particulates removal devices or in
measurement methods situ analysers for wet basis determination. The point of measurement (sampling
and procedures to be point) shall be in the upper section of the flare (80% of total flare height).
applied: Sampling shall be conducted with appropriate sampling probes adequate to high
temperatures level (e.g. inconel probes). An excessively high temperature at the
sampling point (above 700 ºC) may be an indication that the flare is not being
adequately operated or that its capacity is not adequate to the actual flow.
Measured continuously. Values to be averaged hourly or at a shorter time interval

be applied: recommendation. A zero check and a typical value check should be performed by
comparison with a standard gas.
Any comment: Monitoring of this parameter is only applicable in case of enclosed flares and
continuous monitoring of the flare efficiency.
Data / Parameter: fvCH4,FG,h
Data unit: mg/m3
Description: Concentration of methane in the exhaust gas of the flare in dry basis at normal
conditions in the hour h

used:
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of Extractive sampling analysers with water and particulates removal devices or in
measurement methods situ analysers for wet basis determination. The point of measurement (sampling
page 47
and procedures to be point) shall be in the upper section of the flare (80% of total flare height).
applied: Sampling shall be conducted with appropriate sampling probes adequate to high
temperatures level (e.g. inconel probes). An excessively high temperature at the
sampling point (above 700 ºC) may be an indication that the flare is not being
adequately operated or that its capacity is not adequate to the actual flow.
Measured continuously. Values to be averaged hourly or at a shorter time interval

be applied: recommendation. A zero check and a typical value check should be performed by
comparison with a standard gas.
Any comment: Monitoring of this parameter is only applicable in case of enclosed flares and
continuous monitoring of the flare efficiency. Measurement instruments may read
ppmv or % values. To convert from ppmv to mg/m3 simply multiply by 0.716.
1% equals 10 000 ppmv.
Data / Parameter: Tflare

o
Data unit: C
Description: Temperature in the exhaust gas of the flare
Source of data to be Measurements by project participants
used:
Value of data applied Measure the temperature of the exhaust gas stream in the flare by a Type N
for the purpose of thermocouple. A temperature above 500 ºC indicates that a significant amount of
calculating expected gases are still being burnt and that the flare is operating.
section B.5
Description of Continuously.
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to Thermocouples should be replaced or calibrated every year.
be applied:
Any comment: An excessively high temperature at the sampling point (above 700 ºC) may be an
indication that the flare is not being adequately operated or that its capacity is not
adequate to the actual flow.
Data / Parameter: Other flare operation parameters

--
Data unit:
Description: This should include all data and parameters that are required to monitor whether
the flare operates within the range of operating conditions according to the
manufacturer’s specifications including a flame detector in case of open flares.
Source of data to be Measurements by project participants
page 48
used:
for the purpose of
section B.5
Description of Continuously.
measurement methods
applied:
QA/QC procedures to
be applied:
Any comment: Only applicable in case of use of a default value
The measurement equipment for gas quality (humidity, particulate, etc.) is sensitive, so a strong QA/QC
procedure for the calibration of this equipment is needed.
Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures are being undertaken for data
monitored
Data Uncertainty level of Are QA/QC Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these data, or
data procedures why such procedures are not necessary.
(High/Medium/Low) planned
for these data?
1. - 3. Flow meters shall be subject to a regular maintenance and

LFGy Low Yes testing regime to ensure accuracy.
4. Regular maintenance shall be undertaken to ensure

FE Medium Yes optimal operation of flares. Flare efficiency shall be
checked quarterly, with monthly checks if the efficiency
shows significant deviations from previous values.
5. Regular maintenance shall be undertaken to ensure

PPE Medium Yes optimal operation of the Power Plant. Combustion
efficiency shall be checked quarterly, with monthly
checks if the efficiency shows significant deviations from
previous values.
6. The gas analyser shall be subject to regular maintenance

wCH4,y Low Yes and testing regime to ensure accuracy.
page 49
B.7.2 Description of the monitoring plan:
Monitoring Management Plan
Monitoring and reporting will be undertaken by an yet to be identified independent consultant contracted
to maintenance and testing of the monitoring equipment as well as undertaking the ongoing monitoring of
the project. Monitoring points and control systems of the facility will be linked by telemetry to an off-site
SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) monitoring location which will allow for real time
performance monitoring, systems control, error logging, analysis and reporting (Figure 3). In addition,
monitoring points and valves will be installed at each wellhead to allow for manual measurements and
“tuning” of individual wells to ensure optimum performance of the collection system.
ISO Standards to be used; ISO 10012:2003 definition specifies generic requirements and provides
guidance for the management of measurement processes and metrological confirmation of measuring
equipment used to support and demonstrate compliance with metrological requirements. It specifies
quality management requirements of a measurement management system that can be used by an
organization performing measurements as part of the overall management system, and to ensure
metrological requirements are met.
page 50
Figure 4 Schematic of Monitoring Management undertaken Internally by PT Gikoko Kogyo

Indonesia
page 51
Figure 5 Schematic of Monitoring, Coordination and Reporting Lines and Responsibilities – PT

Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia
page 52
Figure 6 Schematic of Monitoring Management undertaken externally by independent consultant
page 53
Figure 7 Schematic of Monitoring, Coordination and Reporting Lines and Responsibilities –

