Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A breach of contract is refusal by one party to abide by its terms, without lawful excuses such as, impossibility of performance, defective/late performance by the other party.
Learning Objectives
Breach of Contract and Remedies:
Rescission Damages Specific Performance Injunction
Quantum Meruit
Quasi-contract : Other Remedies
Rescission
Rescission is the revocation of a contract. When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing in its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract. (Section 39) In such a case, the other (aggrieved) party can refuse further performance and is absolved of all of its obligations under the contract. A promises to supply a PC for Bs office on a certain date on COD basis. However, A fails to deliver the computer on the agreed date. B is absolved of the liability of paying the price and can rescind the contract. Rescission is done to bring the parties, as far as possible, back to the position in which they were before entering into the contract. This is known as status quo ante. It is an equitable remedy and is discretionary.
Damages
A breach of contract entitles the non-breaching or injured party to sue for monetary damages besides rescinding the contract. Damages are designed to compensate the aggrieved party for the loss sustained in the bargain. When a contract has been broken, the aggrieved party is entitled to receive, from the breaching party such damages which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach. This relates to ordinary damages, and which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it. This relates to special damages. (Section 73)
Remoteness of damage, which means for what kind of damage should the plaintiff, be compensated? That is, whether the courts will take the step of recognizing that a breach of contract can, in principle, give rise to a claim for damages to the injured party. Assessment of damages, which means what monetary compensation or damages should the plaintiff receive in respect of the damage, which is not too remote or indirect?
Types of Damages
Depending upon the nature of the awards in compensating the injured or aggrieved party, damages have been classified as follows: 1. Compensatory damages 2. Nominal damages 3. Consequential damages 4. Punitive damages 5. Incidental damages 6. Liquidated damages and Penalty
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
Specific performance is a decree issued by the court, which orders the defendant (party accused of breaching a contract ) to perform his obligations under the contract. Where damages represent inadequate or unjust remedy (for example, where the subject matter of the contract is unique or where there are no standards to ascertain the quantum of loss) the non-breaching party may approach the court for the grant of an order for specific performance of the contract. The court has broad discretion to award specific performance and in exercising this discretion it takes into account factors such as: Whether the person seeking performance is prepared to perform his side of the contract (Chappell vs Times Newspapers Ltd) Whether the person against whom the order is sought would suffer hardship in performing it. (Patel vs Ali) ). The difference between the benefits that the (court) order would give to one party and the cost of performance to the other (Tito vs Waddell).
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
However, specific performance is not granted in the following circumstances: Monetary compensation is an adequate remedy. It will be inequitable to either party. Thus, it is not available to an infant in respect of a contract not enforceable against him. The contract requires personal services such as employment contracts because such an order would restrict an individual's freedom (Chappell vs Times Newspapers Ltd). The contracts which require extensive supervision, for example building contracts. The defendant cannot perform exactly in accordance with the original contractual obligation. On the basis of above-mentioned constraints, it can be argued that specific performance is a substitutionary and not a specific remedy.
INJUNCTION
An injunction is a court order directing a person to do or refrain from doing some specified act, which, of course, has been the subject matter of a contract. Like specific performance, an injunction is an equitable remedy and therefore only granted at the discretion of the court. It is awarded in circumstances where damages would not be an adequate remedy to compensate the claimant. For example, A factory begins to allow harmful smoke to escape from its chimney, affecting the health of people in the neighbourhood. Damages would be inadequate, as the residents would want the emission of smoke to stop altogether. This can therefore be remedied by an injunction order. Injunction orders are of two types: prohibitory and mandatory.
INJUNCTION
Prohibitory injunction This orders the defendant to restrain from committing a breach of a negative contractual obligation i.e., where he does something, which he had promised not to do. Such an injunction may be granted to prevent the breach of a reasonable restraint of trade clause. For instance G agreed to source all the electric power required for his house from M but started buying part of his requirement from some other company. He was restrained by an injunction order from buying electricity from the other source. (Based on Metropolitan Electric Supply Company vs Ginder ). Mandatory injunction This, on the other hand compels the performance of a positive contractual obligation, for example, compel an employee to do any work or attend at any place for the doing of any work. The main use of injunction in the contractual situation has been as an indirect means of enforcing a contract involving personal services. In exercising its discretion (of injunction) the court will use the balance of convenience test weighing the benefit to the injured party and the detriment to the other party. For example, a factory begins to allow noxious fumes to escape from a chimney, affecting the health of neighbouring residents. Damages here would be inadequate, as the residents would want to stop the fumes being emitted. This can only be remedied by an injunction order. An injunction will not be granted if its effect would be to compel a party to do something, which he could not have been ordered to do by a decree of specific performance (Lumley vs Wagner).
QUANTUM MERUIT
Quantum Meruit is a Latin term meaning, 'as much as is merited' or 'as much as earned'. In the context of contract law, it means something along the lines of reasonable value of services rendered. The normal rule of law is that unless a party has performed its promise in its entirety, it cannot claim performance from the other party. Contrary to it, in certain cases, when a person has done some work under a contract, and the other party repudiates the contract or some such event occurs that renders the rest of the performance unworkable, then the court may allow remuneration to the party which has performed for the work he has done. Thus, quantum meruit is imposed to avoid the unjust enrichment of one party at the expense of another. The action of quantum meruit is allowed in Indian courts under Section 70 of the Contract Act. The concept of quantum meruit applies to the following situations: When a person employs (impliedly or expressly) another person to do work for him, without any agreement as to his compensation, the law implies a promise from the employer to the workman that he will pay for the services, as much as the workman may deserve or merit. When there is an express contract for a stipulated amount and mode of compensation for services, the plaintiff cannot abandon the contract and resort to an action for a quantum meruit. However, if there is a total failure of consideration, the plaintiff has a right to elect to repudiate the contract and then seek compensation on a quantum meruit basis.
QUANTUM MERUIT
If a contract is divisible and a party to a contract is prevented from fulfilling its contractual obligations by the other party then obviously he will not be in default. For example, in a building contract, if the owner should prevent the builder from completing, like not allowing him to enter the construction site, the builder can recover a reasonable price for the work done on a quantum meruit basis. If an indivisible contract is completely executed, but badly, the person who has performed will be entitled to a lump sum less deduction to make good the defect in the performance. In all the above cases, the claim is not based on the original contract, but on the implied promise by the other party arising from the acceptance of an executed contract. For example, A contractor is contracted to work on a school. He does some work but quits (breach of contract) midway. The contractor is entitled to be paid for the services he has already rendered for the school on the basis of quantum meruit. However, the school would also be entitled to damages arising out of the need to look for a new contractor.