Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Underline
Sub Heading- Calibri 18 B
Body – Calibri 18
• INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1871
• MERGER
Fo rd b o u g h t Ja g u a r fo r £ 1 . 6 b n in 1 9 8 9 a n d it is b e lie ve d th a t Fo rd h a ve
in ve ste d a b o u t $ 1 0 b n in Ja g u a r sin ce it b o u g h t, Fo rd b o u g h t th e La n d
R o ve r fro m B M W fo r £ 1 . 7 b n in 2 0 0 0 .
O n 2 6 th April 2008 ,
T h e E u ro p e a n C o m m issio n ( E C ), th e exe cu tive p a n e lo f th e 2 7 -
m e m b e r E u ro p e a n U n io n , cle a re d th e a cq u isitio n o f th e Ja g u a r a n d
La n d R o ve r b u sin e ss ( JLR ) o f U S -b a se d Fo rd M o to r C o m p a n y b y In d ia ’ s
Ta ta M o to rs Ltd .
T h e E C a n n o u n ce d h e re Frid a y th a t it h a s g ra n te d cle a ra n ce u n d e r th e
E U M e rg e r R e g u la tio n .
Ta ta M o to rs m a n u fa ctu re s p a sse n g e r ca rs, co m m e rcia lve h icle s a n d
b u se s p rim a rily in In d ia a n d se lls lig h t co m m e rcia l ve h icle s a n d
p a sse n g e r ca rs in th e E u ro p e a n e co n o m ic a re a .
Ja g u a r m a in ly m a n u fa ctu re s lu xu ry p a sse n g e r ca rs a n d La n d R o ve r
p ro d u ce s sp o rts u tility ve h icle s.
T h e o p e ra tio n w a s exa m in e d u n d e r th e sim p lifie d m e rg e r re vie w
p ro ce d u re , n o te d a n E C sta te m e n t.
O T H E R C O M P E T IT O R S
M&M which wants to be global SUV maker should have an
interest, at least, in Land Rover, says the brand is attractive.
Even so, it will not help Mahindra become an independent
global sports utility vehicle, or SUV, brand. Moreover, Land
Rover, which is about six times as big as M&M, might simply
be unaffordable.
M&M says they have interest in Land Rover, SUV maker, but
they say that Ford wants to package both brands together.
Actual reason is M&M cannot afford both the brands
together..
Earlier this year Ford sold its UK based sports car division
Aston Martin for $848 million.
The rumor that Ford will contribute to pension funds associated with the brands is also true, as
it confirmed that $600 million will be dropped into the retirement coffers of the brands once
the deal closes. It is, of course, subject to regulatory approval in a number of countries, but the
automaker expects the deal to be done by the end of the following quarter.
As part of the deal, Ford will continue to supply powertrains, stampings and other unnamed
vehicle components to Tata for "differing periods", as well as R&D research, environmental and
platform technologies, and even accounting services, among others. Clearly the ties that bind
Jaguar Land Rover to Ford are strong and will take some time to undo.
Judging from the press release, it seems all parties involved, including the employees of Jaguar
Land Rover, are pleased with how the deal went down, and for the time being both brands will
be run business as usual during the transition period.
The key challenge for the new owner of Jaguar and Land Rover will be to grow and maintain
sales of the two brands in a global downturn and credit crunch.
Tata Motors will have to commit significant managerial and financial resources to engineer a
turnaround. It will have
to significantly step up its R&D budget as well as increase operating expenditure and capital
expenditure to meet JLR’s requirements. Auto analysts tracking the development say the
acquisition was just the first step; the real challenge lies in running JLR.
• 27th July 2009
The steep downturn of the world's luxury automotive markets
has taken a toll on Jaguar/Land Rover, and the company's
bottom line has taken a huge hit as a result. Financial Times
report that says Tata Motors' British luxury brands lost 673.4
million pounds ($1.11 billion U.S.) in 2008. That's a $2 billion
swing from the 641.5 million pound ($1.05 billion) profit the
British brands earned in 2007.
Tata Motors said last month that Jaguar/Land Rover lost 306
million pounds ($504 million) for the fiscal year ending March
2009.
Tata Motors reported a net loss of Rs3.29bn ($67 million) for the
quarter to end-June, compared with a Rs7.2bn profit a year ago.
It said it made a standalone profit of Rs5.14 billion, up 58 per
cent on a year ago, not including the losses at JLR.