Independent consultant
page 54
B.8 Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology and
the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies)
Data, assumptions and variable used to determine the baseline scenario and baseline emissions are
provided in Annex 3 of this document.
The baseline study was determine by Kenneth Butler on behalf of PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia (contact:
kenrbutler@yahoo.com.au) and completed on ????? 2007
SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period
C.1 Duration of the project activity:
C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:
August 2007
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:
21 years
C.2 Choice of the crediting period and related information:
C.2.1. Renewable crediting period
C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period:
August 2007
C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period:
7 years
C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:
C.2.2.1. Starting date:

>> Left blank intentionally
C.2.2.2. Length:
>> Left blank intentionally
page 55
SECTION D. Environmental impacts
D.1. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary

impacts:
According to Law No. 23 of the Republic of Indonesia, year 1997, on Environmental Management, every
project and/ or activity with large and significant environmental impact must conduct an “Analisis
Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan” (AMDAL) or Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), in order to
attain the approval to proceed with the project and/ or activity.
EIA requirements for landfill are defined in Decree Concerning Types Of Businesses Or Activities
Required To Prepare An Environmental Impact Assessment, Decree No. Kep-11/Menlh/3/1994,
APPENDIX I, List Of Activities Requiring Environmental Impact Assessment, items; (12) Garbage
disposal using controlled landfill or sanitary landfill systems >=800 ton/ha, and (13) Garbage disposal
using open dumping systems >=80 ton/ha. As the project site, TPA Batu Layang, is an operating landfill
having an AMDAL that covers the environmental impacts of waste disposal and management at the site,
the new landfill management activities therefore form a component of landfill management supporting the
boundary of the existing AMDAL.
An Environmental Impact Scoping Study (EISS) and Stakeholder Consultation process have been
undertaken as components of a project Feasibility Study to determine the scale of any new significant
environmental impacts associated with this additional landfill management activity (LFG control and
management). Where according to the Indonesian regulation regarding Environmental Impact
Assessment, Number 51 of 1993,Article 3, and Decree Concerning Guidelines For The Determination Of
Significant Impacts, BAPEDAL, Decree Number, Kep-056 of 1994 , the significant impacts of a business
or activity on the environment are determined by:
1. number of people affected;

2. extent of the affected area;
3. duration of the impact;
4. intensity of the impact:
5. number of other environmental components affected;
6. cumulative nature of the impact;
7. reversibility or irreversibility of the impact.
The results of the EISS and SC determined that there are many positive impact through the
implementation of this improved landfill management activity such as leachate management, disease
vector control, reduced passive emissions of LFG, reduced air pollution from landfill fires and community
development activities. Improved collection services brought about by the project will have major positive
environmental and health impacts for the residents of the city.
Potential negative impacts such as short-term noise and dust during implementation whilst under
operational conditions potential negative impacts are the plume of the flare emissions, safety issue
associated with the high temperature flare. These identified operational impacts are to be minimised
through the design and location of the flaring facility. Section E of this document covers the potential
impacts (both positive and negative) on the local population.
page 56
D.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host
Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental
impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:
All identified negative environmental impacts will be dealt with in the project design and implementation
plans. This will include the development of;
• An environmental management plan (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan -UKL) document details

actions that will be made to manage the significant environmental impacts which could result
from the project activity, and
An environmental monitoring plan (UpayaPemantauan Lingkungan - UPL) document detailing actions

that will be made to monitor the environmental components which could be subjected to significant
impacts arising from a proposed project activity.
SECTION E. Stakeholders’ comments
E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:
In December 27, 2006 PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia together with Local Government of Pontianak c.q.
Sanitary and Gardening Services (Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan) have conducted a stakeholder
meeting for the GHG Emission Reduction through Improved MSW Management Incorporating LFG
Capture, Flaring and Electricity Generation project. The venue was held at Kelurahan Siantan Hilir
office, North Pontianak district, West Kalimantan. About 50 people from local people (Including
scavengers), local government institutions, local journalists, and PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia
management attended this meeting.
1. Brief Introduction of Stakeholder Meeting
The stakeholder meeting is one of the criteria that has to be realized for the Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) of Kyoto Protocol. The objective of stakeholder meeting is to get comments, inputs,
feedbacks from all stakeholders in the surrounding areas which directly and indirectly related to the
proposed CDM project. This socialization is one of the requirements in conducting CDM activity and it is
a normal procedure to construct any projects in Indonesia.
To carry-out a stakeholder meeting which was initiated by PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia and Municipality
of Pontianak (Dinas Kebersihan & Pertamanan), a socialization process with local community and local
government officials took place through a special meeting held at Kelurahan Siantan Hilir office, North
Pontianak on December 27, 2006,
2. Stakeholder Meeting & Discussion
About 50 participants were invited (including PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia and Municipality of Pontianak
attended this meeting. Through this event local community and governments were informed of the
objective and description of the CDM project and asked to give comments.
page 57
The following stakeholders participated in this meeting;
1. The local government authorities represented by :
- Local parliament section B (Komisi B DPRD)/Regional Secretary of local government (Bidang

Pemerintahan Setda) of Pontianak representative
- Region Investment Agency (PMD) of Pontianak representative
- Environmental Protection Agency of Pontianak City (Bapedalda)
- Public Works (Dinas Pekerja Umum) representating City Management Service
- Municipality of Pontianak Waste Management Department (Dinas Kebersihan & Pertamanan)
- City Infrastructure & Facility Service
- Sub-District Head (Camat) of North Pontianak city
- Head of Siantan Hilir Village (Lurah)
- Head of Neighborhood (RW & RT)
2. Informal Community Leaders and local community (scavengers)

3. PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia as the project owner
4. Journalists (Four local newspapers and one national newspaper)
From the socialization event indicated that the interaction among the project management, local
governments, local informal leaders and local community is well maintained through personal
relationship and stakeholder meeting.
From 29 questionnaires that had been distributed to all participants during the meeting, 29
questionnaires had been returned and evaluated. Participants who agreed with the project were 27
persons, not agreed was 0 person, and abstain was 2 persons.
E.2. Summary of the comments received:
Discussion between the participants and the project owner resulted in enthusiasm to the project
development and realization. The main issues discussed were as follows;
1. Mr. Rajini (Head of Neighborhood (RW 04 ) of Batu Layang Village)
a. This is the first time that we had been invited and involved to this socialization process. We
hope this kind of socialization should be kept as it is now, so we will work hand in hand in
developing and improving Batu Layang landfill site in the near future.
b. On behalf of the local people of Batu Layang I would like to ask Municipality of Pontianak
to take more care on transporting MSW from the city to the landfill site (TPA), please do
secure the dump trucks equipped with a proper cover (canvas fabric) so they won’t drop any
waste along the road and caused bad odor to the environment.
c. The leachate from TPA often flows to the nearby settlement drainage area and hence it
caused negative impact (such as bad odor and worms), and ultimately the water can not be
used for washing and bathing.
d. Health and education problems need to be given proper attention.
2. Mr. Rusni (Informal leader (LPM) of Batu Layang Village)
page 58
a. We strongly support of this CDM project. We hope this project can give more job
opportunity to the local people since in this region it’s difficult to get the job.
b. Caring for public health, education, and public facilities (such as : improving road condition,
mosque, water supply) should also given the priority.
3. Mr. Bambang S. (Public Work (PU) Service)

a. How long is the contract between Local Government of Pontianak and PT Gikoko Kogyo
Indonesia ? Is 21 years?
b. In the first stage of the project which will be started in May 2007, when the methane gas will
be generated and detected?
c. What is the amount of CER generated and when, since this related to the community
development activities?
E.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:
1. Mr. Sugeng (Dinas ) : Question from Mr. Rajini
a. Municipality of Pontianak has spent amount of money to buy covers for our dump trucks every
year. In fact, we have already instructed all the drivers to cover/protect the waste during the
transportation. However, many drivers were not discipline regarding this, so we will remain them
again to do so and make sure they will do it.
b. We will improve our leachate drainage system in TPA and to protect leachate not to flow to the
residential area.
c. We will carry out community development activities in the near future, but what we need now is
to manage proper landfill site and prepare piping system first for CDM project.
2. Mr. Petrus Panaka (Gikoko)

a. I am quite sure our CDM project is able to improve living condition of local people since we have
a community development based program. So as for improving road condition. TPA Batu Layang
will become a public issue, local government will give more attention in the near future as many
officials and visitors would like to see this kind of TPA.
b. We would like to employ local people as many as possible according to our needs and capacity,
however, firstly, we need your support to establish this project in TPA Batu Layang which in turn
we will carry out community development activities.
3. Mr. Sugeng (Dinas)

a. The first MOU (signed in July 2006) between Local Government of Pontianak and PT Gikoko
Kogyo Indonesia was for 1 (one) year since we would like to see first whether PT Gikoko is
really serious in doing the project. We have experiences with many companies which came to us,
they just came and went without doing any actions. But PT Gikoko is different one; Gikoko is an
investor so our Mayor is considering to sign up an MOA for 21 years.
b. As soon as the first stage of the project is completed (end of May 2007), the methane gas can be
generated.
c. The amount of CER is about 45.000 ton CO2eq per year, we expected starting June 2007 the
methane gas can be generated. However, as for Gikoko we don’t need to wait for CER issuance
to start doing the community development activities.
page 59
Annex 1
CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
Organization: PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia

Street/P.O.Box: Pulogadung Industry Estate, Jl Pulokambing Kav. II /i9
Building: The Municipality Building of Pontianak
City: Jakarta
State/Region: DKI Jakarta
Postfix/ZIP: 13930
Country: Indonesia
Telephone: (62 21) 460 1970
FAX: (62 21) 460 9380
E-Mail: Gikoko@aol.com,
URL: http://www.gikoko.co.id
Represented by:
Title: Production Director
Salutation: Mr
Last Name: Hwang
Middle Name:
First Name: Joseph
Department:
Mobile: (62) 81932991424
Direct FAX: (62 21) 460 9380
Direct tel: (62 21) 460 1970
Personal E-Mail: joehwang78@aol.com
Organization: Municipal Government of Pontianak

Street/P.O.Box: Jalan Rahadi Usman No. 2,
Building: Kantor Walikota
City: Pontianak,
State/Region: Province of West Kalimantan,
Postcode/ZIP:
Country: Indonesia
Telephone: (62 561) 733040
FAX: (62 561) 772 807
E-Mail: buchary@pontianak.go.id
URL: www.pontianak.go.id
Represented by: Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan
Title: Kapala Dinas
Salutation: Drs
Last Name: Subandi
Middle Name: Harjo
First Name: Sugeng
Department:
Mobile: (62) 8125725660
page 60
Direct FAX: (62 561) 7396161

