You are on page 1of 63

Operations Management

Reference:
Heizer and Render
Operations Management, 10e
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall

1-1

Production is the creation of


goods and services
Operations management (OM)
is the set of activities that
create value in the form of
goods and services by
transforming inputs into
outputs
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-2

Organizing to Produce
Goods and Services
Essential functions:
1. Marketing generates demand
2. Production/operations creates
the product
3. Finance/accounting tracks how
well the organization is doing,
pays bills, collects the money
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-3

Organizational Charts
Commercial Bank
Operations

Finance

Marketing

Teller
Scheduling
Check Clearing
Collection
Transaction
processing
Facilities
design/layout
Vault operations
Maintenance
Security

Investments
Security
Real estate

Loans
Commercial
Industrial
Financial
Personal
Mortgage

Accounting
Auditing

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Trust Department

1-4

Organizational Charts
Airline
Operations
Ground support
equipment
Maintenance
Ground Operations
Facility
maintenance
Catering
Flight Operations
Crew scheduling
Flying
Communications
Dispatching
Management science

Finance/
accounting
Accounting
Payables
Receivables
General Ledger
Finance
Cash control
International
exchange

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Marketing
Traffic
administration
Reservations
Schedules
Tariffs (pricing)
Sales
Advertising

Figure 1.1(B)
1-5

Organizational
Charts
Manufacturing
Operations
Facilities

Construction; maintenance

Production and inventory control


Scheduling; materials control

Quality assurance and control


Supply-chain management
Manufacturing
Tooling; fabrication; assembly

Design

Product development and design


Detailed product specifications

Industrial engineering

Efficient use of machines, space,


and personnel

Process analysis

Development and installation of


production tools and equipment

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Finance/
accounting
Disbursements/
credits
Receivables
Payables
General ledger
Funds Management
Money market
International
exchange
Capital requirements
Stock issue
Bond issue
and recall

Marketing
Sales
promotion
Advertising
Sales
Market
research

Figure 1.1(C)
1-6

Why Study OM?


1. OM is one of three major functions of
any organization, we want to study
how people organize themselves for
productive enterprise
2. We want (and need) to know how
goods and services are produced
3. We want to understand what
operations managers do
4. OM is such a costly part of an
organization

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-7

What Operations
Managers Do
Basic Management Functions
Planning
Organizing
Staffing
Leading
Controlling
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1-8

Ten Critical Decisions


Ten Decision Areas

Chapter(s)

1. Design of goods and services


2. Managing quality
3. Process and capacity
design
4. Location strategy
5. Layout strategy
6. Human resources and
job design
7. Supply-chain
management
8. Inventory, MRP, JIT
9. Scheduling
10. Maintenance
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

5
6, Supplement 6
7, Supplement 7
8
9
10
11, Supplement 11
12, 14, 16
13, 15
17

Table 1.2
1-9

The Critical Decisions


1. Design of goods and services
What good or service should we
offer?
How should we design these
products and services?

2. Managing quality
How do we define quality?
Who is responsible for quality?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 10

The Critical Decisions


3. Process and capacity design
What process and what capacity will
these products require?
What equipment and technology is
necessary for these processes?

4. Location strategy
Where should we put the facility?
On what criteria should we base the
location decision?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 11

The Critical Decisions


5. Layout strategy
How should we arrange the facility?
How large must the facility be to meet
our plan?

6. Human resources and job design


How do we provide a reasonable
work environment?
How much can we expect our
employees to produce?

Table 1.2 (cont.)

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 12

The Critical Decisions


7. Supply-chain management

Should we make or buy this


component?
Who should be our suppliers and how
can we integrate them into our strategy?

8. Inventory, material requirements


planning, and JIT
How much inventory of each item
should we have?
When do we re-order?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 13

The Critical Decisions


9. Intermediate and shortterm
scheduling
Are we better off keeping people on
the payroll during slowdowns?
Which jobs do we perform next?