The Financial Times report comes as Tata Motors is working out
a deal with the British government to provide short-term
financing for the cash-strapped automaker. The report that says
the U.K. government is willing to provide a 175 million pound
($288 million) commercial bridge loan to keep operations
running. The reports says Tata Motors would like a 12-month
loan, while the British government would like a six-month term,
The fact that Jaguar Land Rover accounted for $504 million of that $520 million total loss
means that more job cuts and plant shutdowns are in store for the ailing British duo. Says Tata
Vice Chairman Ravi Kant:
“We have sent people on sabbatical, gone for cheaper low-cost country sourcing and tight
control in cash flows, and are assisting JLR (Jaguar Land Rover) for a major belt tightening.”
Earlier this month, it was reported that Tata was in search of some £1 billion ($1.5B) in cash
and underwriting help to pump into the JLR operations.
Jaguar's bail-out
Published: December 19 2008 02:00 | Last updated: December 19 2008 02:00
Peter Mandelson, Britain's business secretary, is contemplating a bail-out of Jaguar Land Rover.
It is hard to imagine a less deserving candidate. The luxury carmaker fails the public interest
test on two key grounds. First, its products are of questionable social utility. For the
government to allocate scarce funds to prop up the production of the 4.2 Litre V8 Petrol
Supercharged Jaguar is a nonsense. It has a top speed of more than 150mph, emits 299g of
carbon dioxide per kilometre and costs about three times the average annual wage. True, the
UK car industry employs 190,000 people directly and supports several hundred thousand more
once components and retailing are taken into account. But if Mr Mandelson wants the
government to underwrite this £50bn industry, he should harness such public funds as are
available to develop the green cars of the future, not pander to vested interests.
The second reason Mr Mandelson should refuse to bail out JLR is that Tata Motors, the Indian
company that paid $2.3bn for it, is capable of doing so itself, if it wishes. Tata Motors, let it not
be forgotten, is a subsidiary of Tata Group, one of the wealthiest companies on the
subcontinent, with revenues of $62.5bn and profits of $5.4bn last year. The argument that
thousands of jobs are at stake is weak: sectors employing many more, such as retail, receive
no special treatment. If job protection starts to drive government policy, then the UK would bar
Tata Consulting Services, a sister company, from offering the type of business process
outsourcing services that have sucked back-office jobs to India in their hundreds of thousands
during the past decade. But that would be nutty. Manufacturers are now leaner precisely
because they now manage their inventory, process warranty claims and order spare parts
through TCS's offshore centres . The simple truth is that Tata Motors overpaid for a trophy
asset with poor prospects. It must sort it out itself.
• Mr Kant said that Tata Motors was finalising the £100m of loans from
commercial banks including Standard Chartered, Bank of Baroda, ING, GE
Capital, and Bank of Ireland subsidiary Burdale.
• Analysts said it would take much more than £100m to turn around JLR’s
fortunes, given the depressed state of the global premium car market. Tata’s
core commercial vehicles market in India is also suffering from slower sales.
• “We’ve seen the bottom of the luxury market, but the road to recovery will be
slow,” said Ashvin Chotai, director of consultancy Intelligence Automotive
Asia. “JLR will continue to be a drain on Tata’s financial resources for a
while.”
• JLR has been a burden for Tata since its carmaking arm bought the two brands
from Ford Motor for $2.3bn last year, just as demand for large and
expensive vehicles began to plummet.
• Since then, Tata has poured more than £1bn into the carmakers, which have
three plants and employ 14,500 people. It has eliminated more than 2,200
jobs, and in July said it had appointed KPMG and Roland Berger to advise it
on cost-cutting and cash management.
• Last month Tata and JLR ended long-running discussions with the UK
government over emergency financing for the two carmakers. Tata had been
seeking government guarantees for a £340m European Investment Bank
loan to finance JLR’s investments in lower-emission products, including a
planned compact Land Rover model, plus guarantees for up to £500m of
commercial bank loans.
• At the time, JLR said it had lined up commercial lending to meet its needs,
including the EIB loan, and that it would no longer need UK government
guarantees. Tata had balked at conditions attached to any lending by the
OUR LEARNINGS
• OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
The deal was offered by Tata and finally accepted on 2nd
June 2008 by William Clay Ford (Chairman of Ford) and Allan
Mulally (CEO of Ford)
OFFER BY TATA ACCEPTANCE BY FORD
• LEGAL RELATIONSHIP
Both the parties have the intention to create legal Relationship
between them and were agreed to legalize the deal in written
• LAWFUL CONSIDERATION
• POSSIBILITY OF PERFORMANCE
In this deal both the parties were able perform there respective
promises.
• LEGAL FORMALITIES