Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Art. 11.
Custom Defined
A custom is a rule of human action (conduct)
established by repeated acts, and uniformly
observed or practiced as a rule of society,
thru the implicit approval of the lawmakers,
and which is therefore generally obligatory
and legally binding. (See Chief Justice Arellanos definition
cited by La Jurisprudentia, Vol. 1, p. 38). *
Art. 11.
Stimsons Law Dictionary defines a
custom
of
a
place as that which is brought about
by local usage, and is not annexed or
peculiar to any particular individual. *
Art. 11.
Requisites Before the Courts can
Consider Customs
(a)A custom must be proved as a fact,
according to the rules of evidence;
otherwise, the custom cannot be
considered as a source of right.
(Patriarcha v. Orfate, 7 Phil. 370). Thus,
there is no judicial notice of custom. (Art.
12, Civil Code).
(b) The custom must not be contrary to
law (contra legem),public order, or public
policy.
(Art.
11,
Civil
Code).
*E.L.
Paras, Civil
Code
of the
Philippines
Annotated, 17 Edition
th
2013 p. 95-96
2013 p. 96
Art. 11.
Law Distinguished from Custom
While ordinarily
a
law
is written,
consciously made, and enacted by
Congress,
a
custom
is
unwritten,
spontaneous, and comes from society.
Moreover, a law is superior to a custom as
a source of right. While the courts take
cognizance of local laws, there can be no
judicial notice of customs, even if local. (Art. 12,
Civil Code).
Art. 12.
CUSTOMS. Custom has been defined as a
rule of conduct formed by repetition of acts,
uniformly observed (practiced) as a social
rule, legally binding and obligatory. Courts
take no judicial notice of custom. *
A custom must be proved as a fact
according to the rules of evidence. A local
custom as a source of right cannot be
considered by a court of justice unless such
custom
is
properly
established
by
competent
evidence like any other fact. *
*M.S. Sta. Maria, Persons and Family Relations Law, p. 18-19
Art. 12.
Merely because something is done as a
matter of practice does not mean that courts
can rely on the same for purposes of
adjudication as a juridical custom.
Juridical custom must be differentiated from
social custom. The former can supplement
statutory law or applied in the absence of
such statute. Not so with the latter. *
Customs which are contrary to law,
public order or public policy shall not be
countenanced. Custom, even if proven,
cannot prevail over a statutory rule or even a
legal
rule enunciated by the Supreme Court
*M.S. Sta. Maria, Persons and Family Relations Law, p. 18-19
(In the Matter of the Petition for Authority to Continue use of the Firm name
Art. 13.
Art. 13.
(b) 1 year = 365 days
This does not, however, apply in
computing the age of a person. Thus, a
person becomes 21 years old on his 21st
birthday anniversary, and not on the date
arrived at by multiplying 21 by 365 days.
However, in case the law speaks of years
(as in prescriptive periods for crimes),it is
believed that the number of years
involved should be multiplied by 365.
Thus, if a crime that is committed today
*E.L.
Paras, Civil Code
of 10
the Philippines
Annotated,
17 Edition
prescribes
in
years,
the
end
of said
2013 p. 98
th
Art. 13.
In effect, therefore, the period will be
shorter than when the calendar reckoning
is used because certain years are LEAP
YEARS. (See NAMARCO v. Tecson, L-29131, Aug. 27,
1969).
Art. 13.
(c) March = 31 days
This is because the month is specifically
designated
by name. (Art. 13, par. 2, Civil Code). Thus,
if in a contract it is stipulated that
performance should be done, say in the
month of March, the act can still be validly
performed on March 31.
(d) One week = seven successive days.
(Derby and Co. v. City of Modesto, 38 Pac. 901). But a week
of labor, in the absence of any agreement, is
understood
comprehend
only
six labor
*E.L.
