Good Publication Practices

TOWARDS GOOD PUBLICATION PRACTICES
Halmar Halide@fisika.unhas
Tim Validasi, Reviewer dan PAK Pusat
Presentasi pada Workshop Penulisan Artikel Jurnal Internasional oleh
Pascasarjana Unhas, Minggu 28 September 2014, Hotel Aston, Makassar
Background: retraction watch: disciplines and
institutions, policies for punishing bad practices

Type of bad practices (BPs) and how to detect
them: Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, salami/tempe
pub., bogus Authorship, COI, rules & software

Unhas efforts against BPs: Self-Assessment

Good practices (return to the right path):
appropriate manuscript and reputable publisher
Halmar Halide @ physics unhas
Article withdrawal Policies and Forms
https://www.elsevier.com/about/publishing-guidelines/policies/article-withdrawal
Article Withdrawal: Only used for Articles in Press which represent early versions of articles
and sometimes contain errors, or may have been accidentally submitted twice. Occasionally,
but less frequently, the articles may represent infringements of professional ethical codes,
such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data
or the like.

Article Retraction: Infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple
submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like.
Occasionally a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication.

Article Removal: Legal limitations upon the publisher, copyright holder or author(s).

Article Replacement: Identification of false or inaccurate data that, if acted upon, would
pose a serious health risk.
the importance of the scholarly archive as a permanent, historic record of the
transactions of scholarship. Articles that have been published shall remain extant, exact and
unaltered as far as is possible. However, very occasionally circumstances may arise where an
article is published that must later be retracted or even removed.
http://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/21/controversial-paper-linking-conspiracy-ideation-to-
climate-change-skepticism-formally-retracted/
http://retractionwatch.com/2014/02/12/paper-on-refolded-mountain-range-a-
reproduction-now-retracted/#more-18545
http://retractionwatch.com/2013/05/07/double-dipping-leads-to-removal-of-petroleum-
research-paper/#more-14032
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2013/310726/#B1
http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-subject/dentistry/
http://retractionwatch.com/2014/02/24/springer-ieee-withdrawing-more-than-120-
nonsense-papers/
Unfortunately, Amgen's findings are consistent with those of others in industry. A
team at Bayer HealthCare in Germany last year reported
4
that only about 25% of
published preclinical studies could be validated to the point at which projects could
continue.
Fifty-three papers were deemed 'landmark' studies
Nevertheless, scientific findings were confirmed in only 6 (11%) cases.
http://www.ithenticate.com/resources/infographics/research-misconduct?...
http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/academic-integrity/students
Halmar Halide, Fisika FMIPA Unhas 2014
https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct
Hai orang-orang yang beriman, mengapa kamu
mengatakan apa yang tidak kamu perbuat?
Amat besar kebencian di sisi Allah bahwa kamu
mengatakan apa-apa yang tiada kamu kerjakan.
KELENGKAPAN DOKUMEN PENILAIAN KARYA ILMIAH
UNTUK USULAN KENAIKAN JABATAN FUNGSIONAL, KOPERTIS WIL IV, MARET 2011

http://budisansblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/ga
gasan-asuransi-bencana.html
SNIP=1,250, SJR=0,643
SNIP=1,38, SJR=0,591
SNIP=2,641, SJR=5,473
SNIP=3,,628, SJR=2,672
SNIP=2,108, SJR=3,145
Type Examples Weight(*)
Primary primary research articles in peer-reviewed journals
dissertations and theses
technical reports
conference proceedings
1
Secondary monographs (books dealing with a specific area of
research in the sciences)
literature reviews (or review articles)
2/3
Tertiary encyclopedias
textbooks
handbooks
1/3
(*) untuk pembobotan kemutakhiran dan kedalaman pembahasan
KEMUTAKHIRAN = (rujukan dlm 3 atau 5 tahun terakhir/ total rujukan) x 100%
KEDALAMAN = (rujukan pada bagian hasil dan diskusi/total rujukan) x 100%
Rujukan 5 (tiga) tahun terakhir Jumlah bobot Jumlah x bobot
Primer 28 1 28
Sekunder 1 2/3 0,67
Tertier 1 1/3 0,33
Total = 29
Total rujukan = 37
Mutakhir (%) (29/37) x 100 % = 78 %
Rujukan 3 (tiga) tahun terakhir Jumlah bobot Jumlah x bobot
Primer 20 1 20
Sekunder 1 2/3 0,67
Tertier 1 1/3 0,33
Total = 21
Total rujukan = 37
Mutakhir (%) (21/37) x 100 % = 57 %
Publikasi SJR SNIP Kemutakhiran
(%)
Kedalaman
(%)
3 Tahun 5 Tahun
PNAS 5,473 2,641 57 78 53
J. Ecology 3,145 2,108 29 52,7 49,1
Nature Climate Change 2,672 3,628 31,2 39,6 31,2
Physica A 0,634 1,25 13,3 36,7 7,7
Natural Hazards 0,591 1,38 34,2 42,1 23,7
http://publicationethics.org/cases
http://publicationethics.org/text-recycling-guidelines
Text recycling in a published article
Journal editors should consider publishing a correction article when:
Sections of the text, generally excluding methods, are identical or near identical to
a previous publication by the same author(s);
The original publication is not referenced in the subsequent publication; but
There is still sufficient new material in the article to justify its publication.

The correction should amend the literature by adding the missing citation and clarifying
what is new in the subsequent publication versus the original publication.

Journal editors should consider publishing a retraction article when:
There is significant overlap in the text, generally excluding methods, with sections that are
identical or near identical to a previous publication by the same author(s);
The recycled text reports previously published data and there is insufficient new material
in the article to justify its publication in light of the previous publication(s).
The recycled text forms the major part of the discussion or conclusion in the article.
The overlap breaches copyright.

http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/public/instructionsForAuthors.a
spx#SecDuplicatePreviousPublicationorSubmission
http://www.elsevier.com/journals/pharmacological-research/1043-6618/
guide-for-authors#5000
http://publicationethics.org/cases
fdc11166046-photo https://www.inmagine.com/searchterms/salami.html
http://www.123rf.com/stoc
k-photo/tempe.html
http://www.biochemia-medica.com/2013/23/237
Updated October 2013
http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-
of-authors-and-contributors.html
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-
of-authors-and-contributors.html
http://journalfinder.elsevier.com/
http://www.citefactor.org/journal-impact-factor-list-2014_N.html
http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php
http://www.elsevier.com/journals/learning-and-instruction/0959-4752/guide-for-authors#25001
http://www.elsevier.com/journals/learning-and-instruction/0959-4752/guide-for-authors#25001
www.bms.bc.ca/resources/library/pdf/GuidelinesScientificPapers.pdf

Good Publication Practices

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Good Publication Practices

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TOWARDS GOOD PUBLICATION PRACTICES

You might also like