You are on page 1of 15

A person defending evolution often

excludes an intelligent creator as an


explanation for the cause of things
happening, and in the void substitutes
"chance."
But "chance" can be one of the
evolutionist's worst enemies.
Chance is equated with randomness,
and randomness is equated with
disorder and chaos.
Life on earth is an example of
incredible order and complexity.
What, then, was the cause for this
order and complexity?
Living matter coming about from non-
living material by chance.
Hypothetical primordial atmosphere:
Ammonia, water, methane and energy can
combine to form amino acids.
Miller/Urey experiment of 1953
Amino Acids and other carbon compounds
were formed
Accesed from https://wslearning.ucompass.com/wxstem_meteorology_01/module-05/03/10.html
http://semi-skimmedscience.weebly.com/past-present-future.html
The random formation of amino acids
produces an equal proportion of left-
handed and right-handed molecules.
Any particular protein contains amino
acids that are linked together in a
particular sequence geometrically.
20 common amino acids that comprise
the basic building blocks of life.
Any particular protein must have all the
correct left-handed amino acids joined
with only peptide bonds with the correct
amino acids at all the active sites.
Many different kinds of proteins necessary
to form the simplest single-cell
organisms.
Formation of the various nucleic acids and
other chemical constituents of life, which
must be simultaneously present (by
"chance").
Finally, all these must occur in in a
specific arrangement to form a complex
structure that would make for a
reproducing organism (by "chance").
Many evolutionists are now proposing
that not proteins, but DNA or RNA
occurred first.
Information must be coded into the
nucleic acid to synthesize a protein as
is represented by design and structure
of the protein itself.
This makes such scenarios to be at
least as unlikely.
Clay template must by necessity be as
complex as what is formed on the
template.
This makes such scenarios to be at least
as unlikely.
The classic examples given for the
formation of some of the basic building
blocks of life by chance therefore lacks
substance.
The formation of living matter from
non-living matter by chance remains
within the realm of speculation without
foundation.
What are your thoughts on the
existence of life on Earth?
Among Creator and Chance which is
more convincing for you? Why?

You might also like