Professional Documents
Culture Documents
University A cash
University A publishing
opportunities
University University A cash University A & B cash
Press A
Evaporates University A publishing
(Defect) opportunities Publishing opportunities
University B cash
University B publishing
University Presses (UPs) are seen
as businesses not services
UPs have weak internal
constituencies
Students Interns
Faculty Advisory/Editorial Boards
Alumni None
UPs appear as subventions of
other faculty
Each UP eliminated from picture
potentially reduces number of not-
for-profit publishing venues
Each UP eliminated leaves private
publishers the field with their
troubling dynamic
UPs can offer indirect benefits
Student training and work/study
opportunities
Faculty gain editorial/advisory board
Publishing decision shaped by profit
obligations
Total Revenue (“top line”)
Operating Income (“bottom line”)
All units must deliver on revenue &
OI goals
Corporation Division Imprint
Book/Journal
Private publishers adopt strategies
to serve top-line and bottom-line
objectives
Twigging: creation of new subspecialty
More titles, fewer publishers
Decline of the specialized scholarly monograph
Increased cost of scholarly journals
Similar production costs, fewer potential
subscribers or buyers
Market flooding: more journals, series, and
books
Buyer spreading: fewer buyers per journal/book
Recent Positive
Trends Reduction Recent Negative Trends
in production costs •Reduced
(PPB & shipping) subscribers/buyers
from digital o Working paper sites
platforms o Institutional
repositories
•Increased submission
Mimicry
Twigging more journals
Bundling/Aggregating content: Project Muse, JSTOR,
Caliber
Textbooks: Yale UP (World Language Textbooks),
Cambridge UP
Reference: Oxford UP, Harvard UP, Princeton UP
Series: Columbia UP, Cornell UP
Working Papers: CIAO
Open Access
Grant funded: PhilPapers, The Modernism Lab,
MITOpenCourseWare
Volunteer: RePEc
“Yet if the only form of tradition, of handing
down, consisted in following the ways of the
immediate generation before us in a blind or
timid adherence to its successes, "tradition"
should positively be discouraged.”
--T.S. Eliot, “Tradition and the Individual Talent,” 1922
Why the push for publication?... For many, however, a more immediate
objective is to establish credit—often in the form of a long list of
publications. A thick “vita” helps in the continual struggle to secure
government grants and win academic promotion.”
--William Broad, BioScience, Sept. 1982
University presses and scholarly communication
have always featured a changing dynamic that
remains centered on the distribution of scholarly
work.
Publishing, digital or otherwise, is an evolutionary
phenomenon and therefore not only changing, but
layered.
Digital revolution has
altered how scholarly
information is gathered,
reviewed, and
disseminated.
Digital information
distribution is still built
on cognitive models
through which we
process information,
such as classification
and embedding.
In a digital environment,
the UPs role in scholarly
communication shifts
from availability
(“publication”) to
visibility, a.k.a.,
Democratization of
communication has shifted
balance from… Scholarly
Scholarly Communicati
Communication
on