Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Objectives
Bandingkan dan monitoring dan evaluasi kontras Menjelaskan dan menggambarkan kriteria untuk mengevaluasi kinerja kebijakan Kontras evaluasi kausal, evaluasi resmi, dan evaluasi partisipatif Jelaskan bagaimana etika mempengaruhi pasarberpusat dan perspektif polis yang berpusat pada kebijakan dan manajemen Jelaskan proses penalaran tentang nilai-nilai Tunjukkan bagaimana penilaian mempengaruhi evaluasi kebijakan desentralisasi fiskal di Makedonia
Causal Evaluation
Field experiment
Official Evaluation
Policymakers Values can be Summative determine stated and need evaluation objectives no justification
Participative Stakeholders Values can be Evaluability Evaluation determine stated and need assessment objectives no justification
Change occurs through persuasion, alliances, and the satisfaction of public and community interests
Public administration can be productive (public trust)
Group Simulation
Break into three groups. Assume that your group is an expert commission responsible for making a recommendation about the formula that should be used for the local government equalization fund in Macedonia. The groups should use these rules: Group I: Rules 1, 2, and/or 3 Group II: Rules 4 and/or 5 Group III: Rules 6, 7, and/or 8 Use the structural model of argument to develop a well-justified recommendation.