Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Earthquakes and tsunamis: What causes them,
and why are they so dangerous?
The 2011 Tohoku, Japan, Earthquake: What
makes it so special, and so dangerous?
Why might we expect such an earthquake to
occur in Indonesia?
What might happen if it did?
Earthquake
What can we do about it?
Prediction?
Acknowledgements
ANU
ITB
al)
Badan Geologi
(A. Omang, S. Hidayati, A. Cipta, Surono, et. al)
Geoscience Australia (H. Ghasemi, N. Horspool, D. Robinson, et al.)
BMKG
(A. Rudyanto, Suhardjono, P. Maesworo, P. Harjadi, et al.)
LIPI
(H. Harjono, D. Natawidjaja, E. Yulianto, I. Rafliana, et al.)
AusAID
(T. Dhu, J. Griffin, R. Hadikusuma et al.)
3
Earthquakes
Illuminate Earths
Tectonic Plate
Boundaries
Earthquakes
1960-1995
(NASA)
Plate Boundary
Intraplate
Earthquake Size
Magnitude
Energy
(kg TNT)
20,000
A hydrogen bomb
600,000 similar to Hiroshima
20
million
30 hydrogen bombs
600
million
1,000 hydrogen
bombs
20
billion
Equivalent to
A small atomic
(www.teara.govt.nz)
5
Magn
itude
Fatalitie
s*
(Ground
Shaking
)
2010 Haiti
7.0
316000
2008 Wenchuan
7.9
87587
2005 Pakistan
7.6
80361
2003 Iran
6.6
31000
2001 India
7.7
20023
1999 Turkey
7.9
17118
2006 Java
6.3
5749
1995 Kobe
6.9
5530
2009 Padang
7.5
1117
* US Geological Survey
6
Fatalities
2004 Sumatra
2011 Tohoko
2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami
Economic Loss
227,898
$14 billion
15,703
$235 billion
2011
Nocorrelationbetweenplateconvergenceandearthquakemagnitude.Therewasa
suggestionthatoldplatesdonotproducegiantearthquakes,butsince2011weknowthis
isnttrueeither.
(Answer: We dont)
St
ab
ly
s
lid
sli ing/
p
slo
w
Fully locked?
(NEID http://www.bosai.go.jp)
Kurahashi &
Irikura (2011)
SMGA1: 49 MPa
SMGA2: 24 MPa
SMGA3: 30 MPa
SMGA4: 16 MPa
SMGA5: 26 MPa
15
Warm
Cold
Inundation at Ishinomaki
00.51
21
Bali Regional
Timor Sea
Kuta local
22
Dampier
Port facilities Port Hedland
and shipping can be
affected by strong
currents even when
tsunami heights are
small.
23
Jakarta
Tokyo
24
Surabaya
Tokyo
25
Event
This study
{
{
Damage
MMI VII
MMI VIII
MMI IX
Resilient
Moderate
Mod/heavy Heavy
V. Heavy
Vulnerable
Mod/heavy
Heavy
V. Heavy
V. Heavy
MMI X
2010 Haiti
(M 7.0)
598k
2,030k
908k
2011 Tohoku
(M 9.0)
34,740k
5,816k
257k
4,006k
1,245k
528k
2k
29,747k
25,642k
6,313k
121k
10,676k
10,055k
3,293k
58k
???? Java
(M9.0)
???? Bali
(M9.0)
118k
Spectral Accelerations
Tokyo vs. Jakarta
Tokyo and Jakarta are at similar distances
from the actual and scenario events,
respectively. Both Tokyo and Jakarta
occupy sedimentary basins, so it makes
sense to compare the accelerations
recorded in Tokyo to the 500-year design
spectrum for Jakarta specified in the
Indonesian building code SNI-1726-2002:
Some Tokyo accelerations are well above
the linear elastic design spectrum of SNI1726-2002, indicating that even
engineered structures could be damaged
Most residential structures are not
engineered, and so are likely to
experience even more damage.
27
28
Concluding Remarks
Until we know better, the 2011 Tohoku earthquake &
tsunami should be used as a maximum credible
megathrust earthquake scenario in hazard assessment.
31
Coseismic
subsidence
& uplift
Tsunami
Deposits
Turbidite Chronology of
Prehistoric Earthquakes
Spence 2007
36
37
Conclusions
The kind of disaster that could be caused by a giant Java
Trench megathrust earthquake is one both Australia and
Indonesia should be concerned about:
Indonesia: Many through both building collapse and tsunami
inundation, huge setback in economic development
Australia: Potentially many fatalities in Bali, and large loss in
export income due to damage to ports/shipping
38