You are on page 1of 61

Unique Regular Prime Order Associative Magic Squares

MSP NCR Convention San Sebastian College Guido David University of the Philippines Diliman March 2, 2013

Magic Square Example

A 3 3 magic square

8 3 4

1 5 9

6 7 2

Magic Square Example

A 3 3 magic square

8 3 4

1 5 9

6 7 2

15

15 15

15

= 15 = 15 = 15 15

Siamese Method
1

Siamese Method
1

Siamese Method
1

3 2

Siamese Method
1
4 3 2

Siamese Method
1
5 4 3 2

Siamese Method
1
5 4 6 3 2

Siamese Method
1
5 4 6 3 2 7

Siamese Method
17
23 4 10 11

24
5 6 12 18

1
7 13 19 25

8
14 20 21 2

15
16 22 3 9

Magic Sum

The magic sum is easily calculated as n(n2 + 1)/2 The center has value (n2 + 1)/2 The associates p and q must add to n2 + 1 Thus the associate of p is n2 + 1 p

Center

13

Associative/Self-Symmetric

5 4 10 13 21

16 22

Panmagic?
17
23 4 10 11

24
5 6 12 18

1
7 13 19 25

8
14 20 21 2

15
16 22 3 9

Not Panmagic
15
16 22 3 9

17
23 4 10 11

24
5 6 12 18

1
7 13 19 25

8
14 20 21 2

15
16 22 3 9

Panmagic (Ultramagic)
10
11 17 23 4

18
24 5 6 12

1
7 13 19 25

14
20 21 2 8

22
3 9 15 16

Regular Construction of Siamese Magic Square


Iij

= i, Jij = j A = (I + J + (n 3)/2)mod n B = (I + 2J 2)mod n M = nA + B

(1) (2) (3) (4)

and

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3

4 4 4 4

5 5 5 5

and

3 4 0 1

4 0 1 2

0 1 2 3

1 2 3 4

2 3 4 0

1 2 3 4

3 4 0 1

0 1 2 3

2 3 4 0

4 0 1 2

Orthogonal Latin Squares

The construction works because A and B are orthogonal (magic) Latin squares (Euler). A magic square that can be decomposed into two Latin squares is called regular.

Lemma

Let n be odd and I and J be n n matrices defined by (1). Let A = [aI + bJ + f(n)]mod n where 0 < |a|, |b| < n, and f(n) be defined such that Amm= (n 1)/2 where m = (n + 1)/2. If a and b are relatively prime to n, then A is a magic Latin square.

Brees Orthogonality Criterion

Let n be odd and I and J be n n matrices be given by (1). Let A and B be given by A = [aI + bJ + f(n)]mod n, B = [cI + dJ + g(n)]mod n (5) Then M = nA + B + 1 is a magic square if: (i) a, b, c, d are relatively prime to n (ii) |ad bc| 0 modn and relatively prime to n

Corollary 1

Let A, B be given by (5). If n is prime, then for 0 < |a|, |b|, |c|, |d| < n, M(A, B) = nA + B + 1 and M(B, A) are magic squares provided |ad bc| 0 modn. Note: the second condition is equivalent to: for any k, k(a, b) (c, d) in Zn Zn.

Conways Lozenge Method


1
3 5 9 15 7 13 19 25 11 17 23 21

Conways Lozenge Method


1
3 5 6 9 15 7 13 19 25

10
11 17 23 4 21 2 8

Conways Lozenge Method


Iij

= i, Jij = j A = (I + J + (n 3)/2)mod n B = (I + (n 1)J + (n 1)/2)mod n M = nA + B

and

3 4 0 1

4 0 1 2

0 1 2 3

1 2 3 4

2 3 4 0

2 3 4 0

1 2 3 4

0 1 2 3

4 0 1 2

3 4 0 1

Conways Lozenge Method


18
24 5 6 12

22
3 9 15 16

1
7 13 19 25

10
11 17 23 4

14
20 21 2 8

Pyramid Method
5 4 3 2 1 6 7 12 8 13 18 9 14 19 24 10 15 20 25

11
16

17
22 21

23

Pyramid Method
5 3 20 7 24 11 4 16 8 25 12 4 16 9 21 13 5 17 21 10 22 14 1 18 10 22 15 2 19 6 23

