Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Guide
July 2007
VESDA
Preface
Xtralis has produced this Design Guide as a reference, to be consulted when designing and specifying VESDA fire protection solutions for Clean Rooms of all sizes. There is a significant fire risk within such environments due to the high volume of electrical equipment, continuous air supply, operation of fully automated processes and presence of flammable/explosive substances. In addition to the fire risk, smoke detection is made more difficult by air movement caused by the forced ventilation required to maintain the sterile environment. In this Design Guide we will discuss the relevant design considerations and make recommendations regarding the most effective way in which to install a VESDA solution in the particular Clean Room environment for which it is being designed. The majority of Clean Rooms are typically found in the following facilities: Semiconductor manufacturing plants. Electronic device manufacturing plants. Pharmaceutical processing plants. Research and development laboratories. The information contained in this Design Guide should be used in conjunction with specific local fire codes and standards as well as the guidelines provided in the VESDA System Design Manual[1]. Where applicable, other regional industry practices should also be adhered to.
Important Note:
VESDA
ii
VESDA
Contents
1. Background Information ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2. 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. 4. Fire Safety Considerations in Clean Rooms ................................................................................. 1 Performance-Based Design .......................................................................................................... 1 Key Design Considerations........................................................................................................... 2 Why Use VESDA Smoke Detection?............................................................................................ 3 Levels Of Protection...................................................................................................................... 4 The Effects Of Airflow ................................................................................................................... 5 Detector Coverage Comparisons.................................................................................................. 5
Fab Area Ceiling Protection.................................................................................................................... 6 Under Floor Void (UFV) Protection ........................................................................................................ 7 4.1 4.2 Perforated Floor Void Protection................................................................................................... 8 Solid Floor Void Protection............................................................................................................ 9 Under Waffle Slab (UWS) Ceiling Protection.............................................................................. 11 Dry Coils/Return Air Vent Protection...........................................................................................14 Ancillary High Risk Area Protection ............................................................................................15
5.
6. 7.
Air Handling Unit (AHU) Protection ..................................................................................................... 16 Object Protection ................................................................................................................................... 17 7.1 7.2 VESDA OEM Solution................................................................................................................. 17 Utilities And Process Tool Protection.......................................................................................... 17
8. 9.
Truss And Ceiling Void Protection ...................................................................................................... 18 PROACTIV Fire Protection System ...................................................................................................... 18 9.1 9.2 Single Site Monitoring ................................................................................................................. 19 Multiple Site Monitoring............................................................................................................... 19
10. Commissioning, Service and Maintenance.........................................................................................20 Appendix VESDA Smoke Thresholds Set-up Procedure For Clean Rooms ........................................ 21 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 23
iii
VESDA
iv
VESDA
1.
1.1
Background Information
Fire Safety Considerations in Clean Rooms
The major fire risks and detection difficulties within Clean Rooms arise as a result of the following: Utility and process tool equipment faults. Electrical faults in cabling or other electrical and electronic equipment. The Over Head Transport (OHT) System. The presence of large amounts of flammable and explosive materials. Potential rapid fire growth resulting from the delayed control of forced ventilation. Rapid fire spread as a result of the air circulation used to filter out pollutants. Air movement dilution of and interference with the normal dispersion of smoke (Figure 1), making its detection by conventional technologies extremely difficult.
High air velocity smoke distribution. Figure 1 Examples of the way in which different air velocities affect the dispersion of smoke.
Important Note:
It is recommended that smoke tests or Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models be used to determine the optimum arrangement of the VESDA sampling pipes, based on predicted smoke movement paths with reference to the above risks.
1.2
Performance-Based Design
The unique environments within Clean Rooms present a challenge to both early and reliable fire detection. There is a high likelihood that detection system performance will be dependent on air change rate, air velocity in the particular area and the geometry of the area to be protected. The flexibility of Performance-Based Design, while still following rigorous engineering processes, allows the fire protection system to be tailored to the specific requirements of each individual applications environment, with the commercial drivers to manage the risks.