Direct tel: (62 561) 741241
Personal E-Mail: sugeng@pontianak.go.id
Organization: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) acting as
Trustee for the IBRD – Netherlands Clean Development Facility ("NCDMF")
Street/P.O.Box: 1818 H Street, NW
Building: MC
City: Washington
State/Region: District of Columbia
Postcode/ZIP: 20433
Country: USA
Telephone: +1 (202) 453 9189
FAX: +1 (202) 522 7432
E-Mail: IBRD-carbonfinance@worldbank.org
URL: www.carbonfinance.org
Represented by:
Title: Manager, Carbon Finance
Salutation: Mrs.
Last Name: Chassard
Middle Name:
First Name: Joelle
Department: Environment Department
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct tel:
Personal E-Mail:
Organization: The Netherlands, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment

Street/P.O.Box: Rijnstraat 8,
Building:
City: Hague
State/Region:
Postcode/ZIP: 2515 GX
Country: The Netherlands
Telephone: +31 (0) 70 339 34 56
FAX:
E-Mail: Ferry.vanhagen@minvrom.nl
URL: www.international.vrom.nl
Represented by:
Title:
Salutation: Mr
page 61
Last Name: van Hagen

Middle Name:
First Name: Ferry
Department:
Mobile:
Direct FAX:
Direct tel:
Personal E-Mail:
page 62
Annex 2
INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING
No ODA funds will be used will be used for this project.
page 63
Annex 3
BASELINE INFORMATION
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INDONESIAN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW)
Working landfills have a number of problems associated with them. The problems are associated with
technical, financial, environmental, social and institutional aspects of the landfills. To effectively and
efficiently overcome these problems a holistic approach to developing solutions is required.
The impact of these aspects varies markedly depending upon the income levels and socio-economic
factors of individual countries or cities. Higher per capita income levels in developed countries allows for
the financial means to maintain appropriate collection systems and landfill management. The generally
higher education levels of the population in developed countries also provide the support for
implementation of waste minimization programs, public education and strict environmental regulations.
Industrialisation and socio-economic factors also play a major role in the generation and composition of
MSW.
The data in Table 6 clearly demonstrates the difference in the composition of MSW between high and low
per capita income cities in Indonesia. The more economically developed cities such as Jakarta and
Surabaya display similar composition of MSW as industrialized countries e.g. increase in the percentage
of paper and plastics and a decrease in the putrescible matter component of the municipal solid waste.
Data captured during the per capita survey in the JICA (1993) Surabaya study (Table 7) demonstrates this
trend between high and low per capita households.
Another important aspect of MSW generation in Indonesia is demonstrated in Figure 8, the source and
percentage of MSW generation, households having by far the largest impact on SWM (JICA 1993). It is
this combination of high organic waste component and the source of generation that leads to the issues of
MSW impacts on society, the environment, local governments and the choice of appropriate solutions.
Table 8 provide a typical example of solid waste generation sources, composition and growth predictions
over time in Indonesia. This data is taken from a study (JICA 1994) in the Municipality of Makassar,
South Sulawesi. The prediction from the study is that as the city develops the composition of the
municipal solid waste will move closer to that of more industrialized countries e.g. increase in the
percentage of paper and plastics and a decrease in the putrescible matter component of the municipal solid
waste.
Importantly, a positive impact derived from the current SWM systems in under-developed countries and
economies in transition is the high level of recycling of the non-organic component of MSW. Although
the methods employed for sorting and separation of MSW in these countries are considered inappropriate
for solid waste management systems, as defined by developed countries, these existing method not only
provide an income stream to the hundreds of thousand people involved in this unofficial sector but also
ensure a far greater amount of MSW generated is recycled. The added benefits of this are a reduction in
potentially harmful / toxic material being disposed of in landfill and an increase in the organic content of
the landfills.
page 64
Table 6 MSW Composition Comparisons
% Composition of Indonesian Cities
Pontianak Bogor Makassar Depok Tangerang Bekasi Surabaya DKI

West West Java South West Java West Java West Java East Java Jakarta
(5)
Kalimantan Sulawesi (3) (5) (5) (5) (2) (1)
(4)
Material Population
8,900,000
482,365 1,206,453 1,323,622 1,475,672 1,598,216 2,099,292 2,692,503 to
13,000,000
Wood 1.5 1.22 5.7 7.09 0.95 - 5.0 0.07
Paper 5.0 6.0 10.71 3.28 5.81 8.0 13.3 20.57
Organic (Food
83.0 72.9 65.96 61.08 78.99 72.45 65.6 55.37
& Garden)
Textile 0.1 1.9 4.05 1.88 0.63 1.0 1.8 0.61
Plastic 6.0 11.1 8.24 13.07 10.88 9.0 9.0 13.25
Glass 2.1 2.1 2.14 0.58 1.48 1.0 1.0 1.91
Metal 2.0 1.7 1.49 0.66 0.84 2.0 1.0 1.06
Other 0.3 3.08 1.71 12.36 0.42 6.55 3.3 7.16
Total Organic 90% 82% 86% 73% 86% 81% 86% 77%
1. Dinas Kebersihan DKI Jakarta, WJEMP 2005

2. JICA- 1993
3. JICA - 1996
4. Dinas Kebersihan dan Pertamanan, Kota Pontianak, 2006
5. .Rencana Pengelolaan Persampahan Kota Bekasi Tahun 2006 – 2010 (WJEMP 2005)
page 65
Table 7 Per Capita Waste Generation – Surabaya, East Java

Unit Waste Discharge by Weight
Household (kg/cap./day) Market Commercial
Season
High Middle Low Average kg/m2/day kg/shop/day
Rainy Season 0.83 0.77 0.48 0.50 0.93 3.2
Dry Season 0.72 0.60 0.40 0.45 0.72 2.7
Unit Waste Discharge by Volume