10. Maintenance
How do we build reliability into our
processes?
Who is responsible for maintenance?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 14

Significant Events in OM

Figure 1.3
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 15

The Heritage of OM
Division of labor (Adam Smith 1776;
Charles Babbage 1852)
Standardized parts (Whitney 1800)
Scientific Management (Taylor 1881)
Coordinated assembly line (Ford/
Sorenson 1913)
Gantt charts (Gantt 1916)
Motion study (Frank and Lillian Gilbreth
1922)
Quality control (Shewhart 1924; Deming
1950)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 16

The Heritage of OM
Computer (Atanasoff 1938)
CPM/PERT (DuPont 1957, Navy 1958)
Material requirements planning (Orlicky
1960)
Computer aided design (CAD 1970)
Flexible manufacturing system (FMS 1975)
Baldrige Quality Awards (1980)
Computer integrated manufacturing (1990)
Globalization (1992)
Internet (1995)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 17

Eli Whitney
Born 1765; died 1825
In 1798, received government
contract to make 10,000 muskets
Showed that machine tools could
make standardized parts to exact
specifications
Musket parts could be used in any
musket
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 18

Frederick W. Taylor
Born 1856; died 1915
Known as father of scientific
management
In 1881, as chief engineer for
Midvale Steel, studied how tasks
were done
Began first motion and time studies

Created efficiency principles


2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 19

Taylors Principles
Management Should Take More
Responsibility for:
Matching employees to right job
Providing the proper training
Providing proper work methods and
tools
Establishing legitimate incentives for
work to be accomplished
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 20

Frank & Lillian Gilbreth


Frank (1868-1924); Lillian (1878-1972)
Husband-and-wife engineering team
Further developed work
measurement methods
Applied efficiency methods to their
home and 12 children!
Book & Movie: Cheaper by the
Dozen, Bells on Their Toes
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 21

Henry Ford
Born 1863; died 1947
In 1903, created Ford Motor
Company
In 1913, first used moving assembly
line to make Model T
Unfinished product moved by
conveyor past work station

Paid workers very well for 1911


($5/day!)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 22

W. Edwards Deming
Born 1900; died 1993
Engineer and physicist
Credited with teaching Japan
quality control methods in postWW2
Used statistics to analyze
process
His methods involve workers in
decisions

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 23

Contributions From
Human factors
Industrial engineering
Management science
Biological science
Physical sciences
Information technology
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 24

New Challenges in OM
From
Local or national focus
Batch shipments
Low bid purchasing
Lengthy product
development
Standard products
Job specialization
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

To
Global focus
Just-in-time
Supply-chain
partnering
Rapid product
development,
alliances
Mass
customization
Empowered
employees, teams1 - 25

Characteristics of Goods
Tangible product
Consistent product
definition
Production usually
separate from
consumption
Can be inventoried
Low customer
interaction
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 26

Characteristics of Service
Intangible product
Produced and
consumed at same time
Often unique
High customer
interaction
Inconsistent product
definition
Often knowledge-based
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Frequently dispersed

1 - 27

Goods and Services


Automobile
Computer
Installed carpeting
Fast-food meal
Restaurant meal/auto repair
Hospital care
Advertising agency/
investment management
Consulting service/
teaching
Counseling
100%

75

50

25

25

50

75

100%

Percent of Product that is a Good


2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Percent of Product that is a Service


1 - 28

Manufacturing and Service


Employment
120

Employment (millions)

100
80

Service

60
40
20

Manufacturing

0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1950
1970
1990 2010 (est)
1960
1980
2000
Figure 1.4 (A)
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 29

Manufacturing Employment
and Production
Industrial
production

125

(right scale)

100
75
50
40
30
20
10
0

Manufacturing
employment
(left scale)

25

Index: 1997 = 100

Employment (millions)

150

0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1950
1970
1990 2010 (est)
1960
1980
2000
Figure 1.4 (B)

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 30

Development of the
Service Economy
United States
Canada
France
Italy
Britain
Japan
W. Germany
1970

2010 (est)

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

40

50

60
70
Percent

80

Figure 1.4 (C)


1 - 31

Organizations in Each Sector


Service Sector

Example

% of all
Jobs

Education,
Legal, Medical,
other

San Diego Zoo, Arnold


Palmer Hospital

25.8

Trade (retail,
wholesale)