VESDA
Detector spacing or, for a VESDA pipe, sampling hole spacing is traditionally dictated by local prescriptive codes and standards. In a more performance-based approach, each installation is assessed according to its specific environmental conditions. Sampling hole spacing and location can then be altered easily to suit the particular performance requirements The Performance-Based Design approach is widely used since it can provide evidence to justify divergence from prescriptive requirements, particularly in cases where there are practical limitations or a need for an improved level of fire protection. There are some specific guidelines for the use of Performance-Based Design and risk management concepts. Examples of these codes and standards are listed below: International Fire Engineering Guidelines (Edition 2005)[2]. British Standard BS 7974[3]. SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection[4]. AS/NZ 4360 Risk Management Standard[5]. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering Third Edition[6].
Performance-Based fire protection solutions can be made to comply with local and national codes and standards for buildings and life safety. Assessments of the environmental risks and performance requirements, specific to the particular Datacom Facility, are conducted as part of the design process. Note: The SFPE Code Officials Guide to Performance-Based Design Review[7] is also a very good source of information for Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs) reviewing and assessing a VESDA system design for a Clean Room.
1.3
3. 4. 5.
VESDA
Important Note:
The arrangement of process tools and other equipment will affect the speed and direction of the airflow. It is strongly recommended, therefore, that performance tests be conducted once the system is installed. All such tests should be carried out with the full cooperation of the facilities safety officers.
1.4
The Very Early Warning Fire Detection (VEWFD) capability of the VESDA system allows it to minimize the risks, discussed in section 1.1, and combat the detection difficulties caused by air movement in the following ways: VESDA detectors can be configured as both early warning and very early warning devices, thus, if both are required only one technology need be installed. A VESDA system can detect fires very early, at the incipient (smoldering) stage. This provides staff with an opportunity to investigate and take action, before the smoke contamination can irreversibly damage process tools or the products being manufactured. The very early warning capability of the VESDA system also minimizes the rapid fire growth and spread facilitated by the high air movement. Since the security precautions necessary to ensure the maintenance of the sterile environment within the Clean Room also complicate evacuation, very early warning will allow more time to execute an evacuation. A VESDA system has a better chance of detecting smoke that has been diluted than conventional point (spot) type smoke detectors. This is due to the fact that air collected by several sampling holes, at different locations within the protected area, is being analyzed simultaneously by the same detector (aggregated sampling effect). A VESDA system actively draws air into its sampling holes which increases the chance of smoke being detected. Passive smoke detectors rely on smoke reaching them via diffusion or using the thermal energy of the fire. Thus the detection of smoke by passive detectors would be less likely where air movement is being artificially directed as well as being cooled. There is a comparatively low incidence of nuisance alarms with a VESDA system; a feature which will minimize the possibility of unnecessary evacuations. In cases where fire suppression is to be included, as part of the overall fire protection system, the VESDA detectors wide sensitivity range of 0.005 to 20%Obs/m (0.0015 to 6%Obs/ft) means that appropriate alarm thresholds can be set for both early detection and, at a later stage in the fire event, the activation of the suppression release mechanisms.
VESDA
2.
2.1
(VEWFD) (VEWFD)
(EWFD) (EWFD)
The VESDA Fire alarm levels can be set to provide sampling hole sensitivities equivalent to point (spot) type smoke detectors. The Alert and Action alarm levels are used as part of the emergency procedure controlled from the local Emergency Response Centre.
VESDA
2.2
The average air velocity, in the locations listed above, can usually be obtained from the Mechanical Services designers before beginning the Fire Protection System design.
2.3
Throughout the remainder of this Design Guide, recommendations regarding the appropriate VESDA detector area of coverage and sampling hole spacing will be provided. Table 3 illustrates the relationships between detector coverage and the factors listed above for VEWFD in comparison to EWFD.
VESDA
Table 3 Comparison of the factors affecting detector area of coverage for VEWFD and EWFD. Factor Level of Protection Detector area of Coverage Air Velocity Sampling Hole Spacing Maximum Transport Time VEWFD VERY High Smaller Higher Reduced Shorter EWFD High Larger Lower Increased Longer
It is clear from the information presented in Table 3 that as the air velocity within the protected area increases, all other factors must be decreased in order to achieve VEWFD. Important Note: All pipe network designs should be verified by Xtraliss Pipe Network Modelling Tool, ASPIRE2TM. This program will also determine which VESDA model (LaserFOCUS, LaserCOMPACT, LaserPLUS or LaserSCANNNER) would be most suited to the protection of a particular area.
3.