Paras, Civil Codeto
of the
Philippines Annotated,
17 Edition
2013
p. 98 (Lee Tay & Lee Chay, Inc. v. Kaisahan
days.
th
When
is
mailed
petition
considered filed, from the date of
mailing or from the time of actual
receipt by the Court?
[NOTE:
Computation of Periods
In computing a period, the fi rst day shall be
excluded, and the last day included. (Art. 13,
last par., Civil Code). Thus, 12 days after July
4, 2006 is July 16, 2006. In other words, we
just add 12 to the first-mentioned date.
Art. 14.
PROHIBITIVE
LAWS.
Under
our
law,
prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts
or property, and those which have for their
object public order, public policy and good
customs shall not be rendered ineffective by
laws, or judgments promulgated, or by
determinations or conventions agreed upon in a
foreign country.
Hence, considering that the only ways to
terminate a marriage in the Philippines are by
nullifying a marriage or by annulling the same
on the basis of the specific grounds exclusively
enumerated under the Family Code of the
Philippines,
and and
byFamily
filing
anLaw,affidavit
of
*M.S. Sta. Maria, Persons
Relations
p. 26
reappearance for the purpose of terminating a
2013 p. 120
2013 p. 121
CHAPTER 2
HUMAN
RELATIONS
ANONYMOUS COMPLAINTS
ANONYMOUS COMPLAINT V. ARAULA AM
1571-CFI
FEB. 7, 1978
Although the Supreme Court does not as a rule
act on anonymous complaints, cases are
excepted in which the charge (concealment of
the pendency of a criminal case by a person at
the time he applied for appointment to the
judiciary) can be fully borne by public records of
indubitable
integrity,
thus
needing
no
corroboration by evidence to be offered by
complainant, whose identity and integrity can
hardly be material where the matter involved
is
th
*E.L. Paras, Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated, 17 Edition
of public interest.
INEXPERIENCED COUNSEL DE
OFICIO
LAMES V. LASCIERAS
AM 1919, MAR. 30, 1979
FACTS: A counsel de ofi cio defended his
client without the ability of a more
experienced
and
competent
lawyer.
Should the counsel de ofi cio be
disbarred?
HELD: No, because said incompetence
does not necessarily
*E.L. Paras, Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated, 17 Edition
th
BAD FAITH
SEA COMMERCIAL CO., INC. V. CA
GR 122823, NOV. 25, 1999, 116 SCAD 198
By appointing as dealer of its agricultural
equipment, the corporation recognized the role and
undertaking of the dealer to promote and sell said
equipment.
After
being
informed
of
the
demonstration, the dealer had conducted to
promote the sales of the equipment, including the
operations at the dealers expense conducted for 5
months, and the approval of its service facilities by
the dealer, the corporation participated in the
bidding for the said equipment at a lower price,
placing itself in direct competition with its own
*E.L.
Paras,The
Civil Code
of the Philippines
17th Edition
dealer.
actuations
of the Annotated,
corporation
are tainted
Art.
20.
Every
person
who,
contrary
to
law,
willfully
or
negligently causes damage to
another, shall indemnify the latter
for the same.
FERNANDO V. CA
GR 92087, MAY 8, 1992
Negligence has been defined as the failure
to observe for the protection of the interests
of another person that degree of care,
precaution
and
vigilance
which
the
circumstances greatly demand, whereby
such other person suffers injury.
Acts resulting from negligence may
vary
in
nature,extent,
and
resulting
consequences. This is why, particularly in
criminal cases, courts are given greater
leeway or discretion in imposing the proper
penalty, and are not bound to mathematical
*E.L. Paras, Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated, 17 Edition
formulas for the lowering of degrees of
th
TORTS
Art. 20 introduces a broader concept
of torts in our country, for it embraces:
(a)The Spanish tort based on
negligence. (Art. 1902, oldCivil Code,
see Caguioa, Civil Law, Vol. I, p. 19).
