Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caleb Parker GIS Analyst Behavioral and Social Sciences FHI/NC 919.544.7040 x 11487 cparker2@fhi.org
Contents
Geographic Information Systems Defined FHIs utilization of GIS (FHI/NC): Examples Other examples in Public Health Technical Assistance
GIS in Brief
A geographic information system is a complex tool to create maps of your data, to understand spatial trends and patterns in the data. A GIS has a multitude of functionality, such as:
Displaying data spatially (on a map) Calculating distance, area, and direction Building spatial models to understand how changing one variable can change the map Identifying statistically significant clusters of like values Visualizing topography: elevation, hydrology, land use
3. 4. 5. 6.
Monitoring and Evaluation Facility Referral for Emergency Care Prioritizing Recruitment for Clinical Trials
We need to define catchment areas for the facilities in the green area, so that we can calculate populations that come to each facility. We used data on elevation, roads and streams to figure out where natural breaks between catchment areas might be.
This is the final map of catchment areas. Each catchment area is shaded light to dark green to describe the density of population. Notice how the catchment area boundaries curve and weave, forming random shapes. These shapes are formed when taking elevation, rivers and roads into account.
1 2 3 5 6
Boundary
Catchment Area
Comprehensive Facilities: 1. Got Agulu Sub District Hosp 2. Usigu Dispensary 3. Bondo District Hospital 4. St. Annes Dispensary 5. St. Elizabeth Lwak Hospital 6. Anyuongi Dispensary 7. Manyuanda Health Centre 8. Madiany District Hospital
Data Sources Kenya Administrative Boundaries: USAID Famine Early Warning System, 1992 Kenya LandScan Population Dataset: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2009 Kenya Road Network: Google Earth, 2010
In this example, catchment areas need to be created for comprehensive facilities (the ones that have all three services: HIV testing, pharmacy and lab). The facility identified where the population they serve lives. Thus, these catchment areas are based on actual data.
2
3
Population
4 6
Facility Type
Comprehensive Not Comprehensive
Catchment Area
Catchment Area
Comprehensive Facilities: 1. Got Agulu Sub District Hosp 2. Usigu Dispensary 3. Bondo District Hospital 4. St. Annes Dispensary 5. St. Elizabeth Lwak Hospital 6. Anyuongi Dispensary 7. Manyuanda Health Centre 8. Madiany District Hospital
Data Sources Kenya Administrative Boundaries: USAID Famine Early Warning System, 1992 Kenya LandScan Population Dataset: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2009 Kenya Road Network: Google Earth, 2010
Population for each catchment area is calculated and displayed by color. This allows managers to plan the amount of drugs (that require onsite HIV testing, pharmacy and lab) to stock at each facility. For example, more drugs should be allocated in catchment areas 3, 5 and 8.
Flatter terrain decreases travel time around this facility, enabling more people to walk to care within 14 hours.
Steep slopes make walking harder and increase travel time to this facility.
This walking time model is easily affected by terrain. Terrain, while not able to be seen on this map, is measured by slope: the steeper the slope, the longer it would take someone to walk across it. Because of the varying slope, facility walking areas are of different shapes and sizes.
In this example, each dispensary was assigned a number of condoms to stock per month to meet the expected needs of the population. One month after the program to distribute condoms started, the data were mapped. Note how very few locations have received more than 50% of their expected number of condoms from the distributor during that month.
After six months, another map was created and shows improvement in distribution. By now, the majority of dispensaries have received at least 50% of the condoms during this month. Several groups of dispensaries received fewer than 50% of the needed condoms that month, so staff can try to address distribution issues specific to those areas.
The GIS recognizes this road network and the facilities that are located on it. It also understands average rates of speed input by the user for each road.
To identify emergency referral networks from each Tier B to the closest Tier A, the GIS calculated travel time on the roadway for each Tier B facility. This map shows a model of the referral networks (each one is color-coded) based on the shortest travel time. Notice that some Tier As will have many more Tier Bs referring patients than other Tier As.
The green areas have many Tier B facilities that can reach a Tier A facility within one hour.
The red areas have many Tier B facilities with a travel time beyond 2 hours.
Each facilitys total travel time to a Tier A is calculated, and is doubled if the Tier B does not have its own transportation. The results show that more than one third of facilities are beyond the desired threshold of a 2-hour travel time (shown as red dots).
Cumulative Minutes to Closest Tier 1 Facility
Under 60 61 to 120 More than 120
Count
77 64 74
Percentage
35.8% 29.8% 34.4%
This is a smaller study area from within Amhara in the previous map. We estimated that 7.5 million people live in this area. According to this model, only 57% of people live near a Tier B facility that is within 2 hours of travel time to a Tier A facility.
Note: The population served by a Tier B facility that is beyond a 2hour drive time (red) indicates that the population that attends that facility is not served by the current referral network.
Total Population of Study Area Population Within 2hour drive of Tier A Facility Percent of Total
7,515,478
4,305,400 57%
One solution modeled is to provide each facility with transportation that does not have it. This increased the population served by 21% and reduced average travel time from 145 minutes to 90 minutes.
Note: The population served by a Tier B facility that is beyond a 2hour drive time (red) indicates that the population that attends that facility is not served by the current referral network.
Total Population of Study Area Population Within 2hour drive of Tier A Facility Percent of Total
7,515,478
5,847,195 78%
Establishment Clusters by the Average Number of Sex Partners Women Had in Past 4 Weeks
A clinical trial needed to identify the highest risk areas so they could be prioritized for recruitment. Establishments where sex workers were found were clustered together, and their sexual behavior data were averaged by the cluster. One of several variables to identify higher risk areas is a higher average number of sex partners. Two clusters, A and C, stand out as places of higher risk relative to other clusters.
Once the other variables were taken into consideration, the GIS was able to assist decision makers in prioritizing recruitment efforts. Establishment clusters A and C that were at higher risk in the previous map continued to be the higher risk area when other variables were factored in, giving them the first and second priority status for recruitment.
Other Examples
GIS can support research and programs in other ways. Some examples from the literature are listed below.
Identifying statistically significant clusters of high fetal loss and infant death rate due to arsenic concentrations in well water in Matlab, Bangladesh (Sohel 2010) Measuring access to primary health care services in rural South Africa (Tanser 2006) Mapping environmental changes that affect risk of diseases like West Nile virus and Rift Valley Fever in Europe and West Africa (Lambin et al 2010) Community members participated in developing neighborhood maps which strengthened understanding of population served by local health facilities (Ansumana et al 2010) Predicting mosquito habitat for malaria prevention in Zambia (Clennon et al 2010)
Presentations by other researchers can be found online as well at these searchable websites:
Association of American Geographers conference proceedings ESRI Health and GIS conference proceedings
RTI International
RTI has an expansive utilization of GIS, from survey research and human health risk assessments to cartographic modeling; an overview is found here
Contact Information
Caleb Parker
GIS Analyst Behavioral and Social Sciences FHI/NC 919.544.7040 x11487 cparker@fhi360.org