Figure 2 Illustration of a typical Fab area in a Clean Room. Circulating air, introduced through the ceiling and removed through the floor, will dilute smoke and affect its dispersion pattern. Therefore, in comparison to conventional point (spot) type smoke detectors, ceiling mounted VESDA sampling pipes are a reliable and effective way of detecting smoke under these circumstances. Note: The sampling pipe network can be placed directly on the ceiling below the FFUs with the sampling holes facing downward.
The VESDA system is designed to replace point (spot) type smoke detectors. Recommended detector coverage, for a single VESDA detectors pipe network, is 500 m2 (5,400 sq.ft) (Figure 3) with a sampling hole spacing of 6 m (20 ft). An increase from low to medium air velocity requires no alteration in the area of coverage of VESDA detectors due to the aggregation effect caused by smoke entering a greater number of sampling holes when it is moved around more rapidly.
VESDA
600
6 m x 6 m (20 ft x 20 ft) spacing
6000 5000
500 400 300 200 100 FFU Air Velocity (m/s - fpm) 0 0.15 / 30 0.3 / 60 1.2 / 240 2.4 / 470 0
Figure 3 Recommended detector coverage for ceiling mounted sampling pipes in the Fab area. Important Note: Since all Fab areas vary with respect to layout and specifications, an assessment of each should be conducted to determine factors such as air change rate, equipment location etc as part of the design process.
Note:
Future Clean Rooms are expected to have higher Fab and Sub-fab area ceilings. This will make the VESDA systems VEWFD capabilities even more crucial.
4.
VESDA Coverage (m 2)
VESDA
4.1
600
6 m x 6 m (20 ft x 20 ft) spacing
FFU Air Velocity (m/s - fpm) 0 0.15 / 30 0.3 / 60 1.2 / 240 2.4 / 470 0
Figure 5 Recommended detector coverage, for different average air velocities, in an UFV with a perforated floor void.
VESDA
Both detector area of coverage and sampling hole spacing are reduced as average air velocity increases, to maintain high VESDA detection performance. The sampling pipe network is positioned 0.8 m (2.6 ft) beneath the ceiling of the UFV to ensure adequate mixing of smoke. Important Note: In general, it is acceptable for sampling holes to face in the same direction as the airflow. However, in cases where the airflow characteristics are likely to vary, it is necessary to orientate the sampling holes at an angle of 30 to the direction of airflow. This neutralizes pressure difference effects at the sampling holes.
If conventional point (spot) type smoke detectors are being used to protect the Fab ceiling in a high airflow environment (FFU average air velocity of > 1.2 m/s (240 fpm)), the area of coverage per VESDA detector and sampling hole spacing within the UFV must be reduced to provide VEWFD. Detector coverage should be between 200 and 300 m2 (2,100 3,200 sq.ft)); sampling hole spacing being 4 m (13 ft). Under these circumstances, the VESDA system should still detect Fab area fire events which would not be detected by point (spot) type smoke detectors mounted on the Fab ceiling. Note: Due to the limited space within the UFV, the use of continuous, flexible HDPE piping is recommended to avoid interference with equipment foundations and hookup piping/ducting. When using this type of material, compression or electric fusion joints are necessary.
4.2
Figure 6 Air sampling in a Fab with a solid UFV. For a single VESDA detector, the recommended areas of coverage relative to the average air velocity, measured at the FFU in an UFV with a solid floor void, are shown (Figure 7).
VESDA
VESDA Coverage (m 2)
500 400 300 200 100 FFU Air Velocity (m/s - fpm) 0 0.3 / 60 0.6 / 120 1.2 / 240 2.4 / 470
4 m x 4 m (13 ft x 13 ft) spacing
Figure 7 - Recommended detector coverage, for different average air velocities, in an UFV with a solid floor void. The area of coverage per VESDA detector varies with the average air velocity to ensure the optimum detection performance. Due to the airflow pattern within the UFV, sampling holes are arranged in a zigzag or alternating manner as shown (Figure 8) to maximize coverage.
Sampling Hole
Return Air
Figure 8 Zigzag or alternating arrangement of sampling holes in a Fab with a solid UFV.
10
6000
VESDA
5.
Figure 9 Illustration of a Sub-fab area. The next two sections contain recommendations on detection methods suited to the protection of a number of features common to Sub-fab areas.