Household (litre/cap./day) Market Commercial
Season
High Middle Low Average litre/m2/day litre/shop/day
Rainy Season 4.35 2.60 1.43 1.60 2.64 18.8
Dry Season 2.86 2.49 1.24 1.50 2.60 17.1
Source: JICA, Main Report 1993, pp 1-31
Figure 8 Source of MSW Generation – Surabaya, East Java
% of MSW by Generator
2%
8%
79%
11%
Household
Street & Open Spaces
Markets
Commercial & Industry
Table 8 Future Solid Waste Composition of Domestic Waste in Makassar, South Sulawesi
Wet base composition 1994 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
page 66
(%)
Combustible
Paper 10.31 10.71 12.71 14.71 16.71 18.71
Textile 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81
Plastic 7.94 8.24 9.74 11.24 12.74 14.24
Rubber & Leather 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Wood 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Putrescible matter 66.76 65.96 61.96 57.96 53.96 49.96
Other (over 5mm) 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74 4.74
Other (under 5mm) 3.24 3.24 3.24 3.24 3.24 3.24
Sub-total 94.83 94.73 94.23 93.73 93.23 92.73
Non combustible
Metal 1.39 1.49 1.99 2.49 2.99 3.49
Glass 2.14 2.14 2.14 2.14 2.14 2.14
Ceramic 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
Stone 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Sub-total 5.17 5.27 5.77 6.27 6.77 7.27
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Moisture content (%) 58.32 58.02 56.52 55.02 53.52 52.02
Ash content (%) 13.52 13.42 12.92 12.42 11.92 11.42
Organic (%) 28.20 28.56 30.56 32.56 34.56 36.56
Lower calorific value
917 937 1036 1135 1234 1333
(Kcal/kg)
Bulk Density (tonne/m3) 0.265 0.260 0.247 0.232 0.217 0.202
Source: JICA 1994
Definition of parameters used for project modelling

Total MSWT and Fraction of MSWF disposed of:
page 67
Insitu waste
a. The insitu waste volumes of TPA Batu Layang Pontianak have been calculated from waste
collection data,
b. The landfill capacity has been taken from design documents for TPA Batu Layang,
c. The methane generation model adjusts (increase in tonnes per cubic metre) the current tonnage
due to the effect of decomposition and settlement since the original dumping.
Municipal Solid Waste Generation
a. A number of MSW generation rates have been calculated in various studies;
JICA (1996) 0.70 kg/capita/day for Makassar

The World Bank (1999) 0.86 kg/capita/day for Pontianak
The World Bank (1999) 0.76 kg/capita/day for Indonesia
A conservative generation rate of 0.80 kg/capita/day has been used to forecast future waste
generation for the city of Pontianak.
b. Historical population figures have been sourced from various studies and government statistical
publication. Current population has been taken from 2006 population data of the Municipal
Government of Pontianak, forecast population growth for the City of Pontianak is calculated on
a continued growth of 2.76% per annum,
c. Current disposal rates are based on government calculation on the daily haulage capacity of
their truck fleet.
d. Future collection/disposal services are forecast to improve to a maximum of 80% during the life
of this project due to improved waste management brought about by this project.
Figure 9 Historical and Forecast MSW Generation and Disposal

Kota Pontianak - MSW Generation & Collection Service
800
Municipal Solid Waste (tonne
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
96
98
00
02
04
06
08
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Year
MSW Generation Growth per day Collection Service
page 68
Table 9 Waste Generation and Disposal Forecast
page 69
Methane Correction Factor (MCF)
a. TPA Batu Layang had been designed for controlled dumping with cell heights to a maximum of
10 metres. Currently two cells ready for closure have a high above road level of approximately 8
metres. Under this project it is proposed to implement and or improve landfill management,
which will result in improved operational management and limiting other environmental impacts.
IPCC (1996) classifies such landfill as Managed with a MCF of 1.0. This value for MCF is used
in this proposal.
Degradable Organic Carbon (DOC)
a. Current research into Indonesian MSW (Butler 2005) the proportion that is normally
classified as Food/Putresibles (fast decomposition) includes a percentage of non-wood
waste such as; coconuts, bamboo, rattan and other, all of which have high lignin/cellulose
ration and therefore a slower rate of decomposition. This is reflected in the DOC = 0.187
used in this project.
% DOC (Degradable
% Composition Composition DOC % of Organic Carbon) kg
Material
(Pontianak) of Total fresh waste per kg of fresh
Organics organic waste
W ood* 1.5% 1.7% 0.30 0.005
Paper 5.0% 5.6% 0.40 0.022

Organic (Food &
76.0% 84.8% 0.16 0.136
Garden)
Coconut,
7.0% 7.8% 0.30 0.023
Bamboo,Rattan#
Textile 0.1% 0.1% 0.40 0.000
Total Organics (kg) 89.6% 100.0%

