Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
Provide general review of types of dental impression materials. Provide general information on the physical and handling properties and indications for use of various types of impression materials.
Official Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the US Air Force or the Department of Defense (DoD). Devices or materials appearing in this presentation are used as examples of currently available products/technologies and do not imply an endorsement by the author and/or the USAF/DoD.
Impression Materials
Non-elastic Elastic
Aqueous hydrocolloids
Agar Alginate
Non-aqueous elastomers
Polysulfide Silicones
Condensation Addition
Polyether
Indications
Diagnostic casts
preliminary opposing
Indirect reconstruction
fixed removable
Bite registration
Giordano, Gen Dent 2000
Rapidly remove
decreases permanent deformation
chains recoil from a recoverable distance
ZnO - Eugenol
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Condensation Addition
Silicones Polyether
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Colloidal suspensions
chains align to form fibrils traps water in interstices
Two forms
sol
viscous liquid
gel
elastic solid
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Semi-permeable membranes
poor dimensional stability
Evaporation Syneresis
fibril cross linking continues
contracts with time exudes water
Imbibition
water absorption
swells
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
Agar (reversible)
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Elastic
Alginate (irreversible)
Polysulfide Condensation
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Example
Slate Hydrocolloid (Van R)
Composition
Agar
complex polysaccharide
seaweed
Potassium sulfate
improves gypsum surface
gelling agent
Borax
strength
Water (85%)
cool to 43C
heat to 100C
Manipulation
Gel in tubes
syringe and tray material
Manipulation
3-chamber conditioning unit
(1) liquefy at 100C for 10 minutes
converts gel to sol
(2) store at 65C place in tray (3) temper at 46C for 3 minutes seat tray cool with water at 13C for 3 minutes
converts sol to gel
OBrien, Dental Materials & their Selection 1997
Advantages
Dimensionally accurate Hydrophilic
displaces moisture, blood, fluids
Inexpensive
after initial equipment
Disadvantages
Initial expense
special equipment
Difficult to disinfect
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
Agar (reversible)
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Elastic
Alginate (irreversible)
Polysulfide Condensation
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Examples
Jeltrate (Dentsply/Caulk) Coe Alginate (GC America)
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
Composition
Sodium alginate
salt of alginic acid
mucous extraction of seaweed (algae)
Sodium phosphate
retarder
Calcium sulfate
reactor
Manipulation
Weigh powder Powder added to water
rubber bowl vacuum mixer
Advantages
Inexpensive Easy to use Hydrophilic
displace moisture, blood, fluids
Stock trays
Disadvantages
Tears easily Dimensionally unstable
immediate pour single cast
Non-Aqueous Elastomers
Synthetic rubbers
mimic natural rubber
scarce during World War II
Large polymers
some chain lengthening primarily cross-linking
Viscosity classes
low, medium, high, putty monophasic
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
Agar (reversible)
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Elastic
Alginate (irreversible)
Polysulfide Condensation
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Polysulfide
First dental elastomers Indications
complete denture removable fixed partial denture
tissue
Examples
Permlastic (Kerr) Omni-Flex (GC America)
Composition
Base
polysulfide polymers fillers plasticizers
Catalyst
lead dioxide (or copper) fillers
By-product
water
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
Polysulfide Reaction
--SH O = Pb = O H S mercaptan + lead dioxide polysulfide rubber + lead oxide + water S H O = Pb = O HS---------------------SH O Pb = O = S + 3PbO + H O 2 S HS--S-S---------------S-S-
Manipulation
Adhesive to tray Uniform layer
custom tray
Advantages
Lower cost
compared to silicones and polyethers
Long working time High tear strength High flexibility Good detail reproduction
Disadvantages
Poor dimensional stability
water by-product pour within one hour single pour
Agar (reversible)
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Elastic
Alginate (irreversible)
Polysulfide Condensation
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Condensation Silicone
Indications
complete dentures crown and bridge
Examples
Speedex (Coltene/Whaledent) Primasil (TISS Dental)
Composition
Base
poly(dimethylsiloxane) tetraethylorthosilicate filler
Catalyst
metal organic ester
By-product
ethyl alcohol
Phillips 1996 Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
CH3
Si
HO Si O Si - O - H CH3 CH3 n
C2H5O
OC2H5
Si
+ 2C2H5OH
ethanol
HO Si O Si - O CH3 CH3 n
OC2H5
Manipulation
Mix thoroughly
paste - paste paste - liquid
Putty-wash technique
reduces effect of polymerization shrinkage stock tray
putty placed thin plastic sheet spacer preliminary impression
intraoral custom tray
Advantages
Better elastic properties Clean, pleasant Stock tray
putty-wash
Disadvantages
Poor dimensional stability
high shrinkage
polymerization evaporation of ethanol
pour immediately
within 30 minutes
Hydrophobic
poor wettability
Agar (reversible)
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Elastic
Alginate (irreversible)
Polysulfide Condensation
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Addition Silicones
AKA: Vinyl polysiloxane Indications
crown and bridge denture bite registration
Examples
Extrude (Kerr) Express (3M/ESPE) Aquasil (Dentsply Caulk) Genie (Sultan Chemists) Virtual (Ivoclar Vivadent)
Composition
Improvement over condensation silicones
no by-product
First paste
vinyl poly(dimethylsiloxane) prepolymer
Second paste
siloxane prepolymer
Catalyst
chloroplatinic acid
Phillips 1996 Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
CH3
---O Si CH = CH2
O
H - Si CH3 O CH3 CH = CH2 Si O ---
CH3
CH3 - Si - H
O
CH3
Manipulation
Adhesive to tray Double mix
custom tray
heavy-body
light-body to prep
Putty-wash
stock tray
Advantages
Highly accurate High dimensional stability
pour up to one week
Disadvantages
Expensive Sulfur inhibits set
latex gloves ferric and Al sulfate retraction solution
Pumice teeth before impressing Short working time Lower tear strength Possible hydrogen gas release
bubbles on die palladium added to absorb
Manikos Aust Dent J 1998
Addition Silicones
Surfactants added
reduce contact angle improved
castability
gypsum
wettability??
