Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Diamond-Water
Paradox
The Law of Diminishing
Marginal Utility
Consumer Equilibrium
Marginal Utility Analysis
and the Law of Demand
Behavioral Economics
To select a topic, click on its link above
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned,
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use
Diamond-Water Paradox
Click to return
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned,
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected Lesson
website for classroom use
Utility Theory
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Total Utility, Marginal Utility, and the Law of
Diminishing Marginal Utility
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
Application
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Interpersonal Utility
Comparison
Comparing the utility one person receives from a good,
service, or activity with the utility another person receives
from the same good, service, or activity.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
No Interpersonal Utility
Comparison
Caution: The utility obtained by one person cannot be
scientifically or objectively compared with the utility
obtained from the same thing by another person
because utility is subjective.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Diamond-Water Paradox Resolved
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
1. State and solve the diamond-water paradox.
The paradox is that water, which is essential to life, is cheap, and
diamonds, which are not essential to life, are expensive. The solution to
the paradox depends on knowing the difference between total and
marginal utility and the law of diminishing marginal utility. By saying that
water is essential to life and that diamonds are not essential to life, we
signify that water gives us high total utility relative to diamonds. But
then, if water gives us greater total utility than diamonds do, why isnt
the price of water greater than that of diamonds.
(continued)
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
Price isnt a reflection of total utility; it is a reflection of marginal utility.
The marginal utility of water is less than that of diamonds. This answer
raises another question: How can the total utility of water be greater
than that of diamonds, but the marginal utility of water be less than that
of diamonds? The answer is based on the fact that water is plentiful
and diamonds are not and on the law of diminishing marginal utility.
There is so much more water than diamonds that the next (additional)
unit of water gives us less utility (lower marginal utility) than the next
unit of diamonds.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
2. If total utility is falling, what does this imply for
marginal utility? Give an arithmetical example
to illustrate your answer.
If total utility declines, marginal utility must be negative. For example, if
total utility is 30 utils when Lydia consumes 3 apples and 25 utils when
she consumes 4 apples, it must be because the fourth apple had a
marginal utility of 5 utils. Chapter 1 explains that something that takes
utility away from us (or gives us disutility) is called a bad. For Lydia, the
fourth apple is a bad, not a good.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
3. When would the total utility of a good and the
marginal utility of a good be the same?
The total utility and the marginal utility of a good are the same for the
first unit of the good consumed. For example, before Tomas eats his first
apple, he receives no utility or disutility from apples. Eating the first
apple, he receives 15 utils. So the total utility (TU) for 1 apple is 15 utils,
and the marginal utility (MU) for the first apple is 15 utils.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Consumer Equilibrium
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
1. Alesandro purchases two goods, X and Y, and
the utility gained for the last unit purchased of
each is 16 utils and 23 utils, respectively. The
prices of X and Y are $1 and $1.75,
respectively. Is Alesandro in consumer
equilibrium? Explain your answer.
Alesandro is not in consumer equilibrium because the marginal utility
per dollar of X is 16 utils, and the marginal utility per dollar of Y is
13.14 utils. To be in equilibrium, a consumer has to receive the same
marginal utility per dollar for each good consumed.
Self-test
2. In a two-good world, in which the goods are A
and B, what does it mean to be in consumer
disequilibrium?
The marginal utility-to-price ratio for one of the goods is higher than the
ratio for the other good.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Behavioral Economics I
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Self-test
2. Summarize David Friedmans explanation of
the endowment effect.
The endowment effect relates to individuals valuing X more highly
when they possess it than when they dont have it but are thinking of
acquiring it. Friedman argues that if we go back in time to a hunter-
gatherer society when there were no well established property rights
(no rules as to what is mine and thine), if some individuals would
fight hard to keep what they possessed but wouldnt fight as hard to
acquire what they did not possess, they would have a higher
probability of surviving than individuals who would fight hard at both
times. Thus, those who would fight hard only to keep what they
possessed would have a higher probability of reproductive success.
The characteristic of holding on to what you have has been passed
down from generation to generation, and, although it may not be as
important today as it was in a hunter-gatherer society, it still
influences behavior.
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson
Wall Street Journal
2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, Click to return
or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license to In this
distributed with certain product , service, or otherwise on password-protected
website for classroom use Lesson