PERSONAL EVALUATION

REPORT (PER)
 PER- Observation & Record
OBSERVATION THROUGH FREQUENT VISITS OF CLASSROOMS
VERBAL/ WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS / ADVICE AS A FEEDBACK
OF VISITS
ASSIGNING THE TASKS / DUTIES
ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS
STAFF MEETINGS / MINUTES
INFORMAL OBSERVATIONS
PEER GROUP OBSERVATIONS
VISITS OF LABS/LIBRARAY
OPINION OF VPS/ STUDENTS/ PARENTS
DATA COLLECTION ACADEMICS CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
TAKING THE ODD PERIODS/ CLASSES
DATA COLLECTION BIO-DATA / QUALIFICATION / SUBJECT/
TIME
 SOME SUGGESTED MODELS
Option I

a. Present yourself as a Role Model

b. Guide / counsel in isolation
c. Hold staff meetings / Discuss flaws at staff level Collectively
d. Collective written Advice / Instrs on order book guidance / instrs
e. Assembly address Collective advice / instructions

Option II

a. Written advice/ council to only concerned indl

b. Seek reply / keep record of Advice / Warnings
c. Get Peer group support
d Needless to send GSO-I (If somewhat improving)
Option III

a. Repeat case- if warning / advice is ineffective in

option II, then Advice / Warnings copy to GSO-I
b. In second phase after some time 2nd Advice / Warning
copy to GSO-I (Make these part of Official record)

Entry in PER

Enter references of these 2 x pieces of advice / warnings in PER on

the basis of these award him / her Average or Adverse etc

LAST OPTION MAY BE TAKEN AS UNDESIRED

 PER TENDERING PROCEDURES

Scales / BPS RO CO
Reporting countersigning

(5 18) Principal GOS-I

19 GSO-I Dy Director

20 DEI Sec / Dy Sec

 PER TENTERING PROCEDURES
Main Flaws

Reflection not coinciding to academic results

Part II (Work Description not supported with docus)
Up-gradation cadre is shown - promoted
Grading given by RO does not tally with overall
assessment.
Grading does not match with results of person
Previous performance is not taken into account.
Adverse remarks are not under line in red ink by CO
 PER TENTERING PROCEDURES
Main Flaws
Late submission of PERs - cause delay in promotion
Results shown do not match actual board school results.
PERs written by RO in Jan while countersigned after
6/7 months.
Results shown on the basis of grades, not on GPA
Cuttings / overwriting
Imbalance - pen picture and overall grade & assessment
differs
Not properly documented
 WHAT S
GOING ON ?
CASE STUDIES
PER EXISTING STATUS
 PER EXISTING STATUS
FGEI DTE
WRITING THE PERS SOME
GUIDELINES
WRITE WITH CLEAR / UNBIASED MIND
DONT WRTIE INTO TWO SHADES , BETWEEN GOOD AND BELOW
AVERAGE OR GOOD OR V. ADVERSE

FILL ALL THE COLUMNS WITH YOUR INITIALS

OVERALL ASSEMENT OF GRADE OF EACH PART MUST INDICATE
OVERALL ONE SHADE
DONT OVER-WRITE/ CUTTING, INITIALS ON YOUR CUTTINGS
CHECK THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS /EVIDENCES REGARDING
MENTIONED DUTIES / RESPONSIBILITIES OF STAFF

VERFIY THE ACADEMIC RESULTS

ADVERSE REMARKS BY CO MUST BE UNDERLINED WITH RED INK
WHICH ARE BELOW AVERAGE

ADVERSE BY RO MUST BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED AND COVERED

IN ADVICE & MUST BE COMMUNICATED ON TIME BY CO
15