Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DESIGN OF JUNCTION HOUSE FOR CONVEYOR GALLERY AT RAW MATERIAL HANDLING PROJECT
Presented By:
ARIJIT MONDAL
08CE1013, 4th Yr. UG IIT Kharagpur
Introduction
TATA STEEL Ltd. is presently undergoing 3 MTPA
expansion project .
This include a new blast furnace I , new coke oven
Objective
Requirements
Functional Requirement
Aesthetic Beauty
Economical Requirement
6
Steel sheets are used for Side sheeting & Roofing R.C.C Floors or chequered Plate Proper floor slope for drainage The floor openings such as Erection Hatches , Stair Case entries
Description of JP11
Height 36.7 meter 11.5 meter 9 meter 9
PC 13 CKC 7 SCI 3 & SCI 4
11
Length
Width Floors
Conveyors
12
Main Components of JP 11
Beams (IS sections) Columns (IS sections & Crucified I sections)
Trusses
Chequered plates R.C.C slabs Monorails Stair cases Pulley (for SCI - 3)
13
Sections Used
I Sections
Ex:ISMB200
14
Approach
Load Analysis in Staad.Pro of Original Structure
Changing of geometry & section prop. of the original structure to make it Economical
15
IS Code Followed
IS 800-2007 : for Steel Design purpose
IS 875 part 1 : for dead load calculation IS 875 part 2 : for live load calculation IS 875 part 3 : for wind load calculation SP 6(1)1964 : for sectional properties IS 456-2000 : for R.C.C foundation design SP 16 : for reinforcement of R.C.C Foundation Design
16
Loads Considered
Wind loads
Dust loads Belt tension of the conveyor
17
18
Failed Members
19
Alternate Design 1
Design (original) Design 1
20
Design (original)
Fy(-1) Fy(+1) Fx Fz Fy(-1) 348 160 185 187 0 0 173 0 0 516 377 638 222 449 238 280 569 267 -2.175 70 19.43 0.56 64 0.40 16.43 59 2.2 -0.543 4 -0.785 0.144 5.4 14.25 53 16 23 380 278 247 175 0 0 274 0 146
Design 1
Fy(+1) Fx Fz 398 349 458 413 496 435 241 635 297 -3.5 59 22 -0.6 69 0.053 -7 55 -1 -2.25 -1.4 1 95 25 65 3 27 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12 13 14
107
0 0 518 0
795
435 952 224 800
2
69.5 10 -2.273 76.1
15.37
1 54 2.25 0.506
161
0 0 488 0
743
538.452 852 184 719
-0.832
69 14 -2.4 72
4.17
0.754 47 2 -0.113 21
Alternate Design 2
Design (original) Design 2
22
Design (original)
Fy(-1) Fy(+1) Fx Fz Fy(-1) 348 160 185 187 0 0 173 0 0 516 377 638 222 449 238 280 569 267 -2.175 70 19.43 0.56 64 0.40 16.43 59 2.2 -0.543 4 -0.785 0.144 5.4 14.25 53 16 23 372 207 225 228 0 0 197 0 0
Design 2
Fy(+1) Fx Fz 382 343 469 290 485 320 346 619 339 -3 62 22 0.4 66 0.26 17 61.71 2.3 -2 0.6 2 -2 8 12.5 56 19 21.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12 13 14
107
0 0 518 0
795
435 952 224 800
2
69.5 10 -2.273 76
15.37
1 54 2.25 0.506
161
0 0 489 0
651
523 811 204 715
-2
67 12.25 -3.6 73
6.3
1 54 1.7 0.325 23
Original Design
Steel Consumption (Tonnes) Reduction Of Steel
Design 1
Design 2
142.4089
115.3388
116.0277
19%
18.52%
24
compared to Design-2
Horizontal sway of the top most point is less More adequate in strength
25
Final Outcome
Detection of Under designed members Evolvement of two different designs in different approaches Economically viable designs
26
Benefits to Company
Cost reduction
Expertise in analysis of structures
27
Personal Learnings
Proper Practical application of Theoretical knowledge
How to study engineering drawing in detail Multiple sites visit increase 3-D visualization Sound knowledge in application of Staad.Pro Load analysis of giant structures
28
29
30
31
32
33