Walgreens, Wal-Mart,
Nordstroms

14.9

Utilities,
Transportation

Pacific Gas & Electric,


American Airlines

5.2

Professional and Snelling and Snelling, Waste


Business
Management, Inc.
Services

10.7

Table 1.3
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 32

Organizations in Each Sector


Service Sector

% of all
Jobs

Example

Finance,
Information,
Real Estate

Citicorp, American Express,


Prudential, Aetna

9.6

Food, Lodging,
Entertainment

Olive Garden, Motel 6, Walt


Disney

8.5

Public
Administration

U.S., State of Alabama, Cook


County

4.6

Total

78.8
Table 1.3

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 33

Organizations in Each Sector


Other Sectors

% of all
Jobs

Example

Manufacturing
Sector

General Electric, Ford,


U.S. Steel, Intel

11.2

Construction
Sector

Bechtel, McDermott

8.1

Agriculture
Sector

King Ranch

1.4

Mining Sector

Homestake Mining

0.5
Total

21.2
Table 1.3

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 34

Changing Challenges
Traditional
Approach

Reasons for
Change

Current
Challenge

Ethics and
regulations
not at the
forefront

Public concern over


pollution, corruption,
child labor, etc.

High ethical and


social
responsibility;
increased legal
and professional
standards

Local or
national
focus

Growth of reliable, low


cost communication
and transportation

Global focus,
international
collaboration

Lengthy
product
development

Shorter life cycles;


growth of global
communication; CAD,
Internet

Rapid product
development;
design
collaboration

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 1.5

1 - 35

Changing Challenges
Traditional
Approach

Reasons for
Change

Current
Challenge

Low cost
production,
with little
concern for
environment;
free
resources
(air, water)
ignored

Public sensitivity to
environment; ISO 14000
standard; increasing
disposal costs

Environmentally
sensitive
production; green
manufacturing;
sustainability

Low-cost
standardized
products

Rise of consumerism;
increased affluence;
individualism

Mass
customization

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 1.5

1 - 36

Changing Challenges
Traditional
Approach

Reasons for
Change

Current
Challenge

Emphasis on
specialized,
often manual
tasks

Recognition of the
employee's total
contribution; knowledge
society

Empowered
employees;
enriched jobs

In-house
production;
low-bid
purchasing

Rapid technological
change; increasing
competitive forces

Supply-chain
partnering; joint
ventures, alliances

Large lot
production

Shorter product life


cycles; increasing need
to reduce inventory

Just-In-Time
performance;
lean; continuous
improvement

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 1.5

1 - 37

New Trends in OM
Ethics
Global focus
Environmentally sensitive production
Rapid product development
Environmentally sensitive production
Mass customization
Empowered employees
Supply-chain partnering
Just-in-time performance
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 38

Productivity Challenge
Productivity is the ratio of outputs (goods
and services) divided by the inputs
(resources such as labor and capital)
The objective is to improve productivity!
Important Note!
Production is a measure of output
only and not a measure of efficiency
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 39

The Economic System


Inputs

Transformation

Outputs

Labor,
capital,
management

The U.S. economic system


transforms inputs to outputs
at about an annual 2.5%
increase in productivity per
year. The productivity
increase is the result of a
mix of capital (38% of 2.5%),
labor (10% of 2.5%), and
management (52% of 2.5%).

Goods
and
services

Feedback loop

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 40

Improving Productivity at
Starbucks
A team of 10 analysts
continually look for ways
to shave time. Some
improvements:
Stop requiring signatures
on credit card purchases
under $25

Saved 8 seconds
per transaction

Change the size of the ice


scoop

Saved 14 seconds
per drink

New espresso machines

Saved 12 seconds
per shot

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 41

Improving Productivity at
Starbucks
A team of 10 analysts
continually look for ways
to shave time. Some
improvements:

Operations improvements have


Stop requiring signatures
Saved
8 seconds
helped Starbucks
increase
yearly
on credit card purchases
perby
transaction
revenue per outlet
$200,000 to
under $25
$940,000 in six years.
Change the sizeProductivity
of the ice hasSaved
14 seconds
improved
by 27%,
scoop
peryear.
drink
or about 4.5% per
New espresso machines
Saved 12 seconds
per shot

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 42

Productivity
Units produced
Productivity =
Input used
Measure of process improvement
Represents output relative to input
Only through productivity increases
can our standard of living improve
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 43

