Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENERATORS
Presented B y Sajeesh Jos Parakkal MTI-Thrissur Reg.No.89035078
SUPERCONDUCTING
ELECTRIC MACHINES
Superconductivity is the property of having zero electrical resistance. Are electromechanical systems that rely on the use of one or more superconducting elements. Since superconductors have no DC resistance, they typically have greater efficiency.
HISTORY
DC homopolar machines are among the oldest electric machines. Michael Faraday made one in 1831. Superconducting DC homopolar machines use superconductors in their stationary field windings and normal conductors in their rotating pickup winding
HISTORY
In 2005 the General Atomics company received a contract for the creation of a large low speed superconducting homopolar motor for ship propulsion. Superconducting homopolar generators have been considered as pulsed power sources for laser weapon systems.
SUPERCONDUCTING
GENERATOR
SUPERCONDUCTING
GENERATOR
The
higher current density achievable in many superconducting materials tends to make them smaller compared with non-superconducting machines with the same power density.
These
SUPERCONDUCTING
GENERATOR
High-temperature
motors and generators will be smaller, lighter, more efficient, and less expensive to manufacture and operate than conventional machines.
It is able to carry more than 140times the electrical current of copper wire of the same cross section, and is robust enough to meet commercial requirements
HTS WIRE
HTS MACHINES
The major components of a rotating machine employing HTS winding Only the field winding employs HTS cooled with a cryocooler subsystem to about 35-40K The cryocooler modules are located in a stationary frame and a gas, such as helium, is employed to cool components on the rotor.
HTS MACHINES
CROSS-SECTION OF
SUPERCONDUCTING GENERATOR.
SUPERCONDUCTING GENERATORS
Superconducting Generators offer increased electrical efficiency, reduced size, increased system stability, and higher generation voltages.
Unlike a conventional generator winding where the core has iron teeth and the armature coils are disposed in slots, the winding in a superconducting generator sits in an air-gap between the rotor and an iron flux shield. For the 300 MVA superconducting generator, the six armature coils were pancake wound and were interleaved together in a spiral configuration.
The overall armature winding and flux shield were very orthotropic in their material properties.
Stress and displacement of the armature winding and flux shield were calculated using finite element analysis for steady state and transient electromagnetic and thermal loads.
COMPARED WITH A
CONVENTIONAL
CONDUCTOR MACHINE
Superconducting electric machines typically have the following advantages: Reduced resistive losses but only in the rotor electromagnet. Reduced size and weight per power capacity without considering the refrigeration equipment.
There are also the following disadvantages: The cost, size, weight, and complications of the cooling system. A sudden decrease or elimination of motor or generator action if the superconductors leave their superconductive state. A greater tendency for rotor speed instability. A superconducting rotor does not have the inherent damping of a conventional rotor. Its speed may hunt or oscillate around its synchronous speed.
CONCLUSION
A well-designed superconducting generator can represent a beautiful optimization between competing and often conflicting electrical, economic, thermal, reliability, and mechanical requirements.
Basically thermal performance improves as the operating temperature is increased, and electrical performance is decreased. Electrical system stability and power density is increased at the expense of mechanical strength and vibration tolerance
ANY QUESTIONS???
REFERENCES
[1] J. H. Parker, Jr. and M. P. Krefta, The Intrinsic Magneto-Resistance of Cryogenic Joints, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 7, Part 1, pages 820823, June 1997. [2] Z.J.J. Stekly, H.H. Woodson, A.M. Hatch, L.O. Hoppie, and E. Halas. IEEE
Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems Vol. 85, p. 274 (1966). [3] P. Thullen, J.C. Dudley, D.L. Green, J.L. Smith, H.H. Woodson, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems Vol. 90, p. 611 (1971).