Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOHN S. LOUCKS
St. Edwards University
Chapter 10
Comparisons Involving Means
=
ANOVA
2
x1 x2of
Properties of the Sampling Distribution
Expected Value
E ( x1 x2 ) 1 2
Standard Deviation
x1 x2
12 22
n1 n2
Interval Estimate of 1 - 2:
Large-Sample Case (n1 > 30 and n2 > 30)
x1 x2 z / 2 x1 x2
where:
1 - is the confidence coefficient
Interval Estimate with 1 and 2 Unknown
x1 x2 z / 2 sx1 x2
where:
sx1 x2
s12 s22
n1 n2
Sample Statistics
Sample #1
Sample #2
Par, Inc.
Rap, Ltd.
Sample Size n1 = 120 balls
n2 = 80 balls
x1 yards
Mean
= 235
yards
Standard Dev. s1 = 15 yards
x2 = 218
s2 = 20 yards
= 235 - 218 =
x1 - x2 = Point Estimate of
m1 2
10
12 22
(15) 2 ( 20) 2
17 1. 96
n1 n2
120
80
Interval Estimate of 1 - 2:
Small-Sample Case (n1 < 30 and/or n2 <
30)
Interval Estimate with 2 Known
x1 x2 z / 2 x1 x2
where:
x1 x2
1 1
( )
n1 n2
2
12
Interval Estimate of 1 - 2:
Small-Sample Case (n1 < 30 and/or n2 <
30)
Interval Estimate with 2 Unknown
x1 x2 t / 2 sx1 x2
where:
sx1 x2
1 1
s ( )
n1 n2
2
2
2
(
n
1
)
s
(
n
1
)
s
1
2
2
s2 1
n1 n2 2
13
Sample Size
Sample #1
Sample #2
x1
x2
M Cars
J Cars
n1 = 12 cars n2 = 8 cars
Mean
mpg
Standard Deviation
= 29.8 mpg
s1 = 2.56 mpg
= 27.3
s2 =
14
= 29.8 - 27.3
15
1
)
s
(
n
1
)
s
11
(
2
.
56
)
7
(
1
.
81
)
1
2
2
s2 1
5. 28
n1 n2 2
12 8 2
x1 x2 t.025
1 1
1 1
s ( ) 2. 5 2.101 5. 28( )
n1 n2
12 8
2
Hypotheses
H0: 1 - 2 < 0
2 = 0
H0: 1 - 2 > 0
H0: 1 -
Ha: 1 - 2 > 0
2 0
Ha: 1 - 2 < 0
Ha: 1 -
Test Statistic
( x1 x2 ) ( 1 2 )
z
12Large-Sample
n1 22 n2
Sample
( x1 x2 ) ( 1 2 )
2Smalls (1 n1 1 n2 )
18
19
Sample
#2
Par,xInc.
Rap,xLtd.
2
1
Sample Size n1 = 120 balls
n2 = 80 balls
Mean
= 235 yards
yards
Standard Dev. s1 = 15 yards
= 218
s2 = 20 yards
20
6. 49
2
2
2
2
2. 62
1 2
(15) ( 20)
n1 n2
120
80
Conclusion
Reject H0. We are at least 99% confident
that the mean driving distance of Par, Inc. golf
balls is greater than the mean driving distance
of Rap, Ltd. golf balls.
22
23
Test Statistic ( x1 x2 ) ( 1 2 )
s2 (1 n1 1 n2 )
2
2
(
n
1)
s
(
n
1)
s
1
1
2
2
where:
s
n1 n2 2
2
24
25
32
30
19
25
24
15
16
15
18
14
10
7
16
7
6
4
15
13
15
15
8
9
11
1
2
3
-1
2
-2
5
27
Hypotheses
H0: d = 0, Ha: d
Rejection Rule
Assuming the population of difference
values is
approximately normally
distributed, the t distribution with n - 1 degrees
of freedom applies. With = .05, t.025 = 2.262
(9 degrees of freedom).
Reject H0 if t < -2.262 or if t > 2.262
28
2. 7
n
10
2
76.1
( di d )
sd
2. 9
n 1
9
d d
2. 7 0
t
2. 94
sd n 2. 9 10
Conclusion
Reject H0.
p2
Sampling Distributionp1of
Interval Estimation of p1 - p2
30
Sampling Distribution of p1 p2
Expected Value
E ( p1 p2 ) p1 p2
Standard Deviation
p1 p2
p1 (1 p1 ) p2 (1 p2 )
n1
n2
Distribution Form
If the sample sizes are large (n1p1, n1(1 - p1),
n2p2,
and n2(1 - p2) are all greater
p1 p2 than or equal to
5), the
sampling distribution of
can be
approximated
31
by a normal probability distribution.
Interval Estimation of p1 - p2
Interval Estimate
p1 p2 z / 2 p1 p2
Point Estimator of
p1 p2
s p1 p2
p1 (1 p1 ) p2 (1 p2 )
n1
n2
32
Example: MRA
MRA (Market Research Associates) is
conducting research to evaluate the
effectiveness of a clients new advertising
campaign. Before the new campaign began, a
telephone survey of 150 households in the test
market area showed 60 households aware of
the clients product. The new campaign has
been initiated with TV and newspaper
advertisements running for three weeks. A
survey conducted immediately after the new
campaign showed 120 of 250 households
aware of the clients product.
Does the data support the position that the
advertising campaign has provided an
increased awareness of the clients product? 33
Example: MRA
. 48. 40 . 08
250 150
p1 = proportion of the population of
households
aware of the product after the new
campaign
pp
1 2 = proportion of the population of
households
p2 aware of the product before the new
campaign
= sample proportion of households aware
of the
product after the new campaign
34
Example: MRA
250
150
.08 + 1.96(.0510)
.08 + .10
or -.02 to +.18
Conclusion
At a 95% confidence level, the interval
estimate of the difference between the
proportion of households aware of the clients
product before and after the new advertising
35
campaign is -.02 to +.18.
Hypotheses
H0: p1 - p2 < 0
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
Test statistic
z
( p1 p2 ) ( p1 p2 )
p1 p2
p1 p2
Point Estimator of
s p1 p2
where:
where p1 = p2
p (1 p )(1 n1 1 n2 )
n1 p1 n2 p2
n1 n2
36
Example: MRA
Example: MRA
Rejection Rule
Test Statistic
250(. 48) 150(. 40) 180
p
. 45
250 150
400
s p1 p2 . 45(. 55)( 1
1 ) . 0514
250 150
(. 48. 40) 0
. 08
z
1. 56
. 0514
. 0514
Conclusion
End of Chapter 10
39