Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning.
All rights reserved
1 CHAPTER THREE CHAPTER THREE Management 3rd Edition Chuck Williams Ethics and Social Responsibility Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 2 CHAPTER THREE Chapter Focus? This chapter examines ethical behavior in the workplace and how the sentencing guideline for organizations make ethical behavior which is much more important for businesses. We also examine the influences on ethical decision making and review practical steps that managers can take to improve ethical decision making. We finish by considering to whom organization are socially responsible, what organizations are socially responsible for, how they can respond to societal expectations for social responsibility, and whether social responsibility hurts or helps an organization's economic performance. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 3 CHAPTER THREE Learning objectives After discussing this chapter, you should be able to: 1. discuss how the nature of management jobs creates the possibility for ethical abuses. 2. identify common kinds of workplace deviance (turn aside from a course of action, rules etc.). 4. describe what influences ethical decision making. 5. explain what practical steps managers can take to improve ethical decision making. 6. to whom organizations are socially responsible.
7. for what organizations are socially responsible.
8. how organizations can choose to respond to societal demands for social responsibility. 9. whether social responsibility hurts or helps an organizations economic performance.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 4 CHAPTER THREE Ethics Ethics: set of moral principles or values that defines right and wrong for a person or group. Ethical Behavior: behavior that conforms to a societys accepted principles of right and wrong. Unethical behavior is rising in businesses. (such as deceptive sales practices, unsafe working conditions, environmental breaches, and mishandling of confidential or proprietary information) However, people want to be ethical, and when they believe they work in an ethical environment, they are more likely to be loyal to the company. Different studies shows when people are convinced that they work in an ethical work environment, they are six times more likely to stay with that company than: If they believe they work in an unethical environment. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 5 CHAPTER THREE Ethics and the Nature of Management Jobs 1 Unethical Managerial Behavior (unethical behavior occurs when managers violate the principle Three areas in which managers encounter ethical dilemma) Authority and Power (managers can be tempted by authority and power since they control company resource) Handling Information (misuse the information for its own purposes) Influencing the Behavior of Others (tell subordinates to engage in unethical behavior) Setting Goals (set unrealistic goals, the pressure to perform and achieve those goals can influence employees to engage in Unethical business behaviors, if they are just short of meeting their Goals)
More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 6 CHAPTER THREE Ethics and the Nature of Management Jobs 1
Managers can encourage ethical behaviors by using resources for company handling information confidentially not influencing others to engage in unethical behavior not creating policies that reward employees for unethical behavior setting reasonable goals Ethics: the set of moral principles or values that define right and wrong. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 7 CHAPTER THREE
Workplace Deviance
workplace deviance: unethical behavior that violates organizational norms about right and wrong. Different kinds of workplace deviance are: 2 Personal Aggression Political Deviance Property Deviance Production Deviance Types of Workplace Deviance Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 8 CHAPTER THREE Workplace Deviance Workplace deviance can be categorized by how deviant the behavior is, from minor to serious, and by the target of the deviant behavior, either the organization or particular people in the workplace.