* Excludes lignin
Total DOC (kg) 0.187
# Estimated % of Food & Garden
Fraction of Degradable Organic Carbon Dissimilated (DOCf)
a. This proposal uses the default value of 0.77 in the IPCC (1996) rather than the suggested value in
the IPCC (2000) of between 0.50 – 0.60. Climatic conditions and the internal anaerobic
environment have a major impact on process of decomposition of organic carbon. Indonesian
page 70
landfills are typically highly saturated and maintain thermophillic conditions (40 – 60oC) over
long periods of time (Butler 2005) providing optimal conditions for anaerobic decomposition of
even the most recalcitrant organic carbons such as lignin and lignocelluloses. Research undertake
on a number of landfills in the USA (Boda 2002) indicates decomposition of lignin within
landfills. This is supported by analysis (Butler 2005) of coconut core fibre (high lignin) removed
from the Makassar landfill after 8 years in an anaerobic environment that shows a loss of
structural strength of the fibre, therefore improving the accessibility of anaerobic bacteria to the
organic carbons.
b. The formula for calculating DOCf (organic carbon which is dissimilated minus that which is
assimilated into microbial cell material) is given as DOCf = 0.014T + 0.28 (Tabasaran 1982)
where T is the internal temperature of the landfill. As temperatures increase so does the rate that
organic carbon is dissimilated, reducing that which is assimilated (Bingemer and Crutzen 1987).
In addition the assimilated carbon remains available for dissimilation in the long term as the
microbes die. The IPCC (1996) uses an internal landfill temperature of 35oC to calculate the
default value of 0.77. .
c. As previously mentioned, data collected from various Indonesian landfills (Butler 2005) indicate
much higher temperatures are maintain for long periods. The effect on the DOCf value using a
constant internal temperature of 40oC is a DOCf = 0.84, hence the use of 0.77 is considered as a
conservative DOCf value for Indonesian landfills.
Fraction of Methane (CH4) in Landfill Gas (LFG) ( WCH4Baseline )
a. Methane gas composition 50% is typical given for landfill gas concentrations as per the
default given in the IPCC (1996). This default figure is used in this study due to complex
nature of anaerobic decomposition within landfills.
Methane Recovery ( RE )
a. The methane recovery (RE) value for this project has been estimated at 50% of the methane
theoretically generated after 10% loss due to natural oxidation. Except for the first two cells,
which will have been closed prior to the project implementation, all additional cells will be
constructed to allow for maximum methane recovery.
Oxidation Factor (OX)
a. The IPCC (2000) provides advice that landfill management affects the oxidation factor, well-
managed landfills using OX = 0.1 whilst less well managed landfills would have an OX closer to
zero. Due to the many uncertainties associated with Oxidation Factor this proposal uses the IPCC
(2000) default of 0.1.
Methane Generation Rate Constant (k)
a. The methane generation rate constant (k) represents the time taken for the DOC of the organic
waste to degrade to half of its initial mass (half-life or t1/2).
page 71
b. Whilst there are many factors that affect the rate of organic degradation (such as moisture
content, temperature, size, landfill management etc) the rate of degradation is largely dependent
upon the lignin composition of the organic waste, as lignin creates a physical and chemical barrier
to microbial attack (Boda 2002), inhibiting degradation of enclosed cellulose and hemicellulose.
Food waste, having low lignin contents, degrades rapidly 1 to 3 years whilst high lignin content
organics (wood, coconut husks, some paper) takes between 25 to 50 years to degrade.
c. The k value calculated for this proposal takes into account the differing degradation rates of the
organic waste and the percentage of the three types within the organic waste stream in Indonesia
(Butler 2005), resulting in a weighted average for k of 0.116.
k values % of Total
W aste Type Years (T) # Averaged k value
(Ln2/T 1/2 ) * Organics
Readily Degradable 3 0.201 42.4% 8.511
Moderately Degradable 10 0.060 48.0% 2.889
Slowly Degradable 30 0.020 9.6% 0.193
# Pro ject M ethane

adapted from T chobanoglous et al. (1993)
Generatio n Rate Co nstant 0.116
* IP CC (2000)
(k) =
Methane Generation Potential - Lo
The IPCC (2000) gives the following formula for calculating the methane generation potential;
Lo = MCF * DOC * DOCF * F * 16/12 (Gg CH4/Gg waste)
Where;
MCF = Methane correction factor (fraction)
DOC = Degradable organic carbon [fraction (Gg C/Gg MSW)]
DOCF = Fraction DOC dissimilated
F = Fraction by volume of CH4 in landfill gas
New Waste Lo = 1.0 * 0.187* 0.77 * 0.5 * 16/12

