Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Low noise
High cost
FUEL CELL
Chemical energy stored is converted to electrical energy with out combustion.
High cost of fuel cell (according to DOE mass produced fuel cell costs 200$ per UNIT as per 2008 records)
Use an energy storage device to supplement extra power requirement in FCEV vehicle
SUPER CAPACITOR
super capacitor is an electrochemical device that can provide high capacitance in a very small volume and weight Have very low charging and discharging time
FCEV POWERTRAIN
AT HIGH POWER
SUPER CAPACITOR + FUEL CELL
DC LINK VOLTAGE
At low power
Fuel cell
SUPER CAPACITOR
DC LINK VOLTAGE
PROPOSED DESIGN
Cost of AC motor , inverter and transmission are constant for specific rating of vehicle So by proper design cost of fuel cell and capacitor stack has to be reduced.
Total cost of the fuel cell and capacitor stack is given by Q = C1 Mfc Nfc + C2 Msc Nsc Q=total cost , M= number of units connected in series
CONSTRAINS ON C1 & C2
Cost on fuel cell and capacitor unit are assumed independent of & number Dc link voltage has to be maintained stable during all vehicular conditions Vdc,m = Vdc,n(1 + ) Mfc = Vdc,m/Vfc,m Msc = Vdc,m/Vsc,m.
Initial acceleration
Gradability
Maximum speed Drive cycle
Both fuel cell and super capacitor have to supply power to FCEV power train Here for given spec it is assumed to have an initial acceleration of 60mi in 10s If Nfc is smaller Nsc should be greater and vice versa The combination must lead to 10% dc link variation Acceptable combinations are found by trial and error method
GRADING
Only fuel cell supplies power
Pg = M g g
P from table 3 is calculated as 20.98 kw let Vdc,min = Vdc,n(1 ) Vfc,min = Vdc,min / Mfc Nfc= Pg/ (Mfc. Pfc)
vehicle spec.png
DRIVE CYCLE
At high power requirement both fuel cell and super capacitor provide power and at low power fuel cell provides power alone and charges super capacitor. Fig shows characteristics of FTP 75 DRIVING CYCLE
ACCEPTABLE COMBINATIONS
RESULTANT CURVE
where p1 =0.50056; p2 =6.6939; p3 = 42.742; p4=18.781; and p5 = 115.66. Points B and C are given by Point B : Nsc =1.43 Nfc =89.2 Point C : Nsc =2.43 Nfc =42.
The design is implemented for a sample vehicle and the dened vehicle performance. The cost, volume, and weight of the optimized fuel-cell stack and super capacitor bank and the fuel economy of the vehicle are presented. Simulation results verify that the designed fuel-cell stack and super capacitor bank can provide all the required vehicle performance. The limitation of the method is that the design method is only applicable to FCEVs powered by a fuel cell and super capacitor.
M. C. Pera, D. Hissel, and J. M. Kauffmann, Fuel cell systems for electrical vehicles, in Proc. IEEE VTC, May 2002, vol. 4, pp. 20972102
web.iitd.ac.in/~sbasu/seminar/presentation/5Dr.G.SASI.KUMAR.pdf V. Wouk, Hybrids: Then and now, IEEE Spectr., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 16 21, Jul. 1995. The Fuel Cell Handbook, U.S. Dept. Energy, Morgantown, WV, 2002.