Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J.-L. Chartier
- Homogeneous compressed mixture - 2 types of (a , n) reactions a) 9Be + a 12C + n + 5.701 MeV - Break up reaction b) 9Be + a 8Be + a + n 1.665 MeV - Fission of Am
Code Norio
Code system for calculating (a,n) and (a,an) neutron spectra. Distributed by N.Tsujimura (JAEA)
Calculation of the a spectra at the cluster surface (modified SPAR code) for several values of Rc Graphs : a) with MCNPX b) with SPAR* code
0,10
Na in E ( = 50 keV)
0,06
radius = 2.5 microns radius = 2.0 microns radius = 1.5 micron radius = 1.0 micron radius = 0.5 micron radius = 0.1micron
0,04
0,02
Energy/MeV
0,10
= = = = =
0.1 micron 0.5 micron 1.5 microns 2.5 microns 0.01 micron
Na in E ( = 50 keV)
0,06
0,04
0,02
Energy/MeV
Capsule type X3, material stainless steel Capsule diameter x height (mm) : 22.4 x 31 Capsule lateral wall thickness (mm) : 2.4 Source materials : Be 4.6g ; AmO2 0.37g Nominal activity (appr.) : 37GBq (1 Ci) Emission rate (appr.) : 2.2 (10**6) n/s ISO spectrum : E average = 4.16 MeV
Option 1 : "homogeneous mixture" (tape 1) Modification of the "tape 5 input data" by inserting the a spectrum calculated at the Rc cluster surface (tape 5) instead of 241Am a spectrum Graphs: - theoretical neutron spectrum versus Rc - emission rate versus Rc (n/cm3) - average neutron energy versus Rc
Spectres-4C
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,1
10
Energy / MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,1
10
Energy/MeV
5,0 3,20x106
3,00x106 4,8
2,60x106
4,6
2,40x106
Rc / mm
2,80x106
Taking into account the geometry of the neutron source type X3 with MCNPX 2.6.0 Graphs: - emergent neutron spectrum versus Rc (average spectrum on a spherical surface surrounding the source Tally F2) - emission rate versus Rc (n/cm3) - average neutron energy versus Rc
Sources-4C + MCNPX
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8 0,8
AmO AmO Be Be 2 2 ISO ISO--(4c+ (4c+MCNPX) MCNPX) -- log log cluster clusterradius radius= = 2.0 1.5 micron micron
0,6 0,6
0,4 0,4
0,2 0,2
1 1
10
Energy/MeV Energy/MeV
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
3,20x106
3,00x106
4,6
2,60x106
4,4
2,40x106
4,2
4,0
Rc / mm
2,80x106
Conclusions:
the general shape of the ISO reference spectrum is obtained, but: Strong differences (peaks, resolution, ) Much higher average energies No spectral contribution of the break-up reaction in the low energy range Sources_5A version
Version Sources_5A code E.F. Shores,G.E. Mueller and G.A. Schlapper Appl. Rad. and Isot. 59 (2003) pp. 151-158 A new 9Be(a,n) cross-section evaluation for use in the Sources computer code Should take into account the breakup reaction 9Be(a,a'n) by modification of tape4 branching fraction file
Norio Tsujimura, T. Yoshida and T. Momose (Nuclear Fuel Cycle Engineering Laboratories) JAEA Rad. Prot. Dos. (2007), pp. 1-6
Calculations of anisotropy factors for radionuclide neutron sources due to scattering from source encapsulation and support structures
Same model : spherical AmO2 clusters embedded in thick Be target Calculation of the a-particles spectrum at the sphere surface ( modified SPAR code) Calculation of the theoretical neutron spectrum taking into account both reactions: - 9Be (a,n) and 9Be (a,a'n) - cross-sections and their angular distributions (JENDL file 2005)
The "Norio" theoretical neutron spectrum is used as an input neutron spectrum in the input MCNPX file The characteristics of the X3 type source (geometry, materials, ) are also included in the MCNPX input file Calculation of the average emitted neutron spectrum on a spherical surface surrounding the source (Tally F2)
Graphs: - neutron spectra (Tally F2) - emission rate versus Rc - average neutron energy
Norio + MCNPX
AmO2// Be (Norio23 + MCNPX) MCNPX Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=1.5mm JLC Monte Carlo aspectrum cluster R=1.5mm - neww -
3,0
2,5
0,6
2,0
0,4
1,5
1,0
0,2
0,5
0,0 0,1
0,0 1 10
Energy/MeV
Ratio
AmO2// Be (Norio23 + MCNPX) MCNPX Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=2.0mm JLC Monte Carlo aspectrum cluster R=2.0mm - neww 2,5
0,6
2,0
0,4
1,5
1,0
0,2
0,5
0,0 0,1
0,0 1 10
Energy/MeV
Ratio
0,8
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
AmO2// Be ISO - (Norio23 + MCNPX) Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=0.1mm new version
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
AmO2// Be ISO - (Norio23 + MCNPX) Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=0.5mm new version
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
AmO2// Be ISO - (Norio23 + MCNPX) Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=1.5mm new version
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
AmO2// Be ISO - (Norio23 + MCNPX) Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=2.0mm new version
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
0,8
AmO2// Be ISO - (Norio23 + MCNPX) Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=2.5mm new version
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
3,00x106
2,80x106
4,6
2,40x106
4,4
2,20x106
4,2
4,0
Rc / mm
2,60x106
Capsule type X4,material stainless steel Capsule diameter x height (mm): 22.4 x 48.5 Capsule lateral wall thickness (mm); 2.4 Source material: same density as X3 source Nominal activity (appr.): 111Gbq (3 Ci)
0,8
AmO2// Be - source type X4 Y and Z Axis (Norio23 + MCNPX) Monte Carlo a spectrum cluster R=2.0mm
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0 0,1
10
Energy/MeV
2 series of results were presented Neutron spectra obtained withNorio code are consistent with measured ones Higher average energy Continuation of calculations Which ones ? Estimation of uncertainties ?
Estimation of uncertainties is not easy - the manufacturer doesnt want to communicate the radioactive materials characteristics - the manufaturer doesnt know the r.m.s characteristics (density, ) with an accuracy lower than 20 to 30% - reproducibility of production ? - granulometry ?
For calculations modelling is necessary How to validate a model when input data are not accurately known? Calculations enable to visualize some modifications of the neutron spectrum with respect to selected input data Normalisation of calculated results ?