Professional Documents
Culture Documents
or
Drilling Close
Collision Avoidance
Policy
Shut-in Criteria
Etc.
Collision Avoidance
Policy
Etc.
Collision Avoidance
Policy
Separation factors
Shut-in criteria
Etc.
Collision Avoidance
Practices
Collision Avoidance
Standards
Standards
Geomagnetic Field Model
Co-ordinate Reference Systems
Target Definition Geological and Drilling
Trajectory Design Planning Inputs and Outputs
Anti-Collision Criteria
Survey Program Design
COMPASS software
BHA SAG Deflection Correction
Reporting Requirements/Database Maintenance
Collision Avoidance
Surveying Practices
MWD Surveying Procedures
Gyro Surveying Procedures
Generic Survey Programs
Isolated Vertical Well
Deviated Platform Well, 45 inclination
Deviated Platform Well, 65 inclination
Anti-Collision Monitoring Practices
Shut In Criteria (Planned)
Shut In Criteria (Offshore Monitoring)
Plug-back Criteria (While Drilling)
Offshore Anti-Collision Monitoring
Onshore Anti-Collision Monitoring
Standards
Collision Avoidance
Data reliability
Collision Avoidance
Data reliability
Collision Avoidance
Data reliability
Collision Avoidance
Examples
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
BGGM
The Geomagnetic Field Model used by Halliburton is the
British Geological Survey Global Geomagnetic Model
(BGGM).
This model estimates the values describing the earths
geomagnetic Field, i.e. the magnetic field strength, the Dip
angle, the corrections from Magnetic to True North and the
correction from True to Grid North.
This model is updated each year, and the model for the
most recent year must be used.
The geomagnetic field varies with time, and so should be
re-calculated if drilling resumes after a well has been
suspended for an extended period of time.
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Platform/Template Reference Point Uncertainty
In addition to wellhead uncertainty, there is an
uncertainty associated with the position of the
platform/template reference point.
It is only taken into account when performing anticollision monitoring calculations for wells from
different platforms or templates.
The XXX well site has been assigned an uncertainty of
5m radius.
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Target Definition Geological and Drilling
Geological Target
Each well has one or more proposed geological targets .
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Drillers target
Geological target
Landing point
Uncertainty
area
Trajectory
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Anti-Collision Criteria
Effective collision avoidance begins with good preplanning initiated during field exploitation planning
and platform positioning.
During well target allocation to specific slots or planned surface
well coordinates, potential conflicts with adjacent wells are
assessed and minimised
The proposed wells are planned to allow maximum possible
separation between existing and future wells, and should be
drilled without encroaching into the planned path of a future well
The locations and directional surveys of adjacent exploration and
appraisal wells must be included in the database used for
proximity calculations
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Anti-Collision Criteria
2-sigma uncertainty / confidence level
This shows the 1 sigma and 2 sigma confidence intervals for the standard
normal distribution.
95.4%
Confidence
interval
-2
-3
-2
-1
-1
68.3%
Confidence
interval
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Compass Example
Error System
Wellbore position uncertainty
Cone of Error
Systematic Ellipse (SPE 9223)
also known as Wolff & de Wardt
ISCWSA (SPE 56702)
Industry Steering Committee for WellBore Survey
Accuracy
Collision Avoidance
Error Models
80 to 89.99 26ft/1000ft
t
ft/1000
f
50 to
79.99
15
35
to
49
.9
9
14
ft/
0ft
0
0
1
/
ft
7ft
0
9
0
9
.
0
ft
14
1
o
0
/
t
t
f
Up
9
00
9
1
9
/
4.
ft
2
2
o
t
1
9
15
.9
4
o3
t
25
10
00
ft
Expansion
7ft/1000ft
9ft/1000ft
12ft/1000ft
14ft/1000ft
15ft/1000ft
21ft/1000ft
Collision Avoidance
Error Models
Collision Avoidance
Error Models
Collision Avoidance
Error Surfaces
Separation Factor
The Error Surface determines the shape of the errors when relating
one wellpath to another in the anti-collision separation factor
calculation.
Separation
=
Factor
Elliptical Conic
Circular Conic
Combined Covariances
Projected Vector
Collision Avoidance
Separation Factor
Separation Factor
R1
R2
Center to Center
Separation Factor =
Center to Center
----------------------R1 + R2
Collision Avoidance
Separation Factor
Separation Factor = 1
Collision Avoidance
Error Surfaces
Elliptical Conic
Reference Well
Error Ellipse
Major
Minor
Major
R2
R1
C
C
ne
a
l
P
Separation
= Center to Center Separation
Factor
R1 + R 2
Collision Avoidance
Error Surfaces
Separation Factor Collision Avoidance Methods
To date the most common method for determining a minimum
separation is to add the projected ellipse radii of the offset well and
the reference well together. (Compass software)
SF
Reference Ellipsoid
Er
S
( Er Eo)
Offset Ellipsoid
Eo
Where Er is the error on the reference projected in the direction of closest approach.
And Eo is the error on the offset similarly projected.
