Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drill Bits
Types and Selections
Agenda
Drilling and
Intervention
Introduction
Drilling and
Intervention
Bit Classification
Drill Bits
Fixed
Cutter
PDC
Roller
Cone
Mill
Tooth
Diamon
d
Natural
Diamon
d
Impreg
Hybrid
4
Insert
Drilling and
Intervention
Milltooth Bits
Advantages
Fast ROP
Good Stability
Steerable
Low unit cost least expensive bit type
Potential Limitations
Tooth Wear Rate the least durable of all
cutting structures
Bearing Life if run long enough the bearing
will fail
Gauge wear roller cone bits tend to suffer
more gauge wear than PDC bits
5
Drilling and
Intervention
Insert Bits
Advantages
Cutting Structure Durability
Range of Formations
Interbed Tolerance
Steerability and Stability
Potential Limitations
Slower ROP
Bearing Life
Drilling and
Intervention
PDC Bits
Advantages
Very Fast ROP
Long Life Potential
Adaptability
Potential Limitations
Impact Damage - brittle
Abrasiveness
Steerability tool face control issues
Stability tend to induce bit whirl, or
stick slip
High Unit Cost
7
Drilling and
Intervention
Diamond Bits
Advantages
Very Durable
Hard Rock Capability
Low Junk-in-Hole Risk
Potential Limitations
Slower ROP
RPM Sensitive turbine requirement
High Cost Applications
Roller Cone
Bits
Drilling and
Intervention
Tungsten Carbide
Inserts or
Cutters
Heel
Cone
Shirtt
ail
Nozzle
Pin
Shoulder
Pin
Connection
10
Drilling and
Intervention
IADC Nomenclature
Formation
Series/Ty
pe
Cutting Element
Soft to Hard
11- to 34-
Mill Tooth
Soft to Hard
41- to 84-
Tungsten Carbide
Insert
Seri
es
Type
7
Bearin Special
g
Featur
Gauge
es
5
11
IADC Nomenclature
Mill Tooth Bits
Soft
Hard
Formation Hardness
Insert Bits
12
Drilling and
Intervention
Chip Formation
Tooth load overcomes rock compressive
strength to generate crater
Scraping helps to remove chips from
craters
13
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Chip Removal
Removal of chips is required to allow for
new chip formation
Hydraulics help to remove chips
14
Journal Angle
Offset or Skew Angle
Cone Profile
Journal
15
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Journal Angle
Journal angle influences:
Load distribution between
journal and thrust face
Cutter diameter
Gage bevel length
Cutter shell thickness
As journal angle increases, the
thrust portion of the load
increases
8% difference between 33 and
36 degree journal angle
16
Load Components
For Vertical load (WOB), V,
there is an Radial component, R,
and a Thrust component, T,
such that:
T = V sin
R = V cosT
17
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Journal Angle
18
19
Drilling and
Intervention
Effects of Offset or
Skew
Reduced Offset
0
Reduced Gage Scraping
More Durable
Slower Drilling
Hard / Abrasive Formations
20
Drilling and
Intervention
Increased Offset
5
Increased Gage Scraping
Less Durable
Faster Drilling
Soft / Sticky Formations
Drilling and
Intervention
Cone Profiles
22
Drilling and
Intervention
23
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
24
Drilling and
Intervention
26
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
RC Bearings
27
Roller Bearings
Drilling and
Intervention
29
Drilling and
Intervention
30
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Seal Squeeze
Calculation
31
Pressure Compensation
System
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Hydraulics
Conventional nozzle
directed between cones at
bottom of hole
Directed nozzles -directed
tangent to interlock row
insert tips and bottom of
hole
33
Fixed Cutter
Bit
34
35
Drilling and
Intervention
36
Drilling and
Intervention
37
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Design Decisions
Cutter
Sizes
Tip Profile
Cutting
Structure
Number of
Blades
Body
Material
Stability
Body
Hydraulics
Gauge
Drill
Bit
38
Design Considerations
Bit Profile
Cone
Deeper cone, Greater stability
Nose
Heavy set, Greater durability
Shoulder
Longer shoulder, Greater cutter
count
Flatter profile, Greater steerability
39
Drilling and
Intervention
Design Considerations
40
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Tip Profile
41
Cutter Selection
Even wear
Optimum Life
Acceptable Sideforce
Stability
Drilling and
Intervention
43
Drilling and
Intervention
Design Compromise
44
Drilling and
Intervention
Drilling and
Intervention
Rake Angles
45
Drilling and
Intervention
Backrake
Low back rake
more aggressive
High back rake
less aggressive
46
Design Considerations
47
Drilling and
Intervention
Bit Selection
48
Drilling and
Intervention
Bit Abilities
49
The Application
Drilling and
Intervention
Lithology
-Rock Strength/Abrasiveness/Clay
Content/Drillability
Interval
-Single Bit Run/Multiple Bit Run
Direction
-Build/Turn/Drop/Hold Drive Type - Specifics
Mud
- Type/Bit Type
Other
- Drill Out/Junk
50
Drilling and
Intervention
Offset Data
Geography/Application/Time
Large Scale
Bit Cost
Rig Cost per hour
Drill Time -derived from R.O.P.
Trip Time -Round trip
Interval Drilled -proposed well
52
Drilling and
Intervention
53
Drilling and
Intervention
Thank You
5454
+ Rupam.Sarmah@nov.
com
+ 91 7506 374 792