Professional Documents
Culture Documents
| 1
Mukesh Butani
November 17, 2005
| 2
Agenda
Transaction imperatives
Key tax and financial considerations
Income stream
Entry strategy
Financing options
Debt structuring
Cash repatriation
Exit considerations
Case Study
Business reorganisations
Leasing transactions
| 3
Cultural Issues
Business
Dynamics
Accounting
treatment
CrossBorder
Border
Cross
Transactions
Transactions
Legal & regulatory
framework
Identifying and
delivering synergies
| 4
| 5
Entry Strategy
Financing
options
Crossborder
border
Cross
transactions
transactions
Exit considerations
4
Debt Structuring
Cash repatriation
| 6
Dividends
Capital gains
Interest
shares
Brand fee would flow to the IPR company
Key elements arms length principle, documentation, overall tax costs and foreign tax credits
| 7
Cyprus
Netherlands
Singapore
USA
Nature of
Income
Dividends
Nil*
Nil*
Nil*
Nil*
Nil*
Capital gains on
disposal of shares
Nil
Nil
Note
Nil
As per Indian
tax Laws
Interest
0 / 20.91%
10%
10%
10%
0/10/15%
Royalty
10.46%
10.46%
10.46%
10%
10/15/20%
*DDT @ 14.025%
Note Nil in case of transfer of shares by one non-resident to another non-resident
| 8
2 Entry strategy
Direct investment
US Parent
European /
Netherlands sub
European /
Netherlands sub
Overseas
Singapore /
Mauritius sub
India
WOS/ Branch
WOS/ Branch
WOS/ Branch
| 9
3 Financing options
Parameters
Equity
Term
Long Tem
Pay outs
Dividend
Interest
Dividend
Tax rate
Withholding tax @ 0 / 10 / 15 /
20%
Tax credit
Usage
No restrictions
No restrictions
Deductibility
No thin capitalisation norms and hence an Indian company can be highly leveraged if it meets
commercial requirements
Leveraging Indian company using overseas debt subject to restrictions in ECB Guidelines (see next
slide)
10
4 Debt structuring
Internationally recognized sources (international banks, capital markets, multilateral financial
Lenders
Amount/
maturity
End use
Total cost
of debt
Prepayment
ECBs with minimum average maturity of 3-5 yrs: 200 bps above six month LIBOR
ECBs with minimum average maturity of more than 5 yrs: 350 bps above six month LIBOR
ECBs upto 200 MUSD can be pre-paid without approval subject to compliance with minimum
average maturity period
MUSD means million United States Dollars
11
| 11
5 Cash repatriation
Suitability
Dividend distribution
Simplest and most common
Capital reduction
Court regulated process, involving repayment of share capital
comparatively complex and time consuming amount paid to
the extent of accumulated profits of the company would be
taxable as dividend in India
Share buyback
Repurchase of shares restricted amount of repatriation
income taxable as capital gains in hands of the shareholder
Broad mechanics of each of the above options have been
discussed in detail in Annexure 1
Profit making
company
Ease of repatriation
12
6 Exit considerations
Capital gains
No Objection Certificate requirement for setting up new venture Press note
1 of 2005 (refer Annexure 2 for process)
Shareholders agreement and implications thereof
Right of First Refusal; Tag Along rights; Drag Along rights
Liquidation process long drawn and Court approval process
13
Case study
business
reorganization
14
Global
conglomerate
engaged in
diversified
businesses
Aggressively
targeting Asian
foods markets
Has significant
experience in
the foods
business and
commands a
powerful brand
name
Target Co
Indian
Controls
significant
share of the
Indian foods
market
Leading
exporter to
Asia
Strong track
record and
substantial
reserves
Mauritian Co
US Corps
strategic holding
company for
Asian
investments
Has a wholly
owned Indian
subsidiary, F&P,
engaged in two
businesses foods and
packaging
F&P has
accumulated tax
losses
Indian Partner
Leading Indian
company (not
part of US Corp
group)
Holds majority
equity in Target
Co
15
USA
Business strategy
US Corp
US Corp
(conglomerate)
100%
Mauritian
Co*
100%
Mauritius
43%
Target Co
(Foods)
India
Phase II
Target Co sells trademark
to US Corp
US Corp licenses
trademark to Target Co
US Corp receives royalty
Indian Partner
57%
*Consider Singapore
jurisdiction
Phase I
Asian strategy - acquire
control of Target Co
Foods business of F&P to
be consolidated with
Target Co
Indian Partner
Auto ancillary
Foods &
Packaging
Redefining strategy
Focus on core business
- auto ancillary
Exit non-core business
All rights reserved
16
Direct
increase
Acquisition of
shares
Passive
increase
Preferential
allotment of
shares
Capital reduction
of identified
shares
Share buyback
Business
restructuring
Merger
Demerger
Sale of business
undertaking/
sale of assets
The case study however discusses the implications arising under the
merger option, in detail in following slides
17
Mauritius
Co
51%
43%
Target Co
Indian
Partner
Merger
Foods &
Packaging
57%
49%
Present scenario
Post Merger
Tax Implications
Broadly tax neutral on
satisfying conditions
Transfer of tax losses and
tax benefits of F&P
Tax losses available for
fresh lease of 8 years
Stamp duty costs
significant
Other Implications
Valuation of companies
No foreign investment
approvals, subject to
conditions
No cash outflow for
Mauritian Co
No consideration to Indian
Partner on indirect
dilution of its stake
All rights reserved
18
Mauritius
India
51%
Sale of trademark
capital gains
Target Co transfers
its Trademark (TM)
to Mauritian Co.