There different kinds of workplace deviance: Production deviance: unethical behavior that hurts the quality and quantity of work (leaving early, taking long breaks, purposely working slower, or intentionally wasting resources Property deviance: unethical behavior aimed at the organizations property Example: sabotaging, stealing, shrinkages Political deviance: using ones influence to harm others in the company Example: favoritism, rumor-spreading, falsely blaming Personal aggression: hostile or aggressive behavior towards others. Example: Sexual harassment, verbal abuse, threatening behavior. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 9 CHAPTER THREE
Influences on Ethical Decision Making
The ethical answers that manager choose depend on ethical intensity of the decision, the moral development of the manager, and the ethical principles used to solve the problem. 4
Ethical Answers Depend on
Ethical Intensity of Decision Moral Development of Manager Ethical Principles Used More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 10 CHAPTER THREE
Ethical Intensity The degree of concern people have about an unethical issue. It depends on 6 factors 4.1 Concentration of effect Magnitude of consequences Social consensus Probability of effect Proximity of effect Temporal immediacy Factors Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 11 CHAPTER THREE Ethical Intensity Magnitude of consequences: is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision. Social consensus: is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good. Probability of effect: is the chance that something will happen and then result in harm to others. Temporal immediacy: is the time between an act and the consequences the act produces. (to lay off workers next week as opposed to three months from now) Proximity of effect: is the social, psychological, cultural, or physical distance of a decision maker to those affected by his or her decisions. Concentration of effect is how much an act affects the average person.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 12 CHAPTER THREE
Moral Development (three stages of MD)
Your decision should be based on your level of moral development. Three phases of moral development, with two stages in each phase
4.2 Societal Expectations Selfish (decisions made for selfish reasons)
Internalized Principles Pre-conventional (general agreement on social behavior)
Conventional
Post-conventional More Mature More Selfish More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 13 CHAPTER THREE Stages of Moral Development 4.2 Preconventional
1. Punishment and Obedience
2. Instrumental Exchange
Conventional
3. Good boy, nice girl
4. Law and order Postconventional
5. Social contract
6. Universal principle Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 14 CHAPTER THREE Stages of Moral Development At the preconventional level of moral development, people decide based on selfish reasons. For example, if you were in Stage 1, the punishment and obedience stage, your primary concern would be not to get in trouble. Yet, in Stage 2, the instrumental exchange stage, you make decisions that advance your wants and needs. People at the conventional level of moral development make decisions that conform to societal expectations. In Stage 3, the good boy--nice girl stage, you normally do what the other good boys and nice girls are doing. In the law and order stage, Stage 4, you do whatever the law permits. People at the post conventional level of moral maturity always use internalized ethical principles to solve ethical dilemmas. In Stage 5, the social contract stage, you would consider the effects of your decision on others. In Stage 6, the universal principle stage, you make ethical decisions based on your principles of right and wrong.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 15 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3
Principles of
Long-term self-interest Personal virtue Religious injunctions Government requirements Utilitarian benefits Individual rights Distributive justice More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 16 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Long-term self-interest
An ethical principle that holds that you should never take any action not in your or your organizations long-term self-interest
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 17 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Personal Virtue
Never do anything that is not honest, open, and truthful and that you would not be glad to see reported in the newspapers or on TV
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 18 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Religious Injunctions
Never take any action that is not kind and that does not build a sense of community; a sense of every one working together for a long commonly accepted goals.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 19 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Government Requirements
Never take any action that violates the law, for the law represents the minimal moral standard.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 20 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Utilitarian Benefit
Never take any action that does not result in greater good for society
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 21 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Individual Rights
Never take any action that infringes (violate) on others agreed-upon rights
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 22 CHAPTER THREE Principles of Ethical Decision Making 4.3 Principle of Distributive Justice
Never take any action that harms the least among us: the poor, the uneducated, the unemployed.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 23 CHAPTER THREE
Practical Steps to Ethical Decision Making
Managers can encourage more ethical decision making in their organizations by carefully selecting and hiring new employees, establishing a specific code of ethics, training employees how to make ethical decisions, and creating an ethical climate.
5 Select and hire ethical employees Establish a Code of Ethics Train employees to make ethical decisions Create an ethical climate More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 24 CHAPTER THREE Practical Steps to Ethical Decision Making Overt (unconcealed) Integrity Tests: written tests that estimate employee honesty by directly asking job applicants what they think or feel about theft or about punishment of unethical behavior. Personality-Based Integrity Tests: written tests that indirectly estimate employee honesty by measuring psychological traits such as dependability and conscientiousness (moral sense of right and wrong). 5.1 Select and hire ethical employees: managers can increase the chance of Hiring honest job candidates by giving integrity tests. If you found a wallet containing $50, would you return it with the money? Return rate: overall 67% men 62% Women 72 % Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 25 CHAPTER THREE What Really Works Studies show that Integrity Tests
Help reduce workplace deviance Help hire workers who are better performers
However they have a smaller effect on assessing theft. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 26 CHAPTER THREE Practical Steps to Ethical Decision Making 5.2 Establish a Code of Ethics Today, nine out of ten large corporations have an ethics code in place. However, two things must happen if those codes are to encourage ethical decision making and behavior. Companies must: Communicate code of ethics to both inside and outside the company Develop ethical standards and procedures specific to business Example: Nortel Networks has published its 36 codes of ethics on an internet site. These range from bribes to expense vouchers.
