Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review of Ethics
Last week we looked briefly at the origins of ethics Theories of Ethics (Utilitarianism, Duty Ethics, Rights Ethics, Virtue Ethics) Engineering as a profession Codes of ethics (IIE, NSPE, Order of an Engineer) Ethics cases (e.g., space shuttles)
This week
Show how to analyze problems from an ethical viewpoint.
Factual what is actually known about a case. Conceptual the meaning or applicability of an idea. Moral which moral principle is applicable to the situation.
Line Drawing
Useful for situations in which the applicable moral principles are clear, but there seems to be a great deal of gray area about which ethical principle applies. Polar opposites are established.
Moral problems are placed along line in accordance with where each fall on a continuum. P is placed where you believe problem fits relative to entries.
Example - Problem 1
Dispose of slightly hazardous waste into lake. Water source for nearby town. EPA limit 10 ppm. Average concentration of disposal 5 ppm
6 5
4 1 P 7 2,3
Flow Charting
Helpful when there is a sequence of events or a series of consequences that flows from each decision. Gives a visual picture and readily allows one to see results of each decision.
Decision
Example - Problem 2
Should Union Carbide build a plant at Bhophal? Investigate Laws. Safety standards. Cost considerations.
Please read
Section 4.5: Conflict Problems
1st - Conflicting moral choices, but one is obviously more significant than the other. 2nd Creative Middle Way, an attempt at a compromise that will work for everyone. 3rd When 1 and 2 dont work, bite the bullet, use your gut feelings and make best possible choice from information available. Bribery never acceptable.
Info source
Engineering Ethics, 2nd Edition, Charles B.
Fleddermann, Chapter 4, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
Incident Summary
Airbus A330-300 departed Vancouver Substantial amount of smoke and vapor seen emitting from Engine 2 Emergency landing in Vancouver Engine 2 shut down Inspection showed fuel was leaking
Causal Factors
1. Incorrect entry on maintenance office duty board Did not follow trouble shooting manual (TSM) Unnecessarily removed LP fuel line from fuel/oil heat exchanger 2. Unfamiliarity with Equipment Retainer hidden from view Did not use Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) 3. Engine vibration caused detachment of fuel/oil heat exchanger LP fuel line Substantial leak from Engine 2
Negative Paradigm: The workers do not follow the Trouble Shooting Manual and the Aircraft Maintenance Manual resulting in troubleshooting and performing maintenance without reference Positive Paradigm: The workers followed the Trouble Shooting Manual and Aircraft Maintenance Manual so that all troubleshooting and maintenance is performed with proper reference and guidance.
No
Accident Summary
April 20, 1997 Two roller coaster cars collided on the Wildcat roller coaster The two cars were going up a hill and an antirollback device failed to keep the first car on the track and it slipped back and crashed into the car behind it. The roller coaster was inspected two weeks before this accident. One person was killed and five others were injured.
Causal Factors
1. The chain dog was riding up on the edge of the chain trough.
If the chain rides up the side of the car and onto the left leg of the chain near the top of the hill, the chain can disengage and the car could slip.
There was no documentation for scheduled or nonscheduled maintenance of The Wildcat, or for operating procedures.
No
Yes No
A maintenance worker must inspect the changes.
Yes No
Fix the height of the chain dog and inspect again.
Yes
The Wildcat can operate properly.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Every time The Wildcat breaks down, it is documented. Operating procedure are followed for the most part. Operators havent been trained at all. Changes made to the car dont need to be written down. Proper part replacements should be followed.
Accident Summary:
Airplane departed Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba without incident After plane was leveled in air, large backfire heard and loss of engine power Pilot landed plane in swampy area with minor and severe injuries to passengers
Casual Factors
Incorrect installation of airplane parts
Cylinder push rod tube Valve adjustment screw protrusion beyond limits Caused damage to valve train exhaust valve would not open overtime Field Barometric Power Reference Check Valve clearance checks on 400-hr schedule
Line Drawing:
Parts
NP
Incorrect Installation of
PP
1. Parts are installed incorrectly, but corrected immediately 2. Parts are installed incorrectly, and cause minor damage overtime 3. Parts are installed incorrectly, but cause no damage overtime
Flow Chart:
Plane
No
Had last Has pilot Yes Yes Inspect plane Check within noticed Irregular before flying 400 hrs? Sounds?
Yes
Inspect plane before flying
No
Inspect plane before flying
No
Inspection is not needed
Assignment
Work in group to choose problem and get my permission before you start sources of info on original class schedule and syllabus document. analyze problem using both techniques shown today. present your analysis in class using PPT. send me one copy of your electronic file via e-mail. Due November 28th.
Groups 1 - 4
Group 1 Group 2 Hwang Group 3 Group 4 Mufalli Beh, Brewster, Frankenfield Geldard, Haseley, Henry, Jain, Kapoor, Keum Kingsley, Koperski, Lottes,
Groups 5 - 8
Group 5 Muller, Munch, Oh Group 6 Olsen, Oropeza, Pandit, Patel Group 7 Pelchy, Saputra, Sriniva Group 8 Swanson, Thornton, Ward, Zimmermann Presentation order will be randomly drawn and announced on Nov. 28th.
The End
Questions??