Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enhances the ability to develop reasoned opinions. Gives a better understanding of the current events and the world around us. Improves self-confidence, speaking style and command of language. Enriches your overall leadership qualities.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
Good knowledge of current issues. Ability to think critically and logically. Ability to present the ideas systematically. Ability to handle culturally diverse and challenging situations with great ease and to ones their (own) enjoyment.
Malaysian Conventional
3 members to a team Topics given in advance POIs not allowed
American Parliamentary
2 members to a team POIs are allowed
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
ELEMENTS OF MATTER
1. Definitions: 4. Rebuttals: - Set up of the debate - Must be logical - Must be relevant 2. Arguments: - Must be prompt - Must be logical - Must be relevant 3. Evidences: - Must be relevant - Evidential value (strength)
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
DEFINING A TOPIC
Explain the key-words in the topic. Identify what you want to prove and what is your stand. This is called the theme of your team. If there is a measurement involved, set up the yardstick or criteria for such measurement.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
Kinds of Definitions:
Literal with key-words definition. Metaphorical definition. Issue based &/or specified definition (different from time-place setting).
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
CHALLENGE OF Challenge mustDEFINITION opposition, not come from the leader of the
later. Leader of the opposition must provide an alternative definition. In most of the cases, the teams must introduce an 'even if argument. An `Even if' argument is not possible in some cases. (e.g. truistic definition & definition running counter to the resolution i.e. where govt. has taken the oppositions case). In a definition debate, all the speakers except the PM argue the following:
Why challenge? Validity/ invalidity of the two definitions. Even if we are to accept the other side's definition, these are the weaknesses of their case. Positive case under their own definition.
GETTING THE RIGHT ARGUMENTS the topic. First, identify what you have to prove under
Then, identify what helps you to prove it. Put them in the format of an argument or a set of arguments.
ESTABLISHING AN ARGUMENT
Basic statement
Logical explanations of why and how the basic statement stands Proofs/ evidences/ examples that factually establish your basic statement Conclusion/ how it proves your teams theme
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
EFFECTIVE REBUTTALS
Rebuttals Attacks (Rebut the Arguments) Defence (Rebut the Rebuttals)
Do not rebut the example, attack the very premise of the argument of the other side. Only then contrary examples can be supplemented.
judges pace,
Use of notes: not to read a written text. Body language: hand gestures, pacing, standing etc.
Impression of sincerity.
Humour, wit, appropriate and healthy sarcasm.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
- Team structure
-
ELEMENTS OF METHOD
Continuity of teams theme in all the speeches. Consistency among all the speakers (no contradictions) Reinforcement of team members' arguments Clear & logical separation between arguments. Attractive opening/ outline of the speech. Proper organisation & priority of the arguments. Organisation of rebuttals. Appropriate timing of the speech Summary of the speech.
- Individual Structure
- Ability to follow the progression of and changes in the debate, and to re-act accordingly.
Rebuttals (attacks and defence) Reiteration and defence of your own teams case Presentation of your own arguments
Conclusion (why your teams case stands and other teams case does not)
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
OPENING OPP.
- Responds to the governments case
CLOSING GOV.
CLOSING OPP.
- Supports the Opening Gov.s - Supports the Opening Opp.s case case, - Adds new dimensions, arguments to further substantiate the governments case.
- Responds to the Opp.s case Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
GOVERNMENT: Defines the topic. Gives the case structure and theme. Presents own arguments. Provides a summary of his speech. (What I've given u so far..).
Rebuts. Reiterates and defends his first speakers arguments. Presents own argument. Provides a summary of his speech.
2nd Speaker
3rd Speaker
Rebuts substantially. Reiterates and defends his own team's case. Provides a summary of his speech. Presents a comparative overview of the clash points in the debate proving why his teams case stands
Reply Speaker
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
1st Speaker /Opposition Leader Responds to the definition (i.e. Accepts, Rejects or Clarifies). Rebuts the Prime Ministers arguments. Gives the case structure and theme of his team. Presents own arguments. Provides a summary of his speech.
Responses to the POIs are judged on the basis of: promptness and confidence in answering. strength of the response. value of wit and humour in the response.