2 1 6

20 25 24

Pyramid Method
Iij

= i, Jij = j A = (I(n + 1)/2 + J(n + 1)/2 1)mod n B = (I(n 1)/2 + (n + 1)J/2 (n 1)/2)mod n M = nA + B

and

0 3 1 4

3 1 4 2

1 4 2 0

4 2 0 3

2 0 3 1

2 4 1 3

0 2 4 1

3 0 2 4

1 3 0 2

4 1 3 0

Pyramid Method
3
20 7 24 11

16
8 25 12 4

9
21 13 5 17

22
14 1 18 10

15
2 19 6 23

Symmetries

There are 8 symmetries each square: four 90o rotations and four mirror reflections The symmetries are elements of the dihedral group D4 with eight elements, generated by a rotation and a reflection

Pyramid Method - Rotation


15
22 9 16 3

2
14 21 8 20

19
1 13 25 7

6
18 5 12 24

23
10 17 4 11

Pyramid Horizontal Reflection


11
24 7 20 3

4
12 25 8 16

17
5 13 21 9

10
18 1 14 22

23
6 19 2 15

Other Equivalences:

Switching corresponding rows (and columns) results in an associative magic square. These are referred to as row or column permutations

Pyramid Method 2nd and 4th Rows Switched


3
20 7 24 11

22
14 1 18 10

9
21 13 5 17

16
8 25 12 4

15
2 19 6 23

Counting Row/Column Permutations

The number of row permutations is (n 1)(n 3) = (n 1)!! This is to be divided by 2 (reflections). Thus R(n) = (n 1)!!/2 The number of row and column permutations R(n) = (n 1)!!(n 1)!! /4

Counting Pairings

Let n be prime (1, t) is a generator of a subgroup of Zn Zn The length of its orbit is n 1 There are n 1 possible values of t. Number of pairings of equivalence classes: (n 1)(n 2) There are (n 1) squares in each class

Counting Pairings

Thus the number of regular associative magic squares (n 2)(n 1)3 There are 8 symmetries for each square (D4) The number of unique regular ultramagic squares by this method is L(n) = (n 2)(n 1)3/8

Swapping Associates

The counting method only included magic squares obtained by the construction M(A,B). Other squares can be obtained by permuting associates. The condition is that associates retain self-symmetry

and

0 3 1 4

3 1 4 2

1 4 2 0

4 2 0 3

2 0 3 1

2 4 1 3

0 2 4 1

3 0 2 4

1 3 0 2

4 1 3 0

and

4 3 1 0

3 1 0 2

1 0 2 4

0 2 4 3

2 4 3 1

2 4 3 1

0 2 4 3

1 0 2 4

3 1 0 2

4 3 1 0

Pyramid Method Post Swap


23
20 9 2 11

16
8 5 14 22

7
1 13 25 19

4
12 21 18 10

15
24 17 6 3

Pyramid Method
3
20 7 24 11

16
8 25 12 4

9
21 13 5 17

22
14 1 18 10

15
2 19 6 23

Counting Swaps

There are (n 1) possible values for the first slot (not including the center) After a slot is filled, its self-symmetric slot is also filled as well. Hence there are (n 3) possible values for the next slot. The total number of swaps is given by (n 1)(n 3)(n 5) = (n 1)!!

Counting Swaps

There are (n 1) repetitions using this method. Thus the number of unique swaps is G(n) = (n 3)(n 5) = (n 3)!!

Counting Unique Regular Associative Magic Squares


The total number of unique regular prime order associative magic squares is given by U(n) = L(n)G(n)G(n) = (n 1)(n 2)(n 1)!!2/8 Including symmetries and row/column permutations, T(n) = (n 1)(n 2)(n 1)!!4/4

Regular Associative Magic Squares


n
3 5 7 11 13 17 19

U(n)
1 96 8,640 1.65 108 3.50 1010 3.20 1015 1.32 1018

T(n)
8 12288 3.98 107 4.89 1015 1.49 1020 6.81 1029 9.12 1034

Construction Method

Choose A = (a b) and choose B satisfying Brees Criterion Permute associates which leave the center, first and last position fixed.

Example: n = 5

The valid pairs for A and B are: (1 1) (2 2) (3 3) (4 4) (1 2) (2 4) (3 1) (4 3) (1 3) (2 1) (3 4) (4 2) (1 4) (2 3) (3 2) (4 1) Associates for each of A and B may be swapped (swapping 1 and 3 only).

