Professional Documents
Culture Documents
De&elopment of 7e&i
$ Melanoc(tes
8 8 8 8 dendritic, neural crest, basal cell la(er s(nthesis of melanin 2+2! to keratinoc(tes h(perplasia" tanning+lentigines, increased ratio
$ 7e&us transformation
8 poorl( understood 8 dendritic" rounded 8 no longer lentigionous pattern" nests
De&elopment of 7e&i
$ 9unctional ne&i
8 nests along dermal"epidermal -unction
$ Compound ne&i
8 :in&ade; dermis, first as nests then cords and single cells
$ Dermal ne&i
8 -unctional component lost
E&olution of 7e&i
Melanoc(te 5(perplasia
9unctional 7e&i
Compound 7e&i
Dermal 7e&i
De&elopement of Melanoma
$ <uestionable
8 benign melanoc(tes 8 progressi&e h(perplasia+d(splasia
$ 'adial growth
8 in epidermis, lines of radii, no e=pansi&e nests or nodules 8 slow unrestricted , no metastatic potential
De&elopment of Melanoma
$ >ertical growth
8 &erticall( into dermis 8 e=pansi&e and coalescent nests and nodules 8 metastatic potential dermal l(mphatic and &ascular in&asion
$ %rowth patterns
8 biphasic" slow radial months to (ears" rapid &ertical growth 8 monophasic" rapid &ertical growth onl(
E&olution of Melanoma
D(splastic 7e&i
$ border melanoc(tic ne&i and malignant melanoma $ clinical resembles malignant melanoma $ lentiginous compound ne&us, prominent bridging across rete ridges $ aberrant in inter"rete spaces $ lamellar fibrosis of papillar( dermis, &ariable l(mphoid response
D(splastic 7e&i
D(splastic 7e&i
?(pes of Melanoma
$ $ $ $ $ ,cral lentiginous Mucosal melanoma Superfical spreading melanoma *entigo maligna melanoma 7odular melanoma
Superficial spreading
$ most common head and neck, /!1 $ @th to /th decade $ clinical mi=ture of brown+tan, pink+white irregular borders, biphasic growth $ irregular nests in epidermis $ underl(ing l(mphoid infiltrate $ enlarged nests and single cells in all epidermal la(ers
Superficial spreading
*entigo maligna
$ $ $ $ $ !1 of head and neck longest radial growth phase A2/ (rs elderl( sun e=posed areas clinical dark, irregular ink spot contiguous lintiginous proliferation, d(shesi&e, &ariable shape, atrophic epidermis, infundibular basal cell la(er of hair follicles
*entigo maligna
7odular melanoma
$ $ $ $ $ 4!1 of head and neck /th decade aggressi&e monophasic growth sun"e=posed and none=posed areas well circumscribed blue+black or nodular with in&olution in irregular plaBue $ downward tumorigenic growth, e=pand papillar( dermis into reticular dermis
7odular melanoma
Mucosal melanoma
$ $ $ $ $ $ C1 head and neck histologic staging little use local control predicts sur&i&al neck dissection for clinical 7D E'? for histo 7D ad-u&ant interferon alpha "b
'isk factors
$ $ $ $ $ $ ?(pe . or .. skin at(pical and congenital ne&i actinic skin changes histor( of melanoma famil( histor( of melanoma, at(pical ne&i histor( of significant sun e=posure FblisteringG
Clinical
$ earl(, increase in siHe, change in shape or color of pigmented lesion $ most common s(mptom pruritis $ late, tenderness, bleeding, ulceration $ ,BCDEIs Fas(mmetr(, border, color, diameter, ele&ation, surrounding tissueG $ Epiluminescence microscop( FE*MG
Biops(
$ $ $ $ e=cisional biops( or sauceriHation if small incisional if large Depth of biopsy must be to sub-Q fat if melanoma a second e=cision must be performed
Patholog(
$ diagnosis, tumor thickness in millimeters, margins $ histologic subt(pe, anatomic site, Clark le&el, mitotic rate, growth phase, ulceration, regression, l(mphoc(tes, angiol(mphatic spread, neurotropism, microsatellitosis, precursor lesion
Prognosis
$ Breslow Fthickness in millimetersG strongest predictor
Prognosis
$ Clark le&el less predicti&e, thin skin useful
Prognosis
$ anatomic site, ulceration, gender, histologic t(pe, nodal disease $ head and neck" scalp worse $ e=tremit( better trunk $ women better men $ l(mph node D
8 Breslow thickness, ulceration, J pos. nodes 8 Cohen 2! (r sur&i&al J nodes positi&e
)ork"up
$ 56P
8 entire skin, inguinal, a=illar(, supracla&icular, 567 nodes,especiall( primar( drainage 8 brain, bone, %., constitutional s(mptoms 8 palpable nodes K7,
)ork"up
$ KD%"PE?
8 some use in distant disease 8 sensiti&it( 201 in stud( with S*7 biops(
Staging"Clark
$ *e&el . " in situ at basement membrane $ *e&el .. " through basement membrane into papillar( dermis $ *e&el ... " spread to papillar(+reticular interface $ *e&el .> " spread to reticular dermis $ *e&el > " sub"< in&asion
Staging"Breslow
$ $ $ $ L!.06 mm " thin !.06 " 2.@3 " intermediate 2./! " @.!! " intermediate A@.!! mm " thick
Staging
$ CS+PS F., .., ...G $ ,9CC" Stage . and .. " local, ... " regional .> " distant
,9CC Staging
Surgical ?reatment
$ 'ecommended margins &ar( $ 'ule of thumb
8 L2mm then 2 cm 8 2"@mm then cm 8 A@mm then 4 cm
7odal Disease
$ CS".. remo&e regional l(mphatics depending on location of primar( and presence of distant metastasis
Balch Stud(
BalchIs recommendations
$ ?hree groups
8 local, local plus micro, local plus distant
$ ?hin " 3/1 cure rate no benefit to E*7D $ .ntermediate " 6!1 regional, !1 distant, benefit E*7D $ ?hick " A6!1 regional, A0!1 distant, no benefit $ Should consider other factors as well
,d-u&ant ?herap(
$ 'adiation
8 high dose F@!!"/!! c%(G bulk(, residual, recurrent, unresectable, ill 8 lentigo maligna / (r cure C!1 Fdisfiguring, debilitating locationG 8 ad-u&ant" trend toward impro&ed regional control in 7D dissected necks 8 palliate " especiall( bon( mets
,d-u&ant ?herap(
$ Chemotherap(
8 response /1, durable control 21 8 consider in CS. with A2./ mm, CS.. with )*E, ?7D 8 no sur&i&al ad&antage demonstrated 8 single agent dacarbaHine FD?.CG 8 multiple combinations carmustine, cisplatin, D?.C, tamo=ifen
,d-u&ant ?herap(
$ .mmunotherap(
8 unusual beha&ior, no sur&i&al benefit
$ .nterferon
8 EC#% 26C@, A@mm or 7D, 6.3 (rs high dose .K7"alpha" b, impro&ed disease"free and o&erall sur&i&al appro=. 2 (r. 61 dropout rate to=icit(
Summar(
$ .ncidence and deaths on rise $ Sur&i&al rates increasing due to detection and thorough treatment $ Depth and nodal status most important prognostic indicators $ E*7D still debated $ S*D useful $ #ther modalities therap( further research