Professional Documents
Culture Documents
#2/2012
31st October 2012
Cogeneration Power
Plant Feasibility Study
S1 Power Management
(PTTEP 0400/PIN.012/2012)
10/31/2012
Outlines
10/31/2012
10/31/2012
Technical
In-plant capacity 23.7 MW
Estimated additional power increase 12 MW
Exhaust gas from K-5804A used for Waste
Heat Recovery Steam Generation
Utilizing K-5801A/B/C/D and K-5804B/C for
Combined Cycle (Power Generation)
10/31/2012
Current Performance
Open Cycle Gas Turbine (OCGT) 7 units
4 MW (site condition)
10/31/2012
Options
CAPEX
PAYBACK IRR
10/31/2012
NPV
Fuel Gas
+ Excess O2 ~ 15%
4-CENTAUR50
3-TAURUS 60 + 3-TAURUS 60
(Total 23.7 MW)
Air Inlet
Electricity
10/31/2012
Fuel Gas
Main Equipment
Heat Recovery Steam
Generator
Steam Turbine Generator
Condenser
Deaerator
Cooling Tower
Duct Burners
New Upgrade
12 MW
Make-up water
1 ton/hr
CCGT efficiency ~ 50%
10/31/2012
Make-up water
60 ton/hr
STG
Deaerator
Stack
180 deg C
1st
Superheater
2nd
Superheater
Risers
Risers
Down
Comer
Economiser
GT Exhaust
525 deg C
10/31/2012
10
10/31/2012
11
Way Forward
Improvement
Pros
Cons
1. Fast track
2. Simple operation
Retrofit of
existing
GTGs to CCGT
1. Increase efficiency
2. Green Technology.
3. Minimal fuel gas
consumption
1. High CAPEX;
2. Complexity
3. More space requirement;
Other Improvements
Upgrade existing
GTs
2. High CAPEX.
10/31/2012
12
Summary
Technically, to achieve 12 MW additional
power demands, all three options are
feasible;
Option 1: Power Import from PEA
Option 2: Install 3 x TAURUS 60
Option 3: CCGT
CCGT converted to Cogeneration when heat
from steam consumption increases.
CCGT utilizes energy effectively as
compared with OCGT so it supports
TAGNOC.
10/31/2012
13