Example: n = 7

The valid pairs for A and B are: (1 1) (2 2) (3 3) (4 4) (5 5) (6 6) (1 2) (2 4) (3 6) (4 1) (5 3) (6 5) (1 3) (2 6) (3 2) (4 5) (5 1) (6 4) (1 4) (2 1) (3 5) (4 2) (5 6) (6 3) (1 5) (2 3) (3 1) (4 6) (5 4) (6 2) (1 6) (2 5) (3 4) (4 3) (5 2) (6 1)

Example: n = 7

Choose A, then B not in the orbit of A For the swapping of associates, the subgroup of permutations is given by: K = {e, (1 5), (2 4), (1 4)(2 5), (1 4 5 2), (1 2 5 4), (1 2)(4 5), (1 5)(2 4)}

Questions/Comments

References
[1] M. Gardner, Magic Squares and Cubes, in: Time Travel and Other Mathematical Bewilderments., New York, W. H. Freeman 1988 pp. 213-225. [2] H.D. Heinz, J.R. Hendricks, Magic Square Lexicon: Illustrated, HDH 2000 pp. 20 24. [3] K. Pinn, C. Wieczerkowski, Number of magic squares from parallel tempering Monte Carlo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 9 1998 541547. [4] A. de Winkel, The magic encyclopedia, 2012 http://www.magichypercubes.com/Encyclopedia/ [5] A.W. Grogono, Grogono magic squares 2004 http://www.grogono.com/magic/ [6] K. Setsuda, Part 4: New advanced study of magic squares and cubes, Chapter 4 Section 6, 2003 pp. 1-49

References
[7] W. Trump, Ultramagic squares of order 7, 2001, http://www.trump.de/magic-squares/ultramagic-7 [8] M. Kraitchik, Magic Squares, in: Mathematical Recreations. New York, Norton, 1942 pp. 142-192. [9] C. Moler, Magic Squares, in: Experiments with Matlab, Mathworks, Inc. 2011 pp. 112. [10] E.W. Weisstein, Magic square, From MathWorld [11] K. Ollerenshaw, Constructing pandiagonal magic squares of arbitrarily large size, Mathematics Today 45 (2005) 23-29, 66-69. [12] R.P. Nordgren, New constructions for special magic squares, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 78 (2012) 133-154.

References
[13] G. Abe, Unsolved problems on magic squares, Discrete Mathematics 127 (1994) 3-13. [14] A.O.L. Atkin, L. Hay, R.G. Larson, Enumeration and construction of pandiagonal Latin squares of prime order, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 9 (1983) 267-292. [15] A.J. Beyer, Enumeration of orthogonal Latin squares, Masters Thesis, SFSU 2010. [16] D. Borkovitz, F.K. Hwang, Multiplicative magic squares, Discrete Mathematics 47 (1983) 1-11. [17] T. Hayashi, Varahamihiras pandiagonal magic square of the order four, Historia Mathematica 14 (1987) 159-166.

References
[18] F. Hruska, Magic squares, matrices, planes and angles. J. Rec. Math. 23 (1991) 183-189. [19] R.H. Jeurissen, Divisor matrices and magic sequences. Discrete Mathematics 250 (2002) 125135. [20] Y. Kim, J. Yoo, An algorithm for constructing magic squares. Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 28042809. [21] Y.H. Ku, N. Chen, On systematic procedures for constructing magic squares, Journal of the Franklin Institute 321 (1986) 337-350. [22] C.F. Laywine, G.L. Mullen, Generalizations of Boses equivalence between complete sets of mutually orthogonal Latin squares and affine planes, Journal of Combinatorial Theory A61 (1992) 13-35.

References
[23] P. Loly, I. Cameron, W. Trump, D. Schindel, Magic square spectra, Linear Algebra and its Applications 430 (2009) 26592680. [24] K. Ollerenshaw, D.S. Bree, Most-perfect pandiagonal magic squares: Their construction and enumeration, The Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, Southend-on-Sea, UK, 1998. [25] B. Turner, K. Warner, The structure and geometry of 44 pandiagonal matrices, Discrete Mathematics 34 (1981) 301-310. [26] D. Xu, Z. Mao, B. Chen, P. Huang, New recursive construction of magic squares using Kronecker compositional operations and its application in engineering computation, Systems Engineering Procedia 2 (2011) 331 337. [27] G. David, Numerical Construction of Regular Prime Order Ultramagic Squares (submitted 2012)

You might also like