(b) And the American tort based
on malice. (Prosser, Torts, p. 4; see
Caguioa, Civil Law, Vol. I, p. 19).
(Albenson
It
presupposes loss or injury, material or
otherwise, which one may suffer as a result
of such violation (Cogeo-Cubao Operators and Drivers
Enterprises Corp. v. Court of Appeals, 217 SCRA 16).
*M.S.
Sta. Maria,
Persons
Family207
Relations
Association
v. Court
of and
Appeals,
SCRA Law,
343).p. 33
2013 p. 142
Example
A owed B a sum of money evidenced by a
promissory note. At maturity, A paid, and a
receipt was given him. When later on he
was again asked to pay, he could not find
the receipt, so to avoid trouble he paid
again. Subsequently, he found the missing
receipt. Can he now get back what he had
intentionally (but unwillingly) paid?
ANSWER: Yes, in view of Art. 22, which
incidentally
*E.L.
Paras, Civil
Codeaccion
of the Philippines
Annotated,
treats
of an
in rem
verso.17 Edition
th
2013 p. 150
Article
25.
Thoughtless
extravagance in expenses for
pleasure or display during a
period of acute public want or
emergency may be stopped by
order of the courts at the
instance of any government or
private charitable institution.
Scope
(a)Prying into the privacy of anothers
residence includes by implication respect
for anothers name, picture, or personality
except insofar as is needed for publication of
information and pictures of legitimate news
value. (Prosser, Torts, p. 1050).
(b) Meddling with or disturbing the
private life or family relations of
another includes alienation of the
affections of the husband or the wife. (Prosser,
Torts, p. 916). (Thus, a girl who makes love to a
married man, even if there be no carnal
*E.L.
Paras, Civil Code
of the Philippines
Edition and
relations,
disturbs
his Annotated,
family17 life,
th
2013 p. 171
Example
(a) A goes to a government offi ce where B,
an administrative clerk, instead of attending
to A (upon As request) just reads the
newspaper. If A suffers material or moral loss,
B will be liable. Also, if B refuses to perform
his duty unless given a bribe, damages may
be asked of him in addition to the proper
criminal and administrative liabilities.
Example
A Chief of Police who, instead of giving legal
assistance
to the victim of an assault, intimidates and
harasses said
victim, his father, and his witnesses is liable
for damages
under Art. 27. This is so even if other
remedies (such as
an administrative charge against the chief of
police and
the filing of a criminal complaint with the offi
ce of the city attorney for such assault) are
*E.L. Paras, Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated, 17 Edition
also
available to the victim. (Amaro, et al. v.
2013
p. 175
th
UNFAIR COMPETITION
The 1947 Civil Code Commission justifies
the inclusion of this provision by saying
that it is necessary in a system of free
enterprise.
Democracy
becomes
a
veritable mockery if any person or group
of persons by any unjust or highhanded
method may deprive others of a fair
chance to engage in business or earn a
living (Report of the Code Commission, page 31).
*M.S. Sta. Maria, Persons and Family Relations Law, p. 49
REASON
FOR
PREVENTING
UNFAIR
COMPETITION
The above provision is necessary in a system
of free enterprise. Democracy becomes a
veritable mockery if any person or group of
persons by any unjust or high-handed method
may deprive others of a fair chance to engage
in business or to earn a living. (Report, Code
Commission, p. 31). This Article is intended to lay
down a general principle outlawing unfair
competition, both among enterprises and
among laborers. Unfair competition must be
expressly denounced in this Chapter because
same tends to undermine free enterprise.
*E.L. Paras, Civil Code of the Philippines Annotated, 17 Edition
While
competition is necessary in a free
2013 p. 142
th
Article 29..continuation
If in a criminal case the judgment
of acquittal
is based upon reasonable doubt,
the court shall so declare. In the
absence of any declaration to
that effect, it may be inferred
from the text of the decision
whether or not the acquittal is
due to that ground.