Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Appendicitis
The chance of a person developing
appendicitis over the course of his or her
lifetime is 7%.
Although generally considered a benign
disease, complication rates following
appendicitis are high (up to 30% in some
series).
Some patients, particularly the elderly or
those who present late, can be extremely
septic and require critical care support
Incidence
Male : female 1.4 : 1
Young age is risk factor. Nearly 70%
acute appendicitis are younger than
30 y.o
Highest incidence : male 10-14 y.o,
female 15-19 y.o
Patients at extreme age are more
likely to develop perforated
appendicitis
Maingot's, 2013
Etiology
Low in dietary fiber & high in refined
sugars and fat.
Pathophysiology
Low fiber diets lead to less bulky
bowel content, prolonged intestinal
transit time & increased intraluminal
pressure.
Clinical findings
Classically the pain is initially colicky or
aching in nature and located in the center
of the abdomen. As the disease
progresses it becomes sharper and
localized in the right iliac fossa.
However, due to the varying position of
the appendix, many patients present with
a different pattern of pain (preileal,
postileal, subcecal, promontoric, pelvic,
paracolic)
Andersson :
Temperature >37.7C
Localized (rather than diffuse) tenderness
Indirect tenderness (where the pain is
worst at the point of maximal tenderness
when the patient is palpated in the left
iliac fossa, also known as Rovsings sign)
Rebound or percussion tenderness
Guarding
Differential diagnosis
If the patient is female, a full
gynaecological history (especially the
date of the last menstrual period) should
be taken.
In older patients, it is important to
consider the possibility of malignancy.
Diabetic ketoacidosis, acute
pancreatitis and a perforated peptic
ulcer can all mimic acute appendicitis.
Laboratory findings
Anderssons systematic review
identified a raised white cell
count, C-reactive protein and a
neutrophilia as being most
predictive for appendicitis.
Radio Imaging
Ultrasound has a sensitivity of 86% and a
specificity of 81% for diagnosing appendicitis.
It has several advantages it is non-invasive, carries
no radiation risk and is cheap and often easily
available.
However, it is operator-dependent and, as shown
above, can neither exclude nor confidently predict
acute appendicitis.
It is most useful in helping to exclude
gynaecological pathology in stable female patients
rather than in diagnosing appendicitis itself.
Appendectomy
Laparotomy
Laparoscopy
Shorter operating
room time
Lower costs
Fewer intra abdominal
abscess
Diagnosis of other
conditions
Decreased pain
Reduced length of
stay
Fewer wound infection
Quicker return to usual
activities
Differential diagnoses
acute pancreatitis, acute
cholecystitis, perforated acute
appendicitis, colonic diverticulitis,
myocardial infarction and any
perforated viscus.
Management
All gastric ulcers require biopsy.
Surgical management is usually by
excision and sutured closure.
All patients should be considered for
H. pylori eradication therapy.
Laparoscopy vs laparotomy
Prognosis
Mortality increases with three risk
factors: the presence of severe
comorbidity, perforation longer than
24 hours and the presence of
hypotension on admission (systolic
<100 mm Hg).
Hemorrhoid
ACS 2007
Anal cushion
cushions are aggregations of blood
vessels (arterioles, venules, and
arteriolar-venular communications),
smooth muscle, and elastic
connective tissue in the submucosa
that normally reside in the left
lateral, right posterolateral, and right
anterolateral anal canal
Treatment
Diet and life style modification
Non operative procedures : rubber
band ligation, infra red coagulation,
sclerotherapy
Operative procedures : open
hemorrhoidectomy, stapled
hemorrhoidopexy
Differential diagnose
Mucosal prolapse
Rectal prolapse