5.1
11
VESDA
700
6 m x 6 m (20 ft x 20 ft) spacing
7000 6000
VESDA Coverage (sq.ft)
VESDA Coverage (m 2)
600 500
6 m x 6 m (20 ft x 20 ft) spacing
FFU Air Velocity (m/s - fpm) 0 0.15 / 30 0.3 / 60 0.6 / 120 1.2 / 240 2.4 / 470 0
Figure 10 - Recommended detector coverage, for different average air velocities, on the ceiling of a Sub-fab area. In order to provide VEWFD, special consideration is required in the case of Sub-fab areas where the airflow at various points varies significantly. For example, at the centre of the Sub-fab area air movement may only be slight. Conversely, next to the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent the airflow would be high in comparison to that at the centre of the Sub-fab area. When designing a VESDA system to cover the entire floor space under the waffle slab (Figure 11), where the FFU measured average air velocity is 2 m/s (394 fpm), the following applies: Each VESDA detector should cover an area no larger than 500 m2 (5,400 sq.ft). Sampling hole spacing should be no more than 6 m (20 ft). All equipment and other objects must be a distance of at least 5 m (16 ft) from the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent (D1 in Figure 11). Any closer than D1 would place objects in the region where smoke detection is most difficult. Unless otherwise stated, by local codes and standards, VESDA sampling pipes should be no further from the walls than D2 (Figure 11), that is, 5 m (16 ft).
12
VESDA
Dry Coils
Figure 11 VESDA detector coverage on the ceiling of a Sub-fab area where the average air velocity at the FFU is 2 m/s (394 fpm). When designing a VESDA system to cover the entire floor space under the waffle slab (Figure 12), where the FFU measured average air velocity is > 2 m/s (394 fpm), the following applies: For normal density coverage, each VESDA detector should cover an area no larger than 500 m2 (5,400 sq.ft). For high density coverage (i.e. close to the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent) each VESDA detector should cover an area no larger than 200 - 250 m2 (2,200 2,700 sq.ft). Sampling hole spacing should be no more than 6 m (20 ft). All equipment and other objects must be a distance of at least 10 m (30 ft) from the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent (D1 in Figure 12). Any closer places objects in the region within which smoke detection is most difficult. Unless otherwise stated, by local codes and standards, VESDA sampling pipes should be no further from the walls than D2 (Figure 12), that is, 5 m (16 ft).
13
VESDA
Figure 12 VESDA detector coverage on the ceiling of a Sub-fab area where the average air velocity at the FFU is > 2 m/s (394 fpm).
5.2
14
VESDA
The pipe network should be positioned 50 to 200 mm (2 to 8 inches) in front of the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent to minimize the possible adverse effects of the air pressure differences created by turbulent airflow at the surface of the vent. Sampling hole orientation, in cases where the airflow characteristics are likely to vary, should be at an angle of 30 to the direction of airflow. For a single VESDA detector, the recommended areas of coverage (i.e. across the face of the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent) relative to the average air velocity, measured 200 mm (8 inches) in front of the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent, are shown (Figure 14).
90 80
1.2 m x 1.5 m (4 ft x 5 ft) spacing 1.2 m x 1.0 m (4 ft x 3 ft) spacing 1.2 m x 1.0 m (4 ft x 3 ft) spacing
100 0
Figure 14 Recommended detector coverage, for different average air velocities, at the Dry Coils/Return Air Vent in the Sub-fab area.
5.3
VESDA Coverage (m 2)
70
15
VESDA
Figure 15 Example of in/on cabinet air sampling. The protection of such areas as UPS systems and Server Rooms is identical to the protection of any other Datacom Facility; refer to the Xtraliss Telecommunications and Data Processing Facilities Design Guide[10]. Ceiling mounted detection, governed by local codes and standards such as NFPA 72[11], together with Return Air Vent and in/on cabinet monitoring provides an effective fire protection solution. Note: For duct protection, follow the guidelines in Application Note VESDA air sampling in ducts[12].
6.
16
VESDA
7.
