Professional Documents
Culture Documents
on
BIOSORPTION OF METALS
presented by
LASSIN VARGHESE ROLL NO : 30 S7 , CIVIL ENGG SNGCE
guided by
Lect. PRAVEENA GANGADHARAN CIVIL ENGG DEPT SNGCE
SELECTION OF BIOMASS
1. While choosing the biomass for metal biosorption, its origin is a major factor .
2. Biomass can come from, activated sludge or fermentation waste from industries like those of food, diary and starch .
3. organisms coming from their natural habitats are good sources of biomass. 4. Fast growing organisms that are specifically cultivated for biosorption purposes
TYPES OF BIOMASS
SELECTION OF BIOMASS
1. 2. 3.
4.
After being grounded, the leaf particle were sieved with 60 70 mesh
sieves (0.2 0.3mm)
5.
Then the leaves were dried at 1000C for 24 hours to be constant weight.
PREPARATION OF ASHES
1. The Ulmus leaves ash obtained from burning of Ulmus leaves in oven at 5500C for 15 minutes. 2. Dried leaves were stored in desiccator until used.
1. By dissolving the cadmium nitrate in the distilled water. 2. The concentration range of cadmium in the solution varied between 2 40 mg/l. 3. For the required PH value diluted and the concentrated H2SO4 and NaOH solution were added.
PROCEDURE
1. The experiment were carried out in the batch system for the measurement of adsorption capacities. 2. Each cadmium solution was placed in 1000 ml. beaker and known amount of adsorbent (1g) were added to each beaker. 3. The beaker were agitated on the jar test equipments at 300 rpm constant mixing rate for 5 300 minutes to ensure equilibrium was reached. 4. After agitating the solution biosorbent, the biosorbent was removed by filtration through 0.45m membrane filter and filters.
CALCULATIONS
Where: qe = adsorbent (leaves) phase concentration after equilibrium, mg adsorbate/g adsorbent Co = initial concentration of adsorbate,mg/L Ce = final equilibrium concentration of adsorbate after absorption has occurred, mg/L V = Volume of liquid in the reactor, L M = mass of adsorbent, g
RESULTS
EFFECT OF CONTACT TIME ON THE REMOVAL OF CADMIUM
Figure 1: Effect of contact time on the removal of Cadmium by ULMUS Leaves and their ash
Figure 2: Effect of PH on the removal of Cadmium by Ulmus Leaves and their ash
Figure 3: Effect of Cadmium concentration on the removal of Cadmium by Ulmus Leaves and their ash
ADVANTAGES 1. Cost effectiveness. 2. High efficiency. 3. Minimization of chemical/biological sludg, 4. And regeneration of biosorbent with possibility of metal recovery. DISADVANTAGES 1. Early saturation of biomass. 2. Little biological control over the characteristics of biosorbents.
CONCLUSION
1. In this case study the removal efficiency of Cadmium was greater than 85% 2. The adsorption of metal ion on tree leaves reached equilibrium in 60 min. 3. pH=6-7 and initial concentration of 2mg/L. 4. Compare ulms leaves and their ash ,ulmus leaves ash is more effective than ulmus leaves 5. Analyzing all the result bisorption is an effective process for the removal of ions
REFERENCES
1. Hima Karnika, Srinivasa Reddy Ronda: Biosorption Anecofriendly alternative for heavy metal removal: Journal of Biotechnology:6.2007, 2924 2931.
2. Nasi R. Bishnoi and Garima: Fungus An alternative for bioremediation of heavy metals containing waste water: Journal of Scientific & Industrial research: 64.2005.93 100
3. Mahvi A.H., Gholami F, Nazmara S: Cadmium Biosorption form waste water by Ulmus Leaves and their Ash:Journal of Scientific Research:23:2008.197 - 203
THANKYOU