http://www.nortelnetworks.com
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 27 CHAPTER THREE Ethics Training 5.3 Ethics Training The objectives of ethic training are to: Develops employee awareness of ethics Example: Lockheed Martin developed a game called The Ethics Challenge that every employee must play at least once a year. Achieves credibility with employees Example: Boeing has a vice president of ethics whose responsibility is to teach employees the difference between right and wrong. Teaches a practical model of ethical decision making (identify the problem, diagnose the situation, analyze your options, make your choice, and act.
http://active.boeing.com General Info & Images, Ethics & Business Conduct, Take the Ethics Challenge
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 28 CHAPTER THREE A Basic Model of Ethical Decision Making 5.3 1. Identify the problem 2. Identify the constituents 3. Diagnose the situation 4. Analyze your options 5. Make your choice 6. Act Adapted from Exhibit 3.6 Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 29 CHAPTER THREE A Basic Model of Ethical Decision Making 1. Identify the problem: What makes it an ethical problem? Think in terms of rights, obligations, fairness, relationships, and integrity. How would you define the problem if you stood on the other side of the fence?
2. Identify the constituents: Who has been hurt? Who could be hurt? Who could be helped? Are they willing players, or are they victims? Can you negotiate with them?
3. Diagnose the situation: How did it happen in the first place? What could have prevented it? Is it going to get worse or better? Can the damage now be undone?
4. Analyze your options: Imagine the range of possibilities. Limit yourself to the two or three most manageable. What are the likely outcomes of each? What are the likely costs? Look to the company mission statement or code of ethics for guidance. Make your choice: What is your intention in making this decision? How does it compare with the probable results? Can you discuss the problem with the affected parties before you act? Could you disclose without qualm (uneasy doubt) your decision to your boss, the CEO, the board of directors, your family or society as a whole? 6. Act. Do what you have to do. Don't be afraid to admit errors. Be as bold in confronting a problem as you were in causing it.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 30 CHAPTER THREE
Ethical Climate 5.4 Steps that managers can take to create an ethical climate: Act ethically themselves (set personal example) Are active in company ethics programs Encourage employees to report potential ethics violations (Whistle-blowing, reporting others ethics violations to management or legal authorities) Punish those who violate the code of ethics
Establishing an Ethical Climate Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 31 CHAPTER THREE What is Social Responsibility? Social responsibility: a businesss obligation to pursue policies, make decisions, and take actions that benefit society. Example: PETA (people for the ethical treatment of animals) believes that Procter and Gamble should eliminate product testing involving animals.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 32 CHAPTER THREE To Whom are Organizations Socially Responsible? There are two perspectives as to whom organizations are socially responsible
Shareholder Model
Stakeholder Model
Maximize Profits
Satisfy Interests of Multiple Stakeholders
6 More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 33 CHAPTER THREE Shareholder Model 6 Shareholder model: holds that managements most important responsibility, long-term survival, is achieved by satisfying the interests of multiple corporate stakeholders. This model developed by Friedman and he believed that: By maximizing profit, businesses maximize shareholder wealth and satisfaction It is socially irresponsible for business to divert their attention from profit maximization to social causes and charitable organizations, and it undermine market efficiency. Shareholders can then use their increased wealth to contribute to social causes. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 34 CHAPTER THREE
Stakeholder Model
persons or groups with a stake, or legitimate interest in a companys actions 6 Primary Stakeholders:
Shareholders Employees Customers Suppliers Governments Local Communities
Secondary Stakeholders:
Media Special Interest Groups Trade Associations