7.1
Object Protection
VESDA OEM Solution
When designing for object protection with a VESDA system, the VESDA detector and sampling pipe network are installed on the process tool to be protected. Some manufacturers install VESDA detectors as an optional feature on their equipment. Sampling pipe length should be as short as possible to minimize Transport Time, thereby, increasing the speed of detection. VESDA OEM solutions are usually explicitly designed, in conjunction with the equipment manufacturer, to provide the best possible detection performance for an individual process tool. Solutions can also be designed to meet specific requirements for a particular type of process tool. For more information contact your local Xtralis representative.
7.2
17
VESDA
Figure 17 Example of air sampling inside a process tool cabinet. Note: The manufacturing processes, taking place within this type of equipment, can result in high background levels of debris and process byproducts.
8.
9.
18
VESDA
The PROACTIV system can function as a standalone system or as a networked system. Both configurations are illustrated below.
9.1
9.2
19
VESDA
Figure 19 Example of multiple site integrated monitoring using PROACTIV fire protection systems. For more information about PROACTIV, visit our website at www.xtralis.com or contact your local Xtralis office.
System maintenance should be performed in accordance with local codes and the Clean Room risk management requirements as well as the procedures outlined in the Maintenance section of the VESDA System Design Manual[1].
20
VESDA
Apparatus
The equipment required is as follows: VESDA detector; Sliding Windows High Level Interface (HLI) (VHX-200 ) x 1; PC with VESDA Ssystem Manager (VSM4).
Go to the Device menu and select Start AutoLearn Smoke as shown below.
21
VESDA
Step
Action Enter an AutoLearn period of a minimum of 1 day and then click on the Start button.
5 6
Obtain the Fire alarm threshold upon the completion of the AutoLearn period. Divide the Fire alarm threshold by 10 which will correspond to the average background level in the environment.
Procedure
The steps below need to be followed to set the VESDA smoke alarm thresholds. Step 1 2 3 4 5 Action Obtain the average background level from above. Set the VESDA Alert alarm threshold to the background value plus 0.015%Obs/m (0.005%Obs/ft). Set the VESDA Action alarm threshold to the background value plus 0.03%Obs/m (0.009%Obs/ft). Set the VESDA Fire 1 alarm threshold to the background value plus 0.05%Obs/m (0.015%Obs/ft). Set the VESDA Fire 2 alarm threshold to the background value plus 0.25%Obs/m (0.08%Obs/ft).
22
VESDA
References
[1] Xtralis (2006) VESDA System Design Manual, Ed. 4.5. [2] Australian Government State and Territories of Australia (2005) International Fire Engineering Guidelines. [3] British Government (2001) British Standard BS 7974: Application of Fire Engineering Principles to the Design of Buildings. [4] SFPE (2000) Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design of Buildings [5] Australian Standard AS/NZ 4360 (1999) Risk Management Standard. [6] SFPE (2002) Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd Edition. [7] SFPE & ICC (2004) The Code Officials Guide To Performance-Based Design Review. [8] NFPA (2002) Standard for the Protection of Semiconductor Fabrication Facilities 318. [9] British Government (1989) British Standard BS 5295: Environmental cleanliness in enclosed spaces. General introduction, terms and definitions for clean rooms and clean air devices. [10] Xtralis (2007) Telecommunications & Data Processing Facilities Design Guide, Doc. No. 11782. [11] NFPA (2002) National Fire Alarm Code (72). [12] Xtralis (2004) Application Note: VESDA Air Sampling for Ducts, Doc. No. 10847. [13] Xtralis (2007) Clean Rooms Smoke Test Method, Doc. No. 11509.
23
VESDA
24
www.xtralis.com The Americas +1 781 740 2223 Continental Europe +41 55 285 99 99 Asia +852 2297 2438 UK and the Middle East +44 1442 242 330 Australia and New Zealand +61 3 9936 7000
The contents of this document are provided on an as is basis. No representation or warranty (either express or implied) is made as to the completeness, accuracy or reliability of the contents of this document. The manufacturer reserves the right to change designs or specifications without obligation and without further notice. Except as otherwise provided, all warranties, express or implied, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are expressly excluded. This document includes registered and unregistered trademarks. All trademarks displayed are the trademarks of their respective owners. Your use of this document does not constitute or create a licence or any other right to use the name and/or trademark and/or label. This document is subject to copyright owned by Xtralis AG (Xtralis). You agree not to copy, communicate to the public, adapt, distribute, transfer, sell, modify or publish any contents of this document without the express prior written consent of Xtralis.
Doc. 11376_09