Professional Documents
Culture Documents
budget allocation
Advertising objectives
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Price
Ad &
promotion
Product
quality
SALES
Personal
selling
Economy
Technology
Competition
Consumer
Tastes
Communication objectives
5%
Repurchase
10% trail
20% preference
40% liking
60% knowledge
80% awareness
1.
2.
3.
4.
New
category
users
Brand trail
yes
Category trail
yes
Brand retrial
Other
brand
users
Other
brand
switchers
yes
yes
yes
yes
Favorable
brand
switchers
Brand
loyals
Repeat purchase
objectives
Maintain repeat
purchase rate
Increase repeat
purchase rate
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Accelerate
purchase
yes
yes
DAGMAR approach
Russell H Colley prepared a report for the
association of national advertisers titled
Defining Advertising Goals for Measured
Advertising Results.
According to this model, communication
objectives are the logical basis for setting
advertising objectives & goals against
which results should be measured.
features
Stated in terms of concrete &
measurable communication tasks
Specify a target audience
Indicate a benchmark or standard
starting point & the degree of change
sought, &
Specify a time period for accomplishing
the objective or objectives
Criticism of DAGMAR
Problem with response hierarchy
Sales as the advertising goal
Practicality & costs
Inhibits creativity
Budget allocation
Kelloggs north American president,
Thomas Knowlton, cuts in advertising &
promotion spending will be a short time
strategy
We cant afford advertising that isnt
working. We are going to be more
demanding with our brands & only proven
ad campaigns will get full funding.
Build-up approach
1. .Ad objectives are set
2. Activities necessary to
achieve objectives are
planned
3. Costs are ascertained
4. Total budget is approved
Build-up approach
Takes into account objectives of
advertising
Budget is allocated on the basis of what is
essential for achieving the goals
It includes objective & task method,
payout planning, & quantitative models
1.
2.
Limitations
Chances of under spending is more
If the product is good it will sell on its
own has little relevance
3. Not based on sound decision making
principles
4. There may be budget cuts at a wrong
time
sized firms
A fixed percentage of last years or next
years projected sales or average sales for
the last few years is taken as the budget
A fixed amount of the unit product cost is
taken as the advertising expense
Percentage figure is often the industry
standard
Merits
1. Safe method as ad spending remains within
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
limits
Easy to arrive at budget
Limitations
It considers sales as the cause rather than an
end
It ignores the possibility that sales decline
because of little advertising
Advertising cannot be used as a tool of
competition
Possibility of overspending & under spending
Cannot be applied in the introductory stage
1.
2.
1.
objectives to be accomplished
2. Deciding specific strategies & tasks necessary
to achieve them
3. Estimating the costs involved in putting these
strategies & tasks in operation
Difficult to determine the tasks & costs
associated with each
More realistic & best suited in introductory
stage
Payout planning
Advertising is considered as an
investment & not an expenditure
It can be used in conjunction with other
budgeting methods
Limitation is that it cannot account for all
uncontrollable factors
Quantitative models
Mathematical & statistical models
It requires experimentation & formal
analysis
It requires the use of computers
Experimental approach
Experiments are used to decide the
budget
Limitation is the expense & time involved
Advertiser cannot control the
environmental variables