The ellipse radii are taken at a specified confidence (sigma) level. 2 Sigma is most commonly
used and is roughly equivalent to 95% confidence in 1 dimension. Other higher levels have
been used
Collision Avoidance
Error Surfaces
Circular Conic
Radius Projected onto Major Error Ellipse Dimension
Spheroidal Projection
based on Major Dimension
of Error Ellipse
R1
Pl
C
C
ane
R2
Major
Major
Collision Avoidance
Error Surfaces
Major Axis
One conservative approach is to take the largest dimension of
the ellipsoid as the ellipse size to be used in the separation
factor formula. (Known in Compass as Circular Conic).
In shallow intersections, the errors should be nearly
symmetrical so the difference is negligible.
In deep intersections the errors are dominated by the azimuth
errors, so this method is overly conservative.
Reference Ellipsoid
Offset Ellipsoid
Er
Eo
S = Separation of Centers
Collision Avoidance
Error Surfaces
Combined Covariance
Combines the errors on the reference and offset by covariance addition before
any distance calculations are performed. Radius Projected onto Error Ellipse
as Intersected by Center to Center Plane
R1
E1
Separation
Factor =
E1
E1 = Combined error of both wells
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Scan Methods
Casing Radii
Including Casing Radii in the Separation Factor calculation results in the
Center to Center distance being reduced by the sum of the Casing radii
assuming that Casing is centered in the Wellbore
Separation
Factor =
Center to Center
Distance
12-1/4
OH
9-5/8
Casing
Without Casing
Radii
With Casing
Radii
8-1/2
OH
7 Liner
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Casings
Where Dr is the bit diameter on the reference wellbore at the depth
of interest. Do is the casing diameter on the offset wellbore.
Separation Factor
S
SF
( Er Eo ( Dr Do) / 2)
S ( Dr Do) / 2
SF
( Er Eo)
Collision Avoidance
Scan Method
Distance between wellpaths
Closest Approach 3D
Travelling Cylinder
Travelling Cylinder North
Horizontal Plane
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Scan Method
Closest Approach 3D
Travelling Cylinder
Travelling Cylinder North
Horizontal Plane
Example Standards
Offset Well Reference Well
(Drilled well) (Drilling well)
Collision Avoidance
Scan Methods
Closest Approach 3D
Offset Well
Reference Well
Advantages:
Always show the minimum
distance to an offset wellpath
sphere
Disadvantages:
Gives a distorted
impression of separation
on a travelling cylinder
plot.
Line is always
perpendicular
to the offset
well
Collision Avoidance
Scan Methods
Travelling Cylinder
Offset Well
Reference Well
Advantages:
True to the concept of a
traveling cylinder plot.
Disadvantages:
Difficult to understand, scans
from offset well back to
reference well
May miss a collision between
wellpaths crossing
perpendicular to each other
disk
Line is always
perpendicular to
the reference
well
Collision Avoidance
Scan Methods
Reference Well
Advantages:
The traveling cylinder plot is
oriented to Map North when the
reference well is at low angles.
Toolface angle to an offset well
is then reported as the angle
from the high-side of your
current Wellbore + the azimuth
of your current Wellbore
Disadvantages:
May miss a collision between
wellpaths crossing
perpendicular to each other.
disk
Line is always
perpendicular to
the reference
well
Collision Avoidance
Scan Methods
Travelling Cylinder
Distance
15
10
5
5
10
15
Angle From
High Side
10
20
40
220
200
190
Appears to collide
Angle From
High Side
10
20
40
220
200
190
+
+
+
+
+
+
Current Well
Azimuth
135
135
135
315
315
315
=
=
=
=
=
=
145
155
175
175
155
145
Plan
Collision Avoidance
Horizontal Plane
Scan Methods
Offset Well
Reference Well
Advantages:
Simple to understand.
Disadvantages:
Should not be used to scan
non-vertical wells.
May miss a collision between
horizontal & vertical wellpaths.
Cannot be used to scan
horizontal wells.
The horizontal
distance between
two wells at a given
TVD
disk
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Reference Well
R1
actual separation
R2
cente
r to ce
nter d
ista
nce
Collision Avoidance
Minimum Separation Distance
Example Standards
S 3 1 2 1 / 2 d 1 d 2 Sb min{0.01DD,10m}
Separation
Where:
1 = Planned well positional uncertainty at 1 standard deviation
d
2 = Interfering well positional uncertainty
at 1 standard deviation.
This must include any uncertainty in the relative surface positions
of the planned and offset wells.
d1 = Hole size in the planned well.
1
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
S 3 1 2 1 / 2 d 1 d 2 min{0.01DD,10m} Sb
3 error ellipse
Mi
nim
um
Lesser of:
a) 1% of drilled depth
b) 10m
All
o
wa
ble
Se
p
a ra
3 error ellipse
tio
n
Radius of the
interfering well
Radius of the
planned well
From: BP BPA-D-004
Collision Avoidance
Minimum Separation Distance
Example Standards
Where:
1 = Planned well positional uncertainty at 1 standard deviation
2 = Interfering well positional uncertainty at 1 standard deviation. This must include any uncertainty in the relative
surface positions of the planned and offset wells.
d1 = Hole size in the planned well.
d2 = Casing OD in the interfering well
Sb = Allowance for survey bias
DD = Drilled depth (ie. The depth in the planned well measured from the Well Reference Point, usually mudline or surface
reference point).
