Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr.NISHAT
INDEX
History Aim Basic structure Types Pharmacokinetics Ovarian function Endometrial effects Role in menorrhagia Meta analysis Applications/Benefits Disadvantages/ Side effects
HISTORY
Most significant development of gynecological management of 20th century
MIRENA was first launched in 1990 in Finland and Licensed in the UK in May 1995. FDA approved since 2000
INTRODUCTION
The only brand currently available is the T-frame LNG20 IUS, marketed as Mirena Coil, releases 20 mcg of LNG/ day over a period of 5 years.
Two newer lower LNG devices are under development, Fibroplant- LNG (frameless device) and MLS system releasing 14 and 10 mcg of LNG/day.
INTRODUCTION: (contd)
License awarded: In 1995, as contraceptive agent. In 2001, treatment of menorrhagia In 2005, in use with estrogen replacement therapy in peri and postmenopausal women to provide uterine protection.
AIM
Deliver a small predictable, daily dose of hormone directly into the uterine cavity
Sustained for a number of years
BASIC STRUCTURE
TYPES
1. 2. 3. 4. Progestasert Mirena Mirena MLS Fibroplant
PROGESTASERT(PIPS)
First progesterone releasing system T shaped polymeric platform Drug reservoir of 38 mg Daily release of 65 mcg /day For 18-24 months Received FDA approval in 1976 Contraceptive use for 1 year,bioavailability of 2 years
MIRENA MLS
Low dose IUS Delivering 10 mcg/day Under trial to evaluate the effectiveness for progestogenic opposition in HRT
FIBROPLANT
Frameless delivery system, also under trial 3 or 4cm long 1.2 mm wide reservoir Sustained release (10 or 14 mcg) Bound to fibrous flexible stem
Duration 3 years
MIRENA IN SITU
MECHANISM OF ACTION:
OVARIAN FUNCTION
Effect on ovarian function minimal As for suppression of ovulation - systemic absorption of LNG IUS should be 50 mcg/24 hours.
ENDOMETRIAL EFFECTS
LNG IUS-profound changes in the hormonally non responsive decidua basalis Endometrium undergoes uniform structural and histological changes HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDIES show-thinning,atrophy of the endometrial glands,decidualisation of the stroma,capillary thrombosis, and inflammatory cell infiltrate
HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHANGES
Doppler studies show - decrease in the subendometrial flow in the spiral arteries
GROWTH FACTORS
Normal effect: Insulin like growth factors modulate the effect of estrogen
Endometrial stromal cells produce IGF and IGF BP IGF 1STIMULATES ENDOMETRIUM TO PROLIFERATE IGF 2CAUSES AND MAINTAINS DIFFERENTIATION WITHIN THE ENDOMETRIUM
OTHER EFFECTS:
Ki 67 gene -abundant in women with menorrhagia
Decreased in women with LNG IUS Endometrial plasminogen activator inhibitor induced with LNG IUS This decreases menstrual blood flow
BIOCHEMICAL FACTORS:
The biochemical mediators cause increase in Apoptosis and gene down regulation.
Gene codes for thrombin(protease activated receptor-1)
MENORRHAGIA
Experienced by 30% of the reproductive age group 60% due to menstrual dysfunction 12% of gynec referrals Cause of IDA in 20-25% of healthy women 1 out of 20 women in the 30-50 year age group consult with menorrhagia STUDD 16
STUDD 16
MANAGEMENT OF MENORRHAGIA
Trend is towards endometrial destructive procedures It has lower complication rates and mortality High patient satisfaction Re operation rate of 11-40%
META ANALYSIS
Andersson and Rybo et al used LNG IUS in 20 women Reduction in the menstrual blood loss by 85% at 3 months usage, 97% at 12 months usage Also ferritin increased by 47% in 1st year Side effects-spotting common in 1st 3 months and
amenorrhoea by 1 year
RCT
In another study by Wildermeersch and Schacht Fibroplant was inserted in 32 women Reduction in menstrual blood loss by 80% in 1-23 months
OTHER STUDIES:
SMART study(Satisfaction with MIRENA and ablation: A RANDOMISED TRIAL) To assess satisfaction and amount of heaviness at 12 months post treatment Study terminated due to poor recruitment rate owing to
APPLICATIONS: (CONTD)
In overall: LNG IUS provides an effective, efficient, well tolerated, cost effective alternative to other medical and surgical management of menorrhagia.
OTHER BENEFITS:
Endometrial suppression also achieved by IUS delivering 10 mcg/day Histological non proliferation of the endometrium after 12 months.
levels
However with lower 10mcg LNG IUS - HDL increased
OTHER APPLICATIONS:
LNG IUS- Improvement in menorrhagia/ dysmenorrhoea, protects against development of fibroids. LNG achieves faster regression of endometrial hyperplasia greater efficacy of androgenic progestogens in achieving secretory transformation
preforation,embedment,expulsion,infection
SIDE EFFECTS
Ovarian cyst formation: Function ovarian cysts commoner with LNG-1.2/100 women years Cysts are symptomless/small/and spontaneous resolution(94%) Fitting the system: Necessitates a wider insertion tube and prior cervical dilatation.
CONTRA INDICATIONS
RELATIVE Postpartum between 48hrs to 4weeks (expulsion rates) Current DVT or Pulmonary embolus Benign trophoblastic disease Past H/O breast carcinoma Ovarian carcinoma Exposure to gonorrhea or Chlamydia STIs AIDs (unless clinically well on anti-retroviral therapy) Active liver disease (acute viral hepatitis, severe decompensate cirrhosis, benign or malignant liver tumors) ABSOLUTE Pregnancy Postpartum puerperal sepsis Immediately post-septic abortion Malignant GTD Cervical carcinoma (awaiting treatment) Endometrial carcinoma Distortion of uterine cavity (fibroids, anatomical abnormalities) Current PID Current purulent cervicitis, STIs Pelvic Kochs
REFERENCES:
Serum and peritoneal fluid levels of levonorgestrel in women with endometriosis, device containing levonorgestrel. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):398404. Nilsson CG, Lahteenmaki PL, Luukkainen T, Robertson DN. Sustained intrauterine release of levonorgestrel over five years. Fertil Steril. 1986;45(6):805807 . Sturdee D, Rantala ML, Colau JC, Zahradnik HP, Riphagen FE. The acceptability of a small intrauterine progestogen-releasing system for continuous combined hormone therapy in early postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2004;7(4):40441. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E, Wildemeersch P, Janssens D, Thiery M. Development of a miniature, low-dose, frameless intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system for contraception and treatment: a review of initial clinical experience. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4(1):7182.
REFERENCES (Contd)
French R. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1: McGavigan CJ, Cameron IT. The mirena levonorgestrel system. Drugs Today. 2003;39(12). McGavigan CJ, Cameron IT. The mirena levonorgestrel system. Drugs Today. 2003;39(12):973984 Ikomi A, Pepra EF. Efficacy of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in treating menorrhagia: actualities and ambiguities. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002;28(2):99100 Pakarinen P, Toivonen J, Luukkainen T. Therapeutic use of the LNGIUS, and counseling. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19(4):365372 Lahteenmaki P, Rauramo I, Backman T. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception. Steroids. 2000;65(1011):693697
THANK YOU