Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Without fundamental research in this area, very little use will be made with full confidence of the real opportunities offered by FACTS devices. For the time being we only have limited examples, entirely based on simulation, which demonstrate that fast regulation of reactive compensation on a transmission grid could be very useful in the future. Because of this, there may exist an immediate danger of uncoordinated system-wide fast regulation via FACTS devices which could become detrimental to system integrity under certain operating conditions.
Marija Ilic, Fundamental engineering problems and opportunities in operating power transmission grids of the future Int'l Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 207-214, June 1995.
Static:
Uneven power flow Excess reactive power flows Voltage capability Thermal capability
FACTS Controllers
Static VAR Compensator - SVC Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator - TCSC Thyristor Controlled Phase Angle Regulator - TCPAR Static Synchronous Compensator - StatCom Solid State Series Compensator - SSSC Unified Power Flow Controller - UPFC
SVC
TCSC
StatCom
shunt device lower rated components since only carry a fraction of the line current impacts bus voltage and reactive power support
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
SSSC
series device must have higher rated transformer and devices impacts active power flow
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
UPFC
combination of StatCom and SSSC may control voltage, impedance, and angle impacts active and reactive power flow in line
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
UPFC Topology
Local Control -Control target acquisition -Power electronics topology -Modulation strategies
time
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Approaches
Sensitivity analysis
bij t
t g
g ij t
Where is the change in power transfer capacity in response to an addition of t compensation in line i-j with admittance bij+j gij and b and g are sensitivity parameters
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Optimization (optimal power flow) with genetic algorithms to minimize some cost function
Generation costs Congestion Problem is nonlinear, non-smooth, and non-convex
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Max-flow (graph theory) uses forward and backward labeling from source to sink to dynamically determine line flows
Dynamic Control
transient stability improvement inter-area oscillation damping voltage collapse avoidance subsynchronous resonance mitigation Each control objective will (possibly) require a different FACTS placement
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Issues
Most dynamic control development has concentrated on SMIB or very small two-area systems How is control implemented in a large nonlinear interconnected dynamic network?
FACTS-FACTS interaction FACTS-generator interaction
StatCom/BESS
voltages
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
active power
SSSC/BESS
voltages
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
active power
Issues
Most work considers only:
Simplified topologies UPFC = variable impedance StatCom = PV bus Three-phase balanced operation No harmonics Simulation based Isolated performance (no interactions)
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Cascaded Converter
Advantages
Use fewer components to achieve the same number of levels Has modularized circuitry which makes packaging possible Does not have balancing problem when with batteries
Disadvantages
Needs separate DC sources for active power conversion
Diode-Clamped
Advantages The harmonic content decreases as the number of levels increases, thus reducing the size of filters Efficiency is high since devices are switched at the fundamental frequency It is easy to realize bi-directional active power flow with a BESS or other energy storage system Disadvantages: Requires a large number of high power clamping diodes if the number of levels is high A high voltage rating is required for the blocking diodes There is potentially a voltage balancing problem
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Local Control -Control target acquisition -Power electronics topology -Modulation strategies
time
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Conventional eigenvalue analysis cannot predict the high frequency self-modes of the several FACTS devices embedded in a large power system network. High frequency control interactions among the several FACTS devices must be checked using an EMTP-type program A promising technique is based on the use of high frequency eigenvalue calculation using Generalized Switching Function Models for the different FACTS devices under consideration.
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Series controllers
low loop impedance - the series controllers may experience a very strong interaction, and therefore these controllers must be designed in a coordinated way - the main linking variable among the series controllers is the ac current high loop impedance - no control interactions may be expected among series controllers
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
HVDC
HVDC converters embedded in a large network will not experience control interactions if the transference impedances between their commutation busbars are high. This means that, in this case, the dc control design of each station can be based exclusively on the Short-Circuit Ratio (SCR) at its ac connection point.
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
SCADA systems
Dedicated SCADA systems will have to be developed if global control of multiple FACTS controllers is desired. Currently available SCADA systems have a refresh rate of 1 second (maximum). This is sufficient for steady-state control dispatch of FACTS controllers. However, this is completely inadequate for dynamic control, especially if we consider that high frequency modes (10-100 Hz) may occur on FACTS assisted power systems
EPRI/NSF Workshop on Global Dynamic Optimization
Discussion