Example:
Planned well uncertainty at 1 std. dev. = 1 =
8m
Interfering well uncertainty at 1 std. dev. = 2 =
5.5m
Hole size in planned well = d1 = 17.5 =
0.445m
Casing OD in interfering well = d2 = 13.375 = 0.340m
Allowance for survey bias = Sb =
0m
Drilled depth = DD =
650m
From: BP BPA-D-004
Collision Avoidance
Minimum Separation Distance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Separation Factor
The Separation Factor has become an industry
standard for analysing proximity situations. The
minimum separation distance can be converted to a
Separation Factor.
Separation Factor = Center to Center Distance (S) / Minimum Separation
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Separation Factor
Collision avoidance factors are very similar.
A factor of 1 is used for the active drilling well as its position
or projected position is monitored.
If the position is plotted or is expected to be less than 1 the
well is sidetracked.
The projected position is then used to anticipate this by
steering the well away.
A higher factor (1.25/1.5) is used for the planned trajectory
which allows the safety margin because it is difficult and not
cost effective to drill exactly on the planned line.
Collision Avoidance
Warning Methods
Depth Ratio
Expresses the distance between the 2 wells (minus the survey
error) as a ratio of the measured depth on the reference
wellbore
Risk Ratio
The implementation here is on a project level where a depth is
chosen where collisions below this depth are allowable at a
given probability level. Above that depth the standard Error
Ratio calculation is used
Rules Based
Combination of the three
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Separation Factor (SF) collision avoidance (ratio based)
Separation Factor (SF) collision avoidance (ratio based) uses the
ratio of the separation distance divided by the minimum
separation.
The different Separation Factors for a planned well (reference)
against an existing well (offset) should be correlated against
different levels of tolerance. Common levels of tolerance would
be:
Less than 1.0 represents a zone that you must not drill into. If the
drilling surveys or projection indicates that a SF will be < 1.0, then
the well must be sidetracked at a shallower depth.
Less than 1.25 means you must take avoiding action. If proximity
is planned to be less than 1.25 then the close well(s) must be
shut in and pressure bled off (SSSV or cement plug).
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Separation Factor (SF) collision avoidance (ratio based)
Continued from previous page
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
+/- 20m
Vertical
+/- 4.3m
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
COMPASS software
COMPASS software is used for Trajectory Control.
It is to be used for:
Wellpath planning and plotting
Project-ahead calculations
Wellpath calculations
Borehole positional uncertainty calculations
Anti-collision monitoring
Data storage
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Reporting Requirements/Database Maintenance
Survey Printouts
All computed survey printouts and reports must specify the
following details as a minimum (dependent on the type of
survey tool):
Collision Avoidance
Surveying Practices
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Checkshots
A checkshot is a comparison of the MWD data against
previously recorded data. (If the previously recorded
data is high accuracy gyro, it is called a benchmark).
The purpose is to demonstrate the tool is performing
properly and consistently with the results of previous
tools.
The new survey data should agree with the previous
survey within the quality control criteria specified - see
section below.
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Checkshots
Checkshot Procedures
Running into a well:
Each time the BHA is run in to the well, a checkshot is taken to
ensure the MWD is recording data correctly
The checkshot survey should be at a point at least 30m (100 ft) from
the previous casing shoe, not affected by magnetic interference
from adjacent wells
The dogleg severity should if practicable be less that 0.5deg/30m
(100 ft)
The purpose of this survey is to identify any problems with the
directional sensors before the MWD is tripped all the way to bottom
Obviously there can be no checkshot for the first run in each hole
section
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Checkshots
Checkshot Procedures
Pulling out of a well if MWD data has become suspect over the
course of the run:
A checkshot survey is taken at the checkshot station
previously established. This is to establish the integrity of the
directional data acquired immediately prior to pulling out.
All checkshots shall be taken with the MWD sensors within 1
meter (3 ft) M.D. of the previous checkshot or survey station.
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Gyro Multishot
Pre-run calibration check against QC parameters.
The primary survey should ideally be taken on the outrun,
where the wireline must always be in tension.
The survey program should be carefully managed to keep the
tool within its normal operating temperatures.
Depth is a critical measurement for gyro multishot surveys
run on wireline. Depth errors in high inclination wells may be
significant.
In these cases, depth control and correlation can be
improved through use of gamma pip tags, or a CCL.
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Shut In Criteria (Offshore Monitoring)
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Shut In Criteria (Offshore Monitoring)
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Project 60m (180 ft) ahead of the bit and use the extrapolated
survey information before calculating the minimum distance
to the adjacent well(s).
If the calculated separation factor is greater than 1 and the
potential collision is above the sub-surface safety valve or
deep plug (and the valve is closed and the well bled off, etc.),
drilling may continue.
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Offshore Anti-Collision Monitoring
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Offshore Anti-Collision Monitoring
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Collision Avoidance
Example Standards
Separation factors
Shut-in criteria
Etc.