Collective Efficacy, Conflict & Group

Performance over time

GROUP-4
Fareen Mansur 133102360
Imran Hossain 1321071660
Raktim Mojumder 1411872666
Md. Nahid Hasan 1320543660
Mir Sozzadur Rahman 1311284060
Background of the study
COLLECTIVE EFFICACY
What is collective efficacy?
The importance of collective efficacy
Collective Efficacy at individual level & group level
The downside of collective efficacy
The discrepancy between the belief that collective efficacy leads to success
and the idea that collective efficacy may cause groups to eventually fail

Group Confidence
Confidence
Affect on Long-term planning
Overconfidence
In General
Group
Performance
Collective
efficacy
Groups
confidence
Process
conflict
Long term
decisions
The Hypothesis
Hypothesis 1 :
Surface level diversity & collective efficacy

Hypothesis 2 :
Early collective efficacy & group performance

Hypothesis 3 :
Early collective efficacy & early process conflict














The Hypothesis
Hypothesis 4 :
Early process conflict & group performance

Hypothesis 5 :
Late collective efficacy & group performance

Hypothesis 6 :
Late process conflict & group performance














The Methodology
Two types of Study :
1) Preliminary Study 2) The Main Study
Preliminary Study
Study Overview
At beginning period and end period
Sample and Procedure
167 Participants, 53% Male, 42 Teams
Measures
Control Variables:
Control Size
Average level of I nterest
















The Methodology
3. Group Performance:
A Final Written Report
A Scale of 0 100
Result
Early Collective Efficacy was Negative
Late Collective Efficacy was Positive
The Main Study
Study Overview
Followed Preliminary Study
Sample and Procedure
262 Participants, 53% Male, 72 Teams
Measures
1. Collective Efficacy
A Continuous 100 Point Scale
0 = not at all certain , 100 = absolutely certain

2. Process Conflict
A Three Item Scale














The Methodology
3. Other types of intra-group conflict:
Two types Conflict during early stage
Task Conflict
Relationship Conflict
A Three Item Scale
4. Group Performance:
A Final Written Report
A Scale of 0 100

Study Variables
Means
Standard Deviation
Correlation

















Results
Path Analysis
Factors that do not effect group performance

Average age

Average year of schooling

Percentage of males in group

Results (Contd.)
Relation between
Collective Efficacy & Surface Level Diversity.

Early Process Conflict & Collective Efficacy.

Process Conflict & Group Performance.

Group Performance & Collective Efficacy.




Results (Contd.)
Factors that effect group performance

Early Collective Efficacy

Early Process Conflict

Late Collective Efficacy

Results (Final)
Two Additional Path Analysis

Small Sample Size

Focus on Process Conflict

Outcomes
Objective
Feedback
Past
Performance
Collective
Efficacy
Process Conflict
Best use of Which, Whom, When & How !!
Sorting
Can be gain either by shared norms or alternative viewpoints
Is linked with Long-Term decisions making

Thank You !!