You are on page 1of 22

Spearman Rho Correlation

Introduction

Spearman's rank correlation coefficient or Spearman's rho is named


after Charles Spearman

Used Greek letter (rho) or as rs (non- parametric measure of


statistical dependence between two variables)

Assesses how well the relationship between two variables can be


described using a monotonic function

Monotonic is a function (or monotone function) in mathematic that


preserves the given order.

If there are no repeated data values, a perfect Spearman correlation of


+1 or 1 occurs when each of the variables is a perfect monotone
function of the other

1
Spearman Rho Correlation

A correlation coefficient is a numerical measure or index of the amount


of association between two sets of scores. It ranges in size from a
maximum of +1.00 through 0.00 to -1.00

The + sign indicates a positive correlation (the scores on one variable


increase as the scores on the other variable increase)

The - sign indicates a negative correlation (the scores on one variable


increase, the scores on the other variable decrease)

2
Spearman Rho Correlation
Calculation

Often thought of as being the Pearson correlation coefficient between


the ranked (relationship between two item) variables

The n raw scores Xi, Yi are converted to ranks xi, yi, and the
differences di = xi yi between the ranks of each observation on the
two variables are calculated

If there are no tied ranks, then is given by this formula:

3
Spearman Rho Correlation
Calculation

Often thought of as being the Pearson correlation coefficient between


the ranked (relationship between two item) variables

The n raw scores Xi, Yi are converted to ranks xi, yi, and the
differences di = xi yi between the ranks of each observation on the
two variables are calculated

If there are no tied ranks, then is given by this formula:

4
Spearman Rho Correlation
Interpretation

The sign of the Spearman correlation indicates the direction of


association between X (the independent variable) and Y (the
dependent variable)

If Y tends to increase when X increases, the Spearman


correlation coefficient is positive

If Y tends to decrease when X increases, the Spearman


correlation coefficient is negative

A Spearman correlation of zero indicates that there is no


tendency for Y to either increase or decrease when X increases
5
Spearman Rho Correlation
Interpretation cont/

Alternative name for the Spearman rank correlation is the "grade


correlation the "rank" of an observation is replaced by the "grade"

When X and Y are perfectly monotonically related, the Spearman


correlation coefficient becomes 1

A perfect monotone increasing relationship implies that for any two


pairs of data values Xi, Yi and Xj, Yj, that Xi Xj and Yi Yj always
have the same sign

6
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 1
IQ, Xi Hours of class per
Calculate the correlation between
the IQ of a person with the number week, Yi
of hours spent in the class per week
106 7
Find the value of the term di: 86 0
100 27
1. Sort the data by the first column
(Xi). Create a new column xi and 101 50
assign it the ranked values
1,2,3,...n. 99 28
103 29
2. Sort the data by the second column
(Yi). Create a fourth column yi and 97 20
similarly assign it the ranked values
1,2,3,...n. 113 12
112 6
3. Create a fifth column di to hold the
differences between the two rank 110 17
columns (xi and yi).
7
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 1 cont/

4. Create one final column to hold the value of column di squared.

IQ Hours of class per week rank xi rank yi di di


(Xi ) (Yi)
86 0 1 1 0 0
97 20 2 6 -4 16
99 28 3 8 -5 25
100 27 4 7 -3 9
101 50 5 10 -5 25
103 29 6 9 -3 9
106 7 7 3 4 16
110 17 8 5 3 9
112 6 9 2 7 49
113 12 10 4 6 36 8
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 1- Result

With di found, we can add them to find di = 194

The value of n is 10, so;

= 1- 6 x 194
10(10 - 1)

= 0.18

The low value shows that the correlation between IQ and hours spent
in the class is very low

9
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 2:

5 college students have the following rankings in Mathematics and


Science subject. Is there an association between the rankings in
Mathematics and Science subject.
Student Ashley David Owen Steven Frank
Mathematic 1 2 3 4 5
class rank
Science 5 3 1 4 2
class rank

