Professional Documents
Culture Documents
He said, he said,
Edwin Ramos-Soto
Presentation Summary
Overview of Strategic Planning Process
Agency Mission, Vision and Goals Business/Operational Priority: Activities, Evaluation Resources Needed
ASF Goals
Keep client input and needs central to our
by HIV/AIDS
Strategic Issue
1. Decreases in agency funding
Rationales
1. Achieving program and services stabilization and
ensuring continuation helps ASF achieve its mission of preventing the spread of HIV and improving the lives of men, women, and children affected by HIV/AIDS in Orange County.
2. The loss of funding negatively impacts the agency, the
staff, and most importantly the lives of our clients that are best served in our county through all programs and services we provide in our community.
10
By Jan 30th 2009, AIDS Services Foundations Fund Development Department will establish the Prevention Fund Advancement Group By December 31st 2009, the AIDS Services Foundation Fund Development Department and Prevention Fund Advancement Committee will increase agency funding for prevention services by 20% By June 30th 2010, AIDS Services Foundation of Orange County will pursue three (3) larger ($500K+) grants at the federal and state level to support its prevention programs
2.
3.
11
By Jan 30th 09
Create the largest possible effective databases of corporate, foundation and individual donors
By Feb 28th 09
Create the largest possible effective databases of corporate, foundation and individual donors
By Feb 28th 09
12
Assist committee members in developing a By April 30th 09 volunteer network of community leaders and executives who will solicit for the organization
Develop compelling written materials that effectively communicate the organizations funding requirements to the board, other volunteers and the public
By April 30th 09
13
By May 30th 09
14
Plan, initiate and produce an endowment campaign and deferred giving program Institute a communication program to maximize awareness of the organizations value to the community
Institute a recognition program to honor major donors 1st Year Closure Gift acknowledgements and other responses; Recognition of donors via testimonials, credits, honors event Final reports and summaries
By Oct 31st 09
By Dec 1st 09
By Dec 31st 09
15
Evaluation
Goal How will you measure achievement?
Formation of a committee to
To diversify and increase funding sources to make prevention services funding more stable allowing ASF to provide much needed uninterrupted services to Orange County
generate funds for prevention programs, services and activities Increased funding for prevention programs Development and implementation of additional prevention services Complete grant proposals New grants awarded
16
Evaluation
Objective 1
By Jan 30th 09 ASFs Fund Development Department will establish the Prevention Fund Advancement Group to help increase funding for agencys prevention services and programs
17
Evaluation
Objective 2
By Dec 31st 09 ASFs
Prevention Fund Advancement Group will increase funding for agencys services by 20%
18
Positive Connections
A Healthy Relationships Intervention
19
Priority Population
HIV+ MSM of Orange County
Ages 20-49 years
Rationale for choosing this population: Stigma, discrimination, shame and fear drive people into social isolation and high-risk sexual behaviors that increase their probability of HIV/STI exposure and transmission to their sero-discordant sex partners.
20
ASF Capacity
AIDS Services Foundation has: Has access to the priority and target population Continues to implement and support prevention programs for PLWHA and MSM populations in our service area Has staff from the target population and professional individuals with vast experience Can implement intervention with funding Can develop necessary evaluation methods and tools
21
Key Findings
Quantitative Cross-sectional Assessment (n=44) How open with other people (or out of the closet) are you about your HIV status? Answer options Response Percent
Not out to anyone Out to a few people Out to half the people I know Out to most people I know Out to almost everyone Refused to answer
22
Key Findings
Quantitative Cross-sectional Assessment (n=44) 36% lacked the self-efficacy to disclose their HIVpositive status before having sex if they did not know their sex partners HIV status 32% lacked the self-efficacy to discuss being HIV positive with a new sex partner 29% lacked the self-efficacy to tell someone they were dating that they were HIV positive 43% lacked the self-efficacy to disclose their HIVpositive status even if they had been drinking 49% would rather not have sex than deal with decisions to disclose their HIV-positive status to a new sex partner 23
Key Findings
Qualitative Assessment
Status disclosure is a complex process
PLWHA are confronted with multiple questions related
Who should I disclose this to? When? Under what circumstances do I tell? How do I disclose HIV-positive serostatus to others?
Key Findings
Qualitative Assessment Lack of skills on the how-to disclose affects the ability and decision making process to disclose HIV status Low self-efficacy results in ineffective coping with highrisk situations Rejection resulting from disclosure episodes leads to negative outcome expectancy every time an individual chooses to disclosure Intentions to disclose may be high or low depending on the cost/benefit of the disclosure Perceived risk of HIV transmission affects disclosure
25
Positive Connections
Healthy Relationships
26
Positive Connections
Goal of Healthy Relationships is to promote intentions
to change risk behaviors and encourage self-evaluation to increase condom use and develop strategies for behavioral change Five-session, small-group intervention for PLWHA Based on Social Cognitive Theory Focuses on developing skills and building self-efficacy and positive expectations about new behaviors through modeling behaviors and practicing new skills. Decision-making and problem-solving skills are developed to enable participants to make informed and safe decisions about disclosure and behavior.
27
Positive Connections
ASF will utilize the HR intervention to help OC HIV+ MSM to build skills that assist in reducing stress in three life areas of influence:
1. 2. 3.