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 35 CHAPTER THREE Stakeholder Model Some stakeholders are more important to the firms survival than others. Primary stakeholders : are groups, such as shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, governments, and local communities, on which the organization depends for long-term survival. So managers must try to satisfy the needs of all primary stakeholders. Secondary stakeholders: such as the media and special interest groups, can influence or be influenced by the company. Yet in contrast to primary stakeholders, they do not engage in regular transactions with the company and are not critical to its long-term survival. While not critical to long-term survival, secondary stakeholders are still important, because they can affect public perceptions and opinions about socially responsible behavior.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 36 CHAPTER THREE Organizations Social Responsibilities 7 Dont violate principles of right and wrong Obey the Law. Ethical Legal Economic Discretionary
Make a Profit Social responsibilities (voluntary) Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 37 CHAPTER THREE Organizations Social Responsibilities Companies can benefit their stakeholders by fulfilling their economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary responsibilities. Economic responsibility: the expectation that a company will make a profit by producing a valued product or service. Legal responsibility: the expectation that a company will obey societys laws and regulations. Ethical responsibility: the expectation that a company will not violate accepted principles of right and wrong when conducting its business. Discretionary responsibilities: the expectation that a will voluntarily serve a social role beyond its economic, legal and ethical responsibilities. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 38 CHAPTER THREE Responses to Demands for Social Responsibility ( how organization can choose to respond to societal demands for social responsibility) 8
Strategies
Reactive Defensive Accommodative Proactive More Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 39 CHAPTER THREE Responses to Demands for Social Responsibility (Organizational Strategies) There are four strategies for responding to social responsibility problems: Reactive strategy: a social responsiveness strategy in which a company chooses to do less than society expects. Example: Wampler Foods found and failed to report evidence of listeria that it had found in one of its processing plants. After seven deaths and 39 listeria-related illnesses, the company recalled 27.4 million pounds of poultry and closed its plant for thorough disinfecting. Defensive strategy: a social responsiveness strategy in which a company chooses to admit responsibility for a problem but do the least required to meet societal expectations. Proactive strategy: a social responsiveness strategy in which a company anticipates responsibility for a problem before it occurs and would do more than society expects to address the problem. Accommodative strategy: a social responsiveness strategy in which a company choose to accept responsibility for a problem and do all the society expects to solve the problem.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 40 CHAPTER THREE Responses to Demands for Social Responsibility 8 Adapted from Exhibit 3.10 Reactive Defensive Accommo- dative Proactive Fight all the way DO NOTHING DO MUCH Withdrawal Do only what is required Legal Approach Bargaining Problem Solving Public Relations Approach Be progressive Lead the industry Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 41 CHAPTER THREE
Responses to Demands for Social Responsibility A company using a reactive strategy will do less than society expects. It may deny responsibility for a problem or fight all the way any suggestions that the company should solve a problem.
By contrast, a company using a defensive strategy would admit responsibility for a problem, but would do the least required to meet societal expectations.
A company using an accommodative strategy would accept responsibility for a problem and take a progressive approach by doing all that was expected to solve the problem.
Finally, a company using a proactive strategy would anticipate responsibility for a problem before it occurred, do more than expected to address the problem, and lead the industry in its approach.
Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 42 CHAPTER THREE Social Responsibility and Economic Performance Sometimes it pays to be socially responsible, and sometimes not, Managers should not expect economic benefit but choose social responsibility for the benefits it gives society. The realities of the relationship between social responsibility and economic performance: It can sometimes cost a company significantly if it chooses to be socially responsible. Sometimes it does pay to be socially responsible. Example: Worldwide sells recycled products to retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target at low prices. The company has turned a profit through most of its short history. While socially responsible behavior may the right thing to do, it does not guarantee profitability. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 43 CHAPTER THREE Social Responsibility and Economic Performance 9 Adapted from Exhibit 3.10 Realities of Social Responsibility Can cost a company Sometimes it does pay Does not guarantee profitability