This document describes improvements made to the operation of the stage-1 mill reject system at NTPC Farakka power plant. Previously, the inlet and outlet reject gates for each mill were operated manually based on an operator's experience. This led to issues like increased risk of fires from hot air bleeding out. The plant automated the operation of the gates using logic programmed into the Distributed Control System. Now the gates operate automatically in cycles without needing continuous operator presence. This improved safety and efficiency while reducing operating costs from eliminating the need for a dedicated operator. Annual savings were estimated at over 7 lakh rupees.
This document describes improvements made to the operation of the stage-1 mill reject system at NTPC Farakka power plant. Previously, the inlet and outlet reject gates for each mill were operated manually based on an operator's experience. This led to issues like increased risk of fires from hot air bleeding out. The plant automated the operation of the gates using logic programmed into the Distributed Control System. Now the gates operate automatically in cycles without needing continuous operator presence. This improved safety and efficiency while reducing operating costs from eliminating the need for a dedicated operator. Annual savings were estimated at over 7 lakh rupees.
This document describes improvements made to the operation of the stage-1 mill reject system at NTPC Farakka power plant. Previously, the inlet and outlet reject gates for each mill were operated manually based on an operator's experience. This led to issues like increased risk of fires from hot air bleeding out. The plant automated the operation of the gates using logic programmed into the Distributed Control System. Now the gates operate automatically in cycles without needing continuous operator presence. This improved safety and efficiency while reducing operating costs from eliminating the need for a dedicated operator. Annual savings were estimated at over 7 lakh rupees.
Arendra Kumar Arya, Sr.Engineer (C&I) , NTPC Ltd, Farakka PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT BY AUTOMATIC OPERATION OF STAGE-1 MILL REJECT SYSTEM AT NTPC, FARAKKA Indian Power Stations 2011 13 15 February , New Delhi Farakka Farakka PRESENTATION ROADMAP INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION OF MILL REJECT SYSTEM NATURE OF PROBLEM INNOVATIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENT ACHIEVED CONCLUSION Introduction NTPC,Farakka has 3X200MW units and 2 X 500 MW units
Each 200 MW unit consists of:- I. 6 no. Bowl Mill II. Model XRP-803 III. Capacity 45.8 Ton/hr IV. Speed 53 rpm V. Crushed coal at inlet 25 mm
Farakka Introduction The source of coal used at Farakka is coming from 23 different open cast mines
In pulverized coal the coal is ground so that about 70 % will pass through 200 mesh ( 0.075 mm) and 99 % will pass through 50 mesh (0.300 mm)
Farakka Introduction The coal supply carries a certain percentage of over burden of stone pieces get leached and come directly into the mills through the bunker though manual stone picking system deployed at coal handling plant
Farakka Introduction
When these come under the roller, the roller lifts up allowing these to pass under.
Then scrapped by scrapper through tramp iron spout to pyrite hopper
Removed periodically. Any material having a bulk density 1.2 tonnes/m3 should be rejected (for coal it is 0.8 tonnes/m3). However sometimes the material to be ground is also rejected
Farakka Introduction Each mill has one Inlet & one Outlet Reject Gate
Periodic operation & proper functioning of reject gates is very much essential.
Farakka INLET REJECT GATE Farakka I/L Power Cylinder OUTLET REJECT GATE Farakka O/L GATE POWER Cylinder Reject Chamber Nature of Problem
In stage-1 ,each gate is opened/closed by the pneumatically operated power cylinder
Accumulation Cycle : Inlet gate is opened & outlet gate is closed for some time.
Rejection Cycle : Inlet gate is closed & outlet gate is opened for some time.
Farakka Farakka SCHEME FOR MANUAL OPERATION IA AIR SUPPLY Manual Switch Manual Switch Inlet power cylinder Outlet power cylinder Nature of Problem
In stage-1, Inlet and Outlet gates were operated with the help of a manual switch
Operation by experience & communication from control room.
Continuous deputation of operator
Frequent operation of reject gates required during high rejection Farakka Nature of Problem This results:-
Hot air containing coal dust coming out of the rejection chamber
Increase the chance of failure of control instruments and has potential to catch fire in control cable.
Transportation of rejects from the mill become troublesome & unsafe for the operation personnel Farakka Innovative Approach Operation from newly installed DDCMIS was felt
Remote as well as automatic operation of reject gates can be done efficiently from Unit Control Room
Continuous deputation of operator not required in the mill area
Farakka Farakka FACE PLATE FOR MILL REJECT GATE OPERATION LOGIC DETAILS Farakka Farakka DO CARD CH - 1 INLET GATE CMD FROM LOGIC 24 V RELAY Ph N 24 V O/P AUX RELAY - 1 AIR SUPPLY DO CARD CH - 1 24 V RELAY Ph N 24 V O/P AUX RELAY - 2 AIR SUPPLY OUTLET GATE CMD FROM LOGIC SOLENOID VALVE SOLENOID VALVE Inlet power cylinder Outlet power cylinder Modified Scheme Innovative Approach In Manual mode both gates can be opened independently
Auto mode is having priority
In Auto mode Inlet gate will remain open for T1 time and outlet gate will remain close. After T1 time is elapsed inlet gate will close and outlet gate will open for T2 time .
Farakka Improvement Operational Flexibility
Deputation of Manpower for local operation is nil.
Opening & Closing time (T1 & T2) of Inlet & Outlet gate can be tuned based on requirement
Avoidance of Mill operation in Blasting mode Farakka GAIN
TANGI BLE GAI N :-
I ) ENERGY LOSS CALCULATI ON: -
When mills are operating with open pyrite gate condition allowing bleeding of hot primary air through pyrite system.
ASSUMPTIONS:
A) Quantity of hot primary air, bleeding through pyrite box at a pressure of about 700 mmwc (M air ) 10 T/hr
B) Average bleed air temperature at full load (T 1 ) = 280 0 c = 553 K
C) Average ambient temperature (T 2 ) = 30 0 c = 303 K
D) Specific heat of hot air at constant pressure (S air ) = 1.006 KJ/Kg/K
E) Average calorific value of coal = 3200 KCal/Kg
F) Cost of coal = Rs. 4.0/kg
Farakka GAIN
TANGI BLE GAI N (contd..)
CALCULATION:
q Energy Loss Per Mill (Q LOSS ) = M AIR x S AIR x (T 1 T 2 )
q Q LOSS = 10 x 1000 x 1.006 x (553-303) KJ/HR
q Q LOSS = 2515000 KJ/HR = 600697 KCAL/HR
q Q LOSS = 600697/3200 = 188 KG/HR Of Coal Equivalent
q Q LOSS = Rs. 752/- PER HR
q Annual Q LOSS = 752 X 365 = Rs. 2,74,480/- Per One Blasting Hour/Mill/Day
At Farakka , normally 5 mills are in service.
Farakka GAIN
TANGI BLE GAI N (contd..)
II) COST SAVING ON ACCOUNT OF MANPOWER
ASSUMPTIONS:
A) At least 4 nos. of skilled manpower required for round the clock reject gate operation
B) Cost of 1 skilled manpower = Rs. 325.00
CALCULATION:
Annual Manpower cost = Rs. 325 X 4 X 365= Rs. 4,74,500.00
Total Annual Saving (I +II) = Rs. 7,48,980.00
Farakka CONCLUSIONS Continual process.
Intangible Gains :
Employee satisfaction, Better plant personnel safety, Reduction in frequency of mill chocking Minimizing chance of dust ingress in UCR