Professional Documents
Culture Documents
154
Held
Where an anonymous telephonic message did not disclose the
names of the accused nor did it disclose the commission of
cognizable offence, it was held that such a telephonic message
could not be held as FIR.
Held
Entirely different testimony was given by the maker of
the first information report. It was held that the FIR can be
used to discredit the testimony of the maker of the report and
the prosecution case cannot be thrown out merely on the
ground that entirely different version is given by its maker.
Held
Delay in lodging FIR quite natural in a traditional
bound society to avoid embarrassment which is inevitable
when reputation of women ( offence of outraging modesty of a
women)is concerned.
Thank You