Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture aim
to provide students with an appreciation of the practice of approaching the literature in relation to specific research areas and the abstraction of conceptualization
Learning outcomes
Understand the purpose of a literature foundation Understand how the approach the literature in relation to specific research areas How to maximise the resources of the library to gather literature effectively and efficiently Appreciate how to organise relevant literature with purpose Develop an appreciation of the issue of plagiarism and appropriate referencing will also be considered.
Exercise:
In pairs, discuss the following questions: What is a theory? Who creates a theory (ies)? Is a theory always right? Do academics (your lecturers) always present two/three schools of thought? What are the 3 broad groupings of theories? List as many management/marketing theories as you can.
Edited Books Parsons, E and Maclaran, P (2009) Contemporary Issues in Marketing and Consumer Behaviour, Elsevier: London
Books can give a good overview of the topic area. An introduction to Mainstream literature Can help to clarify research objectives Can be out of date but a great starting point!
Peer Reviewed (Refereed) Journals Organisation Studies (OS) publishes peer-reviewed, top quality theoretical and empirical research with the aim of promoting the understanding of organizations
Published on a regular basis Print or online resources Refereed journals ensure quality Need to distinguish between academic and professional journals Essential for dissertation research
Conference Proceedings
ECKM 2010 (European Conference on Knowledge Management)
http://www.academic-conferences.org/eckm/eckm2010/eckm10home.htm Conferences are up to date work/thinking in the field Key speakers Contemporary issues and debates Access to other resources networks
Others Academy of Marketing, European Academy of Marketing, European Academy of Management, American Marketing Association, Academy of Management.
Literature searching starting out The Bigger picture Textbooks may provide a summarised introduction Amazon - http://www.amazon.co.uk/ Drilling Down Academic Journals Research groups Conference proceedings
Relevance trees (Saunders et al (2007) Identify key search terms Help focus the research question/objectives Help to establish priorities Identify significant areas for investigation A hierarchical construction which will also help to establish the structure and direction of your literature review
Using databases
Advanced -v- basic search What key terms will you use? Boolean logic Which default field will you use?
Specific
Inverted funnel
Start with a narrow topic or theme and broaden it out
Time line
Track chronological development of an idea or the diffusion of a practice
Example
An argument tree
Reading
Selective reading just reading Jot down questions before reading read with an agenda in mind Active reading is done with a pencil Speed reading making a mental map Get writing! Jot down your ideas, underline words, queries, assumptions that you question Build summary tables of pertinent studies (e.g. year of publication, main findings and conclusions, nature of the dependent/independent variables)
Analytical reviews
Blooms Taxonomy
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Know
Define Repeat Record Relate Underline
Understand
Translate Describe Recognise Explain Express Identify Locate
Apply
Interpret Apply Employ Dramatise Practise Illustrate Operate Schedule Sketch
Analyse
Distinguish Analyse Appraise Calculate Compare Contrast Inspect Debate Question Categorise Manage
Synthesise
Compose Plan Propose Design Formulate Arrange Assemble Collect Create Organise Prepare
Evaluate
Judge appraise Evaluate Rate Compare Revise Assess Estimate
Literature review
Developing a clear motivation
Gaps or flaws in prior research Extends theory
Makes it explicit or connects it to another theoretical idea
Applies theory
But this contribution is much lower
Evidence of complexity
Literature review
Constructs: building blocks of theory
Ambiguous and under developed definitions Underspecified
Here's the easy way to do it. First, take a large, random sample of people and ask them a question like: "When all's said and done, at the end of the day Brian, taking the rough with the smooth and all that, rate your well-being on a scale of one to 10."
For an interesting attempt to measure cause and effect try Mappiness, a project run by the London School of Economics, which offers a phone app that prompts you to record your mood and situation. The Mappiness website says: "We're particularly interested in how people's happiness is affected by their local environment - air pollution, noise, green spaces, and so on - which the data from Mappiness will be absolutely great for investigating."
Meta questions that raised from the reflection of the reflection Narrative turns what is really significant and meaningful in the literature? What is implicit in the literature that you can make explicit? What do you disagree with? Why?
A meta-analysis
Conceptualization
Higher order thinking Distinguish between frameworks and testable models Derived from the literature or from empirical data
Conceptualization (Flow)
A meta-analysis
Start-up Established
Growth
?
Transfer of Undertakings
Many Micros
Succession Chasm
Deductive conceptualizations
Deductive conceptualizations
Facets of relevance
Direct and indirect relevance ServQual Parasuraman, Berry and Zeithaml, 1988; Markor Kohli, Jaworski and Kumur, 1993) Latent relevance (tea bag in hot water effect) Serendipitous relevance (ex ante and ex post) First Order and Second Order
Conceptualizing after the empirical data collection Hard interpretatism, developing propositions
Abduction
Combining induction and deduction Refining conceptualization after the data collection
Conceptual map
Levers of control
Diagnostic control systems critical success factors are communicated and monitored. Beliefs systems are used to enhance core values related to market strategy and to inspire search for new opportunities in line with these values. Interactive control systems are used to discuss strategic uncertainties and to learn novel strategic responses to a changing environment Boundary systems reduce risks by setting limits to strategically undesirable behaviours.
Normative conceptualization
Tables as conceptualization
Institutionalising control
Conceptualization as a spiral
Conceptualization as cyclical
Issues in conceptualization
Further reading
Buschman, J., Warner, D. A. 2005. Researching and Shaping Information Literacy Initiatives in Relation to the Web: Some Framework Problems and Needs', The Journal of Academic Librarianship Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 12-18. Bell J (1999) Doing your research project (3rd Edn) Buckingham:Oxford Univ Press Bryman A and Bell E (2003) Business Research Methods New York:Oxford Univ Press Easterby-Smith M et al(2002) Management Research: An Introduction London:Sage Publications Saunders M. et al (2009) Research Methods for Business Students, (Edn 4) Harlow, Prentice Hall Sekaran V (2000) Research Methods for Business: A skills building approach (3rd Edn) New York:Wiley
Reflection Questions
What is the objective in researching the literature? What should the literature chapter look like? How do I conduct an analytical, rather than a descriptive, literature review?
Reflection Question
Are there any parts of the lecture you would like me to say a bit more about?
Further Reading
Whetten, D. 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 4: 490-495. Bacharach, S. 1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 496-515. Sutton, R. & Staw, B. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371-384. Weick, K. 1995. What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 385-390. Van de Ven, A. 1989. Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14: 486489. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. & Sutton, R. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become selffulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 8-24. Hambrick, D. 2007. The field of managements devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1346-1352. Helfat, C. 2007. Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 5: 185-192. Weick, K. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14: 516-531. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532-550. Poole, M. & Van de Ven, A. 1989. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14: 562-578. Whetten, D., Felin, T. & King, B. 2009. The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35: 537-563.