still need dry field clinically
Agar (reversible)
Aqueous Hydrocolloids
Elastic
Alginate (irreversible)
Polysulfide Condensation
Non-aqueous Elastomers
Polyether
Indications
crown and bridge bite registration
Examples
Impregum F (3M/ESPE) Permadyne (3M/ESPE) Pentamix (3M/ESPE) P2 (Heraeus Kulzer) Polygel (Dentsply Caulk)
Composition
Base
difunctional epimine-terminated prepolymer fillers plasticizers
Catalyst
aromatic sulfonic acid ester fillers
Cationic polymerization
ring opening and chain extension
Phillips Science of Dental Materials 1996
Polyether Reaction
R R base
R N+ H2C CH2
+
H2C
N CH2
R N CH2 CH2 N +
ring opening
H2C
CH2
Manipulation
Adhesive to tray
stock or custom tray
very stiff
mechanical dispenser
high viscosity
Advantages
Highly accurate Good dimensional stability Stock or dual-arch trays Good surface detail Pour within one week
kept dry
Disadvantages
Expensive Short working time Rigid
difficult to remove from undercuts
Complete dentures
alginate vinylpolysiloxane polyether 58% 55% 27% 78% 43% 15%
DPR 2002
Partial dentures
alginate vinylpolysiloxane polyether
*Multiple responses
Handling Properties
Agar
Preparation
Boil, temper, store
Technique sensitive
Alginate Polysulfide
Powder, water
Addition Silicone
Polyether
2 pastes
2 pastes
2 pastes
Ease of Use
Patient Reaction Ease of removal
Good
Pleasant, clean Very easy
Fair
Unpleasant, stains Easy
Fair
Pleasant, clean Moderate
Excellent
Good
Unpleasant clean Moderate to difficult
Pleasant
Moderate
Disinfection
Poor
Poor
Fair
Fair
Excellent
Fair
Handling Properties
Agar
Working Time (min) Setting Time (min) 7 15 5 1 hour
100% RH
Alginate
2.5 3.5 Immediate pour Excellent
Polysulfide
57 8 12
Polyether
2.5 4.5 1 week kept dry Good
1 hour
1 week
Fair to good
Excellent
Fair
Low
Very low
Low
Moderate
Very high
Properties
Agar
Elastic Recovery (%) Flexibility (%) Flow (%) Shrinkage, 24 hours (%) Tear Strength (g/cm) 98.8 11
--
Alginate Polysulfide
97.3 12 -Extreme
Condensation Silicone 98.2 99.6 3.5 7.8 < 0.10 0.2 1.0 2280 4370
Addition Silicone 99 99.9 1.3 5.6 < 0.05 0.01 0.2 1640 5260
Polyether
98.3 99.0 1.9 3.3 < 0.05 0.2 0.3 1700 4800
94.5 96.9 8.5 20.0 0.4 1.9 0.4 0.5 2240 7410
Extreme
700
380 700
Comparison of Properties
Working time
longest to shortest
agar > polysulfide > silicones > alginate = polyether
Setting time
shortest to longest
alginate < polyether < agar < silicones < polysulfide
Comparison of Properties
Stiffness
most to least
polyether > addition silicone > condensation silicone > polysulfide = hydrocolloids
Tear strength
greatest to least
polysulfide > addition silicone > polyether > condensation silicone >> hydrocolloids
Comparison of Properties
Cost
lowest to highest
alginate < agar = polysulfide <condensation silicone < addition silicone < polyether
Dimensional stability
best to worst
addition silicone > polyether > polysulfide > condensation silicone > hydrocolloid
Phillips 1996
Comparison of Properties
Wettability
best to worst
hydrocolloids > polyether > hydrophilic addition silicone > polysulfide > hydrophobic addition silicone = condensation silicone
Castability
best to worst
hydrocolloids > hydrophilic addition silicone > polyether > polysulfide > hydrophobic addition silicone = condensation silicone
OBrien Dental Materials & their Selection 1997
*Multiple Responses
DPR 2005
Summary
Study models
Alginate most widely used
inexpensive displaces moisture lower detail reproduction dimensionally unstable
Summary
Prosthodontics
Addition silicones most popular
accurate dimensionally stable user friendly expensive
References
Phillips Science of Dental Materials, edited by K Anusavice, 11th ed., 2008, Saunders Publishing. Dental Materials and their Selection, edited by WJ OBrien, 4th ed., 2008, Quintessence Publishing. Dental Products Report, 2001, 2002, 2005. CW Caswell, AS von Gonten, and TR Meng, Volumetric proportioning techniques for irreversible hydrocolloids: a comparative study, J Am Dent Assoc 1986 112:859-861. MN Mandikos, Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials: An Update on Clinical Use, Australian Dental Journal, Dec 1998, 43(5): 428-434. RG Craig, Review of Impression Materials, Advance in Dental Research, Aug 1988, 2,51-64.