Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Typically used in low volume serious crimes such as serial murder, serial rape, serial arson
Video
FBI Profilers
Case Example
North London: Kilburn Area 3 Murders and 26 Rapes 1982 and 1986 Women, Early 20s Strangers Attacked During Night On or Near Railway Used Mask & Conversation Violent Rapes Used a Knife Talked to victim after rape Questioned victims about where
lived Varied Description of Rapist by victims Greeted victims as he passed and then attacked from behind
hands behind their backs Gave victims instructions on how to get home
Case Example
Home Location Marital Status Friendships
Lived
Married, Only
Extracurricular activities
Previous Actions Toward Women Pornography Interest? Occupation Age
Martial Arts
Violence Collector Carpenter 28
Late 1800s Jack the Ripper investigation 1950s New York Mad Bomber investigation 1970s Criminal Profiling program developed at the FBI Today - Similar programs developed internationally (e.g., RCMPs Behavioural Science Section)
Types of Profiling
Inductive Profiling Profiling an offender from what is known about other offenders Deductive profiling Profiling an offender from evidence relating to the crime of that offender
Inductive Profiling
80% of serial killers who attack people in parking lots are white males
Our offender has attacked three people in parking lots, therefore it is likely that our offender is a white male
Inductive Profiling
Clinical Experience & Intuition Statistical Base Rates & Multivariate Analysis
Deductive Profiling
Body of a female victim is found in a locked warehouse in busy waterfront section
Offender can easily access warehouse and feels comfortable in the area
Profile Construction
Organized
Planned Offence Used Vehicle High intelligence Sexually Adequate
Disorganized
Spontaneous Offence No Vehicle Low Intelligence Sexually Inadequate
> 100 profilers FBI, 1000 profiles/year in USA 242 profiles 1981-1995 UK
Consumer Satisfaction
Evaluation studies (e.g., Copson, 1995 N = 182) 83% operationally useful 69% definitely use profiling again
But 2.7% profiling helped identify offender 14% helped solve case 16% open new lines of inquiry
Data: 21 offender profiles Used in major inquiries 5 US, 13 UK, 3 other Procedure: Coding dictionary
Content Categories
Factual/Summary information case info Unsubstantiated opinion (e.g., no backing) Unverifiable (e.g., emotions) Ambiguous (e.g., vague poor skills) Opposing alternatives multiple outs
Profiling Assumptions
Nomothetic: Similar processes affect all individuals same way Deterministic: Behaviour is affected in predictable ways Non-situational: Behaviour remains stable across situations
DISPOSITION
aggressiveness
BEHAVIOUR IN EVERYDAY LIFE conviction for violent crimes domestic disputes violent pornography
Criminal Consistency
Little to no support for trait theory Situational factors impact criminal actions across crimes
Meta-analysis (5 studies) Statistically combine accuracy scores Profilers vs. Students, Psychologists, and Police officers
Used solved cases, administered questionnaire
Profilers barely outperformed other groups Low level of objective accuracy in Profilers predictions Profilers dont want to be tested!
Conclusions
Profiles offer comfort to officers but do not help solve crimes redundant
Profiles contain few predictions about offender and those are often ambiguous, unjustified, or unverifiable.
Informational Mediators
Anecdotes
The Mind
Natural Human Reasoning Interpreting Ambiguous Predictions Mistaking fiction for Fact
Critique Video
Anecdotes
Exclusive Reporting of Hits
Geographic Profiling
Geographic profiling analyzes crime scene locations to determine the most probable area of offender residence
Racial Profiling
Racial profiling refers to any police initiated action that uses race to make decisions regarding an individual