Mobilink Merger

Swap Initial KPICluster 5

CLUSTER 5
3-11-16

Activity Summary

Summary
Cluster-5
4 Sites Swap Summary:

20% increase in Warid 2G traffic with no SDCCH and TCH congestion

DCR recovered despite of higher traffic while CSSR and HSR are stable
Field coverage and quality better than pre-swap except for area where 4th sector has been removed. This will be taken
care of during consolidation (2G MOCN) phase
26 Sites RRU Swap:
Visible improvement in UL/DL coverage (1dB from statistical KPI). Field improvement will be more as statistical KPI is
dedicated mode with power control
11% increase in traffic while DCR has improved by more than 15%
CSSR and HSR are slightly degraded due to increased coverage and traffic. Some soft expansions are being discussed
with PMCL
Cluster-4
19 Sites RRU Swap:
Visible improvement in UL/DL coverage (1dB from statistical KPI). Field improvement will be more as statistical KPI is
dedicated mode with power control
4% increase in traffic while DCR has improved by more than 20%
CSSR has improved by 8% while HSR is slightly degraded due to increased traffic and more accessibility in the rural
cluster. It will be kept under monitoring
Cluster-2
Visible improvement in UL/DL coverage (0.6dB from statistical KPI). Field improvement will be more as statistical KPI is
dedicated mode with power control
7% increase in traffic while DCR has improved by more than 35%
HSR/IHSR are showing improvement after RRU Swap
3
GoS TCH is little bit degraded due to increased traffic

2G Warid SWAP KPI COMPARISON UPDATE

CSSR has improved trend after swap

Cluster level traffic is more than the pre swap

trend after parametric changes. Traffic increased
further since the GSM/DCS TRX Power increased to
30W for Cell 24300 (11-Nov).

2G Warid SWAP KPI COMPARISON UPDATE

Cluster Level DCR initially degraded after swap

due to availability issues, however later it
recovered after resolving all pending hardware
issues, optimizing the neighbors plan, and
increasing the cell power of 24300 from 20W to
30W.

HSR is stable after swap

2G Warid SWAP KPI COMPARISON UPDATE

No degradation in GoS SDCCH has been observed.

No TCH blocking after swap

2G Warid SWAP KPI COMPARISON UPDATE

After swap, Location updates increased due to new

LAC introduced in this cluster (limitation of the
Post swap Warid MSC Pool)

TCH availability degraded immediately after

swap, but has recovered now for all the sites.

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: MR816558

(HWY4303) :: Coverage

As per Pre/Post Coverage plot for HWY4303,

considerable improvement observed in good
coverage samples (0 to -65dBm)

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: MR816558

(HWY4303) :: Quality

As per Pre/Post Quality plot for HWY4303,

considerable improvement observed in good
Quality samples (0 =<Rx Qual <4)

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: DP1967

(HWY4302) ::: Coverage

As per Pre/Post Coverage plot for HWY4302,

considerable improvement observed in good
coverage samples (0 to -65dBm)

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: DP1967

(HWY4302) :: Quality

As per Pre/Post Quality plot for HWY4302,

considerable improvement observed in good
Quality samples (0 =<Rx Qual <4)

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: MR816330

(HWY4301) ::: Coverage

As per Pre/Post Coverage plot for HWY4301, considerable

improvement observed in good coverage samples (0 to
-65dBm)
After Swap, 4th sector of this site has been removed, so
there is some loss of coverage in that location which will be

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: MR816330

(HWY4301) :: Quality

As per Pre/Post Quality plot for HWY4300, Good

quality samples are almost same but considerable
improvement observed in reduction of bad Quality
samples (6 =<Rx Qual <8)

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: MR816331

(HWY4300) ::: Coverage

As per Pre/Post Coverage plot for HWY4300, considerable

improvement observed in good coverage samples (0 to
-75dBm). Slightly reduction in > -65 dBm samples however
quality already showing good improvement

2G Warid SWAP Pre/Post DT Comparison ::: MR816331

(HWY4300) :: Quality

As per Pre/Post Quality plot for HWY4300, Good

Quality samples are little bit improved but
considerable improvement observed in bad Quality
samples (6 =<Rx Qual <8)

Hardware Issue Tracker 2G

Cluster Pilot # 5
Technolo Priorit
Site code
gy
y

BSC

Alarms

COMMENTS

2G

HWY4300

PKP_BSC_ZiaTown_1

No current alarm Exists

2G

HWY4301

PKP_BSC_ZiaTown_1

No current alarm Exists

2G

HWY4302

PKP_BSC_ZiaTown_1

No current alarm Exists

2G

HWY4303

PKP_BSC_ZiaTown_1

No current alarm Exists

16

STATU
S

2G RRU Swap Cluster#5 (26-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 26 Sites in Cluster#5, Traffic improved 11% @ day
sum w.r.t pre value, with improved DCR, where the DCR improvement margin is ~17%.
With the increase in traffic, GOS-TCH increased at cluster level. This issue has been discussed
with PMCL regional RAN team, and expansions are being proposed for the top blocker cells.

17

2G RRU Swap Cluster#5 (26-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 26 Sites in Cluster#5, Mean DL/UL Signal Strength
(OSS KPIs) improved around 1dB. These are power controlled values, so in actual the signal level
improvement margin will be higher than 1 dB
18

2G RRU Swap Cluster#5 (26-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 26 Sites in Cluster#5, Since with improved coverage
(as obvious with improved diversity level graph), Sites have larger coverage foot prints.
Degradation in KPIs like CSSR, HSR, In-HSR is related to Call Setup Blocking & Handover blocking
which increased with increase in traffic. Few expansions are under progress to handle the
increased traffic

19

2G RRU Swap Cluster#4 (19-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 19 Sites in Cluster#4, Traffic improved 4% @ day sum
w.r.t pre value, with improved DCR, where the DCR improvement margin is ~24% for peak to
peak values
GoS TCH is following the old trend with increase in traffic

20

2G RRU Swap Cluster#4 (19-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 19 Sites in Cluster#4, Mean DL/UL Signal Strength
(OSS KPIs) improved around 1dB. These are power controlled values, so in actual the signal level
improvement margin may become greater than it.
21

2G RRU Swap Cluster#4 (19-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 19 Sites in Cluster#4, Since with improved coverage
(as obvious with improved diversity level graph), Sites have larger coverage foot prints.
CSSR is showing improvement by 8% while Degradation in HSR and In-HSR is related with
increase in traffic and the improved accessibility for the far users in remote rural cluster. HSR
will be kept under monitoring

22

2G RRU Swap Cluster#2 (9-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 19 Sites in Cluster#4, Traffic improved 7% @ day sum
w.r.t pre value, with improved DCR, where the DCR improvement margin is ~35% for peak to
peak values
GoS TCH is degraded due to increased traffic

23

2G RRU Swap Cluster#2 (9-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 9 Sites in Cluster#2, Mean DL/UL Signal Strength
(OSS KPIs) improved around 0.6dB. These are power controlled values, so in actual the signal level
improvement margin may become greater than it.
24

2G RRU Swap Cluster#2 (9-Sites) Major

KPIs

With the implementation of RRU swap on 9 Sites in Cluster#2, Since with improved coverage (as
obvious with improved diversity level graph), Sites have larger coverage foot prints.
CSS is following the old trend while HSR/IHSR are showing improved trend

25

THE END

26