= 0.096Gg C/Gg MSW or
= 0.134 m3/kg
The project Methane Generation Potential (Lo) of 0.134 m3/kg is considered conservative as temperature
measurements in the anaerobic zone of Indonesian landfills are constantly in excess of 45 oC.
The following calculations illustrate the increase in methane generation potential based upon internal
temperature higher then the IPCC default of 350C.
page 72
The amount of carbon available for biogas formation (DOCf) is be calculated from the following
equation:
Coe/Co = 0.014T + 0.28 (Bingemer and Crutzen, 1987; p.2181).
Where;
Coe is the amount of carbon available for biogas formation,
Co is the total amount of carbon (DOC), and
T is the temperature
Coe/Co = DOCf
At an internal temperature of 40 oC in the anaerobic zone of a landfill
Coe/Co = 0.014 x 40 x 0.28 = 0.84
That is, 0.91 per cent of the carbon is available for biogas formation. As the project Co is equal to
0.194 kilograms, therefore:
Coe = 0.841 x 0.187 = 0.157 kg of waste
Of the total amount of carbon per kilogram of the waste, 0.157 kilograms of carbon is available to
form biogas.
For the preliminary calculation, assuming that all of this carbon is converted to methane, and using
the fact that the molecular weight of methane is 16 comprising 12 units of carbon and 4 units of
hydrogen, then for each kilogram of waste:
Quantity of methane = 16 / 12 x 0.157 = 0.209 kg / kg of waste
Lo value when taking account of high internal temperatures = 0.150 m3 / kg of waste
Methane Gas Generation Forecasts
The Landfill Recovery Model (LRM) (Butler 2005) used to predict methane generation and
abatement/avoidance from landfill organic recovery uses the IPCC (1996) First-Order Decay Model –
Equation 4;
QT,x = kRxLoe-k(T-x)
Where;
QT, x = the amount of methane generated in the current year (T) by the waste Rx
k = methane generation rate constant (1/yr)
Rx = the amount of waste disposed in year x
T = the current year
x = the year of waste input
Calculations for insitu waste rely upon limited historical records for disposal rates as well as opening
and closure years of each zone. A site survey has provided an approximation of volume and mass of
page 73
the insitu waste. The LRM corrects this data to take into account degradation overtime so that
estimations can be calculated for past and future methane generation.
Estimation of future methane generation is based upon current waste generation and disposal data with
forecasts made for waste generation growth and increased waste disposal brought about by
improvements in collection service over time.
Figure 10 and Table 9 provide a summary of estimated methane generation, emissions and abatement
calculated for this project.
page 74
Figure 10 Overview of Potential Baseline Emissions and Abatement 21 project year’s period
page 75
Table 10 Summary of Methane Generation and Abatement
Annex 4
page 76
MONITORING INFORMATION
Overview
The purpose of the Monitoring Plan is to ensure a consistent and transparent management approach is
undertaken for monitoring, data collection, analyses, data auditing and reporting for the project according
to the requirements of the consolidated monitoring methodology, ACM0001, so as to ensure the accurate
calculation and verification of the project ER’s.
Gas Management Plan
A key operational component of this project will be the development of a Landfill Gas Management
Plan (LFGMP) that provides a framework for the management of landfill gas based on the site
characteristics and the nature and extent of the gas control system. This project’s LFGMP will be
developed according to the UK EPA guidance standards,
¾ Environment Agency (2004), Guidance on the management of landfill gas. Environment

Agency, Bristol.
¾ Environment Agency (2002), Guidance on the flaring of landfill gas. Environment Agency,
Bristol.
¾ Environment Agency (2004), Guidance for monitoring enclosed landfill gas flares.
Environment Agency, Bristol.
¾ Environment Agency (2004), Guidance for monitoring landfill gas engine emissions.
Environment Agency, Bristol.
The LFGMP will provide a clear and auditable route-map setting out the methods, procedures and actions
to be implemented at the site for the duration of the project. The key elements covered will be:
• risk assessment,
• control measures,
• operational procedures,
• monitoring plan,
• action plan,
• aftercare and completion plan.
These elements will provide the project with operational guidance, procedures and practices to fulfill the
following project objectives:
• bring together all aspects of gas management considered during the risk assessment and proposed
operational controls;
• provide an estimate of gas production;
• set out performance criteria for the gas control measures;
• set out the design objectives and principles for the gas control measures;
page 77
• set out the methods of implementing site-specific gas management systems to:
– prevent the migration of and control any release of landfill gas
– minimise the impact on local air quality
– minimise the contribution to climate change
– control the release of odorants
– minimise the risk of accidents
– prevent harm to human health
• set out the installation criteria and construction quality assurance procedures for the gas control
measures;
• set out the procedures and responsibilities for installation, operation, maintenance and monitoring
of the gas control measures;
• demonstrate that performance of the control measures meets the requirements and objectives for
gas management;
• set out the procedures for managing changes and reviewing the performance of the gas control
system.
Relevant component of the LFGMP are as follows;
Monitoring and sampling plan

The monitoring and sampling plan is an integral part of the overall Gas Management Plan. It allows the
performance of the gas management system to be established and assessed against the conceptual site
model and provides for developments of the model.
The monitoring and sampling plan is to include as a minimum:

• a schedule for specific data collection and frequency of monitoring at all stages of the site (i.e.
prior to site development to obtain background data and beyond the closure of the site to
demonstrate site completion);
• a layout showing the construction and location of monitoring points in relation to the site,
surrounding area, geology, and phasing of operation;
• a description of the measurement techniques and sampling strategy;
• an analysis and testing schedule;
• a methodology for data storage, retrieval and presentation;
• the background and action/trigger values against which collected data will be evaluated;
• the methodology for data interpretation, review and reporting;
• the means of communicating the results of the monitoring and interpretation to the Validator.
Action plan
The Gas Management Plan must set out the actions to be taken by the operator as a result of:
any abnormal changes observed in collected monitoring data;
• all identified operational problems or failure of the gas control system established as part of the
routine inspection or maintenance programme;
• a reported event, e.g. an odour complaint.
Remedial actions
page 78
Where a deficiency is identified, either via routine monitoring, inspection, maintenance or failure of
elements of the gas management system, then appropriate measures need to be identified. An appropriate
remediation time-scale will be prescribed in the LFGMP.
Emergency procedures and protocols

Significant events identified at the risk assessment stage, which result in either an unacceptable level of
risk or which are an extraordinary occurrence, should be identified as emergency scenarios. Specific
procedures will be set out to manage these events, including the immediate actions required.
page 79
REFERENCES;
Barlaz, M.A., (1988), Microbial and chemical dynamics during refuse decomposition
in a simulated sanitary landfill, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Barlaz, M. A., Ham R. K., and Schaefer D. M (1989) Mass balance analysis of anaerobically
decomposed refuse in laboratory scale lysimeters. J. Environmental Eng. 115:1088-1102
Barlaz, M. A., Eleazer, W. E., Odle, W.S. (1997). Biodegradation Analysis of Municipal Solid
Waste in Lab-Scale Landfills. EPA/600/SR-97/071, USEPA, Cincinnati, OH.
Bingemer, H.G., and Crutzen, P.J., (1987), The Production of Methane from Solid Waste,
2181-2187pp, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 92, NO. D2, Febuary 20, 1987, 2181pp
Boda, B., 2002, Evaluation of Stability Parameters for Landfills – Thesis, Faculty of
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA
Bookter, T.J., and Ham, R.K., (1982), Stabilizations of solid waste in landfills, Journal
of Environmental Engineering 108:1089-1100.
Butler, K, et al, (2000), Landfill Resource Recovery Feasibility Study – Makassar,

