Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
surgery
Malignant
transformation rate: 1 to 18 %
Monitoring
Oral
lichen planus
(OLP)
Malignant
potential
- only histologic
evaluation
Background
Impact
Clinical
Asymptomatic/symptoms
ranging from
burning sensations to severe pain - interfere
with speaking, eating, swallowing
OHRQoL
OL and OHRQoL
Premalignant
Differential
lesion
difficult
OHRQoL
of early OSCC
After
To
Impact
QLQ-C-30 questionnaire
OHRQoL
During
Study Methodology
Aims
1)
2)
Materials
Methods
Informed
Participants
Refusal to Participate
Questionnaire
OHIP-14
Translated
Determine
Never
Functional limitation
Barely
Physical pain
Sometimes
Psychological discomfort
Often
Really often
Answered
using
a Likert
scale
Physical
disability
Maximum
Psychological
score
56 (8 disability
in each dimension)
Analysis
subscale
Social disability
of total
score or score for each
Handicap
Categorization of OLP
Andreasen
OHRQoL
(1968)
Reticular
Papular
Plaquelike
Atrophic
Bullous
Ulcerative
Categorization of OL
Homogenous
Non-homogenous
Inhomogeneous leukoplakia
Erythroleukoplakia
Erythroplakia)
Categorization of OSCC
By
2 cm
>2 cm to 4 cm
>4 cm
>4 cm or invades
bone
SPSS 17.0
Statistical Analysis
Qualitative
Kruskal-Wallis
Univariate
Wilcoxon
Fisher
test
analysis
signed-rank test
exact test
Multivariate
Variable
logistic regression
Results
P Value OLP
(n=73)
OL (n=44)
OSCC
(n=37)
Men
<0.001
22
28
22
51
16
15
60
55
64
Women
Age
0.017
P Value
OLP
OL
OSCC
Alcohol
0.040
Never
17
16
<2/wk
40
24
2-4/wk
11
10
OLP
OL
OSCC
68
22
15
22
22
Daily
Patients
P Value
Smoking
<0.001
Non-smoker
Smoker
Inferences
No
Gender
Women
Erosive; 30%
Reticular; 58%
Atrophic; 10%
Plaque-like; 3%
Reticular
Papular
Plaque-like
Atrophic
Erosive
Bullous
Table 2 Forms of OL
Erythroplakia; 11%
Erythroleukoplakia; 5%
Homogenous
Inhomogenous
Inhomogenous; 18%
Homogenous; 66%
Erythroleukoplaki
a
T4; 16%
T3; 3%
T
1
T1; 51%
T2; 30%
T
2
P Value
(One-way
ANOVA)
OLP
OL
OSCC
Functional limitation
0.762
0.73
0.66
0.81
Physical pain
0.009
3.12
1.73
2.27
Psychological
discomfort
0.933
2.01
1.91
1.81
Physical disability
0.116
1.15
0.66
0.78
Psychological
disability
0.302
1.03
0.82
1.14
Social disability
0.026
0.68
0.57
1.11
Handicap
0.324
0.70
0.61
0.84
0.86
9.42
6.95
8.81
Asymptomat
ic
Symptomat
ic
Functional limitation
0.846
0.66
0.83
Physical pain
0.016
2.84
3.55
Psychological discomfort
0.118
1.59
2.66
0.10
0.86
1.59
Psychological disability
0.081
0.77
1.41
Social disability
0.571
0.5
0.97
Handicap
0.252
0.66
0.76
0.084
7.89
11.76
OHIP-14 Dimensions
Physical disability
Discussion
Impact of OHRQoL
Did
Dimension
OL
physical pain
OSCC
Highest
Impact of OHRQoL
Dimension
social disability
OSCC
OL
OLP
- clinical forms:
Symptomatic
Asymptomatic
OHRQoL
This
Can
OHIP
OHIP
Original
Short
Advantages of OHIP
For
Previous Studies
Llewellyn and Warnakulasuriya
Decrease in OHRQoL in OLP patients
Inhomogeneous group of patients, with smaller number
in each group
Lower OHRQoL in OLP and OL
Lopez-Jornet and Camacho-Alonso
Decrease in OHRQoL in OLP patients
No division into symptomatic or asymptomatic forms
Spanish version OHIP-49 to compare OLP with other oral
diseases (BMS/RAS)
Dimensions physical pain and social disability
showed high values
Inferences
In
Treatment
Previous Studies
Lundqvist et al
Influence of symptomatic forms of OLP
Decrease of OHRQoL in patients with erosive OLP in
relation to stress (General Perceived Stress
Questionnaire), depression (Beck Depression Inventory),
and state anxiety (State- Trait Anxiety Inventory) was
identified
Against
of dysplasia in OL - regular
examination is the only way to detect a
transformation of the lesion and to
perform a new biopsy examination
Malignant
et al - dysplastic and
neoplastic changes in 12% of OLP
Limitations of Study
1.
2.
3.
Significance of OHRQoL
Critical Review
Critical Review
Merits
Demerits
Adequate sample
size
Inconsistent values
of results (Table 2)
Extensive statistical
analysis
Brief review of
literature
Good discussion
Thank You
QUESTIONS?
Suggestions
OHIP-14
First visit
Recall visits
Relationship between oral health and general well being
Follow up of treatments/conditions
Record keeping for statistical surveys
OHIP-14 Questionnaire