Disclosure of HIV status to family and friends Disclosure to sex or needle sharing partners Safer sexual behaviors
28
Adaptation of Intervention
Healthy Relationships will be delivered with complete fidelity to the core elements; no adaptation will be required.
29
Intervention Stakeholders
Edwin Ramos-Soto Martin Salas OC Health Care Agency TBD TBD Health Education & Prevention Programs Supervisor Health Education Department Director Office of HIV Planning and Coordination Programs Monitor HR Program Coordinator HR Mental Health Facilitator
TBD
TBD
Process Objectives
By 07/17/2009 Health Education and Prevention services supervisor will secure all human resources By 08/14/2009 all HR staff will be trained in HR intervention, Agency Policies and Procedures. By 08/28/2009 a private, centrally located site will be secured By 08/28/2009 HR infrastructure will be established and all resources needed for the HR intervention implementation will be secured. By 09/11/2009 staff will develop and operationalize all client recruitment strategies and materials.
Goal Statement
By 09/25/2009 staff will establish a network of service providers to create a referral network system within the service area.
By 10/16/2009 staff will recruit and screen participants for pilot test of the HR intervention, report and revise recruitment protocols if needed. Between 11/06/2009 and 12/11/2009 staff will implement and evaluate Core Element #1-5 of the HR intervention. By 01/15/2010 staff will evaluate HR intervention. By 01/29/2010 staff will begin dissemination of evaluation results to all key stakeholders with final report by 02/12/2010.
By June 30, 2010, six months post intervention, 60% of the HIV-positive MSM ages 20-49 exposed to the ASF intervention will report an increase in their serostatus disclosure.
To reduce risky sexual behaviors thereby, increasing by 15% the number of MSM ages 20-49 diagnosed with HIV who report adopting and maintaining behaviors that reduce the risk of HIV and STI transmission, including serostatus disclosure in OC over the next three (3) years.
Impact 31 Evaluation
32
By June 30th 2010, Increase in six months post serostatus intervention, 60% of disclosure the HIV-positive MSM ages 20-49 exposed to the HR intervention will report an increase in their serostatus disclosure.
33
intervention, 60% of the HIV-positive MSM ages 20-49 exposed to the HR intervention will report an increase in their serostatus disclosure.
2. After completing the Healthy Relationships intervention,
90% of participants will report increased confidence in making informed and safe decisions about disclosure and behaviors.
34
90% of participants will report acquisition of social and self-management skills that allow for effective action implementation, i.e. serostatus disclosure.
5. After completing the Healthy Relationships intervention,
90% of participants will report increased intentions to engage in safer sex and disclose HIV-positive serostatus to sex partners.
6. After completing the Healthy Relationships intervention,
90% of participants will report increased decision-making and problem solving skills that relate to making informed decisions about disclosure and sex behaviors.
35
Pre and post test assessing increased perceptions of HIV transmission risk
90% of participants will Increased selfPre and post test report increased confidence efficacy in making assessing selfin making informed and safe informed decisions efficacy reports decisions about disclosure and behaviors
36
90% of participants will report increased decision-making and problem-solving skills that enable participants to make informed decisions about disclosure and sex behaviors
Pre and post test assessing increased decision-making and problem solving skills
37
Process Objectives
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
Secure funding Hire and train staff Develop curricula, assessment and knowledge surveys Establish monitoring protocol Establish referral network Establish formal mandates Provide five, two hour sessions over a eight weeks Formalized the curriculum, all movie clips Ensure active coordination of services with follow-up Provide intervention to 24 participants in first year
38
Staff trained
Easily accessible location Reviewer observations Adequate space Sufficient seating Working electronic equipment Video clips for sessions Reviewer observation Equipment log HR sessions materials
By 09/11/2009 staff will develop and operationalize all client recruitment strategies and materials.
Recruitment strategies
Recruitment plan
39
Between 11/06/2009 and 12/11/2009 staff will Facilitation and implement and evaluate Core Element #1-5 coordination sessions of the HR intervention conducted Debriefings held By 01/15/2010 staff will evaluate HR intervention By 01/29/2010 staff will begin dissemination of evaluation results to all key stakeholders with final report by 02/12/2010 Implementation plans Debriefing notes Evaluation report developed
Resources Needed
Facilities Supplies Staffing
Program Manager Mental Health Co-facilitator HIV + Peer facilitator Equipment Television DVD Player Movie Clips Software
41
Year 1 Budget
Strategic Plan Personnel Facilities Equipment Travel Supplies Indirect Costs Total 111,875 10,500 24,200 3,000 11,000 19,269 179,844 Intervention Plan 126,875 21,000 24,200 4,560 12,700 22,720 212,055 Total
Final Thoughts
Disclosure of HIV-positive status is a complex,
difficult and a very personal matter Some HIV-positive persons report several negative emotional consequences that have followed the HIVpositive status disclosure, including rejection, abandonment, and isolation In HIV prevention, there is a need for a greater understanding of the complex factors of influence that impact an individuals HIV positive status disclosure We need to focus on the HIV-positive community as a key player in the prevention of HIV through HIVpositive status disclosure
43
Final Thought
Questions?
45