Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance-based guidelines
and regulations
Joe Maffei
Rutherford & Chekene
Jack Moehle
UC Berkeley
Outline
Todays tall buildings
Applicability of PBEE to tall
buildings
PBEE practice needs
PEER Tall Building Initiative
Types of
Occupanc
y
CONDO
HOTEL
RETAIL
PARKING
STEEL GRAVITY
FRAMING
Washington
Mutual / Seattle Art
Museum
Buckling
restraine
d braces
after MKA
Two-Stage Design
Determine the strengths at nonlinear
locations using the building code
requirements
Code (DBE) level earthquake R factor
Minimum base shear
Example PBEE
Practice Needs
Acceptability of
yielding outside
base hinge zone.
Protection
against
shear failure
Protection
against
sliding shear
ETAB
S
Mode
l
EQ3
R
o
o
f
D
i
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
[
i
n
]
'
!OU
l
Time [s]
RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE
(Joes top
15)
Minimum base shear
Capacity design factors
Inherent slab-outrigger effect
Story mechanism protection
Wall shear strength
Effective damping in NLRH analysis
Other NLRH assumptions
Effective elastic stiffness
Podium force transfer
Rational drift limits
P-delta modeling
Concrete slab to core wall
connections
Steel framing to core wall
connections
Deep mat slab behavior
Dual system requirements
Applicable ground
motions
(e.g., T = 9 sec)
J. Moehle, Y. Bozorgnia
N. Abrahamson, M. Lew, P. Somerville
R. Hamburger, H. Krawinkler, M. Moore, F. Naeim
R. Lui
Scope
Tall buildings
Seismic design of structural system
Coastal California
Concrete and steel
Residential focus, but not excluding
other occupancies
Tasks
Establish and operate Project Advisory Committee (TPAC)
Research tasks
Performance Objectives
Core group: W. Holmes, C. Kircher, L. Kornfield, B. Petak,
N. Yousef
L42
L37
Storylevel
L32
L27
L22
L17
L11
L6
L1
B5
0.5
1
1.5
Maximum story moment in Y direction [kip-in.]
StoryMoment
2.5
7
x 10
Core
B. B.
Core group:
group:P.P.Somerville,
Somerville,
Aagaard,
Aagaard,N.
N.Collins,
Collins,R.R.Graves
Graves
Approach:
for
Approach:Develop
Developwaveforms
waveforms
large-magnitudes,
smallsmall
distances
for large-magnitudes,
in
SF and LA,
constrained
distances
in SF
and LA, by PSHA
constrained by PSHA
Review: F. Naeim, Y. Bozorgnia,
N. Abrahamson, B. Chiou, CB
Crouse, D. Dreger, Y. Moriwaki, Y.
Zeng
Guidelines: Y. Bozorgnia, N.
Luco, F. Naeim, J. Hooper, N.
Abrahamson, J. Maffei
Key issues:
f
uf
ug
Final product
Guidelines for
performancebased seismic
design of
tall buildings
December 2008
13th
BASE
Minimum
Maximum
Mean(m)
m+
c.o.v.
Nonlinear
static
Roof
drift,ft
Wall
base
shear,k
Wall
momentat
13thfloor,
1000xk-ft
2.1
6.7
4.2
5.4
0.23
7600
29700
15500
22200
0.43
513
1080
900
1090
0.21
5500
760
(b)Summaryofresults