South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Municipality of Makassar and the International Centre for
Application of Solar Energy (CASE), Perth, Australia.
Butler, K, (2001), Landfill Resource Recovery Feasibility Study – Bantargebang

Landfill Jakarta, West Java, Indonesia, International Centre for Application of Solar
Energy (CASE), Perth, Australia and the Municipality of Bekasi, West Java,
Indonesia.
Butler, K, and Lee, Siak Ku, (2002), Municipal Solid Waste Management – Bapedalda
East Java Institutional Strengthening, AusAID, Australia.
Butler, K, et. al. (2004), Landfill Resource Recovery Feasibility Study – Keputih
Landfill Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia, Black Earth Resources Pty Ltd, Perth,
Australia.
Butler, K,. (2004), Landfill Resource Recovery Feasibility Study – Maroangin Landfill
Palopo, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Municipal Government of Palopo.
Butler, K, (2005), Municipal Solid Waste Management through Organic Waste

Resource Recovery in Indonesia - A Study (Draft).
page 80
Daniel David E. ed., (1993) Geotechnical Practices for Waste Disposal – Chapter 6,
Chapman & Hall, London. ISBN 0 412 35170 6
Energy Strategies and George Wilkenfeld & Associates, (2000), Workbook for
calculating greenhouse gas reductions from projects using renewable energy (2000)
rev. ed. International Greenhouse Partnerships Office, Dept. of Industry, Science and
Resources. IGP Office, Canberra, Australia.
Hater, G. et. al., (2004), Landfills as Bioreactors: Research at the Outer Loop Landfill,
Louisville, Kentucky First Interim Report EPA/600/R-03/097, USEPA, Louisville,
Kentucky.
IPCC (1996), Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories – Revised, Chapter
6
IPCC, (2000), Good Practices Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National

Greenhouse Inventories – Chapter 5
IPCC (2006), Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
JICA (1996), Master plan and feasibility study on wastewater and solid waste management for
the City of Ujung Pandang in the Republic of Indonesia : Final report. Main report part I;
master plan, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Tokyo, Japan.
JICA (1993), The Study on the Solid Waste Management Improvement for Surabaya City in
the Republic of Indonesia, Main Report (Draft) February, Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA), Tokyo, Japan.
Kanoksak, E., Wetherill, T., and Boonma, P., (2003), Landfill Gas Generation and Recovery
in Thailand, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Marchaim, Uri Migal, (1992), Biogas processes for sustainable development, Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Parkin, G.F., and Owen,W.F., (1986), Journal of Environmental Engineering ASCE, 112(5),
867.
Tabasaran, O., (1982) Abfallbeseitigung und Abfallwirtschaft, 280pp., VD1 Verlag,

Dusseldorf, 1982
World Bank (1999), What A Waste: Solid Waste Management in Asia, The World Bank,
Washington D.C., USA
page 81

Report of Project Design of Kalimantan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report of Project Design of Kalimantan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.

CDM – Executive Board page 1

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

A. General description of project activity

B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period

Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity

Annex 2: Information regarding public funding

Annex 3: Baseline information

Annex 4: Monitoring plan

CDM – Executive Board page 2

SECTION A. General description of project activity

A.1 Title of the project activity:

Version 02.00 Date of Version: 21 May 2007

Pontianak_Ver5-01-03 CDM_PDD_Ver03 ACM0001 Ver 5.doc

A.2. Description of the project activity:

1. Contribute to the global abatement of greenhouse gas emissions,

CDM – Executive Board page 3

approximately 400,000 tonne of MSW by the end of 2006.

1. Residents native to the area, and

A.3. Project participants:

CDM – Executive Board page 4

The Municipal Government of the

A.4. Technical description of the project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the project activity:

A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies):

The Republic of Indonesia

A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.:

West Kalimantan, Indonesia

A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc:

Kota Pontianak, Desa Batu Layung

A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the unique

CDM – Executive Board page 5

Figure 1 Project Location Map

A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:

A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 6

CDM – Executive Board page 7

Table 1 Estimated Project Emission Reductions

Annual average over the 91,814

A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:

CDM – Executive Board page 8

No ODA funds will be used for this project.

CDM – Executive Board page 9

SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

a) The captured gas is flared; or

CDM – Executive Board page 10

Table 2 Project GHG Emissions

CDM – Executive Board page 11

Figure 2 Project Boundary Definition

CDM – Executive Board page 12

Sub-step 1a. Define alternatives to the project activity:

Alternative 1 Continuation of the current landfill operational and management practices;

CDM – Executive Board page 13

Sub-step 1b. Enforcement of applicable laws and regulations:

Relevant Indonesian Comment Extract of Relevant Section

CDM – Executive Board page 14

Relevant Indonesian Comment Extract of Relevant Section

Regulation Regarding An Environmental Impact

Decree Concerning Guidelines Definitions A significant impact shall mean

Law Concerning Environmental management

CDM – Executive Board page 15