Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Team D1
GCHQ1
Design Goals
Lightweight < 0.7Kg
Short Range
Aerial photography
Manoeuvrable
Component accessibility
Wing
Design
Tapered Wing
Less induced drag
Naca Profile
Wing Span
Wing Area
Mean Aerodynamic
Chord
Aileron Size
Taper Ratio (panel 2)
2412
1m
0.1672m2
0.189m
MAC= 0.189m
Span =
1m
Root chord =
0.2m
0.018
(11%)
0.75
Panel 1 length=
0.124m
Panel 2 length=
Tail - Design
25mm
75m
m
Inverted V-tail
NACA 0010
2 control surfaces
Split Elevators
Less potential drag
Places tail outside prop wash
Tail arm = 250mm
110
200m
m
100m
m
376.66mm
Tail - Design
Horizontal Tail
=
Area
= Horizontal Tail
Arm
S = Wing Area
C = Average Wing
Chord
B = Wing Span
= Vertical Tail Area
= VerticalRanges
Arm for Tail volume
Standard
Coefficients:
= 0.30 0.60
= 0.02 0.05
Tail Volume Coefficients:
Vertical
= = 0.032
Horizontal = = 0.50
No
Aircraft
1
1
2
2
Home-built
Home-built
0.5
0.5
0.04
0.04
3
3
0.7
0.7
0.04
0.04
0.8
0.8
0.07
0.07
5
5
GA-single prop-driven
GA-single prop-driven
engine
engine
GA-twin prop-driven
GA-twin prop-driven
engine
engine
GA with canard
GA with canard
0.6
0.6
0.05
0.05
6
6
Agricultural
Agricultural
0.5
0.5
0.04
0.04
7
7
Twin
Twin turboprop
turboprop
0.9
0.9
0.08
0.08
8
8
Jet
Jet trainer
trainer
0.7
0.7
0.06
0.06
9
9
Fighter
Fighter aircraft
aircraft
0.4
0.4
0.07
0.07
10
0.1
0.06
11
Bomber/military
transport
0.08
12
Jet Transport
1.1
0.09
4
4
0.03
0.03
(MIT
2006)
Wing Construction
Traditional Rib and spar
Construction
Front spar uses Top and
Bottom spar caps with
webbing
Balsa wood construction
Will be covered in a
lightweight film
Tail - Construction
Fuselage design
2 Part fuselage
with removable draw section
Tricycle Landing gear
Pusher Prop
Fuselage Construction
Speed
controller
RC Receiver
Battery
Camera
2 Part fuselage, with rail system for draw
Semi mono
Balsa construction with a film skin
Battery and Camera housed in detachable section
Fuselage Construction
Wing structure
passes
through
fuselage
Servos mounted
ahead of control
surfaces
Engine mounted in
rear fuselage
Stability
Neutral Point
30%
Centre of
Gravity
Static Margin
15%
Estimated
Mass*
0.650kg
15%
MAC
NP =
30%
COG =
15%
*Solidworks Mass
estimate
Stability
hn neutral-point
h0
aerodynamic centre
of the wing, typically 0.25
stabilizer efficiency
typically 0.6 (0.9 for a T-tail)
Stabiliser Area
Tail arm
as
aw
Wing Area
Wing Chord
Reynolds number
Range from 0-170000
Used JavaFoil to generate data for lift and drag.
L = MAC = 0.189m
Performan
ce
Stall Angle
10
Stall Speed
~8m
/s
(Data Generated In
Javafoil)
Stall
Angle
Stall
speed
NACA 2412
Performan
ce
Performan
ce
Peak CL/CD = 23.56 at 3AOA
Corresponds to a flight speed of 12.8m/s
Wing
area of for reference
area
References
Raymer, D. (2006) Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. 4th edn. Virginia:
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
Simons, M. (1999) Model aircraft aerodynamics. 4th edn. Swanley: Nexus Special
Interests.
MIT, (6/04/2006) Basic Aircraft Design Rules aeronautics and astronautics [online]
Available from http://
ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronautics-and-astronautics/16-01-unified-engineering-i-ii-iiiiv-fall-2005-spring-2006/systems-labs-06/spl8.pdf
Sadraey, M Chapter 6 Tail Design [online] Available from
<http://faculty.dwc.edu/sadraey/Chapter%206.%20Tail%20Design.pdf>
Questions?