Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pseudoaneurysmsurgery ?
Leg ischemia
Nerve compression
Large hematoma with skin
compromise
AV Fistula
Suspicion of infection
Anastomotic pseudoaneurysms
Bovine thrombin allergy
Hypotension post-Cath
Differential Diagnosis
Retroperitoneal
hematoma
If suspicion is high, and blood loss
significant, treat before a definitive
diagnosis is made.
Discontinue/ reverse anticoagulation.
CT Scan
Contralateral Access
Surgical Repair
Balloon Tamponade
Retroperitoneal Bleeding
Anemia
100 %
Hypotension
92 %
Abdominal tenderness
69 %
Diaphoresis
58 %
Groin pain
46 %
42 %
Groin hematoma
31 %
Bradicardia
31 %
Back pain
23 %
Retroperitoneal
Bleeding
Incidence 3.0%
Avoid highCFA arterial puncture
Front-wall puncture desirable
Treat immediately
Volume (PRBC) support
Compression
Balloon tamponade vs surgery
Considerations in PVD
Known aorto-iliac disease or prior
AFB.
Consider brachial or radial access.
Review any previous angiography.
Aorto-femoral graft may be used for
access, avoid retrograde access into
blind limb of iliac artery.
Considerations in PVD
Beware of brachiocephalic
disease in patients with
occlusive aorto iliac disease.
Increased risk of stroke with
catheter manipulation in
tortuous subclavian vessels.
Considerations in PVD
Distal SFA occlusive disease is not
contraindication. Enter CFA !!
Take care not to compromise the
patent profunda femoris artery ( only
remaining circulation to the leg.
Radial access
Successful access 90%.
Normal Allens test required.
Most common failure is inability to
cannulate artery.
Occlusion post PCI approximately 5
%
Associated with fewest major
complications of any access site.
RADIAL ACCESS
Pitfalls
Difficult Access
Hit it on the first try!
diminished (even if transient) pulse:
Wait
Go proximal
Give NTG IV or SL
Have the patient clench/open the hand
Go to another site
IDEAL SITE
2-3 CM proximal to the flexor
crease of the wrist
1 cm proximal to the styloid
bone
Second crease from wrist
POTENTIAL
DISADVANTAGE
The radial artery is smaller than the
femoral (approximately 2-2.3mm)
Obtaining radial access involves a
learning curve
Smaller sheaths are required
Vessel spasm is more common
Guide placement is more challenging and
requires learning a different technique
Many physicians are not familiar with the
equipment and anatomy, and thus are
reluctant to try a new approach
ADVANTAGE
Dual blood supply which limits the
potential for limb threatening ischemia
Advantageous for patients with severe
occlusive aorto-iliac disease
Advantageous for patients with difficulty
laying/lot (back pain, obesity, CHF)
The vessel is easily compressible
Less chance for local nerve injury
earlier patient ambulation and likely will
cost less (closure devices are not
necessary)
Vascular complications are less frequent
Contraindications
Patients who have evidence of an abnormal
Allen's test
Patients who display evidence of abnormal
oximetry/ plethysmography
Patients who may require IABP.
Patients who may require devices that are not
compatible in 7F or smaller sheaths (TEC, larger
Rotoblator burrs,certain stents).
Patients with known upper extremity vascular
disease.
Patients with Buergers Disease, severe
Raynauds, or other forms of upper extremity
peripheral vascular disease
Tortuosity
Spasm
Radial is occluded
Guidewire is in a side branch (usually
too distal in the artery)
Abnormal take off of the radial (off of
the brachial)
Radial artery stenosis
Against the wall or subintimal
Technical Points
Rotate the needle to change the
angle of the bevel
Do a radial angiogram
Use a hydrophilic-coated wire
Try a 0.018 PTCA wire
Give vasodilators (GTN) through the
needle and then try to advance wire
Arrow shows radial loop which the GW was unable to negotiate (A)
Radial artery is of small caliber, making it impossible to pass a
Coronary catheter through it. (br= brachial artery, r = radial artery,
u = ulnar Artery.
Hemostasis
Manual compression.
Mechanical compression device.
Closure devices.
* Angioseal.
* Vasoseal.
* Perclose.
* ETC
Wrist splint
THANK YOU