Subsequently
Mauritian Co
licenses TM back to
Target Co
License of trademark
royalty income
Mauritian
Co
Target Co
19
Leasing
transactions
20
Operating lease
Finance lease (for detailed discussion, refer next slide)
21
Finance lease
Lessor is the legal owner
Lessee is the economic owner
Risks include losses due to idle capacity, technological obsolescence & changing
economic conditions. Rewards include expectation of profitable operation over economic
life of asset and gain from appreciation in value or realisation of residual value
22
Dry lease
Lessor
Royalties - Section 9(1)(vi)
Or
Section 44BBA - 5% of deemed profits
Lessor
Royalties - Section 9(1)(vi)
Or
Section 44BBA 5% of deemed profits
Lessee
Lease rentals allowed as deduction
Depreciation allowed to lessor
Lessee
Resident - Lease rentals would be
allowed to the lessee
Depreciation would be allowed to the
lessor
Section 10(15A) exemption from tax
withholding extended
23
24
Thank you
25
Annexure 1
26
Limitations
Amount
restricted to
positive
distributable
reserves
Other issues
27
Limitations
Other issues
Positive
distributable
reserves are not a
pre-requisite
Board/ shareholder
approvals required
Capital repayment
not possible at
amount higher
than par value of
shares
Allowed without
regulatory approvals
from an exchange
control perspective
subject to certain
conditions
Possible to
increase cash pay
out by capitalizing
reserve
Court/ creditor
approval required
28
Limitations
Amount restricted
to 25 per cent of
(share capital+free
reserves)
Other issues
Board approval if
buyback is less
than10% of total
paid-up equity
capital and free
reserves/
shareholder
approval required
if buy-back more
than 10%
Buy back price
would need to be
in consonance
with fair
valuation
principles
enunciated in
transfer pricing
legislations
All rights reserved
29
Limitations
Broad time
frame
Other issues
Under exchange control
Under exchange
regulations,
on per
controlcap
regulations,
on per
share on
sharecap
amount
payable
amount
on
buyback
is thepayable
higher of
buyback is the higher
the price based on the
of the price based `on
NAV per
linked
with
the share
NAV per
share
stock linked
exchange
as per
with or
stock
exchange
or as per
valuation
of statutory
valuation
of statutory
auditor/
merchant
banker
auditor/ merchant
Disclosure
in offer
banker
document,
if the in offer
Disclosure
promoters
to tender
document,
if the
promoters
tender
shares,
for publictolisted
shares, for public
companies
listed companies
30
Annexure 2
31
Regulatory compliances
No Objection Certificate from Indian partner has been a key negotiation point for foreign company having existing
JV relationship in India In certain cases MNC have to sacrifice by accepting low JV exit price
No
No prior approval required
investment can be made by
foreign company
NOC has been made inapplicable to past ventures as also relaxing the allied field condition
For ventures after January 12, 2005, parties are free to contractually agree a conflict of interest clause
accordingly, it is advisable to incorporate easy exit clause for future independence, while entering into a JV
relationship
All rights reserved
32