10
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 2 cont/

Compute Spearman Rho

n= number of paired ranks


d= difference between the paired ranks

(when two or more observations of one variable are the same, ranks
are assigned by averaging positions occupied in their rank order)

11
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 2 cont/

Maths Rank Science Rank X-Y (X-Y) 2

X Y D d2

1 5 -4 16

2 3 -1 1

3 1 2 4

4 4 0 0

5 2 3 9

30
12
Spearman Rho Correlation
Example # 2- Result

Result: = -0.5

There is a moderate negative correlation between


the Math and Science subject rankings of students

Students who rank high as compared to other


students in their Math subject generally have lower
Science subject ranks and those with low Math
rankings have higher Science subject rankings than
those with high Math rankings.

(The formula for Pearson r and Spearman rho are


equivalent when there are no tied)

13
Research Article

Title:

Motivation and Attitude in Learning English among UiTM


Students in the Northern Region of Malaysia

Purpose:
To describe the relationship between the students motivation and
attitude to their English Language performance

14
Article Cont/

Method:

Used a correlational research design

Independent variables:
Motivation, attitude, and personal characteristics variables, as
measured by a self-report questionnaire

Dependent variable:
English Language performance, measured by the UiTM
Preparatory English (BEL100) examination result

15
Article Cont/

Method:

Sampling Design
The subjects were 139 students from the Perlis Campus, 248 from the
Kedah Campus and 233 from the Pulau Pinang Campus.

The selection criterion used in attaining the samples was to choose


those students who had just received their BEL100 examination result
regardless of their status whether as the first timer or repeater for that
particular paper.

16
Article Cont/

Method:

Questionnaire

Research instrument used was questionnaire that comprised questions


on personal characteristics, motivation and attitudes.

The instrument was adopted and adapted from Gardner andLambert


(1972) so that it is more appropriate, intelligible and meaningful for the
sample concerned.

The reliability test of the instrument produced a Cronbach Alfa of 0.757,


which was satisfactory and acceptable.

17
Article Cont/

Method:

Data Analysis
The data collected were computed and analyzed using the SPSS 12.

Each students score on the questionnaire was matched to his or her


BEL100 examination grade.

The statistical procedures used in this study were the descriptive


statistics mean & standard deviation scores, frequency & percentage,
t-test, Spearman Rho Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient & ANOVA.

18
Article Cont/

Result- Correlation between motivation in learning English &


English language performance

Spearman Rho rank-order correlation coefficient test


Very weak relationship between Intrinsic Motivation & English
language performance, which is -.020.

One-way ANOVA test


Intrinsic Motivation: Critical value of F at alpha = .05 is 2.70. The
obtained F value is 1.63, which is less than the critical value.
Extrinsic Motivation: Computed value for the correlation test
which is .043 and the obtained value of F for the one-way
ANOVA, 2.39.

This justifies there is no significant differences between Overall


Motivation (Intrinsic Motivation & Extrinsic Motivation) & English
language performance.
19
Article Cont/

Result- Attitude in learning English & English language performance

Spearman Rho rank-order correlation coefficient test


Exists a significant correlation (alpha = .01) between the attitude in
learning English & English language performance, which is -.152.

One-way ANOVA test


F value from the one-way ANOVA test is 6.66, which is greater than the
critical value.

Mean scores
Respondents received A - M = 3.06, B- M = 2.99, C - M = 2.93, D - M =
2.80), it can be concluded that the respondents who obtained an A
(high achievers) have better attitude in learning English compared to
the low achievers.

This justifies that there is a significant difference between the attitude in


learning English & English language performance.
20
Spearman Rho Correlation
References

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spearman's_rank_correlation_coefficient

http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A62436.html

http://www.wellesley.edu/Psychology/Psych205/Spearman.html

www.ccsenet.org/journal.html

www.statisticallysignificantconsulting.com

http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate- Spearman's-Rank-Correlation-Coefficient

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spearman%27s_rank_correlation_coefficient

21
Thank you
Prepared by:
Rubiyatul Huda
Norsafrina
Salina

22

You might also like