Productivity Calculations
Labor Productivity
Units produced
Productivity = Labor-hours used
1,000
=
= 4 units/labor-hour
250
One resource input single-factor productivity
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 44

Multi-Factor Productivity
Output
Productivity =
Labor + Material + Energy
+ Capital + Miscellaneous
Also known as total factor productivity
Output and inputs are often expressed
in dollars
Multiple resource inputs multi-factor productivity
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 45

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day

8 titles/day
Old labor =
productivity 32 labor-hrs

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 46

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day

8 titles/day
Old labor =
= .25 titles/labor-hr
32
labor-hrs
productivity

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 47

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day
New System:
14 titles/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day
Overhead = $800/day

8 titles/day
Old labor =
= .25 titles/labor-hr
32
labor-hrs
productivity
14 titles/day
New labor =
32 labor-hrs
productivity
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 48

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day
New System:
14 titles/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day
Overhead = $800/day

8 titles/day
Old labor =
= .25 titles/labor-hr
32
labor-hrs
productivity
14 titles/day
New labor =
= .4375 titles/labor-hr
32
labor-hrs
productivity
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 49

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day
New System:
14 titles/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day
Overhead = $800/day

8 titles/day
Old multifactor =
$640 + 400
productivity

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 50

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day
New System:
14 titles/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day
Overhead = $800/day

8 titles/day
Old multifactor =
= .0077 titles/dollar
$640
+
400
productivity

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 51

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day
New System:
14 titles/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day
Overhead = $800/day

8 titles/day
Old multifactor =
= .0077 titles/dollar
$640
+
400
productivity
14 titles/day
New multifactor =
$640 + 800
productivity
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 52

Collins Title Productivity


Old System:
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day
Payroll cost = $640/day
New System:
14 titles/day

8 titles/day
Overhead = $400/day
Overhead = $800/day

8 titles/day
Old multifactor =
= .0077 titles/dollar
$640
+
400
productivity
14 titles/day
New multifactor =
= .0097 titles/dollar
$640
+
800
productivity
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 53

Measurement Problems
1. Quality may change while the
quantity of inputs and outputs
remains constant
2. External elements may cause an
increase or decrease in
productivity
Precise units of measure may be
lacking

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 54

Productivity Variables
1. Labor - contributes
about 10% of the
annual increase
2. Capital - contributes
about 38% of the
annual increase
3. Management contributes about
52% of the annual
increase
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 55

Key Variables for Improved


Labor Productivity
1. Basic education appropriate for the
labor force
2. Diet of the labor force
3. Social overhead that makes labor
available
Challenge is in maintaining and
enhancing skills in the midst of rapidly
changing technology and knowledge
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 56

Labor Skills
About half of the 17-year-olds in the U.S. cannot
correctly answer questions of this type

Figure 1.7
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 57

Investment and Productivity


Percent increase in productivity

10
8
6
4
2
0
10

15

20

25

30

35

Percentage investment
2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 58

Service Productivity
1. Typically labor intensive
2. Frequently focused on unique
individual attributes or desires
3. Often an intellectual task performed by
professionals
4. Often difficult to mechanize
5. Often difficult to evaluate for quality

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 59

Productivity at Taco Bell


Improvements:

Revised the menu


Designed meals for easy preparation
Shifted some preparation to suppliers
Efficient layout and automation
Training and employee empowerment
New water and energy saving grills

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 60

Productivity at Taco Bell


Results:
Improvements:

Preparation
Revised the time
menucut to 8 seconds

span
control
increased
Management
Designed meals
forofeasy
preparation
from 5 to 30
Shifted some preparation to suppliers
In-store labor cut by 15 hours/day
Efficient layout and automation

Stores handle twice the volume with half


the
laborand employee empowerment
Training

water and
Conserve
New water300
andmillion
energygallons
savingof
grills
200 million KwH of electricity each year
saving $17 million annually

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 61

Ethics and
Social Responsibility
Challenges facing
operations managers:
Developing and producing safe,
quality products
Maintaining a clean environment
Providing a safe workplace
Honoring stakeholder commitments

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 62

END

2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1 - 63

You might also like