MTN GSM NPM PROJECT

FIRS (Federal Inland Revenue Service) Zone

5 HQ Abuja
July 2013
POST-OPTIMIZATION DRIVE TEST REPORT

Presentation Confidential between MTN ad Audience

Introduction
The data collection was conducted on 9th July,2013 for
the post-optimization
The test was an optimization check
The drive test covers FIRS (Federal Inland Revenue
Service) Zone 5 HQ Abuja
Drive test procedure involves two mobile stations; MS1
initiating short calls and MS2 initiating long calls.

Complaint Area and Test Route

COMPLAINT:

Subscribers complained of poor network service

Serving Cells of the Complaint Area

Inside FIRS

Best Server is 5813_7

Around FIRS

Best Server is 5813_7

Call Statistical Data

Call Statistical Data
Call Attempts
Call Setup Success
Blocked Calls
Dropped Calls
Total Good Calls - /Call End
Established Calls
Total Handover Success
Total Handover Failures
Total Location Update
Requests
Total Location Success
Total Location Update
Failures
% Call Setup Success
% Blocked Calls
% Dropped Calls
% Established Calls
% Good Calls
% Handover Success
% Handover Failure
% Location Update
Success

MTN_July
Pre-Optimization
Post-Optimization
9
4
8
4
0
0
0
0
8
4
8
4
47
34
1
0
1
1

0
88.89%
0.00%
0.00%
88.89%
100.00%
97.92%
2.08%

100.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
0.00%

100.00%

Coverage, Quality & Interference

Signal Level
Downlink RxSignal Level
Performance Indicator
% Probability Density
Functon (PDF)
Ranges/ dbm
[120, -102)
[-102, -95)
[-95, -90)
[-90, -85)
[-85, -75)
[-75,-65)
[- 65,
0)

GSM Voice Coverage

Reliability

% Coverage Reliability
% RxSignal Level > (95dbm)
Signal Quality

MTN_July
Pre-Optimization
Post-Optimization
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.22%
1.05%
1.93%
16.18%
23.58%
30.94%
46.91%
51.83%
27.35%

100.00%

100.00%

Coverage, Quality & Interference

Downlink Rx Quality
Level_Sub Performance
Indicator
% Probability Density
Functon (PDF)
Ranges

MTN_July

[0, 4)
[4, 5)
[5, 6)
[6, 7)

Pre-Optimization
90.99%
2.32%
2.56%
4.13%

Post-Optimization
91.44%
3.33%
2.39%
2.84%

RxQual > 5

6.69%

5.23%

Overall Received Signal

Quality Value : RxQual <
5
Downlink Rx Quality Level
Performance Indicator

93.31%

94.77%

KPI Statistics & Network Performance

KPI RAW
Accessibility
Retainability
Voice Quality (RxQual < 5)
Handover Success
Coverage Reliabilty (RxLev >
-95dBm)

KPI Score
Accessibility
Retainability
Voice Quality (RxQual < 5)
Handover Success
Coverage Reliabilty (RxLev >
-95dBm)

Total Score

Network Quality Score

% SQI

MTN_July
Pre-Optimization
Post-Optimization
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
93.31%
94.77%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%

MTN_July
10.00
10.00
8.33
10.00

100.00%

MTN_July
10.00
10.00
8.69
10.00

10.00

6.39

3.25

94.21%

10.00

6.39

3.30

91.65%

RxLevSub
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

The network coverage is very okay and good

The network coverage is also very okay
inside and around the FIRS
and good inside and around the FIRS
after optimization

RxLevSub
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

Rxqual Sub
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

The network quality is better and okay

inside and around the FIRS after
optimization

Rxqual Sub
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

SQI
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

SQI
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

SUMMARY HOF
Pre-Optimization

Post-Optimization

HOF
OCCU
S/
RREN
N CELL
CE
1

FC0163
D

No handover failure after optimization

REASON

COMMENT

Overlapping
coverage

Down tilt of this cell

is needed

Handover Failure
Network Issue: Case 1 (Pre-Optimization)
OBSERVATION:
The overlapping by
FC0163D caused the
handover failures.
RECOMMENDATION
: Down tilt the cell
FC0163D by two
degree

PROBLEM: Handover failure occurred on FC0163DA

Handover Failure
Network Issue: Case 1 (Post-Optimization)
OBSERVATION:
There is no handover
failures after
optimization and rxlev
of the cell 1118C is
now better.

CONCLUSION
The network coverage of FIRS is good, okay
and better inside and around the complaint
area. The quality is still averagely okay and
better after optimization.

THANK
YOU